The Case for Michael McKenry
The Royals wanted a catcher this offseason. We signed one. A very well documented signing. The catching situation around Kansas City has caused some of us great heartache and migraine headaches. I’ve seen many question or revoke their fanship, but perhaps all is for naught. I present to you the case for Michael McKenry.
Michael McKenry was the 7th round draft choice of the Colorado Rockies in 2006. McKenry attended Middle Tennessee State University and was the 198th player taken in the draft that produced players such as Luke Hochevar, Evan Longoria, Clayton Kershaw, Tim Lincecum, and Max Scherzer. The 2006 crop of draft eligible college catchers was considered very weak in that particular year. Twelve catchers were drafted before McKenry, nine from the NCAA ranks while three from high school. I believe none have received as much as a cup of coffee.
The Rockies have recently signed former Royal stud Miguel Olivo to battle for the starting catching position with incumbent Chris Iannetta. This will be an interesting battle as Olivo is offensively strong while defensively horrible. But, more importantly for McKenry, this does not allow him to get a realistic shot as the backup in Colorado this season or next. And it’s appearing that he may be running out of chances as the Rockies have international signing highly touted prospect Wilin Rosario hot on his heals. Rosario has been ranked ahead of McKenry in the last few Rockies prospect polls I have seen including being ranked as the #7 prospect on Sickles Rockies list.
Baseball America ranked McKenry as the best defensive catcher in the Rockies system as he threw out 46% of base stealer last season. Michael is said to be a natural leader with very good receiving skills. He has the build of a catcher and will be solid defensively at the position for years to come.
Almost everything I’ve read on Michael is good. He hit for a decent average last year at Tulsa (.279), has a good batting eye (54 BB to 69 K), is on base quite often (.376), and seems to even have some of that slug that Trey loves (38 extra base hits out of 100 including 12 HR). As with most catchers, speed seems to elude him as McKenry stole 2 bases out of 4 attempts last season in AA.
One scouting report that I read states that the best case outcome for Michael is an everyday MLB catcher with plus defense and a chance at above average power. It seems as though McKenry has a relatively high ceiling and a decently good floor as a defensive MLB backup who could have some occasional pop.
With the Royals signing of Jason Kendall now paring him with Brayan Pena, it seems as though we may have an opening at catcher either next year or the year after. This Royal catcher timetable seems to fit McKenry’s timetable perfectly. With the successful year at AA Tulsa, Michael seems to be on target for a MLB ETA of 2011. Olivo and Iannetta will still be in Colorado and Rosario will probably have passed him on the prospect watch for the Rockies. With this being the case and McKenry hitting the 25 mark on his age this year, he seems to be destined as a classic blocked player in the Rockies system. However, if he was to break 2011 with KC as a backup catcher, he will have the opportunity to grow into a starting catcher (at age 26) with decent but limited potential.
McKenry may never make it as a starting big league catcher, but he is younger than Jason Kendall and has a shot to make a solid MLB career. McKenry seems to possess all the tools that Dayton Moore wants in his catcher. And, as a bonus, and even though I don’t believe Dayton looks at this in evaluating players, he seems to be a devout Christian closing blog entries with Bible verses and seemingly living to Christian fundamentals.
Dayton Moore seems to have a trade history with the Rockies. In fact, he has made trades with Daniel J. O’Dowd before. Perhaps you remember Jeremy Affeldt and Denny Bautista for Ryan Shealy and Scott Dohmann? Or future considerations for Ramon Ramirez? And if not those two, then perhaps Jorge de la Rosa for future considerations?
With the recent history of Moore and O’Dowd, one would assume that we could perhaps get catcher Michael McKenry from the Rockies for only “future considerations.” If we were to do that soon, perhaps Michael could get some seasoning in our system and begin to learn his new pitchers. It is still scary, the thought of Dayton Moore trading away Michael Montgomery for someone like McKenry….
References:
Michael McKenry Player Page from MiLB
2006 Draft Scouting Footage from MLB.com
32 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sounds good.
But in a couple years we may have a fella named Wil Myers ready or close to being ready
Maybe
Myers’s bat may be too good to leave him behind the plate learning to catch for 4 years—from what I understand, he’s that raw as a catcher. If his bat stays huge this year, I’d hope they really consider turning him into a CF, which I’ve heard he’s athletic enough for.
We also have other catching prospects—I’m still high on Salvador Perez, who’s ahead of Myers defensively, and the new Korean kid whose name I’ll learn eventually behind him. All of those guys, however, are quite a ways off. A guy like McKenry could fill the gap, probably better than Manny Pina can.
Once upon a time, I had faith that finding these types of blocked guys and trading guys who just couldn’t put it together here were exactly the kinds of moves that GMDM would be good at making—the examples you gave (Shealy/Affeldt and the Ramirez and de la Rosa deals) are appropriate. The last two offseasons of overpaying for marginal veterans have sapped any faith I had that Moore is even interested in trying to make these types of deals anymore.
That seems like a more appropriate name.
by CentralChamps20?? on Feb 8, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
how about this?
there’s no way the GMDM regime would be this unconventional, but Pena and Pina/McKenry/other defensive-oriented catcher plus Myers. Myers catches just one pitcher—some guy who is easy to catch, doesn’t throw in the dirt much, or doesn’t mind throwing to a catching pupil—and plays RF three of the four other days. Pena and defensive catcher de jour each catch 2 of the 4 remaining pitchers. that way Myers gets to the pros quickly without worrying that his catcher skills are not quite up to snuff, but also he hasn’t totally thrown away the option to be a catcher long-term, considering how important a position it is.
also +1 for the correct grammar on “Myers’s”
Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "In the game of chess you can never let your opponent see your pieces"
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 8, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
I write for a living
so inappropriate apostrophes really bother me.
That seems like a more appropriate name.
by CentralChamps20?? on Feb 9, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
sorry if I used any
or ever do… :)
Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.
is myers even 20 yet?
I would be stunned if myers is an asset at the big league level before age 25
that basically happens about 3-4 times a decade
maybe you haven't learned to ignore small sample sizes like the rest of us
Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "In the game of chess you can never let your opponent see your pieces"
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 9, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
IF he pans out
You should always prepare as if none of your prospects will pan out. Because many of them won’t.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
Except for th 83 pitchers the Royals have acquired since Dayton took over
I’ll take the over on “70.” The man can scout.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Feb 9, 2010 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
Good thoughts
One thing to keep in mind is that the Rockies’ depth might make McKenry available at some point in the near future, but it does not really affect his trade value. Catchers are hard to find and develop, so there should be plenty of teams interested if the Rockies sought out trading partners. He would not come cheap.
Or the Rockies may decide to wait a year and trade Iannetta and his cheap contract for more than he is worth in prospects.
I particularly enjoyed this line:
Perhaps you remember Jeremy Affeldt and Denny Bautista for Ryan Shealy and Scott Dohmann? Or future considerations for Ramon Ramirez? And if not those two, then perhaps Jorge de la Rosa for future considerations?
I just wish future considerations could stick with a club long enough to show what he could really do.
I certainly could be wrong here...
…but I thought that Jorge de la Rosa was the “future consideration” for RamRam…
Is anyone aware of anything else we gave the Rockies that could have been the other half of the Ramirez trade (or of anything else the Rockies gave us that could have been the other half of the de la Rosa trade)?
I believe
there were cash considerations for each deal—they seemingly wound up being traded for each other, but I also remember them each being traded separately for what turned out to be cash. BR says each was traded as part of a “conditional deal,” which would mean each was traded for a PTBNL or cash, as opposed to being traded for each other.
That seems like a more appropriate name.
by CentralChamps20?? on Feb 8, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
sounds right
I recall that for some unexplained reason, the Royals front office went out of its way to stress that de la Rosa was not the PTBNL for the Ramirez deal and the transactions were not related. Of course, sometime later, I think it was reported that there would be no additional players or cash changing hands to complete either deal.
blocked players are very important
Free agency has never helped this franchise but we have been very succesful at finding blocked players early on…
Patek blocked by Gene Alley
McRae blocked by several players like
Mayberry blocked by Lee May
several more
we have also done very well at finding players that were all but given up on by their previous organization
leibrandt, buddy black, ibanez and more
I believe the best chance this club has is to stay away from free agency after this pipeline gets full again and use the money on the draft and picking players like McKenry and AJ Ellis, Mitch Canham guys in creative moves that don’t break your back
as I write this I say to myself…easier said than done…But..I think you get my point
soria and callaspo
even the dreaded GMDM has found low-cost undiscovered talent. seems like he should have taken a hint from that.
Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "In the game of chess you can never let your opponent see your pieces"
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 8, 2010 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
Hey now.
We took LHP Osuna from the Braves in the Rule 5 this year. Hopefully he turns out to be a golden nugget.
Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.
i actually was thinking of Osuna too when i wrote that
would like to see more chances like this taken
Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "In the game of chess you can never let your opponent see your pieces"
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 9, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
btw
Omar Quintanilla could have been the Royals SS if the Rockies had not asked for a very good LH pitching prospect in return…
when Yuni was grabbed he was just one of several SS’s this team was looking at…unfortunately, he is the one that ended up here
so there is an example of a blocked player that I like (i have liked him since his UT days that looks like he won’t get a chance in Colorado….I think he would have been a nice player here *not a star but a nice player
Who was the prospect?
We gave up a decent prospect for Yuni.
Yuni for Cortes and that LOOGY.
Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.
I like Quintanilla
Can take a walk, decent defense, doesn’t seem to have much of a role in Colorado. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s on waivers by the end of camp.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
McKenry would be a good fit for the Royals
The trick is that the Rockies know that he has talent and is a good trade chip for them. McKenry would be a player to pick up with a mid/late season trade. He has good defensive skills and power. The Rockies like Ianetta to be their starter and they favor a veteran backup.
Right now, he’ll start at Colorado Springs and play everyday. The Rockies system has done a good job of producing players who are contributing on the big league roster. Remember the Rockies drafted near the Royals spot a few years ago. Now they are in the playoffs – it can be turned around.
We have one of those!
they favor a veteran backup
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
by Warden11 on Feb 8, 2010 8:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
FYP
a veteran backup starter who should be a backup
Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "In the game of chess you can never let your opponent see your pieces"
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 9, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
I watched him play here in Tulsa
often last year. He would be a great addition to KC but don’t hold your breath.

by 















