Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shaq As Orlando Magic General Manager? Don't Bet On It

Wow, I'd love to be all over this. Has virtually no chance of happening but that doesn't stop me from dreaming. Perhaps a 3 way trade--sending off Greinke and getting Upton? Or perhaps Gordon/Montgomery/? for Upton.

FYI J. Upton has 5yr/$50 million left on his contract.

over 1 year ago Tiny nwroyal 146 comments 2 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I dont know if he is "fast" enough for Moore

But that would be an amazing grab. Definitiely willing to give up one of our top pitchers. Not sure about Greinke though.

by Boots 58 on Nov 16, 2010 12:54 PM EST reply actions  

How About Soria

And throw in Getz and maybe a MiLB pitcher, maybe Crow. Upton could save us from Frogger, too.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

Can't trade Gordon for him

We should have the top two guys from the 2005 draft.

by NotAHippie on Nov 16, 2010 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

Gordon/Montgomery wouldn't be enough for me if I was the Dbacks

IT’s really nuts that they are even thinking of trading him. He has so much value that to to get a fair return they’d have to send him to a team basically willing to either send one of the best prospects in the game and then a “lesser” A prospect, or at least one “A” and then a 3-4 good Bs.

Trading for Upton is similar to trading for Longoria — a fair trade would require stripping your farm system pretty badly . Are you ready to give up, say, Lamb and Moustakas? Because I don’t think it would be crazy for the DBacks to ask for that.

Then again, these are the guys who got Joe Saunders and change back for Dan Haren (maybe the prospects are better than I remember), so, yeah, offer them Butler and Mazzaro.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 1:05 PM EST reply actions  

wasn't it the interim crew?

and it was not a great return—Skaggs—the big prospect in the deal was just rated a 4 star prospect by BP—so he’s a good but not great prospect.

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, it was after Byrnes was canned

but you’re right, it was the interim group.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Quite A Haul
July 25, 2010: Traded by the Arizona Diamondbacks to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for a player to be named later, Patrick Corbin (minors), Rafael Rodriguez and Joe Saunders. The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim sent Tyler Skaggs (minors) (August 7, 2010) to the Arizona Diamondbacks to complete the trade.

I would definitely go in with a lowball offer and see if they take it.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I figure they must be down on him if they want to shop him

and they seem to value Stephen Drew higher than Upton.

And, yeah, I would be tempted to give up Lamb/Moose for Upton.

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

me too
Lamb/Moose for Upton

The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Nov 16, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

No No No No!!!!

"2010: The year Mizzou gets over the hump. The year the Chiefs show the NFL that they're back. And the year Dayton Moore signs some washed up has been or never was to return us to the glory of the Royals not losing 100 in 2011."

by royaldaddy on Nov 17, 2010 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Only if we can dump Hosey's contract on them, too.

What’s that?… Hosey’s gone? It’s a MIRACLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by BrRoyal on Nov 17, 2010 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Lamb/Moose was just an example

and maybe the Royals should do it, I dunno. Basically, I think the D-Backs could ask for any one prospect out there, plus another really good one. Given pitcher attrition rates, pitching prospects aren’t as valuable, so if they wanted Hosmer/Montgomery, you could make an argument for it. THere are other permutations, naturally…

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

To be fair,

that was Jerry Dipoto’s failure.

What's that about?

by Brian. on Nov 16, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Better than Dan Uggla!

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Nov 16, 2010 1:06 PM EST reply actions  

I would make a trade in a heart beat.

I would Lamb and Moose in a heart beat.

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Nov 16, 2010 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

D-Backs need a first baseman, don't they?

Butler/Montgomery for Upton? Maybe add a third piece.

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

Honestly, they'd need a pretty good third piece to go with that

I’m not sure how the other pitchers all shake out in overall prospect rankings, but the Royals would have to send at least another high-end B prospect in addition to Monty/Butler, I least that’s what I think would be fair.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

Butler, Montgomery, and Collins

by BlueEyes_Austin on Nov 16, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

A starter

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Butler Montgomery Mendoza

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 16, 2010 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

That seems a hair high

But I realize you can’t fall THAT much in love with your prospects, as they are still just prospects. And I actually am a big fan of trading Butler and giving Kila 1B until Hos is ready to come up. I wouldn’t necessarily give up Montgomery or Lamb if I have to throw in a third guy, but I’d go with the next to LH, Duffy or Dwyer, in the second spot, and a guy in the third slot like Tyler Sample. Is Butler/Duffy/Sample enough for five years of Upton?

It's all ball bearings these days!

by CentralChamps20?? on Nov 17, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Is it at all possible

that GMDM anticipated Upton’s availability and that’s why he moved DDJ early?

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Nov 16, 2010 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

We Can Dream

But I’ll believe it when I see it. I shudder to think of the package GMDM might put together.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

that's what Mrs. GMDM said

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Nov 16, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

TWMrs.GMDMS

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

You'll Never Know

If you don’t ask.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

How about the top chunk of the farm

For a 4.6 WAR player the year before who you are comparing to the partial season of DDJ who was having a career year and is old(er)

by Boots 58 on Nov 16, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

So down year for Upton or a trend?

You move those numbers to 2005 and you are evaluating players the same way DM does. I prefer to rate recent performance more heavily.

He’s a strikeout machine too.

by AxDxMx on Nov 16, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

He Does Maintain

A decent OBP, and his walk rate is improving. His power was down last year, and I’d expect that to come back. I wouldn’t let Seitzer anywhere near him.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

As said above, Upton's iso was down last year

It can be expected to go back up to his previous rates. He strikes out a lot, and has a good walk rate as well. He will also steal close to 20 bases.

DDJ had a .355 BABIP last year, a career high

by Boots 58 on Nov 16, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Heard Upton had shoulder issues last year

that zapped his power—would expect it to jump back up this year.

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow, He Absolutely

Massacred LHP in 2009; .377 .445 .762 1.208 in 137 PAs. He maintained his performance vs RHP in 2010, but his LHP split went to .276 .390 .378 .768 in 155 PAs. SSS, but still striking. Maybe the league is figuring him out to some extent. Also, only 2 HRs vs LHP in 2010, 12 in 2009 in fewer PAs. You’d think that would have to even out.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Would Greinke for Upton straight up be fair?

Or would one side or the other have to contribute more?

"We're gonna win with pitching and defense" General Manager Dayton Moore, circa winter 2009

"Where did all these Indians come from?" General George Armstrong Custer, circa summer 1876

by loyal2sdad on Nov 16, 2010 2:33 PM EST reply actions  

The More I

Look at Upton, the more I think he’d be worth Greinke. Good power, good speed, good RF defense, and still very young. His peak could be HOF; I’d roll those dice.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking the same thing

Especially with the upside of the myriad arms we have in the minors. Club control for I think four more years.

Hating life as a Royals fan 365 days a year at Royalscentricity

by Old Man Duggan on Nov 16, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

No kidding

Upton for Greinke straight off would be a ripoff

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

How does Upton currently compare to Rollins? And does he project as high as Rollins (I understand he’s in the majors already but I think he’s several years younger than Rollins)?

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

FYI--Keith Law thinks Upton would be a good fit in KC

I don’t have insider so I can’ read the whole thing—just what I’ve picked up on the Twitter

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 2:35 PM EST reply actions  

I have insider, but can't find the article

Do you have the link?

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Nov 16, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

even the thought that its a remote possibility makes me

approach tumescence ……. which is significant, considering my age

by Nighthawk at the Diner on Nov 16, 2010 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know what that is but I’m going to look it up after posting this because I’m sure it’s awesome.

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

TWSS

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking Duffy or Dwyer plus Melville or Sample and

Duffy/Dwyer + Melville/Sample + another b or C prospect.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 16, 2010 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

Definitely Do That

If they will.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I think everyone's drastically overvaluing upton...

Billy Butler + Melville should be enough. If they thought upton were a superstar that warranted a greinke-like haul, they wouldn’t be dealing him. or mark reynolds for that matter.

by Bart41 on Nov 16, 2010 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

Keith Law
“The Royals make a lot of sense. Why not? They have a ton of minor league pitching depth, which, while fantastic to have, is always far from a sure thing because of injury risk. Acquiring Upton accelerates the rebuild, and they have nothing like him in their system, neither offensively or defensively. And they can afford the contract: He’s already signed to a reasonable deal. It’s just a nonconventional landing spot for Upton, who makes a ton of sense for a lot of clubs … including Arizona.”

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 16, 2010 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

If we were to land Justin Upton

That would be like when Lloyd Christmas bought the scooter in Colorado and TOTALLY REDEEMED HIMSELF.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I won't hold my breath for us to do anything right.

Call me a cynic.

"2010: The year Mizzou gets over the hump. The year the Chiefs show the NFL that they're back. And the year Dayton Moore signs some washed up has been or never was to return us to the glory of the Royals not losing 100 in 2011."

by royaldaddy on Nov 17, 2010 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Justin Upton is a beast and if KC can give up Greinke in a 3 way deal to get him its a no brainer

Pull in the Braves toss Greinke towards ATL get Upton while the Braves give up Mike Minor a B/C Prospect and have the Royals sweeten the pot by tossing them a Dwyer or Duffy.

Everyone wins AZ gets 3 solid prospect plus saves off the contract. The Braves get a #1 starter by only giving up a B+ starter and the Royals win by getting Upton plus just giving up one prospect.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 16, 2010 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

I'd be all for it

but I think the Braves might rather just have Upton—they really want a RH OF

by nwroyal on Nov 16, 2010 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

ya you are probably right

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 16, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

3 way with Texas?

Rangers get: P Zack Greinke

Royals get: OF Justin Upton

Dbacks get: Their pick of two of the best minor league systems in baseball

Beats the hell out of the Joe Saunders/Dan Haren deal

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

No shit

Do it now Dayton.

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Nov 16, 2010 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

No Moose, Myers, or Hosmer

Then, I’m probably with you.

"2010: The year Mizzou gets over the hump. The year the Chiefs show the NFL that they're back. And the year Dayton Moore signs some washed up has been or never was to return us to the glory of the Royals not losing 100 in 2011."

by royaldaddy on Nov 17, 2010 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

That would be great for the Royals

no way the Dbacks should do it without one of those guys being included, unless they get Montomery and their pick of 2 or 3 other players from both systems.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 17, 2010 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm More Inclined

To give up pitching than one of the big three position players. That’s probably not rational, just my gut feeling.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 17, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Completely rational

Weird to say, but we’re loaded with pitching prospects, especially power LHs. Pitching is the currency of baseball, and for once, the Royals have something to spend. We’re starved for offense, so yeah, you’ve gotta keep those prospects and add a player like Upton. Plus, Upton and Gordon in CF/LF when they were drafted 1-2 at SS/3B just satifies at so many levels.

It's all ball bearings these days!

by CentralChamps20?? on Nov 17, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

$10M a year? Why not?

He’s been willing to pay more for lesser talent.

And especially if Grienke’s contract gets traded away as part of the deal, for sure it suits the bottom line.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Nov 16, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Might be the only way to inject some life into this franchise and energize the fanbase

Before these kids are ready.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Do this

Trade Billy as the centerpiece of the deal (Plus, say, Monty and another prospect) then turn around to the Yankees and work out Soria + prospect for Montero.

That’s a team that competes in 2012, no need to trade Greinke.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Nov 16, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

age

DM’s age dyslexia will hurt us. He clearly thought JoGui was 23 instead of 32 and Upton’s 23 just seems a little too risky.

"Greinke and the Brain" (R) (C) TM

by SittinByTheFoulPole on Nov 16, 2010 3:11 PM EST reply actions  

Sign me up – this is EXACTLY the type of player we need to be targetting – the combination of ‘track record of success’ plus ‘young with reasonable expectation of improvement’ is uncommon, throw in the reasonable contract and years of control and it’s a no brainer.

Moose+Monty+random minor leaguer is fine with me.

Let's just trust the process.

by trusttheprocess on Nov 16, 2010 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

This would be crazy

I think i’m more hesitant to trade any of the pitching prospects though. I’m fine w/ sending Billy off and using Kila until Hos is ready. We’d still have to throw in a pitcher, but like Matt suggested, I’d throw them Vinny. I doubt that would get it down though. Who knows though.

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Nov 16, 2010 3:53 PM EST reply actions  

Remember Billy Butler will be just 25 next year!

He’s still 3 years from his peak value! Billy is not a player I would include in this deal.

by AxDxMx on Nov 16, 2010 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

I'm not interested in trading Billy but I also believe a tad in hitter protection.

I think Billy could be outstanding with a hitter like Upton hitting behind or in front of him. I wouldn’t trade Moose or Hosmer.

As much as I love Myers(my #1 prospect) he is the one I would give up if had to just because his probable move to the OF is filled by Upton.

In reality though KC shouldn’t have to give up any of the Top 5 prospects with the depth of their system.

Duffy or Dwyer are easily solid enough to be the cornerstones of a deal toss in a Top 15 type like Giavotella or Melville and a back half of the top 30 is a solid haul for a team looking to unload salary.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 16, 2010 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

That's understandable

but no way should Arizona do a deal with KC without 1 of Hosmer, Moustakas, or Myers, and at least one good pitching prospect. Either that or about 3-4 pitchers.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 16, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Wil And Justin

On the corners would be fine with me. If Gordon comes anywhere near living up to expectations he could be traded for more prospects or moved back to 3B.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

agree entirely

and in every way even

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

The Royals should really give up some good pitching prospects for him

Pitching prospects have a really high failure rate. It would make sense for the Royals to use them as trade bait. I’m not saying that they could get Upton just for pitching prospects, but if they could get him for Butler plus two pitching prospects, I’d do it in a second.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Nov 16, 2010 7:00 PM EST reply actions  

I wonder, if they thought about doing that, if

they would hire an extra team of scouts to sit in a boardroom and pin down the young pitcher most-likely-to-fail (if that’s even possible) and then really push those guys when in discussions.

Wow that sounds kind of stupid, but….I still wonder.

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

That Would Be

The secret to spending the “capital of baseball” wisely, and I’m sure they think they know something about them that other organizations don’t, but it seems to be an inexact science at best.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

the problem is, their criteria are

“who smokes the most ganja” and “who pees on the most fences”

The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Nov 16, 2010 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

this is totes lost on me. Totes.

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you would have to be more coy...

Me being a very cynical person, if someone is really pushing one guy hard, I then begin to question why.

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 16, 2010 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Great point

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

"2010: The year Mizzou gets over the hump. The year the Chiefs show the NFL that they're back. And the year Dayton Moore signs some washed up has been or never was to return us to the glory of the Royals not losing 100 in 2011."

by royaldaddy on Nov 17, 2010 1:30 AM EST up reply actions  

well said.

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Currency, Not Capital

I knew that phrase didn’t sound right, but it still makes sense.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

in no way related to justin upton....

but Mazzaro/Marks looks like a steal compared to what uggla brought in…WOW.

NYRoyal and any of the others who HATED the DDJ deal care to rethink?

Uggla is the better player. While being more expensive, he’s also a better player with skills that are much more expensive. There’s a good chance he brings a similar surplus value with him when you consider his value and contract as Dejesus and he’s a near lock to be a Type A FA who definitely will decline arbitration.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 16, 2010 8:46 PM EST reply actions  

The Marlins are doing some odd things this winter

I’m not sure they’re a good example, although their track record is pretty good.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

but it does make a better statement about the value

of good players with one year left of team control, much moreso than, “this deal sucks, our gm sucks”.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 16, 2010 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

It is one piece of evidence among many
of good players with one year left of team control, much moreso than, "this deal sucks, our gm sucks".

I’m glad that my criticism of the DeJesus trade (and the criticism of many, many others) went far beyond “this deal sucks, our gm sucks.”

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Nov 17, 2010 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

it didnt....

mazarro is very likely to provide more surplus value than dejesus. you have no idea what DM was offered at the deadline or after the season. the market changes. prospects are more valued. a very successful gm just got less in return for a more valuable trade commodity.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 17, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

thats why i said surplus value instead of WAR...

there’s a very good chance that uggla is going to be worth more than $4 million more (guessing at $10 million in arb) than Dejesus next year…along with the strong likelihood of being a type A instead of the outside chance of being a type A.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 17, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

You keep ignoring that the actual value of a player (in terms of dollars and/or players in trade) is about more than WAR and the dollar value thereof. The price of any commodity is determined by what the market will bear. The speculative value of DDJ’s speculative WAR is a meaningful datum. But it is far from the end of determining his current trade value.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Nov 17, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

the market has had two somewhat similar players traded in the past two weeks....

and DM got far more than Beinfest (i think thats his name). we’ll see if there are more.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 17, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It didn't?

I didn’t talk about how Moore ignored DDJ’s market value this offseason given the thin FA market for OFers? I just said that the trade sucks and Moore sucks? I must have dreamt it. My bad.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Nov 17, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

its much more meaningful then

vague anecdotal evidence of players who might or might not have been offered 6 months ago

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Nov 16, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

any noise if the Royals tried to get Uggla?

they could have put together a better package than Atlanta did. I wouldn’t mind seeing him at second base.

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Nov 16, 2010 9:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Or 3B

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn't seem to make much sense

He’s only signed through 2011 I believe, and that’s not a competitive year for us

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

He'd be an interesting addition.

$50 M over 5 years. I think he strikes out an awful lot and I don’t know if his defense would be equal to Dyson or Blanco. His bat would be the tool though.

If you give up a pitcher make it Duffy. Maybe you can get Carlos Rosa back in this deal.

by 306008 on Nov 16, 2010 9:15 PM EST reply actions  

I'm going to go out on a limb

and say that Justin Upton is a way, way, way better baseball player than Blanco or even Outfield TPJ Jarrod Dyson.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 17, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

There has to be a way to make this deal without dealing Butler or Greinke.

I understand the idea of trading those guys for more prospects in order to increase the chances of hitting when the crop comes up. But Upton in the the league and making money now. I know you would be doubling the number of years of team control of a proven player from 2 with Greinke to 4 with Upton, but we would be absolutely destroying the pitching staff for another year.

There has to be a formula to make this work that will allow us to either keep Greinke or get a position player and a hitter back when we trade him.

If we did the three-way with Arizona and Texas, why couldn’t Texas send us a pitching prospect back as well? Just a thought.

All that being said, I’d love to get Upton.

by Chyladin on Nov 16, 2010 9:46 PM EST reply actions  

Four years of Upton > Two years of Greinke

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 16, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It's five years left, isn't it?

But yeah, I can’t believe people can’t see this, if the Greinke for Upton straight up would be a total ripoff in the Royals favor. Can’t see it happening: aside from the ripoff factor, if the Dbacks are really interested in moving a guy under control for half of a decade, why would the do it for a guy under control for two years?

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Nov 17, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, they are cutting salary I assume

I don’t know why they’d want Greinke back either.

by AxDxMx on Nov 17, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

What Max Said
Max says:
November 16, 2010 at 7:38 pm
I would guess a three team trade is more likely. If the D-Backs are in full rebuild mode, Greinke does them little good.

How bout Greinke to the Rangers, Upton to the Royals, and a ton of great prospects to the D-Backs? The Royals and Rangers are two organizations that have the prospects to make this happen.

Makes sense for the Rangers because they are in win-now mode and Greinke gives them the ace they need to replace Lee if he goes (and just imagine if Lee stays! What a rotation!)

Makes sense for the Royals because it helps sell the team while the prospects come up, Upton is young and signed long-term, and they have the depth to give up a prospect or two.

Makes sense for the D-Backs because they get a ton of A/B+ prospects.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 10:46 PM EST reply actions  

Im sold

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 16, 2010 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

i like it

the team has to be willing to use some of its prospects to acquire talent…as NY and others so astutely pointed out, the pitcher failure rate is very high.

i would start with teaford, melville and a reliever and work my way from there…ultimately one of the big 4 plus maybe a giovatella to get it done

BOOM YOSTED!

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Nov 16, 2010 11:33 PM EST reply actions  

Always Go For

The total anal rape first. When that is refused, ratchet it up. When that is off the table, ratchet it up. I’d go as high as Greinke and a pitching prospect, but I’d insist on a C+ throw in. Maybe throw something their way, too.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 16, 2010 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I realize this isn't "fantasy sports"

but if I get a total low ball offer I tend to just tell them to fuck off.

Of course, there has also been the occasional time that I’ve countered with an inversely proportinally ridiculous offer to find a happy medium.

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 16, 2010 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

i think people are way overvaluing upton

as was mentioned above, his OPS was similar to DeJesus…plus, you are taking on $50 million worth of obligation to get him…plus the fact that they are apparently clueless about trades with the take from the haren deal.

BOOM YOSTED!

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Nov 17, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

He's 23 goin on 24 and has already posted a .898 OPS the year before and was injured last season

to drop his totals. Don’t think its an overvalue at all.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 17, 2010 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

He's fn 23 years old

and is a 3-4 WAR player already.

This guy will be a perennial All Star and is a potential HOF player if his tools fully pan out.

by deezle on Nov 18, 2010 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

You always try to get the other guy to tell you his number/price first

If I were Dayton, I’d call them, tell them I’m interested, let them know that no one is off the table, and ask them who they’d want for Upton. Make them throw out the first offer. It will tell you a lot about what Arizona’s mindset is. If it’s offensively-high, then you can always hang up, or come back with a not quite as offensively-low counter.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 17, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

This. You Can

Go either way, but making a lowball offer can be effective, too. You never know unless you ask. It’s called haggling. I suck at it, but my wife was all about it.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 17, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Surely the fact that Upton is "available"

really affects the Carl Crawford market doesn’t it? I realize they are different players, and the acquisition of them isn’t similar. But which player is more desirable, I would assume Crawford, but Im sure age plays a big part of this.

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 16, 2010 11:40 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

interesting point

Like a weapon labeled "very stupid weapon, do not use." - BabyBlues

by Crooow on Nov 16, 2010 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, I completely looked that over

good point. I think Crawford still has the overall upper hand, but I’d much rather take on the younger Upton with his salary. Hard to say what Crawford will get, but I’d venture a guess that it’ll be every bit of twice what’s owed to Upton over the next 5 years. That being said, Upton gets the better “value” nod.

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Nov 17, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

i meant "overlooked"

ugh to mornings

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Nov 17, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Depends though

Some teams have money, others have prospects, few have both.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 17, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

well yeah, and I tried to sum that up in the simple
and the acquisition of them isn’t similar

But a team like the Red Sox who can realistically go after either player… Who would be more desirable.

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 17, 2010 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

After reading MLBTR the Royals are gonna probably need to bring the Yankees into this.

Which might mean they need Greinke to soften his stance on NY. If the Yanks are struggling with Cliff Lee they could get Greinke give up Montero and another prospect while the Royals could give up a SP prospect.

Yanks-Greinke
Royals-Upton
DBacks- Montero + 2 prospects.

The Yanks would also have money available to them to sign Lee as Greinke’s contract probably doesn’t limit them from that..

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Nov 17, 2010 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

Why do the Yankees need to come into this?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Nov 17, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Greinke and Lee both in pinstripes would make me vom

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Nov 17, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I might stop watching baseball if that happened

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 17, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

from mlbtr
The Red Sox are on the “backburner” in the Upton talks after a mystery team made a strong push yesterday, according to Ken Rosenthal

He’ll be wearing Royal blue in a matter of hours.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2010 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

Blue Jays

Per Rosenthal. He added:

Low-revenue club such as the Royals, Rays and Marlins appear to be less likely landing spots, in part because of the steep price in prospects and because Upton will earn $14.25 million and $14.5 million in the final two years of his contract.

by Tito42 on Nov 18, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

For fuck sake we paid Guillen nearly that...

UGH!

Thats like saying: "Sure you didn’t get a hummer from Jessica Alba, but at least you got anally raped from Shaquille O’neil" --- Craig in Calgary

by averagegatsby on Nov 18, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

But He Was

A proven POWERBAT in his Moorean prime

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 18, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals
1481395546_m_small
Why is our lineup so flawed?
Small
Fortune favors the bold
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The first rule of Fight Club is NO FIGHTING
387504_small
Get to know a stop-gap starter - Vol. 2: Luis Mendoza

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan