Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

2010 Player Projections - Luke Hochevar

 

Let's look at another player projection this Spring Training.  Luke Hochevar gets the nod today and thanks to Fangraphs.com for the data.

Star-divide

Standard Projections












Season Type W L ERA G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO
2010 Bill James 7 12 4.95 29 29 171 191 23 58 121
2010 CHONE 7 11 4.81 28 28 161 181 93 86 21 55 108
2010 Marcel 7 12 5.25 144 158 95 84 19 50 102
2010 All Fans (70) 9 11 4.74 29 28 166 218 94 87 20 50 127
2010 Other Fans (54) 9 11 4.76 29 28 164 218 94 87 20 50 125
2010 Team Fans (16) 11 11 4.69 28 28 172 225 97 90 21 52 134

Advanced Projections








Season Type K/9 BB/9 K/BB HR/9 AVG WHIP BABIP FIP
2010 Bill James 6.4 3.1 2.1 1.21 0.284 1.46 0.317 4.66
2010 CHONE 6.0 3.1 2.0 1.17 0.285 1.47 0.316 4.61
2010 Marcel 6.4 3.1 2.0 1.19 0.280 1.44 0.314 4.69
2010 All Fans (70) 6.9 2.7 2.5 1.08 0.318 1.61 0.367 4.13
2010 Other Fans (54) 6.9 2.7 2.5 1.10 0.320 1.63 0.370 4.17
2010 Team Fans (16) 7.0 2.7 2.6 1.10 0.317 1.61 0.368 4.12

Value Projections






Season Type Starting Start-IP Relieving Relief-IP RAR WAR
2010 All Fans (70) 25.3 165 0.1 1 25.3 2.6
2010 Other Fans (54) 24.3 163 0.1 1 24.4 2.5
2010 Team Fans (16) 26.4 172 26.4 2.7

Poll
Will Luke do better than his 2010 CHONE projection of: 7-11, 4.81 ERA, 4.61 FIP, 28 games, 161 innings, 108 Ks?
Better
305 votes
Same
93 votes
Worse
54 votes

452 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 40 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

yeah, what's the deal?

i can’t figure out what’s going on in that photo.

by 9il on Mar 4, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

you can read if you scroll over image that he is making some back handed throw to 1st

No wonder Billy had so many error at first

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Mar 4, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Fearless projection

4.25 ERA, 1.300 WHIP, 60 BB, 150 K.

by rdf8585 on Mar 4, 2010 12:47 AM EST reply actions  

I'm An Agnostic

Where Slim is concerned. Same sounds like the upside to me.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Mar 4, 2010 12:51 AM EST reply actions  

I'm surprised they have his FIP lower than his ERA

Aren’t sinker pitchers supposed to outperform their FIP since they get more ground balls which FIP doesn’t account for? On the other hand, Luke’s not especially adept at preventing HRs….

I said about the same. 4.6 ERA is my prediction, but that feels a little optimistic.

by kcdc1 on Mar 4, 2010 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

It's The Grounders

They didn’t get to that killed his stats.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Mar 4, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

No pitchers are really adept at preventing home runs

they’re just adept at preventing flyballs. Hochevar did have a bit of bad luck with HR/FB last season, but it’s a bit disturbing that his GB/FB ratio has been trending less favorably each season.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Mar 4, 2010 1:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't really buy that pitchers can't limit HR's

for example, Greinke intentionally pitches to allow more flyballs at home where it’s tough to hit it out of the park, and goes for grounders at smaller parks. Because he’s giving up more of his flies in bigger parks, his HR/FB ratio should be better than most.

Also, I’m inclined to say he’s awesome and it’s hard to hit HR’s against him, but I don’t have the stats for it.

by kcdc1 on Mar 4, 2010 1:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Does he really give up more flies at the K

than on the road?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on Mar 4, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, actually

not sure if it’s intentional, a park effect, or random variation, but he does according to FanGraphs split pages

But while FB rate is (home/road spltis aside) under a pitchers control, HR/FB isn’t, at least not nearly to the same extent

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Mar 4, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

HR/FB is defintiely a skill

It’s pretty ridiculous to say that it isn’t. The only reason that it doesn’t appear to be on a a season by season level is because there are only going to be ~300 fly balls allowed by a 200 inning pitch each year. To get it on the same scale as K/PA you would have to have like 5 seasons worth of data.

by vivaelpujols on Mar 8, 2010 2:59 AM EST up reply actions  

So I take you think xFIP is useless?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Mar 8, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

No

Because HR/FB does have a lot of luck in it, and it’s better to regress it 100% to the mean than 0% to the mean. And xFIP predicts ERA in year N + 1 very well because of this.

However, I do dislike the concept of xFIP regressing certain things 100% (HR/FB, Linear Weights on BIP, timing) and the rest 0% (K, BB, FB%). In reality their is a gradience of luck to skill ratio in each of those outcomes, and I think that xFIP perpetuates the idea of “luck” stats.

by vivaelpujols on Mar 8, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel the same way

it seems like he’s due for some positive regression, but, yeah…

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Mar 4, 2010 1:19 AM EST up reply actions  

I'll be the voice of reason

ERA > 5.00 and doesn’t last the year in the rotation

by Mike Fast on Mar 4, 2010 12:59 AM EST reply actions  

Nice to see you hanging around Mike.

You can keep in check with my Pitch FX work

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Mar 4, 2010 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, Jeff

This is what I do when I’m too restless to sleep. :) That, and being on Twitter is keeping me more in touch with what people are writing.

by Mike Fast on Mar 4, 2010 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

speaking of Royals pitchers, Mike

does Bannister still throw that weird 88 mph fastball that he did in 2007 or did he scrap that for ground balls?

by kcdc1 on Mar 4, 2010 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Hochevar, reasons for optimism
  • 4.34 xFIP in 2009
  • 4.20 SIERA (new BP stat) in 2009
  • 80 strikeouts over his last 85 innings in 2009
  • Major league low strand rate among pitchers with 100+ IP in 2009.
  • Inflated .330 BABIP, normal range is .290-.300.
  • His K/BB rose from 1.53 to 2.30 from 08 to 09
  • His K/9 rose from 5.02 to 6.67 from 08 to 09

by rdf8585 on Mar 4, 2010 2:10 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

hochevar has nasty stuff

i don’t really think he gets enough credit… when I watch this guy pitch I see a potential #1 starter, not many pitchers have the array of pitches he has (power four seamer, great two seamer, plus curveball, above average slider)….

In his last 13 starts in 2009, he allowed opposing hitters a .326/.386/.556 line. Watching him pitch, with his stuff, it’s literally just a matter of time in my mind before he’s at worst, a solid #3-4 starter. When I watched Luke pitch last season, I really saw a guy who looked like he was searching for his place in the baseball universe. It might sound dumb, but I’m not sure Luke Hochevar knew last year what kind of a pitcher he was trying to be.

Some of the interviews I’ve heard with him validate this… Royals say be a groundball pitcher, but… why? We saw him do the groundball thing in that 80pitch CG SHO, but then he went power pitcher on the rangers in that 13k game when he was throwing a ridiculous curveball. He really needs to sit down, figure out what the game plan is, and then focus on his best 3-4 pitches.

I think this is the season he starts putting it all together. A lot of this is just going to involve knowing when to go for the strikeout, what pitches to throw with guys on base, having a better defense behind him, and just having that additional confidence that comes from having spent the majority of a full season in the big leagues.

31GS, 195IP, 200H, 174SO, 60BB, ?? ERA

-

by slayor on Mar 4, 2010 3:07 AM EST reply actions  

I kinda disagree, I think

I don’t think Luke’s problem is not knowing what type of pitcher he is. I think his problem is that he is trying to just be one type of pitcher but doesn’t have the control or mental toughness for it.

I think he needs to take a look at Zacks game, how he uses one set of pitches and speeds for starting an inning and a diffrent set of pitches and speeds for important situations.

I think ideally Luke should start with his sinker until a couple of guys get on or someone gets in scoring position, then switch to his power curve. Basically allowing himself to be both a groundball and power pitcher.

Of course a big part of that is going to be McClure getting him to believe he can do it.

I refuse to set up a signature....DAMMIT

by RoyalPug on Mar 4, 2010 4:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I absolutely agree

Hochevar has really good stuff. To me, the elephant in the room is how much was he tipping his pitches? I might be alone on this but he seem to get ahead of a lot of hitters, and then he was unable to get them out. He would get up with two strikes and then hitters would watch a nasty slider just miss off the outside corner or the curve just drop out of the zone as it they new it was coming and knew it would be a strike. Then when Luke was forced to bring those pitches back over the strike zone or throw a fastball to try and avoid a walk, they’d hit it.

I might be over stating all of that (I didn’t watch every game he picked) but I really remember seeing that a lot. If a lot of that was due to tipping his pitches and that is fixed, it could be a real break out year for him.

On the other hand, maybe his stuff isn’t as good as I think it is and he is just hittable.

by Chyladin on Mar 4, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Blind optimism

No real reason to believe he’s gonna bust out, but wishing seems acceptable at this point.

That seems like a more appropriate name.

by CentralChamps20?? on Mar 4, 2010 9:37 AM EST reply actions  

Oh, no? The numbers say something quite different.

by rdf8585 on Mar 4, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I have no doubt

He’ll be better than he was last year. But is that the same as better than the projection, which I would call “busting out”?

That seems like a more appropriate name.

by CentralChamps20?? on Mar 5, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to vote better

Because with 2 outs last year, Hochevar was awful. I can’t remember how many innings he let get out of control with two outs.

I would say that he improves that this year. That will lead to lower runs allowed numbers and hits allowed numbers. He seemed to make some strides towards the end of the year and that leaves me optimistic!

Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.

by 306008 on Mar 4, 2010 11:18 AM EST reply actions  

I'd vote better

but I’m afraid he’ll go through another entire season tipping his pitches.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on Mar 4, 2010 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

slightly better

and it looks like the fans’ ratings generally agree

Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "[my most important sabermetric stats are] runs scored and runs driven in"

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Mar 4, 2010 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

I can't see it

He’ll have a 15-K performance in there, but I don’t get how he gets the ERA under 5.00.

Murphy was an optimist.

by The Ol' Perfesser on Mar 4, 2010 10:36 PM EST reply actions  

Yu-Bet Becoming An

Astronaut would be a start.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Mar 4, 2010 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

In space

no one has lateral movement.

Murphy was an optimist.

by The Ol' Perfesser on Mar 5, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Hochevar

Assuming 32 healthy starts
186 IP
202 H
145 K
56 BB

by stlfan on Mar 6, 2010 12:28 AM EST reply actions  

I will jump with joy if Luke has 32 healthy starts.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on Mar 6, 2010 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Me too

I just always do my predictions based on healthy years. Then, I look at their IP/G, K/9, BB/9, K:BB, H/9, and WHIP and I can kinda see if I was on track with my prediction or not based on the number of starts they actually made.

by stlfan on Mar 6, 2010 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Hochevar looks really good to me

I think he’ll easily – easily – beat a 4.6 FIP.

by vivaelpujols on Mar 8, 2010 3:04 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan