Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

Billy Butler, Not Joakim Soria, Is the Next Player the Royals Should Consider Trading

In trading Zack Greinke, as just about everyone has pointed out, the Royals have definitively punted on 2011. Not that this was really a debatable decision, but it is nevertheless not one that we've typically seen around here. The corollary to the admission that the 2011 season will be a long one, is that, once again, the Royals have put forward their 2012 masterplan. This is especially true given that Dayton Moore fitted the details of the Greinke trade around the lineup he's already imagining.

This process (haha) has been in place since mid-season 2009. Just about everyone of any value (and some with none at all) have been shipped off. At this point, Billy Butler and Joakim Soria are the only guys left standing. There's something to be said for the Royals just going forward and fully committing to Plan 2012 or whatever you want to call it. In that case, trading Billy Butler, not Joakim Soria, should be the number one priority.

While Closer's with a capital C are baseball's most over-rated and over-paid commodities, Soria is signed to an extremely team-friendly contract. In 2011, Soria will earn just $4 million dollars. In 2012, that number goes up to $6 million (club option) followed by a $8 million dollar salary in 2013. In 2014 (another club option) that number will go up to $8.75. Assuming the Royals don't entirely become the Marlins, these are numbers the Royals can live with. More important is the fact that the Royals have Soria under team control through 2014.

Star-divide

Butler, on the other hand, is at the moment only under team control through 2013. Heading into his first arbitration season, Butler's days as a cheap player are over (especially in 2012 and 2013, his second and third arbitration seasons. Butler is an established Major League 1B/DH at the tender age of 24, although his career numbers are a good not great .299/.359/.457. Helping the Royals is the fact that in the last three years, Butler has averaged 16 HRs and 75 RBIs. Those numbers will matter come arbitration time (or, as is more likely, in the pre-arb bargaining).

Essentially, Butler is still a prospect. Because he's been such a precocious player at the Major League level, there is a legitimate chance that he's poised to make a jump to becoming a truly elite hitter. A Butler trade has, without a doubt, a chance to look really bad for the Royals. However, that potential is also what make gives Butler trade value. Butler is a young player with upside and a track record. Butler is basically guaranteed to be a mid-level 1B for the next three years, while still carrying the promise of upside. He's your standard issue 1B prospect ala Smoak or LaPorta, only with almost no risk at all.

A Butler trade would be a major gamble for the Royals. Yet, it is one worth considering. Frankly, Butler's career to date is a little hard to figure out. He's developing into a curious Jon Olerud type of player, only with the body of a Pete Incaviglia type and there hasn't been a clear arc of development. Actually, Incaviglia is in some ways a nice comp for Butler, who might just be someone who got to their destined level of performance quickly and who might stay there, rather than emerging at 27 as a complete beast at the plate. Because Butler plays 1B/DH, the Royals need to begin with the premise that he is replaceable. Unless they believe he can become an elite offensive force, 80% of his production, or more, can likely be found for a fraction of the eventual cost.

When we think about the Royals' timetable for contention realistically, 2013 is really the starting date. 2011 is mostly about killing time. Some of the team's much hyped prospects will be ready to make their debuts in '11, but the majority won't. It's possible that enough impact players emerge as contributors in 2012, but it is more likely that 2012 will be about seasoning, gaining experience, and truly setting everything up. With regards to Butler and Soria, Soria is available for both 2013-14, while the Royals will only have Butler under contract for 2013.

I'd hate to trade a young player with a career OBP of .359 (.388 in 2010!). Then again, trading away a Cy Young pitcher with two years left on his contract wasn't exactly a blast either. The Royals need to make a tough evaluation of Billy Butler. If they truly believe in him, a typical over-pay of his arb years in exchange for an extra year or two of team control kind of deal should be doable. If they aren't so sure, they need to look at shopping him aggressively.

Comment 173 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

nope

keep Butler

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 21, 2010 12:54 AM EST reply actions  

I agree

I actually think now is the time to do the opposite. Go BRUCE him up with a 6 year 45 million dollar deal.

by JD Sussman on Dec 21, 2010 12:58 AM EST up reply actions  

yes i was just about to follow up with this

a 5 year deal or so would be good. i wouldn’t go beyond that because of his body type, but i would feel comfortable locking him up through the rest of his 20’s.

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 21, 2010 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Just throwing a quick contract out there. Totally agree.

by JD Sussman on Dec 21, 2010 1:03 AM EST up reply actions  

this is absolutely the time....

add two more years to the contract….and personally, i’d use some of the zack money to frontload it much more than is typically done. This allows much of the burden of the contract to be put on 2011 and 2012 when were likely going to have a crazy cheap team and no realistic chance to compete.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 1:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

or maybe something like a typical free agent contract where they pay him the same amount each year. i think something like this would give the team a great deal of flexibility down the road…or not to mention a freakin great trade chip if it came to that 3 or 4 years from now.

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 21, 2010 1:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I dont know if I want to give Butler $45 million dollars

that being said, I’m not opposed to signing him to a long term deal, but it may not be an option either.

by Freneau on Dec 21, 2010 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that was a BS number, just didn't want to say = to Bruce.

His comments today make me believe he wants to be the future face of the organization. But, what do I know. I’m certainly not as in tune as you are with KCR happenings.

by JD Sussman on Dec 21, 2010 1:22 AM EST up reply actions  

well, i'm not in tune at all

i’m just thinking

1) he’s about to get more expensive
2) he’s only around through 2013
3) 1B/Dhs are easy to replace and the royals have a few coming up as it is

by Freneau on Dec 21, 2010 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Umm the we have a few line is subject to debate. Hosmer and Kila are completely unproven. Moose is going to get a shot at 3B.

Clint Robinson is kind of interesting in a year older Ryan Shealy sort of way.

Certainly no reason to think Butler would get beat out at DH in the next three years or thereon yet.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 2:39 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Right, but adding more prospects would be a good thing

I like Butler and think he’s about to go Beast Mode on the AL Central. If he can figure out how to get to 25 homers he is in for a huge season.

by AxDxMx on Dec 21, 2010 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d still trade one star for two or an expensive one for a cost-controlled one, but I don’t think trading Butler lands us back a player who will ever put us a WAR he will in his best 3-5 years.

You can’t trade stars who will sign long-term for roles players.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

He might get more expensive, but we have lots of available cash. Give him an extension after this year. Signing Butler and, if he can prove himself, Gordon to extensions are definitely worth considering after this season. Gordon could help solidify the OF with Cain and, in the future, Will Myers.

I think we need to start retaining some of our better players over the next couple of years. We certainly could trade anyone for the right return, but Butler is a very good player for us. We need to keep him and attempt to sign him long-term if possible.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 2:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Wouldn't we technically be selling low?

I mean he hasn’t really lived up to the hype, but the potential is still there (mores than Gordon). I would be willing to move him if the offer was right, but I don’t think anyone is going to offer what he’s truly worth. Now, what Kila’s trade value would be, I have no idea. But, maybe he’d be worth moving for someone willing to pay the right price.

I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.
-- Source Unknown

by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2010 12:57 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Trade the Royals

even if we get nothing in return.

by Lucamachine on Dec 21, 2010 12:59 AM EST reply actions  

I'd rather trade away the bandwagon fans

We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars... But we wont, and we're slowly learning that fact... and we're very very pissed off --- Tyler Durden

by averagegatsby on Dec 21, 2010 1:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

What bandwagon fans?

There is no band or wagon to jump on. And I feel sorry for any fan who fell for the illusion of a “bandwagon,” because the Royals have traded away every quality piece they can scrap and save some money with for the last two decades.

by Lucamachine on Dec 21, 2010 1:34 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Gotta see what Kila and Butler look like this year. I think the Kila 1B stuff might be posturing to get Butler to pay closer attention to his conditioning going into 2011.

If he could develop better conditioning-wise, I’d try to extend him eventually. If not and Kila looks good, then Butler might be expendable via trade but I’m not sure what he’s actually worth. It would have to be Greinke-esque to motivate me.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 1:07 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I suppose it means nothing

that I bought my wife a Butler jersey and assured her he’d be around a while.
I like the guy where he is. I believe he’ll become a big time hitter, and while we’re waiting, he’s not exactly making us suffer through a rough stretch.
It’s funny that we’re all talking about which key pieces we should trade next when it’s generally felt that Dayton doesn’t trade well at all.

www.marklaflamme.com

by LaFLamme on Dec 21, 2010 1:11 AM EST reply actions  

Nope

we should just talk about trading Butler until he demands a trade, then trade him and have our new leader talk about how he didn’t want to be here. It’s how these things are done now.

Butler being long-termed doesn’t seem to make things much better with the future because DH/1B is a pretty plentiful position. Although the org might wind up in a spot where Butler gets a Sweeney deal to try and not repeat history further (and also Hosmer/Moustakas won’t extend if they make it anyways)

Another thing I keep saying as a minority position is that Kila is not long for the organization. His first hurdle is being in the org when Moustakas comes up. The competition for DH would be between Kila and Betemit there. I talk of Kila as a DH because precedent doesn’t show a lot of young first basemen with long term success who were DHs for years. And if Kila survives Moustakas, Hosmer will send him away.

But then again, Hosmer is the best hitter in our system so it won’t be an injustice.

Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
Sponsor, 2011 Royals Alumni Fantasy Camp/Royals 5th Starter Star Search

by BHWick on Dec 21, 2010 1:11 AM EST reply actions  

Butler will hit for a much higher OPS when the Royals lineup improves. The great thing is that the lineup has already improved because we actually may get a look at Hosmer or Moustakas.

The other great thing about keeping BB is that Kila will hit homers next season, Gordon could improve and with Escobar and Cain, the Royals will score runs.

Butler just needs protection, on a more consistent basis, and that will come sooner rather than later. His glove is also better.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 1:16 AM EST reply actions  

um

Butler can actually hit?

There is no reason to expect less than a 1.000 OPS from Butler when they all hit the stride.

The Royals are going to change a lot of people’s opinions next year.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 1:22 AM EST up reply actions  

1.000 OPS

Only 4 players had an OPS of 1.000 or greater in 2010, so while Butler is a good hitter he’s not likely to produce at that level without a serious increase in HR power.

Change a lot of opinions? How so?

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Power.

Butler is 24, three years from 27, the age baseballians say players hit their first prime year, every year Butler plays, his approach improves.

Butler will be similar to Brett.

I know, big dream lol

The Royals are going to be a better team in 2011, without Greinke. There is so much freaking talent in the minors, some of it will make the 40 man, and eventually play in KC.

IF the Royals were to trade Soria for a hitter, like a catcher from a certain Bronx club?

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 1:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I actually like the Butler/Brett comparison

I could see his career turning out pretty similar.

I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.
-- Source Unknown

by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2010 1:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

through his age 24 season, Brett hit .308/.353/.453

though that is dragged down a little by his atrocious first season

very similar, although brett was a 3B in a less friendly offensive environment

by Freneau on Dec 21, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

George Brett in his age 24 year

had 13 3B’s 22 HR’s and 14 SB’s.

Not to knock Billy b/c he is what he is, but he’s not similar to George Brett really other than being a good overall hitter (BAVG and OBP)

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

looking at bretts career

its stunning how out of nowhere his 1980 was

dude hits .390 after being nowhere close to that, WITH the most power of his career

by Freneau on Dec 21, 2010 1:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it is amazing

the all BOLD 390/454/664/1.118 on Baseball Reference is the best part. Like BAM look at me bitches I had one of the best years in baseball history for a 3B.

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:52 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, his SLG is crazy high, but it's partially inflated by his BA

if you look at his ISO, it’s at 270, which is crazy high, but he had two other seasons at 250 and one at 230

I know, that’s still nuts because his career mark was 183. But yeah, 1980 was wack.

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Dec 21, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

And He Was

Hurt most of the year. He only played 117 games, and had 118 RBI’s. It seemed like he could hit a HR any time he wanted to.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 21, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

George was clutch

Billy, not so much

I looked at those players and they had fighter-pilot eyes

by Zdeb on Dec 26, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

check the stats

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 26, 2010 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Billy isn't going to be stealing too many bases

But, his power numbers, Avg., and OBP should be fairly similar if he stays healthy. Nobody could ever be George, but Billy is going to be excellent in the years to come, especially when he gets some protection.

I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.
-- Source Unknown

by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2010 1:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

ehhh. Butler is a DH long-term in KC. Assuming Hosmer doesn’t flop with his bat, he is a very good defensive 1B.

I think Butler’s lack of HR’s is due to a lack to strength which would be improved if he took his conditioning more seriously.

On a related note, I was very impressed by Moose’s outlook on the same issue. He said working out with the Boras people got him in his Spring Training shape last year (as that was the best shape of his life).

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Eh, I wouldn't say it's a strength issue.

More like trajectory issue.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 21, 2010 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

And Kaufman is one of the hardest parks to hit a HR at.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor

KC is a double and triples park. Billy problem is he gets winded running to first. His lack of speed and conditioning will probably cost him 20 bases at least over a season.

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Dec 21, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

But he's so cute when he tucks his head and pumps his arms real hard!

He definitely makes the cutest outs of any of our players.

And I don’t buy the leader stuff. Aren’t you only a leader if someone is following you? Who is following Billy? I like the Hit-A-Ton thing. That’s pretty awesome and I’ll always like Billy for that. If he’d start elevating the ball a little more instead of hitting into so many double-plays, I’ll really like him.

by Gross(est) on Dec 21, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I like the enthusiasm

I think MLBTR reported today that the Royals are not looking to trade Soria, but if they were Montero would be a great target.

I have to disagree with you on 2011 though, the Royals are gonna be pretty atrocious in the W/L column, although you’re right its going to be a lot of fun to watch some of the talent we acquired in the Greinke trade play as well as witness some of our farm system start to percolate up to to the big league club.

Like I mentioned though, if Butler is to have an OPS of even greater than 900 he’s going to have to hit 25+ HR’s per year, as his BAVG and OBP don’t have a huge amount of room for improvement.

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:42 AM EST up reply actions  

HE

will hit 20 homers this season, maybe 25.

His doubles will be insane too, 45+

Butler is one of the best young right handed hitters in baseball, he’s just slow like Steve Balboni.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying he can't or won't

I’m just saying thats not going to be good enough for a 1.000 OPS

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Butler is 24, three years from 27, the age baseballians say players hit their first prime year, every year Butler plays, his approach improves.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Butler's absolute peak, 99th percentile

in my guesstimation is something like 340/420/530

I loathe David Glass

by RoyalJHWKR on Dec 21, 2010 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

i’m pretty excited about the team now.

I mean it beats watching NBA. I’d rather look at the Royals in a positive light considering how much the team has changed over the last 5 years.

The system is really impressive, and unless we have Howard the Duck running the team, the Royals have to improve.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 2:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm excited too

but come on, anything beats watching the NBA.

Look on the bright side...we could be Pirates fans.

by Patek to Rojas to Mayberry on Dec 21, 2010 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Regardless

I can’t friggin wait until we can actually watch some baseball, not just talk about it. I hate winter.

www.marklaflamme.com

by LaFLamme on Dec 21, 2010 1:45 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I like this idea in theory

I just don’t know that too many teams actually need in a Billy Butler. He’s pretty good, he’s young, and he’s cheap, which should be attractive — but his production as a DH is probably around average.

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on Dec 21, 2010 2:03 AM EST reply actions  

DH production isn't as good as you'd assume it is.

Billy would give us premier DH production, even when you take into account he hits better when he plays the field.

by moregritplease on Dec 21, 2010 3:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Butler was the second best DH last year, to Big Papi

Butler is an above average hitter, and projects to get better. He’s 24!

He finished 9th in BA last year, not to mention 5th in Doubles.

Butler is above average anywhere he plays, with the bat.

by Peterman700 on Dec 21, 2010 5:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I stand corrected

Perhaps I was thinking of him relative to other 1Bs — but a quick search on those stats shows he still is above average.

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on Dec 21, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

And he is 25.

The guy is going to be a beast. Don’t know that he will have the longest career, but I’d sure not be opposed to the Royals getting him through age 30.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 21, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Makes no sense to trade him.

What would we get back? He already has productive seasons and he is as old as Cain and Escobar yet we are waiting on their “potential”. He glove won’t kill us.

by vic1124 on Dec 21, 2010 5:05 AM EST reply actions  

As a Rays fan, I haven't had too much fun this offseason either

In fact, this has to be one of the worst off seasons a team has ever had. Whole bullpen is gone, 1B gone, LF gone, SS traded, Willy Aybar who at least showed random power….gone, we have said good bye to so many guys already and we still have plenty of free agents headlined by Rafael Soriano and Grant Balfour.

Royals and Rays can help each other out though. We need a spot for Jeremy Hellickson and we need a 1B and a CL. Jeffries can take over as closer in KC and we can trade Jeff Niemann to you guys who can certainly use a solid SP like that. I think that’s a fair deal for Soria considering Niemann is a starter and Soria is a closer but we need a Butler type also so what would we have to add? Or if it’s changed to Matt Garza who has shown more and more that he can be an ace of a staff and Cobb/Colome type prospect, how would you Royal fans feel about trading your 2 best peices(MLB wise anyway) away?

I am babbling, Rays need a 1B and a CL the most and thats the 2 parts the Royals can offer and replace (Jeffries and Kila) What would you want from us for them?

Price, Garza, Shields, Davis, Hellickson is too awesome, Niemann for closer?

by joeybw on Dec 21, 2010 6:52 AM EST reply actions  

That's an interesting match

I don’t see it happening in practice, but in theory you’re absolutely right. I don’t think that’s quite a fair deal though. We would get a pretty good haul for either Soria or Butler individually, so package them together and you’ve got to really overwhelm us.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 21, 2010 9:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Garza can’t be an ace.

His year last year was pretty unimpressive. League average starter or so.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd be more inclined to extend Butler

But I wonder how the FO feels about a Butler extension. I have a general sense that they don’t want to reduce his motivation by setting him up with 5+ years of guarantee. I don’t know where I get that sense tho. Maybe it’s his body type or his personality or the ‘babies’ controversy. I also saw the Jacobs trade as an attempt to motivate Butler as much as I saw as an attempt to acquire a good player. And it may have succeeded on the first count.

by kcdc1 on Dec 21, 2010 8:35 AM EST reply actions  

Give him the Greinke promise.

We’ll extend you, get you paid a little more now, and if we aren’t contending, we’ll trade you with 2 years to go on your deal to a contender. How’s that sound?

by AxDxMx on Dec 21, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

After seeing what happened to Zackkkkk,

which is stuck on a bad team with an incompetent (depending on whom you ask) FO during your prime, Butler might say Thanks but no thanks.

The whole problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. ~ Bertrand Russell

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Dec 21, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

No.

Turning Kool-Aid to Jesus Juice since 2009.

by Discodave on Dec 21, 2010 8:40 AM EST reply actions  

I don't want to trade him

—he’s still getting better.
WAR:
2008: -0.2
2009: 2.6
2010: 3.4

I could see him going over 4.0 WAR next year. I think he wants to be here—sign him to a 5 year deal.

Also, I don’t think he’s viewed as an elite first baseman—so I don’t think the return in a trade would be all that good.

by nwroyal on Dec 21, 2010 8:54 AM EST reply actions  

depends if he sticks at 1B

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Dec 21, 2010 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Not really a fan of locking up Billy Butler long-term either to be honest

I don’t know, I’m bearish on him ever developing that much power. He’d still be a nice player, but I don’t see the big benefit to locking him up when there are still concerns about his defense, his power, and his body frame.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 21, 2010 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

Any extension would need lots and lots of team options

Butler is a pretty odd case in that his his hitting skill set tends to age well (high average, low strikeouts, good patience, decent power) but his body type absolutely does not age well. He is also looking at losing value due to either the positional adjustment of moving to DH (about half a win) or defensive decline (which could easily reach half a win or more). Thus, even if it is reasonable to expect his hitting to improve (such as more power), it is just as reasonable to expect him to lose about a half a win in value due to position or defense. For an extension to work from a risk management perspective, the assumption should be that Butler stays around a 3 win player. Using the standard assumptions that a player will get 40%/60%/80% of his value in his three arbitration years and a conservative estimate of $4 million per win (and assuming Butler remains a 3 win player), Butler’s expected salary would be $4-$5 million in 2011 (first year of arbitration), $7-$8 million in 2012 (second arbitration year), $9-$10 million in 2013 (last arbitration year), and $12+ million thereafter (free agent), at least until his decline. Buying out his arbitration years for under $20 million might not be a bad tradeoff if Butler is willing to give the team a couple team options on the end of it in the $10-$12 million range (with some sort of buyout).

by Gopherballs on Dec 21, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like a Soria-type deal to me

I do worry you might be a little low on the market value Butler could command on in free agency—what about offering him the following contract:

2011: $4MM
2012: $7MM
2013: $9MM (so $20MM total to buy out his arbitration years)
2014: $12MM
2015: $13MM club option w/ $2-3MM buyout
2016: $14MM club option w/ $2-3MM buyout
2017: $15MM club option w/ $2-3MM buyout (this would be his age 31 season)

Basically, 32/4 guaranteed (or 34-35/4 guaranteed with a buyout), with the potential to be 74/7 total.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

i'd do 5/45right now

9/yr for the next 5 years…it might be a little less money than he wants, but he’s making more in the first 3 years than he wouldve otherwise and it makes sense given the royals finances and how cheap the team will be for the next 3 years.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus you get to give the whole “time value of money” pitch to him.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

more likely to his agent....

i dont see billy being all that fluent in finance talk…but that does make a significant difference and im sure his agent will do all the fancy math and tell him what that contract is worth if normally structured

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

It might be a little less, but I think we have the capacity to show him the money

The Royals’ payroll for 2011 is probably going to weigh in at around $55MM, once you factor in the money we’re kicking to Milwaukee for Yuni’s “services.” That’s a huge decrease from this year’s payroll of $70MM+, and $16MM more comes off the books next year when Meche and Kendall are given the ol’ heave-ho. The Royals can sign Butler to a fair extension and sign a truly elite FA next year and still have their 2012 payroll be lower than it was in 2010.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see us in the market for a truly elite FA.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it would be hard not to

Aside from Soria and Butler, nobody on the 2012 roster projects to be making more than $5-6MM. The Royals will pay some low seven-figure salaries to players like Hoch, but other than that, our players will be making close to the league minimum, and 2012 should be when we start improving into contention. If ever there was a time to splurge $20MM a year on a FA, that would be the time.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

not next year....

unless its a young elite corner OF

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

so the only thing we really need to do long term....

is lock up billy and just fill the holes with guys on 1 year deals who we can be rid of as soon as the prospect at that position is ready. sounds like a winner for everyone involved…especially david glass

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I would have agreed with you until I read the article on royals.com yesterday

I haven’t been the biggest Bulter fan, because he’s always going to be a liability in the field, and good DH’s just aren’t are hard to come by. But I am now. I know a lot of you guys don’t put much weight on clubhouse leadership and morale, but I really do. I hated Hillman as much for destroying Gil Meche as I did for his failure to argue calls and retaliate against other teams when it was warranted.

When these young guys come up, they need a leader and some form of nucleus (and not Jason effing Kendall). Yeah, Moose has all those qualities, but you can’t put all that weight on him from the beginning. I think we should hang onto Butler and re-sign Chen because he would be a great mentor to these guys. And hang onto Soria, because, dammit, we need a guy to love and pull for.

by AJaha25 on Dec 21, 2010 9:50 AM EST reply actions  

Billy was on MLB radio yesterday afternoon.

I have to say that he has completely bought in to everything that’s going on with “the process.” He has always said that he wants to play his entire career in KC. I see nothing wrong with extending him through 2014-2015 or so. It would have to be club friendly, but why not just avoid arbitration? One of the things he stressed in the interview was how much more serious he is about his conditioning. You can’t help but like the guy, and if he improves on the whole double play issue he’s a solid bat for years.

He says that he’s totally pumped about Moose, and Hos coming up too fwiw. No mention of Kila in the interview that I heard, but he is taking being a leader very seriously, and claims that when those two studs come up that his power and rbi totals should improve greatly. I would guess that being protected by Moose and Hos would change your outlook on things over Dick Ankiel and Guillen.

The prophecy has been fulfilled.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 21, 2010 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

is the audio archived?

Hating life as a Royals fan 365 days a year at Royalscentricity

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 21, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Dick Ankiel...

makes me laugh every time.

The Alex Gordon era - www.number4thesmirk.com

by CollininCalifornia on Dec 21, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

There's really no need to make a decision now.

He’s not going to get that much return in a trade now for, as you point out, Will, if he’s getting too expensive for a 1B/DH type for us to keep him, he makes even less sense for another organization to give up a worthwhile prospect AND have to pay Butler in the coming years. Even if he’s crazy expensive in arbitration, the Royals now have a bunch of payroll space to accomodate him and get some other parts—this team really has no business going big on a free agent until 2013, and by then we’ll have seen Kila (if he’s around) and Hosmer and know if Butler really is a need.

At the same time, you don’t commit to a long term contract with Butler because he may wind up being the 3rd best 1B/DH on the team. If Hosmer delivers on his promise (yeah, if), he’s going to be better than Butler at just about everything. If Kila’s MiLB performance starts to translate, he has the potential to be a better DH candidate than Butler, because he’ll have more power with at least as much patience. Now, neither of those things have happened yet and might not happen at all, but, because Butler is under team control for 3 more years, we have time to find out. If Butler is serious about playing in KC long term and he’s still the best option at one of those two positions, you can still extend him after 2012. He’ll be more expensive, but, if his power has come along, he’ll be worth it, and locking up your own best players long term has to be the main point of saving money by having a lot of younger players on the team.

So for now, stay the course.

It's all ball bearings these days!

by CentralChamps20?? on Dec 21, 2010 10:39 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

I agree with every single word in this comment. Stay the course. Don’t get rid of one of the few sure things you have on the field—who’s also still cheap with unfulfilled power potential. – TL

"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.

by timlacy on Dec 22, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

the odds of Kila becoming better than Billy are so slim that they're not worth talking about

and if it were to happen and billy is locked up, there’s nothing to say you cant trade Billy

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 22, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Two words.

Edgar. Martinez.

He never hit more than 18 homers til he was 32. Then never hit less than 23 except for his age 39 and 41 seasons.

Billy has already equaled what Martinez did in his age 28 season (both had .857 OPS, and both were into about their 4th year in the league, and Billy’s OPS is higher than Martinez’s for every year prior to this except for Edgar’s 13 game debut in 1987), and I see no reason Billy won’t continue to improve. His OBP wasn’t as high as Edgar’s, but his slugging was a little higher. In the very next season Edgar busted out for a .948 OPS. If Billy follows this path, it will become a lot more expensive after this next season to lock him up for a little while. I’d take my chances now and try to sign him through 2016 and take him to age 30.

by AxDxMx on Dec 21, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

ROIDS

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 21, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe Edgar Martinez lite

Martinez’s batting eye was amazing — he swung at something like less than 15% of pitches outside the strike zone. Butler at just under 25% for his career is still well above average, but Martinez was just other worldly.

The body type is another pretty big difference — Martinez certainly filled out and became thick, but kept in pretty good shape (even though various leg injuries took away any foot speed). Butler is just big and unathletic.

Maybe Fat Edgar is more appropriate.

by Gopherballs on Dec 21, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Please keep Butler

I enjoy watching him hit. To me he is our version of Edgar Martinez. Yes, he’s going to become a DH early in his career. But much like Martinez he’s going to get more power as he gets older and he could eventually match Martinez in terms of run production. Look at their early career numbers, Billy is as good as Edgar was at an earlier age.

Also, don’t underestimate the value of having a career Royal who can tie the new contending Royals with the old sucky Royals. He would be an excellent guy to have around to remind the young guys of the old days when the Royals were a laughing stock.

by ThirtyOne on Dec 21, 2010 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

He would be an excellent guy to have around to remind the young guys of the old days when the Royals were a laughing stock.

And the benefit of reminding the young guys about this would be…? Maybe he could give them kind of a “Grumpy Old Man” speech? “In my day, we didn’t have any of these fancy ‘home runs’ and we didn’t score a lot or strike a bunch of guys out. We just went out there and bumbled around on the field, and we got hit in the back by cutoff throws, and climbed outfield walls while the ball bounced on the ground behind us. And that’s the way it was and we LIKED it!”

by Sweep_the_Leg on Dec 21, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

When we’re coming off back to back World Series victories someone will have to point out that it wasn’t always that easy in KC. Old man Billy should be that guy.

by ThirtyOne on Dec 21, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree re: the Martinez comparison

Billy may not have the power that Edgar sometimes flashed—I doubt Billy will replicate Edgar’s epic 1995 season, for example, but on the other hand, Martinez didn’t even become a full-time regular on the M’s roster until his age 27 season, so Billy is already years ahead of him on that front. Martinez’s career triple-slash line is .312/.418/.515. I don’t know if Billy will replicate that over an entire career, but I think it is reasonable to think that Billy will be that kind of a hitter in his peak.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you lock him up.

Couple things on Billy’s 2010 season.

He had a career high .888 OPS vs Righties while posting a career low .727 vs Lefties. I don’t expect him to keep that .888 OPS because he is a .776 OPS v. RHP Career but if he can keep that in the .825-.850 range while rebounding vs Lefties who he has a .922 career OPS against (prev low .966) he could be looking at a true breakout season.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Dec 21, 2010 11:48 AM EST reply actions  

I Noticed That

Too. I blame Seitzer and his net.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 21, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm split on this one

I love Billy. I have to. He’s the only guy left to cheer for not named Soria. I’m not sold on him becoming a big power guy, especially since he plays half of his games at the K. But I’m fine with him hitting 20 or so dingers per year and piling up the doubles and walks. And there’s always the chance that he trades some of that fat for muscle and starts really pounding the ball. I know he has no speed and his defense is below average, but there really aren’t a lot of fast, slick-fielding 1Bs out there. I mean, if you’re going to have a tubby guy, where else do you play him besides catcher? And besides, I just like him. He’s like that fat kid friend you had in elementary school, except he can hit the crap out of a baseball.

All that said, if the deal is right, I pull the trigger almost instantly. It would have to be a very decent haul, and I worry that the Zack trade will have the rest of the GMs in the league lowballing us a little on trade offers for a while. But if the price is right, I’m willing to cut ties with anyone in the organization. Including Dayton Moore and David Glass. What do you think we could get for those guys?

by Soria's Unibrow on Dec 21, 2010 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

I feel mostly the same

No player should be untouchable to trade offers. If a net-beneficial trade offer presents itself, you trade the player.

But I would lean towards keeping Billy, for a few reasons (one of those is, like you, the fan in me has grown to love cheering for Billy).

But unlike Will, I do see Butler as fitting in well with the window our farm system would be providing us—Butler will be 27 in his last year before free agency, in other words, about when premier hitters start to peak. Given his current trajectory, he isn’t going to be Jim Thome, but be could definitely be Edgar Martinez, and that is worth an awful lot to a team that has been epically awful at getting on base. Our prospects may help that somewhat, but some of our hitting prospects (namely Moustakas) aren’t exactly known for their OBP. So I think Butler definitely has a significant role in our perpetually-rosy-future Royals roster.

So if it were me, and Butler continues to develop as a hitter, I’ll pay what it takes to buy out a few years of free agency. It will likely be a lot—I can see Butler commanding $15-20MM a year on the market—but he’s not a Boras client, he seems to genuinely like the Royals, and at the very least, his recent interview quotes give the impression of a guy who is optimistic about where the team is headed. I think if a few of our high-minors prospects (Moose, Duffy, Lough) show up this year and do well, you would have a good shot at signing Billy to an extension that buys out a year or three of free agency.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

let's be honest. They're both getting traded

its a matter of when, not if

The only measure of true success in the NFL is the Vince Lombardi trophy. Anything less is a rationalization.

by sm7600 on Dec 21, 2010 2:11 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

Probably the truest statement in this comment string.

"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.

by timlacy on Dec 22, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Heard Butler on MLB radio yesterday

And I think you are underestimating a critical piece of what he brings to the table: loyalty. he sounds like a guy who wants to retire a Royal and spoke about all the club had done for he and his family.

A guy like that brings continuity for the fanbase along with a fixture that we can all root for year-in and year-out. He fills the Brett/Sweeney hole that we had all hoped Greinke would fill. And given his consistent, solid production, you won’t find many more guys on this roster who can do this like Billy.

I once had hope...now I have Moore.

by Dubya on Dec 21, 2010 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

I think he sounds like a guy heading into his arb years who realizes the 2011, 2012, and 2013 payrolls will be pretty low.

If a guy like frenchy can make 2.5 million for being a good leader, a good baseball player who is a good leader might be worth 6 and 72 mil or so to DM.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

He wants to get paid. One of the things the Royals ought to always try to do is buy out an extra couple of years of control before the kids get their first big payday.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 21, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

Let’s just hope it lasts. It seems to me that Zack was a pretty loyal dude at one time, too. It’s got to be tough to stay humble and devoted when a thousand people are whispering in your ear. “You can do better… You don’t need these guys… Everybody wants you…”

www.marklaflamme.com

by LaFLamme on Dec 21, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

No time to read all the comments, so hope I don't repeat other arguments

Will, I had this idea during last season: Trade Butler when Hosmer is ready and established in the big leagues – thereby allowing Royals to keep a relatively cheap Kila for most of the team controlled 6 years. Considering Kila’s age, this would be just about the time he starts to decline anyway. Perfect.

As for the debate, Soria vs Butler, I totally agree with you that trading Butler makes more sense, but with one big caveat:

I still would like to see the Royals give Soria at least one or two years in the rotation just to find out if he could be the potential ace we are now missing. This would be perfect, as the consensus is we aren’t going to really be able to make the playoffs until 2013. If his stuff doesn’t translate to the rotation the way we want, move him back to the closer role. This also gives us AMPLE time to develop a different closer for the playoff runs in 2013 – 2017. It could be Jeffress, it could be Crow, or it could be any number of other guys currently in the minors.

I fully expect the Royals will NOT do this – but I think it is a risk/reward thing where the potential reward FAR EXCEEDS the potential risk.

"We're gonna win with pitching and defense" General Manager Dayton Moore, circa winter 2009

"Where did all these Indians come from?" General George Armstrong Custer, circa summer 1876

by loyal2sdad on Dec 21, 2010 2:53 PM EST reply actions  

It is a risk

but we disagree a bit here. I think the chance of Kila succeeding is roughly 50-50; I assume by “slim”, you see it as something more like a 10% chance?

Nothing wrong with your opinion – just pointing out what would be ideal for the Royals, and that would be for Kila to “explode” this year (or if not explode, at least post a 875 or so OPS)

"We're gonna win with pitching and defense" General Manager Dayton Moore, circa winter 2009

"Where did all these Indians come from?" General George Armstrong Custer, circa summer 1876

by loyal2sdad on Dec 21, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

id give him about a 25% chance of being a consisent 800 OPS guy....

a little bit above what would be acceptable for a DH, but less than what teams would be willing to give anything up for.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I can see arguments for keeping Butler too

I think the key to the whole thing might be this:

Will Hosmer stay in the minors long enough for Kila to enhance his trade value?

Obviously, the Royals will have only 2 spots for 3 guys. They should have enough budget room to keep Butler, should they choose too; however, if they think Kila will be adequate, but the rest of baseball doesn’t see it that way yet because his track record is too short, then Butler would have more trade value.

"We're gonna win with pitching and defense" General Manager Dayton Moore, circa winter 2009

"Where did all these Indians come from?" General George Armstrong Custer, circa summer 1876

by loyal2sdad on Dec 21, 2010 2:57 PM EST reply actions  

i think you're also overlooking the dearth of RH hitters we have.....

both on the team and in the pipeline….billy really needs to stay

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I get that

But I really want to see Kila do well enough, for long enough (all of 2011, half of 2012?), where Moore can decide to simultaneously promote Hosmer, commit to Butler for a longer term, and get value out of moving Kila.

Yes, I am intentionally wanting to take a risk on Kila succeeding – not just because I think he will, but also because it will put the Royals in a very good position.

Don’t misunderstand – if Hosmer dominates so thoroughly right away at AAA, and Moore deems that he is ready sooner than 2012, I wouldn’t be oppossed to calling him up. In other words, Kila is not allowed to block anybody. I am sorta rooting that Moore goes a bit slower promoting Hosmer than the situation warrants, just so we can get a more definitive read on Kila.

"We're gonna win with pitching and defense" General Manager Dayton Moore, circa winter 2009

"Where did all these Indians come from?" General George Armstrong Custer, circa summer 1876

by loyal2sdad on Dec 21, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I am sorta rooting that Moore goes a bit slower promoting Hosmer than the situation warrants, just so we can get a more definitive read on Kila.

Slow is good. I want team control for our prospect above all else.

for when I'm too lazy to come here, http://twitter.com/AtTheWall

by AtTheWall on Dec 21, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that 2011 should act as a season-long audition for Kila

But precisely for that reason (along with the fact that I think it would be rushing Hosmer), I would NOT at all call Hos up in 2011 unless it is to receive a cup of coffee in September. No use in starting Hos’s service time clock during a season that we are already punting on. Better to give Kila an extended look, and if he impresses, we can flip him. But even if Hos is knocking the stuffing out of AAA pitching, I’d rather keep him there. About the only position player prospect who I want to see a lot of in the bigs in 2011 is Moose, and that is only if he spends the first couple months of the season showing that he has nothing left to prove in the minors (well, maybe Lough too, but his downturn in 2010 shows that he could probably benefit from starting out 2011 repeating AAA).

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Hosmer, June 2012.

Boras client, gotta be that way. Sorry.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 21, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I tend to agree

Should do it with Moose too in 2011 too.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

They will, DM said as much this weekend.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 21, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

What if we are surprise 2011 contenders?

I know it’s not going to happen, but in that case, do we bring up somebody that would help the team?

by AxDxMx on Dec 22, 2010 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

That's a good question

I think for Moose you absolutely bring him up, especially if he is still walloping AAA pitching, then you bring him up in June 2011 after his service time clock has been sufficiently delayed regardless of whether we’re contending. With Hos, though, we’d have to be contending—either first in the division or a very close second. Otherwise, keep him in AAA for the entire year. He has one less year in the minors than Moose, and there is less point to starting his service time clock earlier.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 22, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

If we are contending without Hos, we’d probably be stupid to bring him up unless Kila or Butler is really struggling.

And if either of those things happens, it’s hard to see us contending.

by WURoyal on Dec 23, 2010 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Still would love a Soria for Montero trade.

To me Montero’s bat would make up for his defense. He is 21. Keep him behind the plate. even if he is slight below average IMO. Can he catch a pitch and throw it back to the pitcher? How is his arm at throwing out base runners?

Picture it.

CF-Lorenzon Cain
2B-Christian Colon
1B-Eric Hosmer
C-Jesus Montero
3B-Mike Moustakas
1B-Billy Butler
RF-Wil Myers
LF-Alex Gordon
SS-Alcides Escobar

Any line up with the possibility of Wil Myers hitting 7th is pretty scary.

With Jefferes,Coleman,Collins,Chapman,Hardy in the pen.

by vic1124 on Dec 21, 2010 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

I like the thought of Montero playing LF better if he could be somewhere close to average. As a corner OF he’d still maintain a little positional adjustment.

He’s just not a catcher. Catcher defense is pretty important, IMO. Much rather see us have a weaker bat and a defensive whiz like Perez or Pina.

by WURoyal on Dec 21, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

If we are going to obtain Montero with an eye towards a positional change

I’d rather stick him at 1B and have Hos move to the OF. Hos is athletic enough to handle the switch, whereas I still harbor doubts of whether Montero can field any position in an above average fashion. Under this scenario, we’d have Montero and Butler trading off between 1B and DH, and Hos and Myers manning the COF positions.

I would also rather see Perez or Pina behind the plate with Montero, I just would rather keep Montero at 1st. Yes, Hos might end up being a Gold Glove defender at first base, but winning a Gold Glove at first is like winning the tallest short person award. OF defense is more important.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 21, 2010 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

After watching video of Hosmer, I don’t believe he can play in the OF. Montero might be different. Regardless, the Yankees are on Soria’s NTC.

by WURoyal on Dec 22, 2010 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

yes, Chapman

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 21, 2010 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

this is true

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 21, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

lock him up...

THEN trade him

@@@Just assume I forgot the sarcasm font @@@ ... now, if I could just figure out the ### cynical font ###

Support Retiring #29 to honor Dan Quisenberry

by who am i? on Dec 21, 2010 7:26 PM EST reply actions  

What is Butler's trade value?

The only premium players available in the 2012 free agent class are slugging 1B. See Prince Fielder and Albert Pujols. He’s viewed more as a DH so he’ll have neglibile value in the NL limiting the market to AL teams. I trade Butler at the deadline in 2013 if at all. By then you have Hosmer and Kila evaluated and you know where Eibner stands.

The extension isn’t a bad idea. It would increase his future trade value if you viewed him as dispensible. It’s a good PR move after the Greinke trade. We have no payroll right now, and we have no payroll in the future.

by dyehardfan on Dec 21, 2010 8:55 PM EST reply actions  

The Royals may view Butler more as a DH

But Butler, while slightly below average defensively at 1B, is hardly a butcher in the field. He certainly isn’t on the same level as, say, Mike Jacobs, who clearly had no business playing any position other than DH. I think you can successfully market Butler to NL teams. That doesn’t mean we should, it just means that I think he has trade value in the NL.

I’m also not sure how Eibner calculates in this—if he can’t hack it in CF, he’ll likely be moved to a COF position, not 1B.

But I do agree with all your reasons to extend Butler.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 22, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Now we're talking about 2013?

And the goalpost-moving continues…

by Nyghtewynd on Dec 21, 2010 8:58 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

I’m tired of moving from 2011 to 2012 to 2013 to 2014. – TL

"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.

by timlacy on Dec 22, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

no trade.

At least not yet. The 1B/DH free agent market is deep this year. I think we could get better trade value in a better off season environment. Way too much supply out there and not really enough demand.

by don_jerovanni on Dec 21, 2010 8:59 PM EST reply actions  

Butler is not an elite 1B... can he be an elite DH?

In no particular order… there are definitely 10 – 12 first baseman better than Butler in the game right now.

Teixeira, Youkilis, Morneau, Konerko, Cabrera, Morales, Howard, Pujols, Fielder, A Gonz, D. Lee, Votto

Plus their are several young prospects on the way at 1B – Hosmer, Freeman, Smoak, Belt, Rizzo, Morrison, Chris Carter, Brett Wallace

I don’t think Butler has much value in a trade at this time. He will be valuable to the Royals as a clubhouse leader for all the young bucs coming up. He seems to have committed himself to getting in shape this off-season.

My question is… can Butler be an elite DH for the Royals if he’s not an elite 1b?

by billski8 on Dec 21, 2010 9:25 PM EST reply actions  

Three of those top 1B

are in the American League Central, so, at least at this point, Billy is still in the bottom 40% of 1B in his own division.

It's all ball bearings these days!

by CentralChamps20?? on Dec 21, 2010 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Butler is also paid a heck of a lot less

than almost all those guys on that list. And that’s part of Billy’s worth to the team—you can afford both him and a theoretically elite free agent at the same time, whereas the Brewers are sweating bullets over whether they can afford Fielder when he hits free agency this year, and the Padres just traded A. Gonzalez because they won’t be able to afford him going forward.

If you can’t afford the player, his worth to you is zero anyways.

by DarthYoshi on Dec 22, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Howard is not particularly better than Butler, nor is D. Lee (although he could make a comeback)

Konerko is questionable if he can keep up his level of production at his age.

Fire John Mozeliak

by purple_haze on Dec 24, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Only if you mean "consider" in the broadest possible terms...

The offer would have to be much better than what we got for Greinke. I’m pretty firmly in the “no one’s untouchable” camp, but Butler’s pretty clearly the closest thing this franchise has to an untouchable player.

If you were to put odds on the most valuable offensive player for the 2013 Royals, Butler would be the favorite by a huge margin. Butler’s already what Hosmer and Mous will be in 2013 if both develop well.

by billexgordler on Dec 21, 2010 10:13 PM EST reply actions  

You don't give big money to a singles hitter

Give Billy another year to show he can hit for power. If he does, sign him long-term, if not trade him and hope others still see potential. Currently he is Lyle Overbay without the glove.

by maddirishman on Dec 22, 2010 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

But what kind of money...

…do you give to doubles hitters? Double the money, obviously.

"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.

by timlacy on Dec 22, 2010 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Billy's problem is that he hits to the gaps mostly.

It results in lots of doubles and long fly ball outs, which if pulled would be homers. It also contributes to his biggest problem which is GIDP. If Billy were to gain some more strength some of those outs could turn into homers.

by AxDxMx on Dec 22, 2010 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

He said he was bothered by a hand issue the second half of the season or so.

Kaufmann kills power, but Billy might put up better numbers this year.

by WURoyal on Dec 23, 2010 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

if you want to talk about a problem with Billy

it’s that he simply hits too many ground balls. not surprising that in ’09 when he hit 23 or something like that…that was the year where his ground ball rate was the lowest. if Billy starts hitting more balls in the air to supplement the improvements he made in 2010, he will be an elite hitter.

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix

by doublestix on Dec 24, 2010 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals
1481395546_m_small
Why is our lineup so flawed?
Small
Fortune favors the bold
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The first rule of Fight Club is NO FIGHTING
387504_small
Get to know a stop-gap starter - Vol. 2: Luis Mendoza

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan