Baseball Laughs as Royals Sweep Tigers
That was fun. And funny. Once again, the Tigers are double plus uninspiring. This is a fourth place team in the AL West or East.
Still, the AL Central is so damn lame, it probably doesn't even matter. Oh yikes, with a win tonight the Twins can get to two games over .500. They just play the game the right way!
And the amazing thing is, the Royals somehow managed to do well despite having Alex Gordon's bad attitude in the dugout.
Lots to talk about from this one. Whaddya got?
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I officially submit
that every year the K be referred to as the Tiger Trap for the entire month of September.
Or, in a homage to Calvin and Hobbes, Tuna Fish Sandwich will also be acceptable.
*an homage?
I don’t know, dammit. Someone with grammar skills care to comment?
by chiefstatnut on Sep 10, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I LOVE Calvin and Hobbes
Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.
best comic ever. period.
If you watch Rambo backwards, it's Sylvester Stallone healing people with his magic bullet vacuum.
by ratherfantastic on Sep 10, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
As a 5th grade teacher, that’s what I read whenever my kids are silent reading. Other teachers make fun of me because I’ll be sitting at my desk laughing as I’m reading it.
Another good one is Being Five. A comic about about 5 year old that blogs.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
Photo caption
needs to be fixed. It needs the words “at a baseball game.”
Tension is the enemy. - Charlie Lau
by aHorseWithNoName on Sep 10, 2009 5:49 PM EDT reply actions
Hillman really looks like he is getting ready to spit on that ump
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Sep 10, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Just about to write the same thing
Looks like The Mustache is aiming a little high, maybe the forehead region
by chiefstatnut on Sep 10, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions
high arching wad to land directly in the eye
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Sep 10, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
he is trying to get under his sunglasses so he can look him in the eye
"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell
Ha
I think it looks like he’s trying to read the ump’s mind.
“You’re thinking of………Cheeseburgers!”
Tension is the enemy. - Charlie Lau
by aHorseWithNoName on Sep 10, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Bad Attitude
I didn’t get to watch the game but
“And the amazing thing is, the Royals somehow managed to do well despite having Alex Gordon’s bad attitude in the dugout”
Did he do something today to show he had a bad attitude or is this sarcasm?
He hit a home run
and drew a walk.
We don’t need him poisoning the dugout.
by NotAHippie on Sep 10, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And
he stole a base, poisoning the basepaths with his negativity as well.
by 2X2L on Sep 10, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
he surely is not playing the game the right way
NCAA Football; better than everything. That is an understatement.
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Sep 10, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
double plus??
is that a 1984 reference?
We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan
I'm sure this ground has been trodden...or treaded...or trode...whatever
What I get from this game is…yay, two Royals home runs! And…geez, more solo shots!?
Throw me a link if this has been looked at, but doesn’t it seem like this team almost never has anybody on base when they hit their homers, in addition to just not hitting many in the first place? I mean, I know their team OBP sucks and this contributes, but it almost seems like there’s got to be a dash of really poor luck thrown in for good measure.
Or, perhaps I’m just being an alarmist. The pessimist in me demands I bring up something bad even when facing something as unbelieveable as a four-game winning streak, of which 75% came at the expense of the Tigers. Woo hoo?
Before today’s game, about 59% of the home runs hit by AL teams this year have come with the bases empty. The Royals have hit 75 of their 120 home runs with the bases empty, about 63%. In other words, if somebody had been on base for just 4 of their bases-empty home runs, they’d be right at the league average for that category.
Well, heck...
Alarmist I shall be, then. Would you happen to have a stat for, say, average runs scored per home run? Gimme something here, I’m reaching…
Royals: 1.48 runs scored per HR. League: 1.56. For the Royals’ output of 120 home runs prior to today, that works out to a deficit of about 10 baserunners compared to league average.
That's pretty much what you would expect
Once you take into consideration the deficit to league average the Royals have for getting on base. In fact, without looking at the numbers closer, I’d say the Royals may actually be a little lucky with having runners on base as compared to their OBA.
I don’t think I can agree with that. In fact I think Daniel is on to something. The Royals’ OBP is .020 below the league’s, or about 1 fewer baserunner per 50 plate appearances. We’re talking about 11 fewer baserunners over the course of 122 home runs (now including yesterday’s game with two more solo shots), which seems like a larger deficit than expected to me.
Let’s look at it this way: treating all situations as equal, the average number of runners on base per plate appearance in the AL is 0.63, while the average number scored per home run is 0.56.
I would imagine that a difference like this is normal, because pitchers really are trying harder to keep the ball in the yard when runners are on base. Not all of them are able to succeed, but some are — Catfish Hunter being the archetype that comes to mind for those who are. I’d guess that groundball percentage is higher with runners on base than without, but I don’t know where to find splits like that. I can see at b-r.com that BABIP is higher with runners on base, which would be expected if GB% is higher.
Meanwhile the Royals have had an average of 0.59 runners on base per plate appearance (lower than the league, as expected given the Royals’ lower OBP than league average and lousy baserunning) and scored an average of .47 baserunners per home run. That difference is so much larger than the league’s that I have to wonder: are the Royals just unlucky, or is it just that much easier for pitchers to prevent the Royals’ hitters from “squaring it up” in a pinch?
by 2X2L on Sep 11, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Does anyone know if there's a standings out there that tries to take "quality of competition" into account?
such as just counting winning percentage against each AL team, then averaging the winning percentage. i’m just wondering how much the AL central teams have benefited by getting to play each other (or just the Royals and Indians, actually)
"The life of a (Royals) fan must be lived forward but can only be understood backward" -- Kierkegaard (more or less)
answering my own query with some rough estimates
on average, the East teams have done 1.9% worse against their actual foes than they would have if they played each team the same number of times. The Central teams have done .4% better, and the West teams have done 1% worse.
i could turn that into it’s own post if i have more time
"The life of a (Royals) fan must be lived forward but can only be understood backward" -- Kierkegaard (more or less)
BP's third-order standings do something like this as well
you could also do this using BtBS’s power rankings, the schedule, and the odds ratio
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 10, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions
How about the...
…obligatory swipe at Trey in the caption, Will. Classy. Why not go ahead and give to GMDM too? I’m surprised you held back. – TL
this one wasn't nearly as negative as most have been
i get excited any time i read a post on this site that doesn’t use the phrase “The Process” in a sarcastic manner. not that the phrase doesn’t deserve to be mocked. it’s just stale. like tooth-chipping marshemellow stale. like moses’s original unleavened bread stale.
Stale. Tired. Broken down.
Hey, whatever metaphor works for you. They all describe for me the Hillman/Moore bashing at this site. It’s actually prevented me from more enthusiastic posts—-that and all the losing. But it’s hard to analyze the losing seriously when you’re distracted by ad hominem. – TL
Simple formula...
…losing teams, all managerial gaffes magnified, analyzed, then thrown into the freezer for preservation and analysis at some later point.
Winning team, managerial success magnified, blah, blah…gaffes generally shrugged at, but still thrown into the freezer for preservation and analysis for the time when the team starts losing.
I don’t think Hillman’s any good, but I can’t be ready to call him horrible with that roster. Now Dayton Moore…well…heh. That’s different.
oh yeah
it’s totally true. the team sucks, it’s primarily moore’s fault the team sucks, and he and hillman have been weirdly closed off, unnecessarily stubborn, thin skinned, and has even talked down to the fans. the whole thing is a mess. we all knew the farnswoth signing would be catastrophic. the jacobs, crisp, and cruz acquisitions have gone worse than would have reasonably been expected. jacobs was a bad acquisition—i was neutral on the trade because while i though jacobs wouldn’t be worth the money, i didn’t think nunez had a ton of value, and i though the acquisition would push butler. maybe it has, but in hindsight, jacobs has failed in ways a good front office should have seen coming. several of the highest draft picks have dropped substantially in value since they were picked. you go down the list, and it’s bad, bad, and worse.
the only bright spot has been the investment in the farm system. whether you credit glass or moore, the royals have gone from victims in the economics of propsect acquisition to agressors, and despite the FO’s other failings, there is no reason to believe this won’t pay big dividends in the long run. if the core of the team can be filled from within, it shouldn’t hurt as badly when moore overpays for replacement level outfielders. it’s not a championship formula, but it should produce some .500 clubs.
basically, my point is that DM has been a poor GM at the MLB level, and he deserves to be criticized. when he speaks down to the fans and talks about believing in the process, he deserves to be mocked. and while it’s september, and the team has been boring and dead for months, the site would be better with a little more analysis and a little less snark. or a little less of the same snark, more accurately. i like snark.
also, i’d make a terribly boring blogger. i like to get excited about the good things and overlook the bad. did you know the royals have won 55 times this year?
"It’s actually prevented me from more enthusiastic posts"
Blaming things on others. Dayton’s beginning to rub off on you
Unless I'm wrong...
My Twitter feed
Unfair
Dayton wouldn’t blame it on others in general.
This is more like Dayton:
“I’d post more enthusiastically, but the previous regime was so unsuccessful I just can’t get into it.”
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 11, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Looking at the picture again.
I think Hillfart is puckering up for a big kiss on the ump’s cheek. You decide which one.
I've had it with the Tigers.
We keep getting in line for the top draft pick, and they keep crushing our hopes by coming out and letting us beat the crap out of them.
This space for rent.
by jonfmorse on Sep 10, 2009 10:28 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
when's the victory parade?
where's ross gload to explode the process?
by blue bandwagon on Sep 10, 2009 10:53 PM EDT reply actions
ahem....third place in the AL East
The Tigers did just sweep the Rays in Tampa. Before getting swept by the Royals.
My head just exploded. Again.
And given the road series win in Anaheim the week before, and the fact that the Rangers are as snakebit at Comerica as the Tigers are at Kauffman, Detroit could possibly compete out west.
But hey, we’ll take 1st place in the central, since the rest of the division seems so insistent of giving it to us.
Official BYB Juju Consultant...now accepting rally creature applications!
accounting for the unbalanced schedule...
i think 3rd place in the AL East is pretty iffy
but yea, decent sweep of the rays
The Rays could have easily won all three games but their bullpen imploded
with major contributions from JP Howell, causing comments on draysbay like “we are the KC Royals” during that stretch.
by swing and a miss on Sep 11, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
The _____ could have easily won, but their ______ ______________.
Oh wait, that applies in every single baseball game, ever.
by rcpratt on Sep 11, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Royals could easily have won their division
but their Gm sucks ass.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 12, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions














