Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Carlos Rosa traded to the Diamondbacks in exchange for Rey Navarro

Robert Ford, 610 Royals Postgame

about 2 years ago Kcroyalrumble_tiny BHWick 357 comments 2 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

honestly with some of the good RP prospects coming up quickly in our system

I don’t think I mind Rosa being traded. Clearly the Front Office doesn’t like Rosa very much. Though I really don’t know anything about the dude we got. His numbers this year aren’t stellar that’s for sure.

by thehopper on May 1, 2010 10:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe some potential there

No a lot of pop, but a decent amount of doubles that might be predictive of developing power. Can take a walk, but strikes out quite a bit. Only 20 in High A, so reasonably young for the level too.

If the defense is good, it is a premium position, so he is probably worth the AAA relief pitcher.

Also, we have had some decent luck trading with Arizona (though buying their FAs, not so much).

If they got him, they must see something in him that Arizona does not.

by bas on May 1, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boo!!

Rosa is gonna be pretty decent. Better than the stiffs they’ve rolled out this year. DMGM is an idiot.

by trauty on May 1, 2010 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

a hyped one
  1. in the D-Backs system

and he is still 20, grad of the Puerto Rico Baseball Academy

but he is in his 4th Minor League year, so he needs to be in the Major League roster in some form by 2012 to not be a 6 year minor league FA

Relievers are typically expendable and it’s just when you fuck up that expending them goes badly

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is #12 on the D-Backs system

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

BA

I think I misheard his ranking in the system

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

BP

14. Reynaldo Navarro, SS: His tools still intrigue, but his performances remain lackluster.

by WURoyal on May 1, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

uh

everything i’ve read has him playing SS

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

He grades prospects

A “C” grade is just ok.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

type better then

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marc Hulet from FanGraphs

had in the top 10 recently, although he says there’s questions about whether his arm will stick at SS

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there is a serious question as to whether he’ll ever be able to manage a .250 wOBA in the majors.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you'

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

ugh

I think you’re being overly negative

Dayton Moore just traded a so-so minor league pitcher for a shortstop. What could possibly go wrong?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, they do have a good track record for evaluating the talent of position players…especially SS’s. So there’s that.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Joke aside

I really can’t believe how little chance Rosa got to do anything. What did we have to lose?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

In all seriousness, I really think this has to be about attitude/makeup/intangibles problems. I mean, they ran through pretty much the entire Omaha bullpen already, but didn’t call him up. And then they dump him for TPJ, Jr. I’m guessing he didn’t get along with coaches or something like that. And you know the Royals have zero tolerance for that….unless you are a talentless hack.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I always got the impression McClure liked him

but that might have just been typical interview stuff

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

McClure said great things about his talent

Don’t know about his coachability or anything like that.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Most used to think that I was too positive

Of course you see me as negative because you love to champion pure crap like Jose Guillen. Keep up the good work, kid.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, I just thought about that for a minute

So he’s a SS prospect who can’t hit a lick (no contact, on base or power skills shown in any stats so far), but is supposed to be a good fielder. But this good fielding SS has a weak arm? This leaves him with — drumroll please — great lateral movement. Now I love this trade.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pissed but happy for Rosa

He gets out of Dayton’s doghouse. Should be in the big leagues sooner than later. Good luck to you Carlos.

by trauty on May 1, 2010 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

the more flexible your pen is, the better

soon enough even DM will figure out not to give big money to middle relievers

but Rosa is better than a lot of the Royals pen, so DM is spending his currency on more toolsy guys

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean like TOMORROW?
Should be in the big leagues sooner than later.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Some bits of info

1. His first two minor league seasons were in rookie ball (that’s not so good)
2. He hasn’t hit well in rookie ball or low-A. Low OBP. Low SLG.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

BA from 2007

“Righthanded-hitting shortstop Reynaldo Navarro was the player to make the best impression last week in Puerto Rico. He was compared to Rey Ordonez for his easy, if flashy infield actions and skill with which he fields and throws.

"He swings the bat with some pop," the scout said. "He’s got some outer-half issues and he’s a little guy . . . but he has really performed well. He’s a high-energy guy.""

by WURoyal on May 1, 2010 10:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I wish he'd performed well in the U.S. since then

He hasn’t. Unless hitting is completely irrelevant. I don’t think it is.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

When your upside is Rey Ordonez

That isn’t good

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Weg gems!

(and an early retirement)

I sure look forward to this kid making it to KC.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

How much you want to bet

The scout just saw “Hispanic shortstop with the name Rey” = compare to Rey Ordonez

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

he probably saw that he sucked at hitting

and that sealed the comparison

if you suck at hitting, you are a fielding wizard, even if you have an error in every other game

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could have been Rey Sanchez

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on May 1, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

That sums it up perfectly

Dayton took young proven performance and turned it into young tools that have a growing history of not translating into performace. The Royals system got weaker with this deal. Bad move, Dayton.

Still, hope this means Carlos gets his shot. Tell him good luck from us, Minda!

"I think a tactical error might have been committed by the manager of the Royals"

by KSinDC on May 1, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would evaluate him by more than just that

1. I wouldn’t use ERA
2. I wouldn’t look at only one season
3. Tools do count for something

He’s a genuine prospect. I’m not talking about a lock to be a good MLBer. But he is a genuine prospect, and a prospect wasted by Moore.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think when you take kids like Gutz and Cortes with major issues

I can’t fault the organization for wanting to ship a kid out. That kind of behavior is a cancer.

by WURoyal on May 1, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unlike Roman Colon or Jose Guillen

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree those were indefensible moves.

Colon only cost a PTBNL though, not 36 million, so I have to say I would put up with Colon moreso.

by WURoyal on May 1, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's not the point though

Either this team tolerates clubhouse cancers, or they don’t. It doesn’t make sense to dump Daniel Gutierrez and Dan Cortes for behavior issues, only to take on Jose Guillen and Roman Colon (not to mention Alberto Callaspo or Rick Ankiel)

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess the argument could be made

that its more relevant with a young guy

I dont think it was a clubhouse thing, so much as a “this guy is going to waste his talent, lets bail” thing

by Freneau on May 1, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry but that “major issues” stuff is bullshit. They don’t have “major issues.” They have “20 year old douchebag” issues. And that is very common in prospects. That’s the kind of thing you deal with, period. You don’t trade them away for a bag of non-magic beans.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you in principle. I subscribe to the view that for everything we hear there are generally 4-5 incidents we don’t hear about.

by WURoyal on May 1, 2010 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I believe that even with those 4-5 incidents, the Royals overreacted and wasted talent on shit trades.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree wholeheartedly with NYRoyal here

Also, can we drop the shit about Colon being some kind of clubhouse cancer? He had a single incident YEARS ago, but people who’ve never met him and never will continue to define him by that once incident. He’s not that guy.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 1, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point about Colon

That incident was years ago, and isolated. His problem was strictly on-field performance. Guillen on the other hand is a pain in the ass on the field, in the dugout, in the clubhouse, in the tunnel, on the bus from the hotel, in the hotel, on the plane, in the airport…

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd forgive that list and more from Guillen

if he could play better.

And indeed, Colon’s not a very good pitcher, at least not in the Majors. But I will defend him as a person, because even though he’s a pain in the ass to me, he’s not a bad person at all.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 1, 2010 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sigh, yeah

But I’ve been friends with Colon since he got here in 07. I was leery of him because of the face-punching incident, but it didn’t take long to realize he shouldn’t be defined by that incident. I just wish everyone else would catch up on that.

Thus far, he’s an awful matchmaker. :-)

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's young for his level

But looks like he shouldn’t be at the level he is at, which renders it moot.

Color me unimpressed.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

What a surprise

Dayton trades a serviceable young reliever for a toolsy kid who hasn’t produced much. I see this ending well.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

not sure i understand this

rosa’s the type of guy you use in your bullpen…i do think at some point we need to get more hitters in the org, but this guy doesn’t sound like much.

like many of dayton’s moves, maybe the idea is solid but the execution is highly suspect.

"He once had an awkward moment, just to see how it felt...he lives vicariously...through himself- He is the most interesting man in the world"

by Home Run Tony Cogan on May 1, 2010 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Yea, its like there is a genesis of a good idea here, it just went horribly, horribly wrong

I’m all for this organization “getting younger”, but I was thinking more along the lines of trading over 28 year olds with only a year or two left on their contract, not a serviceable young reliever with six years of service time left.

And not for a toolsy shortstop who has demonstrated little ability to hit in a substantial number of PAs with apparently spotty defense.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jesus NYRoyal

90% of this thread is you complaining about this trade… Were you and Rosa lovers? I won’t tell!

by kansasjhawk044 on May 1, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually really liked him a lot as a prospect

But, for the record, there was a time when my complaining comments were 90% of every thread. Good times…

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rosa was good

would have cost about 1.2mm before arbitration and put up at least 10mm in value over that

by wildthang on May 1, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Mets can still offer him arb after this season

and, well, it’s the Mets, so…

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

They did cut Jacobs

They have to be given a little credit.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Relievers = middle infielders

Buckner for Callaspo (win)
Cordier for TPJ (win by default)
Cortes & Saito for YuBet (might be another WBD)
Rosa for Navarro

Well, Navarro was awesome in Jane’s Addiction

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Not a huge Bucker fan

but that’s not horrible in that park, and he’s had some HR/FB bad luck (xFIPs like him better, although tERA doesn’t, though it’s “early” for tRA this season). Still too many walks, but so far this season he’s doing a good job of getting GBs and striking a decent number of hitters out.

I’d rather have Bert, of course, but Buckner has his uses.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cordier has some command issues

But his numbers otherwise have been decent the last year and a half

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

some is a bit mild

that’d be like saying that Rick Ankiel has some problems with plate patience

Cordier isn’t gonna maintain his good ERA while putting up such a bad K:BB ratio

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont think

its a win by default if you pay a guy to put up negative WAR

by wildthang on May 1, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

if none of the guys who were on the other side of the trade make the majors

then how does that side win?

it’s not taking a lot for DM to lose on YuBet/TPJ, but he might pull those out

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Opportunity cost

Yuni literally has negative value. Having him on the team precludes you from playing someone else (not to mention you have to pay his salary)

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 1, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

+100

YOu don’t “win by default” when you trade for the right to pay money to a negative value player who is blocking an actually decent player like Aviles. Yuni is at least four kinds of negative (can’t hit, can’t field, costs money, blocks Aviles).

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you were pretty generous to Moore in some of those

And no mention of R. Ramirez and Leo Nunez?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mike Jacobs is a middle infielder?

notice any common link in the trades I mentioned?

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, but why limit our analysis to times in which Moore traded relievers for middle IFers. Let’s look at Moore’s haul when he traded away cheap, young, talented pitchers. With the exception of Callaspo (a win) and TPJ (a push), Moore got screwed on each trade.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Callaspo was a problem child at the time too

So Arizona was probably more than happy to be rid of him.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

He was

hitting his wife way better than he was hitting the ball.

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m glad we took that problem off your hands.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Glad that worked out for ya

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 3, 2010 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

honestly

dayton really believes pitching is the currency of baseball

I wonder what we’ll get for Montgomery

by Freneau on May 1, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just when

I get excited about a two-game win streak, Deyton goes and totally umm… what’s the opposite for redeems himself?

by powderbluepower on May 1, 2010 10:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Craps himself

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on May 1, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll keep

setting you up if you keep following through.

by powderbluepower on May 1, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're on

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on May 1, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Strike up another victory

for the Dayton Moore baseball position archetype theory.

by wildthang on May 1, 2010 10:55 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

It was obvious

that for some odd reason, Rosa was never going to see Kansas City as a Royal again. I don’t know why, but the number of other relievers the Royals brought up to try and right the bullpen mess without getting to the guy who’s had cups of coffee for two years…clearly, he wasn’t wanted.

Hopefully the new guy has a better chance of playing for us.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on May 1, 2010 10:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Rosa must have had a bad attitude

Attitude trumps talent (unless you are a shit player like Guillen and Colon) so he had to go.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rosa, Kila, Aviles...

I fully expect Mitch Maier to get traded the minute he goes two games without getting a hit

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Following the Royals is rarely boring or predictable.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on May 1, 2010 11:00 PM EDT reply actions  

So when does Gordon get traded?

And for what?

The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them. -- Albert Einstein

by The Ol' Perfesser on May 1, 2010 11:01 PM EDT reply actions  

A "20 year old" Dominican CF

Who can run and………….. well, run.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pop quiz: who does Kila get traded for this season?

A. A left-handed catcher who can’t hit, can’t field, but calls a good game and has a “catcher’s body”

B. A middle infielder with great “lateral movement” who can’t hit, strikes out a lot and doesn’t draw walks

C. A center fielder who can’t make contact, has no power, but is extremely fast

D. A lefty pitcher whose fastball tops out at 86, has one pitch, can’t find the strike zone and doesn’t induce groundballs.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:03 PM EDT reply actions  

HR's are selfish and fascist

A team player keeps the rally going with a single. Kila is a step closer to being traded…or perhaps released.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

And he rubbed in the shittiness

By taking a walk.

But hey, he’ll get 12AB’s in September, so it’s good.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You can’t get a single by drawing a walk. What the hell is this guy thinking? Clearly he can’t take instruction from the minor league coaches. Get this cancer the hell out of the organization!

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think he'll get traded

He might have a smidgen of value left. Rosa aside, the usual organizational strategy seems to be to bury a guy until most of his value is gone, then release him or trade him for $50.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Royals just let him go to minor league free agency.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

You'd think that they'd stop throwing him sliders

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 1, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

no no

slider-speed = shitty fastballs

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like D

we’re going to irrationally acquire a lefty specialist/starter anyday now

by Freneau on May 1, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Viva Zavada!

dude is probably injured or something, but he’s a lefty, and this

he probably wants out of Arizona right now anyways

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Injured and has been TERRIBLE

in Reno this year

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

WTF!

I think Dayton is TRYING to give himself no relief options. I think Rosa would help the team now, and this other kid is a longshot at best.

NY I vote A- and then the Royals trade Pena for b or c.

Stay Thirsty, My friends!

by KHAZAD on May 1, 2010 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Sounds like a plan

No, it sounds like a PROCESS.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

there's good and bad news for Rosa

good: he might make the majors
bad: he’ll be playing in Phoenix, in the summer, as a Hispanic

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:08 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Ye gods

Poor Rosa. He must have reeeeeeeeally ticked Dayton off. The man just signed his death warrant.

The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them. -- Albert Einstein

by The Ol' Perfesser on May 1, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

cmkeller, I'm setting you up:

How many decent Royals prospects does it take to get one decent major league Royals player?

by powderbluepower on May 1, 2010 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

One

once he’s in the hands of the other team

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on May 1, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

What Dayton Moore has purchased with the "currency of baseball"

I was going to write out the list, but I vomited all over my keyboard. Jacobs, Yuni, shit prospects. Oh god, it’s coming up again…

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Carlos Rosa doesn't have options left, right?

if we freak out over options for bad pitchers, imagine how we would have handled this for a good pitcher

or maybe we can just claim him on waivers later on in the year

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Well Rosa had an option exercised this year

…which makes him freely moveable from the majors to the minors and back again as many times as his organization likes in 2010.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

so

we’re gonna get him back in 2011 and watch him suck

actually, the D-Back reliever I want is Zavada. That mustache is hilarious

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dayton Moore would never claim Rosa on waivers

Moore clearly wanted to dump him, just get rid of him for whatever. And I really think Rosa will stick in the majors with another team. He’ll succeed. Write it down.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dayton also traded HoRam

before signing him for a few million

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I swear

Signing HoRam for $1.8m is the single most inexplicable thing I have ever seen a GM do.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

dude's gotta supplement his kids college fund

Dayton Moore, benefactor of expanding college education

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Somehow

Schaum ranks him #11 in the Royals system now.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 11:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Bizarre

Great defense, weak arm, some pop (of course that never translates to actual hitting in actual games). He doesn’t deserve top 20.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Schaum on Navarro from his website
Rey Navarro is a young SS that was taken in the 3rd round of the 2007 draft. He was the D-Backs #9 prospect according to BA in 2008, #10 in 2009, and #12 this season. He will not turn 21 until the end of the season and will be assigned to Wilmington. From what I can take he is a rangy SS that has made a ton of errors. His arm projects well at SS but his first 2 seasons he averaged an error every 2 games. He is a switch hitter but has been much more effective from the left side. The Royals will have to be patient with him but if you paid attention to my ultimate 25 man roster post on this site you would see that SS is the weakest position in the organization. Navarro is listed at 5′10 170 and carries a career line of .257, 305, .340, .645 with 4 HR, 1o1 rbi, 37-55 sb-cs, 221 k’s 66 walks in 1130 plate appearances. He was hitting .241, .307,.329, .636 for Visalia in the Cal league this season.

It should be important to note that former Royals assistant GM Muzzy Jackson is now with the Diamondbacks and he was the guy that drove the Callaspo for Billy Buckner trade a couple of seasons ago. I would imagine he played an integral part in this trade.

One more thing…every month I will re-order my top 40 prospect list (it should be up Monday night with changes and a heads up on Navarro who will be at #11

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:41 PM EDT reply actions  

  1. in the Royals system? I’m sorry Greg, but that’s a joke. The Royals have some genuine prospects in their top 20. It sounds like this guy has maybe two tools and absolutely no production as a professional baseball player.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

and Navarro is gonna play in death valley for hitters

hope that doesn’t mess with his approach to fielding

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's playing

In the Helium California League this year. And sucking.

by kcbottom9th on May 1, 2010 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hitting .241/.307/.329 in the California League is just hilarious. This guy really is TPJ all over again. I have a feeling that Rey-of-the-great-lateral-movement would hit .269/.316/.341 on the moon.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

So who does Omar dump to stay ahead in

“The Contest”.

Coffee. The NEW Performance Enhancing drug for Sport's Writers. Just ask Ken Rosenthal.

by 306008 on May 1, 2010 11:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Omar's gotta bring Neifi back now

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 1, 2010 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sooo, from reading these replies

I take it that this guy is a younger Yuni?

A bad baseball player, but could fix a house with all the tools he has.

Awesome.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on May 1, 2010 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I really think he's more TPJ than Yuni

Yuni actually had some hitting tools once upon a time. TPJ was described as a great fielder who just somehow made a lot of errors. He was also described as a hitter with “some pop” who just didn’t quite show the results in the minors. That is pretty much exactly what I’ve read about Navarro from a handful of sources over the past hour.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 1, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just tried to look up Callaspo's stats to show a positive...

But it’s a no-go. Sure, Callaspo spent essentially three years each at AA and AAA (plus some .188/.235/.188 time at Omaha) before coming to the majors, but his bat was legitimate and he didn’t make an error every two games like Navarro does. The scouts must see something great here and must be willing to develop him because nothing sticks out as “Pick me, pick me! I’ll be a league-average SS someday, I promise!”

by MinnesotaRoyal on May 1, 2010 11:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I have a feeling that Navarro’s realistic ceiling is a good fielding utility IFer in the majors. But I’d bet a month’s pay that he never plays a game in the majors.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd take that bet

Moore will over-promote him at some point

by Freneau on May 2, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm totally in.

One month of your salary vs. one month of mine!

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

best case on Navarro

2010: Wilmington
2011: Springdale
2012: Omaha/KC

He has to have some attachment to the major leagues by 2012, or he’s gone as a six year minor league free agent.

But then again, there’s a shot that Rosa isn’t in the DBacks organization by 2012 either

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 2, 2010 12:10 AM EDT reply actions  

keep in mind that

Navarro would have to be attached to the 40 man by the time he is 22, which should tell you something if you’re considering sending your kid to the Puerto Rico Baseball Academy. He might be drafted so young that he’s gonna switch organizations before he’s 25.

It’d be awesome if errors were broken down by type too. Just so we know how many errors get credited to a shortstop if the first baseman can’t handle the throw or something

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 2, 2010 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Aviles is 29

I think some people just don’t realize that.

Anyways, never hurts to keep the warehouse stocked

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 2, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, realistically he's only here for 2-3 years more at most

and probably not at SS by the end of that.

THis move does NOT fix that problem though.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

ouch

Man you guts are quick

now I still am standing behind my #11 ranking (mostly due to the fact that BA has had him in the top 12 *and top 10 once in the D-Backs system the last 3 years

But, I just finished that an hour or so ago…I have not spoken with any other baseball people yet so when i make my adjustments he could fall from 11…but at 1st glance 11 seems right to me…I will ask you this if I am crazy for having him at 11 is baseball america absolutely bonkers for having him in the AZ top 12 the last 3 years?

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 12:44 AM EDT reply actions  

From what I know, the Arizona farm system is much weaker than the KC farm

Granted, I’m not a pro in the area, but everything I’ve heard shows Arizona as having one of the 3-4 worst farm systems in baseball and KC having one of the top 10 or 15. That’s not to say that we don’t need SS in the system, but I think that moving him up in ranking from their system to our’s might be a stretch.

And you’re right that stats aren’t everything, but they’re representative of how he’s done so far. You said yourself that he commits an error every two games and that is something that will take time to smooth over. He’s going to Wilmington, though, which is where I think some great development happens within the system. It could really help him break through, but I just don’t know what his scouting report says, so I have to look at stats to get any measurement.

by MinnesotaRoyal on May 2, 2010 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

his first 2 seasons

He made one error every 2 games

The report (just sent to me)

 he will make the amazing play but often makes errors that make you go HMMM! the reason he does not position himself well and that is because he is still trying to increase his baseball IQ. But, the kid can be electric and his swing is good but he gets himself out to often…again baseball IQ. He is 20 Greg so tell your Royals friends that they are getting a nice player and not giving up a ton to get him. Rosa is very hittable and the late movement he once had on his pitches has basically disappeared. He has leveled out and has not gone back to back games all season. He is not resilient enough to be taken seriously as a RP. I wonder if the Diamondbacks will consider moving him back to the rotation…

  • Ok, I should have posted this on my site only but I thought I would share because this site has been so good to me (group hug)

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for passing that along

That really helps. Again, I think we have a couple good clubs in Wilmington and NW Arkansas that can really help him improve that baseball IQ. I just don’t want to get my hopes up on him until he shows some progress. It just doesn’t seem like there’s been a lot of progress so far, but, as everyone says, he’s still really young and has plenty of time to improve.

by MinnesotaRoyal on May 2, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I really hate the idea of trying to teach baseball IQ.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on May 2, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

What I hate even more than that

is the notion that the Royals are teaching anyone about baseball IQ.

Hating life as a Royals fan 365 days a year at Royalscentricity

by Old Man Duggan on May 2, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Even better point.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on May 2, 2010 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

he will make the amazing play but often makes errors that make you go HMMM! the reason he does not position himself well and that is because he is still trying to increase his baseball IQ. But, the kid can be electric and his swing is good but he gets himself out to often…

Isn’t that a good description of Tony Pena, Jr. both in the minors and as a KC Royal?

Rosa is very hittable and the late movement he once had on his pitches has basically disappeared.

I wonder how he’s managed more than a K per inning so far this year.

I’d bet anyone that Rosa’s career MLB WAR will exceed Navarro’s by a factor of 10. Or probably by a factor of infinity, as Navarro will probably never sniff the majors.

I’m sorry, I’m just an amateur scout, but I don’t buy this at all. Yet another “nice player” middle IFer who has a “nice swing” but somehow never manages to hit. Never. And makes spectacular defensive plays, but also a lot of mistakes. Has great upside, but never comes close to realizing that mythical potential.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

A question, Greg

If the person who gave you that information wants to remain anonymous that’s fine, but can you tell me generally what he does? Is he someone who works for a prospect website like BA or the like? Or a scout? Or a front office employee? Someone in the Royals organization?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Greg

I think everyone on here is quick to hate the trade because they like Rosa, even though they don’t have any clue whether he’d actually be a decent ML pitcher.

by WURoyal on May 2, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record, no one ever knows if any minor leaguer will succeed in the majors.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but you’re making a distinction without a difference.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Club officials and scouts actually see a guy pitch, thus they may not know if a guy is going to make it, but they have a clue.

Guys who don’t see someone pitch, such as yourself, myself, etc really don’t have a clue.

by WURoyal on May 2, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, that's just as wrong

as what he said, so I’ll just let you two slug it out.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

What if you got current scouting evaluations of Montgomery that said he has suddenly become very hittable and has lost velocity and decreased control. Would that mean that he’s done? That he’s no longer a good prospect, now and forever?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Suddenly, no. But if over the course of several months, including spring training Monty was not throwing very good stuff it would substantially impact his status as a prospect. Same as it did Rosa.

This isn’t a sudden issue. Rosa was never 1/10 of the prospect Monty is either.

In the end the real determination is whether your pitching staff and scouts think the likelihood is of it being a permanent issue. I’d defer to them.

by WURoyal on May 2, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

How long has Rosa lost velocity? His fastball was at the same average velocity in 2009 as 2008 according to Pitch f/x. Do we know that his velocity was down in ST? By how much? What is your source? (I’m not attacking. It may have been down; I just didn’t hear about it.)

In the end the real determination is whether your pitching staff and scouts think the likelihood is of it being a permanent issue. I’d defer to them.

Without getting into the wisdom of always deferring to scouting opinion, I’ll focus on this case. Would you really defer to the Royals scouts? Have they earned that kind of deference with their track record?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

And this is why I'm questioning your... balance right now.
It may have been down; I just didn’t hear about it.

Exactly. You didn’t hear about it, and because you didn’t hear about it you’re immediately leaping off Mount Everest to the conclusion that this was a hare-brained clusterfuck of a trade, and that we’ve just traded off a good prospect for a pile of dung.

It would be one thing if you’d merely questioned it, but you’ve expended a whole slew of comments on this virtually frothing at the mouth over this move. Challenging those who assert flatly that Rosa was a waste? That wouldn’t faze me; it’s valid. But you’ve been going after people who recognize there might be something to this, also, and that’s not rational. Because you don’t know whether the guy’s got a fork sticking out of his back or not.

Might this come back to bite us in the ass? Yup. The coaching staff might feel that he was clearly regressing, and if that’s the case and they’re wrong, that says something about the coaching staff. If he’s damaged goods, on the other hand… well, you got something for him.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly. You didn’t hear about it, and because you didn’t hear about it you’re immediately leaping off Mount Everest to the conclusion that this was a hare-brained clusterfuck of a trade, and that we’ve just traded off a good prospect for a pile of dung.

It’s not like I don’t read obsessively about the Royals. And go to message boards and fan sites. I haven’t read a thing about it. In all of the talk about Rosa, no one said (by the way, his FB velocity down in Arizona). So how did I miss it? I don’t think I did.

But you’ve been going after people who recognize there might be something to this, also, and that’s not rational. Because you don’t know whether the guy’s got a fork sticking out of his back or not.

And neither do they. Get it? I have an opinion about Rosa. None of us know if Rosa is done. I’m disagreeing with their certitude that he’s suddenly shit. That he’ll never again show a plus fastball. That his good slider is suddenly just ok. That his command is suddenly awful and always will be. That he’ll never be able to pitch on back-to-back days.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

"So how did I miss it?"

Simply put, perhaps because nobody said it publicly.

I’m disagreeing with their certitude that he’s suddenly shit.

You left a sentence out of your quote from me which is precisely the reason I think you’ve totally lost your shit over this and need to sit back and calm down:

Challenging those who assert flatly that Rosa was a waste? That wouldn’t faze me; it’s valid.

You ignored those two sentences, then used the rest to make a point which is completely invalid from a logical basis. People who think that there may be something to this move that we just don’t know about are absolutely, positively NOT displaying any certitude about anything. Yet you’re howling and scrapping with those people, too, simply for suggesting that it may be the case… this, despite the fact that “something’s wrong with him” is actually the more reasonable conclusion one can draw from the available evidence.

You’re going berserk over a wish, man. You’re upset because he might just be having a bad month. That’s not rational.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

People who think that there may be something to this move that we just don’t know about are absolutely, positively NOT displaying any certitude about anything.

Have you actually read this thread? There aren’t people in this thread saying that Rosa sucks? That he’s hittable, has no control, can’t pitch back-to-back,etc.? They aren’t simply saying, “hey there maybe a serious problem with Rosa.” They are saying he’s a poor prospect, based largely on his stuff/control in April.

You’re going berserk over a wish, man. You’re upset because he might just be having a bad month. That’s not rational.

Rosa may be completely screwed up now and forever. Or any problems may be temporary. I don’t knjow. It’s irrational to think that he might have had a bad month? What in the world are you talking about?

My problem is that people are saying Rosa isn’t good anymore because of what scouts saw of him April. Is it irrational for me to not completely change my mind about a player based on one month’s scouting report?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, for crying out loud.
Have you actually read this thread? There aren’t people in this thread saying that Rosa sucks?

I’ve already acknowledged that, and WORSE, you QUOTED IT ALREADY. My point is that it’s one thing to tear into people flat-out saying he sucks, and another entirely to argue with everyone who doesn’t share YOUR certitude that this was a shitty trade.

In fact, your continued insistence that just because YOU don’t know about any lingering long-term problems means we should assume there AREN’T any is just as off-kilter and illogical as people stating flatly that Rosa sucks.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

In fact, your continued insistence that just because YOU don’t know about any lingering long-term problems means we should assume there AREN’T any is just as off-kilter and illogical as people stating flatly that Rosa sucks.

Actually I don’t think I’ve said and I certainly don’t mean that Rosa definitely doesn’t have any long-term problems. In fact, I believe I’ve repeatedly asked people if these April problems are going to be long-term. The point there being that we don’t know. As I’ve said, it could be. There could be a major injury there or something else causing a long-term, significant loss of velocity and control. Or it could be minor, and/or shor-term. We don’t know.

My problem has been people pointing to April scouting reports saying that Rosa isn’t pitching well and apparently concluding, “well, there you go. Rosa just isn’t a good pitcher anymore.” I think one month’s scouting reports is insufficient information from which to draw that conclusion. Now the Royals may have drawn their conclusions about Rosa based on knowledge of an injury, and/or velocity down throughout ST as well as April in Omaha. But we don’t know. Maybe the Royals did this because their scouts are in love with Navarro and it’s not so much about Rosa.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're still not getting this, though.

I have no problem with you knocking down the people who are assuming this inherently means Rosa’s no good anymore.

But there have been people in this thread merely saying that there might be justification for the move… and you’re struggling with them as well. If you tell someone who says “Rosa sucks” they’re full of shit, that’s completely rational.

If, on the other hand, you respond to someone who says “Well, his velocity’s down, his command is off, his control is shot… well, if they’re convinced he’s not going to recover, then getting rid of him is logical” by telling them they’re full of shit, then you’re not being sound. Because it IS logical. It may not be right, because our staff may be a bunch of incompetent boobs. But we’re not talking about a small sample size of bad results here. It’s not like giving up on a guy just because he hit .212 in April. We’re talking about a deterioration in actual skills… you know, the things which lead to results. And if those skills are decaying, and you’re going to draw one conclusion or another from this information, the more logical assumption of the two is that there’s an actual problem. That doesn’t mean it’s the correct assumption, which is the actual point I think you’re trying to drill home here. But it IS the more logical.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

If, on the other hand, you respond to someone who says "Well, his velocity’s down, his command is off, his control is shot… well, if they’re convinced he’s not going to recover, then getting rid of him is logical" by telling them they’re full of shit, then you’re not being sound. Because it IS logical

Did I do that? I don’t think I did.

And then there’s the open question of how different Rosa’s skills are now as opposed to 2009 or 2008. And then the issue of what that means. If there is a significant difference, is that long-term skill deteroriation or merely a short-term difference, perhaps because of something minor (like a minor injury or a change in mechanics).

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was simply using your own analysis.

The issue per Schaum is movement.

Would I trust to the Royals scouts? Absolutely. I don’t think the current Royals scouts have been proven to be poor.

by WURoyal on May 2, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, Scott's got a valid point there, though

I mean, these are the scouts who think Yuni’s a good ballplayer with great hands and awesome lateral movement.

Neither side of this argument is exactly certain about anything.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many bad calls do the Royals scouts have to make before you stop deferring to their opinion? Don’t you think the Royals scouts like Colon, Mendoza, HoRam, Ponson, Farnsworth, Yabuta, Wright, etc., etc.?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

So does "don't have a clue" mean that we have no meaningful information about his future prospects?

If so, you are laughably wrong. If you are arguing that the only people who “have a clue” about whether a prospect will succeed are those who see the prospect with their own eyes, then you are foolish.

Stats are irrelevant. Getting scouting information second hand is meaningless. Those aren’t “clues” at all.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh...

Is he?

If I look at a guy’s MLEs and projections, and it looks like he’s going to be a star, do I not have a clue? Of course not. His MLEs and projections ARE a clue.

But I most certainly do not KNOW.

The scouting eye, however, is also a clue. And there IS a difference between not knowing and not having a clue.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

We had the #1 farm system in the majors in 2007.

We promoted some guys that year and gutted the top of the system in 2008 in the Dan Haren trade, and then had pretty lackluster drafts in 2007 and 2008. Since our 2009 draft was kickass, pretty much all our best prospects are now Hi-A or below.

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also,

Navarro was about to be passed on the SS depth chart by Chris Owings, who can field AND hit. (2009 draft pick) He was already behind Stephen Drew, Tony Abreu, and Pedro Ciriaco, so he was about to be only our 5th best organizational SS.

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

unless the Dbacks are super aggressive with their prospects

i don’t think there was any danger of getting passed by Owings THIS YEAR.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why?

Owings is 2 years younger and has an .845 OPS at Mid-A South Bend and a .953 fielding %. Navarro has NEVER had numbers like either of those, and has a .636 OPS in the hitter-friendly California League.

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 3:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think doublestix is talking about Owings passing Navarro in the system (like to a higher level) which would be super aggressive based on his age.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I know.

Well, I guess the answer is yes, we ARE super aggressive about prospects. Cesar Valdez is an example, as is Josh Collmenter. Justin Upton, Mark Reynolds, Jordan Norberto and Brian Augenstein were all promoted over the past few years from AA to the Majors. Paul Goldschmidt went from Rookie ball to High-A, etc.

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO KELLY JOHNSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by DbacksSkins on May 2, 2010 3:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I will ask you this if I am crazy for having him at 11 is baseball america absolutely bonkers for having him in the AZ top 12 the last 3 years?

That’s a fair point. But I don’t know how good AZ’s system is. It seemed to me that the Royals system was pretty deep and that at least the top 15 was pretty damn good. So he’s better than whom? He’s a better prospect than Dwyer, Kila, Blake Wood, Ty Sample, Jordan Parraz, Gia and Cuthbert? Really? He’s a better prospect than ALL of those guys? I don’t see it at all. And what are his tools? Let’s say fielding and arm (despite his errors). Speed? Perhaps. But contact and power? Nope. If he had those tools, wouldn’t they be represented in his stat line somewhere? Anywhere? And no plate discipline either. No sign of it.

I realize that tools and upside potential are more important in evaluating a prospect than stats, but are stats irrelevant? This kid has done absolutely nothing. He hasn’t hit a lick so far (including repeating rookie ball). He makes errors like crazy. But this doesn’t take the shine off of his apple, and he still deserves essentially the same rank year after year. When should I start worrying about him? When he’s been promoted to AAA in a couple years and he still hasn’t hit at all?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I should be having this argument on my site

But, absolutely better then Parraz…Dwyer is moving into my top 10 so scratch that…I love Gio but his glove is an issue (although I have been getting better reports and I will see for myself soon) Cuthbert has a long way to go…the promise is there but the promise was there with this kid when he was 14…that is when he entered the PR academy…
Sample and Wood is a solid argument and I will (like I have said) strongly consider all of this b4 i make my final move…but, like I said at first glance (if you have seen my list) he slots into that spot

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

one more thing

I think we often step on our toes when it comes to stats…they are very important but they need to meet scouting in the middle…there is a upside to this kid and it is the weakest position in the KC system….

so, step away from the stats for just a bit and try and research what baseball people say about him

I am in no way…dismissing stats…so please do not take it that way…But, the kid is 20 years old and was a 3rd round pick that some scouts believe still is learning the game…Hilton Richardson one of my favorite prospects is much older and is still learning the game…other guys there age are not…but, let’s see what happens

by the way….I have been drinking

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 12:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Come ON, Greg.

Drinking and posting here is totally against the rules. ;)

But I agree with you actually. I’m waiting to pass judgment on the trade until I see what Navarro can do. He’s young. I’m willing to give him time, even though I’m sad to lose a friend in Carlos.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

"Drinking and posting here is totally against the rules. ;)"

Shit, I’ve been breaking the rules for three years now?

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 6:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

ive never understood

Why is the round he was drafted in come up multiple years after?

And shouldn’t recent results outweigh past scouting opinions? That is why I can never understand how some guys with far superior stats in aaa get leapfrogged by guys with shitty ones from aa. It seems to me that the organization falls in love with the prospect/high draft pick and uses information from multiple years ago instead of the current situation.

The common arguement I hear is age. Something along the lines of the guy in aaa who is tearing it up should tear it up because he’s in his prime. Well fuck let him do well in the majors if he is in his prime! Just because you let a guy play in kc doesn’t mean you have to keep him for a decade! If the guy is in his late 20s or whatever get his prime years in the bigs and then cut/waive/send him down if he doesn’t perform. I feel like the royals have a formula where they bring the guy straight from aa when he’s young just so their big prospect can have a shot to pan out and play for a decade when in reality he should be in aaa and the guy in aaa should get the shot.

At least Wally Joyner's not on the team....

by tcon125 on May 2, 2010 2:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Drinking

sorry…I forget kids are on this board…I am drinking apple juice

I

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 12:55 AM EDT reply actions  

But of course!

One week from now, i will be free from this stupid dry campus and will be drinking plenty of…apple juice….every time I come around this site.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

By the way, speaking of tools and upside, let's talk about Carlos Rosa

An excellent live fastball and a very, very good slider. And he pitches with decent control. Those are some pretty damned good tools, and he’s actually shown something in the way of performance on the field, as reflected by his stat lines. And he’s major league ready right now. What makes Navarro a better prospect than Rosa? Because Navarro’s upside is Rey Ordonez? I mean, let’s be serious now. Navarro’s upside potential does not include any major league middle IFer who can actually hit at a decent level. I mean we can dream about it, but that’s not just realistic. That’s lottery ticket mentality. It’s fun to dream, but you’re not going to win. Rosa could be a good setup man or even a potential closer in my opinion.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:03 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s so cute when you stop by to drop your mini-snark bombs. Thanks for your contribution.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for your inside information

And so timely too.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

By the way, on Rosa's decrease in velocity

When did this happen? And where did you get the info?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

when the stadium gun has Blake Wood hitting 95, which is where he was according to pitch f/x in spring training, then Rosa constantly at 90 or 91, that sends up red flags all over the place.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

And this is going to be a long-term thing for Rosa?

His avg. fastball velocity was a little over 94 mph in both 2008 and 2009 according to Pitch f/x. But from seeing some velocities in April 2010, you know his velocity is gone for the long-term now? Please. You’ve given up on him because he is no longer a Royal. That’s your M.O.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

you're right

it’s not a concern at all

you’ve outed me.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh it is certainly a concern

But you didn’t just say his velocity is a concern. You’re saying he sucks. His fastball sucks. His slider sucks. He has no control. He’s crap. Why is he crap all of the sudden to you? Because the Royals traded him. And you love to support Royals moves and argue that it somehow makes the organization better.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

it's getting sad now

you really think I like watching the Royals get fucked by bad moves these past three years? you think I LIKE that? I pour my god damn heart into this team, for better or worse (and it’s been for worse). I’ve wanted out shithole GM gone for well over a year now. but I’m willing to give praise when it’s due (I liked signing Ankiel, ZOMG!), and I’m willing to call a spade a spade.

and Rosa is a spade.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

You want this team to be good so badly that you want to believe as many DM moves as possible were actually good for the organization. You’ve certainly defended a ton of them on this site. YOu don’t defend every single one. But you sure love to convince yourself that the guy the Royals gave up was crap (Nunez, R. Ramirez, Rosa, etc.) and what the Royals got was really good! (Jacobs, Crisp, Navarro, etc.).

There is no question in my mind that if I would have asked you about Rosa yesterday, you would have said a bunch of positive things, with some concerns. But you would have been optimistic that Rosa was going to get his velocity back and that he’d be back to 100% in no time. You wouldn’t have said he sucked yesterday. Yesterday he was a good Royals prospect in your mind. Today he sucks. What has changed? I’ll let you figure that out.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

you're wrong

I said he sucked Thursday night. said he looked awful and couldn’t command worth crap. you wanna see it?

http://www.royalstalk.com/forums/content.php?137-Omaha-Observations-from-4-29

Carlos Rosa came into relief and he was terrible. Just so hittable it was unbelievable. Threw one excellent changeup for a strikeout on a 3-2 pitch.

I gave him credit for throwing a really good pitch on a 3-2 count to end the top of the 6th inning. but otherwise he was bad. it was the exact same thing earlier in the season too, but I didn’t write about it anywhere so I guess I have no “proof” for you.

and no I didn’t like the Jacobs trade. I loved the Crisp trade and will defend it to this day. hell, I doubt this new guy will turn out to be anything, but I’d rather see what he can do than Rosa at this point.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

You said he looked bad in that outing

But that didn’t completley change your opinion of Rosa did it? I mean you’re not the kind of amateur scout who completely changes their opinion of a player based on 12 innings, right?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

if a pitcher looks dramatically different over a 12 inning stretch

to the point that they are throwing with decreased velocity, and poorer command, combined with a reported inability to pitch on back to back days – it would not be unreasonable to assume that there may or may not be some sort of serious issue, whether injury or otherwise. also, a lot of the positive things written about rosa were due to his projectability, or the idea that he would improve over time – which he has not done over the past couple seasons…..

-

by slayor on May 2, 2010 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

it would not be unreasonable to assume that there may or may not be some sort of serious issue, whether injury or otherwise

It wouldn’t be unreasonable to think that there may be a serious issue. It would be unreasonable to assume that there is a serious issue. You and I have no idea. None. You’re basically saying that even though his fastball averaged over 94 mph in both 2008 and 2009, one month of decreased velocity means that his fastball is done and that he now sucks. Let’s give up on him and acquire a toolsy, no-hit A-ball shorstop.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

my opinion on Rosa started to change last year

I gave him the benefit of the doubt over the winter because of his track record. what I’m seeing now is just confirming that my gut feeling might have indeed been right, and that the guy is going down hill.

does he SUCK? No. somewhat hyperbole. he got to AAA after all and even got a few cups of joe. but he’s not a good prospect at this point. i’d strongly bet against him having a good ML career.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

So now he doesn't suck?

Man your opinion of Rosa changes not only from month to month but from hour to hour. I’ll check back with you at the bottom of the hour to see how you feel then. ;)

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

reading is yo friend!
hell, I doubt this new guy will turn out to be anything

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 3:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

So basically we traded away a guy who has shown ability at some point. Who has shown production at various times in his career. Who has made the Major Leagues (and certainly will again), for a next to no-hoper playing above his station in A Ball (and the Cal league at that).

What a great trade.

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

And that is the positive way to spin this trade.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you have blinders on

And I don’t blame you with what the Royals have done lately

But, you seem to be only listening to your own thoughts right now..and that is fine as the trade just happened

But, if you want to be a scout you have to put the stat sheet down and use your eyes…there is enough bad reports on Rosa…and you are ignoring *even the e-mail I just shared of the potential of this 20 year old kid tat would be a sophomore in college right now

potential also equals your beloved Cheslor Cuthbert that can not hit a solid off speed
pitch to save his life right now

btw I am e-mailing you

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 1:20 AM EDT reply actions  

I am a little tunnel vision-y on this one at the moment. Part of it is because it is in the context of what look like a lot of other bad moves from the Royals. If this were in isolation, I’d be more open minded about it. Another part is that Rosa was my Royals pitching prospect man crush. Hopefully there were a lot of bad reports on Rosa and good reports on Navarro, and not by the Royals scouts who loved Farnsworth and Colon and disliked J.P. Howell. Oh and I hope the positive reports on Navarro didn’t come from the guys who loved TPJ…and Rey Ordonez.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tunnel-visiony and

totally manic. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you make as many first-level comments before as you have made to this post. It’s like you’re a chicken and someone just chopped your head off. ;)

The sad part is, it just doesn’t matter. We don’t matter. They don’t care.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 6:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

You know we've been told all about potential by scouts for years.

When it comes to the Royals you’re better off not believing it.

What did we hear about Brett Tomko last year from a scout? Something about winning 15+ games? There’s the infamous “You’ll remember this day for the rest of your life” from Art Stewart about Lubanski or some other crap prospect that didn’t pan out. The team history is littered with this stuff, so sorry if we don’t trust whoever you talked to. If it was a Royals scout, he genuinely believes it and is wrong, and if it’s another team’s scout, he’s just talking up the Royals so they will want to trade with his team in the future. All the other scouts are laughing at DM behind his back.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fuck you Dayton Moore!!!!

You aren’t worth a shit and I’m tired of all your bullshit deals fucking up this club. I will admit I’ve had many beers, but Dayton Moore must be shitcanned right now!!!!!

Yes, I'm still alive. Sorry to disappoint you.

by royaldaddy on May 2, 2010 1:22 AM EDT reply actions  

You conclusion is a rational one

…whether you’ve been drinking or not. He’s got to go, like yesterday. I wish it would have been yesterday.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

With all the shitty players we have

Moore sends out one guy that I happen to personally think could be a big part of this organization in the near future. The guy has to go. Maybe I thought a little too much of Carlos Rosa and Dan Cortes, but I was sure that they would be decent in KC and look at the return we’ve gotten for those two arms. Worthless shortstops with GMDM stamped all over them. I’m so fed up with this club. Your Kansas City Royals, the team I hate to love.

Yes, I'm still alive. Sorry to disappoint you.

by royaldaddy on May 2, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

The thing about Cortes

Isn’t Cortes.

Danny Cortes could retire tomorrow and the Royals lost that trade massively. They paid a financial and talent cost (however good that talent is) for a player who actively makes the team worse, with his bat and with his glove.

Seriously, in any other industry if you deliberately harm your employer you are out the door before your feet touch the ground. And that is basically what Moore did with Cortes/Yuni, and has done with numerous other moves also.

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why is the dude not gone?

I will answer my own question. Glass is the worst owner in history. He doesn’t give a shit. That’s the new Wal-Mart way right? As long as you’re making money, fuck everbody else. I’m sick and tired of this bullshit. I need to take a breath and stop drinking beers, but I’m fucking tired of being laughed at by MLB. There is no reason why we couldn’t be in contention sometime this century other than sheer incompetence. Moore has to go!!!

Fire Dayton Moore Now!!!!!!!!!

by royaldaddy on May 2, 2010 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think this trade sucks.

High-potential back-end-bullpen power relief arm for a toolsy, no-performance shortstop.

This will work out.

Classic Dayton.

by Royals Nation on May 2, 2010 1:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I, for one, am excited that this means more Josh Rupe this summer

Rosa was probably destined to middle relief, which is a disappointment considering how he projected a couple years ago. But he was near major league ready at a position of need.

Navarro is at least not Paulo Orlando — he’s an actual prospect, albeit not a not very good one, and like so many other prospects, he really needs a major breakthrough just to make the majors. The Royals at least get two years before he has to be added to the 40-man roster (and he has played so little in full season ball that he might get four option years after that). Unfortunately, at this point in his career, Navarro has the deadly combination of lacking contact skills, patience, and power. It sounds like he has good range but prone to mistakes. Good grief, this does sound like a 20-year-old version of Tony Pena Jr.

by Gopherballs on May 2, 2010 1:57 AM EDT reply actions  

I am stealing this a bit

But, Alcides Escobar was once a questionable prospect making a ton of errors with the Brew Crew

just saying ….not saying it proves anything

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 2:02 AM EDT reply actions  

OK, I'll admit my post above was a bit reactionary

….but I wouldn’t have made this move. Is it a high-risk, high-reward gamble? I think so. And perhaps Dayton believed our bullpen wasn’t going to be average anyway, even with Rosa, but I still think he’s a potential bonafide back-end arm. And I believe Navarro is a long, long, long ways from being a worthwhile major leaguer. Classic tools vs. ability debate, in my opinion (though Rosa himself could be deemed toolsy). That isn’t my style. I value production, even at the minor league level. Cutting down on those errors and improving that plate discipline will be a momentous task.

by Royals Nation on May 2, 2010 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's nice to hope I guess

But for every Escobar, how many never click it all into place? 10? 20?

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Plus all of the other shortstops

who were, you know, good in the low minors and still never made it.

by Gopherballs on May 2, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Carlos Rosa sucks

the single most overrated prospect i’ve seen among royals fans for the last 2 years. just like the backup QB. doesn’t throw strikes, doesn’t even throw ridiculously hard anymore, and can’t even throw on back to back days. i’d be stunned if he has a mediocre career in the majors. floored actually.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:18 AM EDT reply actions  

You are such an apologist for Dayton Moore and everything this organization does. In spring training, I’m sure you were singing Rosa’s praises. As Dayton Moore kept overlooking him for the Royals awful bullpen, I’m sure your tune started to change. Have to stay in line with the Royals front office. Now that the Royals have traded him, “he sucks.” And when the Royals trade Kila, you’ll say he sucks too. If the Royals traded Montgomery, you’d talk about his attitude problems.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

this is fucking hilarious

you’re right, i’m fine with Moore fucking this organization over with terrible moves. I enjoy watching the Royals lose.

of course, unlike you, I’ve seen Rosa pitch. I’ve seen him top 90 like three times this year. I’ve seen him command his fastball worth dick. guy comes in last Thursday and immediately gives up a bomb on a 90 MPH fastball. this “plus slider” that you deem he has, well, don’t even know where to start there. guy has gone backwards for two years now.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

So all of the sudden he sucks this year?

So last year he didn’t suck and this year he’s magically changed? You ranked him the Royals #16 prospect this offseason. I read your write-up about him. There was nothing about him sucking in there. It’s amazing how your opinion of Rosa has totally changed based on whatever you’ve seen of him in his 12 innings pitched this season. He started “sucking” the second you heard that the Royals traded him.

. this "plus slider" that you deem he has, well, don’t even know where to start there. guy has gone backwards for two years now.

Going backwards for the last two years? Somehow you left that out of your write-up about him too. You described him having a “sharp slider.” You didn’t say it sucked. You didn’t express any reservations about it. Any reason you kept all of this knowledge a secret?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

it's not a terrible pitch, no

but he can’t locate it worth crap anymore. it’s sharp, yes. but when it’s never a strike, then that’s a problem, is it not?

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

So everything has changed in 12 innings?

He was a good prospect in the offseason and now your opinion has completely changed. That is extremely convenient. Well timed, ’stix.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes

everything. you got me again.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whew

I’m glad we got that cleared up.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rosa

WAS NOT THE ANSWER. People laughed at the Royals because he was our highest rated pitching prospect before we drafted the likes of Montgomery, Melville, et al.

The guy had a “plus” fastball with no command, zero breaking stuff. He is not the reliever equivalent of Kila Ka’aihue. He is not the reliever equivalent of Mike Aviles. He’s just a guy who Royals fans attached themselves to like all fans do when your AAA team is full of replacement players. Just because this guy was labeled the “next one” doesn’t mean that it was right. Look at Pimentel! Where was the love for that guy when his game went to hell? We as soon forgot about him almost as fast as we forgot about Craig Brazell.

Look, at one point, Rosa was a big bullpen prospect in most Royals fans eyes, but that doesn’t mean that Dayton Moore isn’t right in trading him. But..but..but but he traded Cortes and Saito for Betancourt! Howell for Gathright!

I think we should just be happy that we actually GOT SOMETHING in return for a guy who was well on his way to being released.

http://www.royalskingdom.blogspot.com

by kcdynasty on May 2, 2010 5:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

How do you K 10 per 9

Without throwing strikes, like he did last year.

Why is he still striking out more people this year than his career average?

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Robinson Tejeda throws Strikes 61% of the time through his career

What about Joakim Soria, who we all fellate for his pinpoint precision? 64%

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well said

And Rosa’s strikeouts are meaningless.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

And Zack Greinke last year? A barnstorming 63%.

Apparently not throwing strikes every single time can work for you. Who’d have thunk it?

by kcbottom9th on May 2, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

That Zack Greinke can't locate his pitches worth shit

Doublestix and I think he sucks.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

rosa was always super overrated to me, i never saw anything from him in his major league call ups that impressed me

typical mid 90’s throwing power arm with a decent slider and bleh control, these guys are quite literally dime a dozen in triple a. jesus colome, roman colon, victor marte, david aardsma a few seasons ago, you can pick a guy with rosa’s approximate skillset off the scrap heap / waiver wire, the list really goes on for days. not really sure why nyroyal is getting his panties in a twist over this, rosa is/was a two pitch pitcher with nothing to throw to lefties (laughable changeup), and if his fastball has really lost velocity well he’s even less valuable. sure, maybe he could have thrown middle relief with a 4.5 era, but i’d rather take a gamble on a guy with some upside rather than hang onto a guy who struggles putting up a whip below 1.40 in AAA.

-

by slayor on May 2, 2010 2:57 AM EDT reply actions  

uh oh

someone’s a DM apologist.

baseball rules.

by doublestix on May 2, 2010 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

94 mph fastball and a good slider (it is a good slider according to people like BA, doublestix and others). And decent control. Those things are a dime a dozen? Please. Of course you can’t find a 94 mph fastball with a good slider and that kind of control on the waiver wire. That’s ludicrous. And if he’s lost velocity this season, we certainly don’t know if that’s for good based on what he’s done in his first 12 innings of the season. And are you really using WHIP to evaluate a pitcher. If so, you really shouldn’t be using stats to try to support your opinion.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

what kind of "good control"? you mean 4 bb/9 in AAA?

because i’m pretty sure victor marte put up that exact same walk rate last year for the o’royals, and we got him for a minor league free agent invite. sorry, not impressed. and if you don’t think you can find guys that throw hard with decent sliders on the waiver wire, you’re wrong. shit, where is luis vizcaino when you need him? we just dumped juan cruz and he has better stuff than rosa and a better track record. seth mcclung? seth mcclung has even BETTER stuff than rosa, and is unemployed. or how bout jorge julio? he had a career minor league bb/9 of 3.5, and 4.5 in the majors, which is probably what rosa would end up at. throws hard, good slider. unemployed. see where i’m going with this? skillset = not unique, apparently quite obviously regressing = not such a hot prospect these days

-

by slayor on May 2, 2010 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

the point is

we didn’t just trade away some guy with 4 nasty pitches who just had a bad month
this guy is hardly the next great relief pitcher, just not going to happen with the current skillset

-

by slayor on May 2, 2010 3:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

what kind of “good control”? you mean 4 bb/9 in AAA?

Well, those were his 2009 numbers. In 2008, his AAA BB/9 was 2.1 (and 1.4 that season in AA). Now you may want to argue that somehow his skills deteriorated between 2008 and 2009, but his AAA K/9 over that span went up from 7.8 to 10.1. So I don’t think that happened. I think it makes more sense to take both AAA seasons into account and come up with a BB/9 in the low 3’s.

and if you don’t think you can find guys that throw hard with decent sliders on the waiver wire, you’re wrong. shit, where is luis vizcaino when you need him?

You mean the Luis Vizcaino whose FB averaged 91 mph in 2009? And his slider has gotten less and less effective over the last three years, down to the point where it was negative pitch for him in 2009 (you can check out the effectiveness of individual pitches on the player pages at Fangraphs).
seth mcclung has even BETTER stuff than rosa, and is unemployed

Horrible control (BB/9 climbing over 5 last year). Fastball a full mph slower. The only effective pitch for him last year was his change. And yet he clearly has better stuff than Rosa based on….?
or how bout jorge julio? he had a career minor league bb/9 of 3.5, and 4.5 in the majors, which is probably what rosa would end up at. throws hard, good slider. unemployed

So what are you saying, that Rosa could have a career like Jorge Julio? Could be. Could be better. Could be worse. He did have a nine-year MLB career with almost 500 ip as a reliever.
skillset = not unique, apparently quite obviously regressing

“Not unique” I’m sorry, slayor but that’s a joke. You’re acting like a 94 mph fastball, a good slider and decent control grows on trees. It doesn’t. That’s ridiculous. And “quite obviously regressing” is silly. One month of decreased velocity and control problems = obvious regression? It is “quite obvious” that at this young age his skills are deteriorating never to return. It is obvious that this isn’t just a short-term thing or an injury that he can get over? How is that obvious. Don’t answer. I know you don’t know. You’re guessing.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

rosa HALVED his walkrate in 2008 from 2007. in 2009, it was higher than 2007.

you tell me: which year looks like the outlier? if the scouts say the control hasn’t improved this season, it doesn’t look to me like Rosa currently has plus command. Sorry, not really concerned too much with what he did as a STARTER in 2008. I really fail to see how one good control season outweighs the fact that it’s sandwiched between two 4 bb/9 seasons. also: since mcclung hasn’t pitched this year, and I haven’t seen rosa pitch this year, I can’t say who’s stuff is better right now – but I can say that seth mcclung 2005/2006 era had one of the best curveballs in baseball and looked like a young ben sheets. obviously, he never harnessed that stuff, but i’d take it over rosa’s any day, on a pure stuff level. the point is AAA is absolutely full of hard throwing right handers with 2 pitches and middling control. personally, from what I saw of rosa with the royals, I never thought his slider looked that great – pretty flat and lacking depth, but whatever

-

by slayor on May 2, 2010 3:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's not a 94 MPH fastball.

It’s 90 now. The point you’re missing (and I was missing it too until it just now occurred to me) is that we’re not just talking about 12 innings. You do not know what’s he’s doing in his bullpen sessions. And I think it’s absolutely safe to assume he’s not been hitting 94 there in those bullpen sessions, nor has he been showing a great deal of command and control — if he were, then there would be cries of confusion and anger floating down I-29.

You lose four MPH off your fastball and lose your command over the course of the winter, something is wrong. You keep talking about 12 innings, but in terms of Stuff the coaching staff can see a LOT more about a pitcher throwing bullpen than they can about a hitter taking BP or a fielder taking grounders.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 6:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh

Again we find the Royals participating in another mediocre transaction and ending up on the side with the lower upside and greater downside.

The major problem with this trade, reports of Rosa sucking from doublestix aside, is that the Royals once again fail to even gauge the quality of their own players. We are seeing this with plenty of guys, Aviles, Kila etc. We are forsaking development of young talent chasing pipe dreams.

From what it sounds like, Navarro is a fungible defense first SS with just a bit of pop, though the fact that he can put up 25 doubles but nothing over the fence worries me.

To give up a quality prospect-and it doesn’t matter if Rosa has been dogshit for the first month and looked terrible.-for someone like this-with very few redeeming qualities seems wasteful.

The Royals under Dayton Moore are just terrible around the margins. They have proven time and time again the failure to understand the marginal value of player.
Small payroll teams like KC need to take advantage and squeeze every last bit of value of their farm and major league roster. Instead, we waste millions on premium salaries for undefined assets and qualities. And at the same time waste millions in potential contributions from CHEAP pre-arb players.

It is completely negligent to trade a player that has value NOW for a fungible SS with a career .257/.305/.340 minor league line

I just do not understand what kind of team Dayton Moore and his band of fools is trying to put together….the only common thread with our transactions is how badly we come out looking.

by wildthang on May 2, 2010 4:19 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

At this point, this organization doesn't have time for projects.

They need players who can produce. Players who are already there. Players with actual ability….not mythical, theoretical “talent.” With their track record of developing players, we should be looking to develop refined and polished players, not toolsy, theoretical beings. Looks can be extremely deceptive.

This is a significant loss for the Royals.

As NYRoyal implied earlier, I’m willing to bet $10 that Carlos Rosa finishes with a higher WAR than Rey Navarro after their respective careers are done.

by Royals Nation on May 2, 2010 4:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Rosa

WAS NOT THE ANSWER. People laughed at the Royals because he was our highest rated pitching prospect before we drafted the likes of Montgomery, Melville, et al.

The guy had a "plus" fastball with no command, zero breaking stuff. He is not the reliever equivalent of Kila Ka’aihue. He is not the reliever equivalent of Mike Aviles. He’s just a guy who Royals fans attached themselves to like all fans do when your AAA team is full of replacement players. Just because this guy was labeled the "next one" doesn’t mean that it was right. Look at Pimentel! Where was the love for that guy when his game went to hell? We as soon forgot about him almost as fast as we forgot about Craig Brazell.

Look, at one point, Rosa was a big bullpen prospect in most Royals fans eyes, but that doesn’t mean that Dayton Moore isn’t right in trading him. But..but..but but he traded Cortes and Saito for Betancourt! Howell for Gathright!

I think we should just be happy that we actually GOT SOMETHING in return for a guy who was well on his way to being released.

http://www.royalskingdom.blogspot.com

by kcdynasty on May 2, 2010 5:33 AM EDT reply actions  

You're sort of right.

My anger stems from the fact that all the other known shitty options were tried in the bullpen this year, and Rosa wasn’t even given a chance. It has nothing to do with him being a “prospect”, because honestly, he lost that label a season or two ago. He could have been a serviceable bullpen guy. Would it have worked? Maybe not. My issue is with Dayton not giving him the chance, and trading a position of need (reliever) for a position of I don’t know what. We definitely don’t need a SS this year, or likely next year. Just doesn’t seem to make much sense, especially if the upside is Rey Ordonez.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 5:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

how many times are you gonna post that?

I’d be willing to bet Rosa is already better than at least half the current Royals bullpen. If DMGM would have traded Marte for this guy I wouldn’t have blinked an eye but to trade Rosa it just seems stupid. Sorry, I’m a little cranky. I just can’t trust the process.

by trauty on May 2, 2010 7:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m starting to think that he believes that Carlos Rosa was not the answer.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rey Navarro

I did some extensive research on this player.

He has improved steadily since being signed as a 17 year old. He’s been a pro now for 4 seasons and every year his hitting has improved, as well as his glove.

A switch hitting, 20 year shortstop for a pitcher that Moore almost traded in the Jacobs deal is fine with me.

Changing sports talk one ignorant soul at a time

by Peterman700 on May 2, 2010 5:52 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

the guy we actually traded in the jacobs deal is one of the better relievers in the game

which means the guy we didn’t trade Moore valued more. (either that or Moore doesn’t know how to bargain)

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on May 2, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think that is

beyond debatable. he wasn’t bad right after the trade, but is nowhere near one of the better relievers in the game now. if anything, i think the marlins are disappointed in his digression.

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Was it really so long ago that nobody remembers?

The reason Rosa didn’t get traded for Jacobs is because he was hurt and Florida passed.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

i can't even feign forgetfulness

i legitimately did not know that

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on May 3, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

to the guys that have provided actual insight on what we are giving away and receiving in this deal and not just pissed and moaned about another failed move by Dayton.

Based on the opinions and analysis of guys who acutally follow KC’s minor leagues closesly, and I am assuming have even seen Rosa pitch live, this year this deal is one where KC is trading away a relief pitcher that is dime a dozen to begin with and is going downhill fast for a young player at a organizational position of need with real upside…I am failing to see what Dayton has done wrong here.

I am sure with the disaster that is KC’s bullpen this year that if anybody within the organization believed Rosa would have helped they would have given him the chance, but the facts are the guy couldn’t keep guys off the bases in the minor leagues, lost velocity and command, and couldn’t pitch on back to back days. Best case scenario this guy comes up to KC, does his best Roman Colon impression and gets released/sento back to Omaha eventually released, good job Dayton for actually something of any value for Rosa.

by NU Blackshirts on May 2, 2010 6:41 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

and because his roman colon impression is showcased

we have 0 trade options. so we’re stuck with another roman colon, instead of a ss with considerable upside.

i don’t know about you guys, but i’ve never really enjoyed roman. why have two?

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

So you're saying you trust a Royals scout's judgment.

I have no reason to trust their judgment. They constantly bury guys that can contribute in favor of older more expensive options with zero upside. Maybe if I thought DM was half competent I wouldn’t be so against this trade. I’m not saying it won’t pan out for us, I just don’t trust the Royals and their player personel moves.

by AxDxMx on May 2, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last option year

A few ofvu touched on this but Rosa is so far down on the depth chart and this is his last yr w/ options if he doesn’t make the team next spring ( very likely) he is exposed and done.

He also clears a 40 man spot and was arguably next or close to next to be that guy…

But, at the end of the day he has regressed signifigantly in the last 2 years and he is hard to project AS a rp because his body make up almost is like a sp after throwing 2 ip in relief.
He has not been able to be counted on game after game and is often unavailable
doublestix is right…his stuff is just not electric anymore and most seem to look passed the fact his fastball has lost it’s umph

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 9:33 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

castaneda

If you asked me to predict then I would say Castaneda is a guy that will take that roster spot (40 man) they really like him…88-89 slide piece and throws strikes

but that is me making a guess on a Sunday morning

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 9:53 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

wow, a shitload of comments

On trading friggin Carlos Rosa…..I love this board. Not sure the trade matters a whole lot. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing. Trade Kila NOW! I just want to see the 2000 comment thread that leaves at least one person critically injured.

Turning Kool-Aid to Jesus Juice since 2009.

by Discodave on May 2, 2010 11:29 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I look forward to the spin I'll read when Kila is traded

“He’s really lost bat speed in the past two years. All he’d ever do in the majors is draw a few walks. He could never be able to make decent contact in the majors. And his fielding at first base never developed. He really wasn’t much of a prospect at all. We were lucky to get anything for this piece of junk.”

It’s amazing how much your “prospect status” falls when Dayton Moore lets you languish in the minors. The problem is, a negative evaluation from Dayton Moore really doesn’t tell you anything. He’s wrong more often than he’s right.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

there are some pretty remarkable inconsistincies in this thread

i think we’re all in agreement about 2010 and 2011. obviously, this team isn’t close.

why, then, is there so much concern about trading away a MIDDLE RELIEVER who can help now? i understand the varsity team is seriously lacking an effective bullpen, but carlos rosa – and the three maximum innings per week he may be able to throw – cannot seriously be seen to have more value than a 20 yo position player with a ton of upside.

good position players are obviously a bit more difficult to come across than league average middle relievers. which is why dozens of them are signed on minor league deals every season, all with a comparable skill set.

we’re not playing for 2010. so why act like we are?

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

i think we’re all in agreement about 2010 and 2011. obviously, this team isn’t close.
why, then, is there so much concern about trading away a MIDDLE RELIEVER who can help now?

Because the Royals wouldn’t just have him now. They’d have him for six years of team control. I’d rather have Rosa’s six years than Navarro’s ton (???) of potential? Since we’ve talked about what kind of prospect is “a dime a dozen” I think I should mention that good defense, no hit middle infield prospects are probably a dime for one hundred. They are extremely common and very, very rarely turn into anything.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

and

we wouldn’t just have navarro now. and you apparently suggest that both are pretty easy to replace. so what’s your point?

at best your response is a draw. at worst it makes you look ignorant, since the vast majority of professional scouts which have been referenced in this discussion suggest he has a lot of upside, but some dude who goes by the alias “NYRoyal” disagrees based upon ________ (fill in that blank, please).

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

and you apparently suggest that both are pretty easy to replace. so what’s your point?

Actually I don’t think Rosa is easy to replace. Others have suggested that his “skillset” is common and easily replaced. I was merely pointing out that Navarro’s skillset is much more common and unimpressive.

at worst it makes you look ignorant, since the vast majority of professional scouts which have been referenced in this discussion suggest he has a lot of upside, but some dude who goes by the alias "NYRoyal" disagrees based upon ________ (fill in that blank, please).

Ah, so scouts shouldn’t be disagreed with. Their opinions are sacrosanct. They don’t get things wrong, right? Some “dude” who goes by the alias “NYRoyal” disagrees based on Navarro’s shitty stats, the high failure rate of prospects like him, Rosa’s stats and what I know of his stuff. Apparently his stuff and control have been somewhat different in April 2010. I wouldn’t give up on him simply because of that.

But should I not share my opinion because I’m not a professional scout, Prof?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and one more thing
and we wouldn’t just have navarro now

Right. I was just responding to your straw man that I and others were just focusing on Rosa’s potential help to the Royals in 2010. We aren’t. Rosa would be available to the Royals for several years if they hadn’t dumped him.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

you are completely unable

to support your argument. you cannot continue to isolate sentences and take them out of context in hope of making your assertions sound somewhat coherent.

i understand that you dislike the trade. unfortunately, it is becoming blatantly obvious that this is simply a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction. you aren’t refusing to support the trade because it is ill advised or decimating, but you are refusing to support the trade because you like being that guy. you have absolutely and quite literally no basis at all. even your attempted employment of statistical analysis is misplaced, since, at best, they break even as well.

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

No basis at all. Rosa’s minor league stats provide no basis. Rosa’s scouting reports before April 2010 provide no basis. Rosa’s stuff before April 2010 provides no basis. Huh?

even your attempted employment of statistical analysis is misplaced, since, at best, they break even as well.

Rosa and Navarro’s stats are a “break even.” Are you joking? Perhaps if we’re only comparing one month of stats, but that would be stupid, right? If you compare more stats, Rosa is much, much better. Have you looked at their stats?

And I’m not taking your sentences out of context. I’m replying to them point by point. And is it incoherent to argue that we shouldn’t give up on Rosa merely because his velocity has been donw for one month?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Professor Stephanie

Great post….and not just because you agree with me but because you offered a lot of insight

by gregschaum on May 2, 2010 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Does this bother anyone else?
He was the D-Backs #9 prospect according to BA in 2008, #10 in 2009, and #12 this season.

That was taken from above, I really don’t like how the guy just kept getting jumped in the rankings while AZ’s overall ranking was going down.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on May 2, 2010 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

It shoulld be a concern that he doesn't get any closer to realizing his "ton of potential" with each passing season

So far every year of his addmitedly short professional career has shown the same problems. It would be great if his numbers showed any kind of progress. They don’t. Can’t make contact. Can’t get on base. Can’t hit for power. Can’t stop making errors. This guy will be in KC in no time!

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

additional thoughts on this

as many have said here, it’s the fact that we didn’t even give rosa a real shot that is confusing…we have an apparent immediate need for bullpen help, rosa has shown a fair amount of potential, why NOT try him?

for all of the bellyaching about DM’s trades, he at least (up to this point anyway) has traded guys that aren’t really going to break out or be stars. that’s not to say the trades haven’t been stupid, because some of them have been…i don’t think we’re going to see an alex gordon for (insert middle reliever here) trade.

dayton has been trying to use some of our pitching surplus to acquire bats/defenders. i think the philosophy is solid, but the execution has been VERY spotty…he hit with callaspo, i think crisp was a decent trade, and then there’s a whole bunch of misses.

one thing that i really dislike is that there does SEEM to be a predisposition by DM to purge Allard’s guys…some of it has worked and some of it hasn’t…if true, i think it’s poor management. having said that, it happens in almost every front-office transition out there…the GM brings in HIS guys, either by coaching staff or by cycling through players. look no further than the chiefs, who brought in weis, crennel, vrabel, and about half of their free-agent/waiver wire pickups have been patriot/cardinal castoffs…i get the concept that if you’re going down, you want to go down with your guys, but sometimes i think people (DM included) take it too far.

"He once had an awkward moment, just to see how it felt...he lives vicariously...through himself- He is the most interesting man in the world"

by Home Run Tony Cogan on May 2, 2010 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

On the surface

this looks disappointing. Rosa has struggled since coming back from surgery last year, and he by no means a surefire success story in the MLB bullpen waiting to happen, but it really seemed like he was close to MLB ready, and he would have filled a role the MLB club desperately needs. This prospect doesn’t seem to have…..any good numbers. The only really good number is his age—he’s still 8 months away from legal drinking age. If his tools are great, he still has plenty of time to turn them into production. Still, his production to date has been nonexistent.

by kcdc1 on May 2, 2010 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

six years of team control?

we called Rosa up in 2008 and 2009.

Rosa spent a month on the roster in 2009. He spent 10 days on the roster in 2008 for no good reason.

I’d imagine that Rosa was added to the 40 man in 2008, which means he is out of options in 2011.

Six years of being unable to get optioned seems less than ideal

then again, there’s the matter of all the people who have seen Rosa recently being down on him. Obviously they don’t know as much as someone who looks at Rosa’s numbers

I went to the Plaza and said "this is where the parade will be held when Dayton Moore gets fired"

by BHWick on May 2, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Six years of being unable to get optioned seems less than ideal

Yeah, if he sucks. And you assume he sucks and will continue to suck. I don’t think we can or should assume that.

then again, there’s the matter of all the people who have seen Rosa recently being down on him. Obviously they don’t know as much as someone who looks at Rosa’s numbers

Great argument! I know a little bit more about Rosa than that. I am familiar with his scouting reports from the last several years. I am familiar with his velocity the last two years. Now, apparently some have seen him look back in April 2010. Pitch f/x shows that his velocity wasn’t down a bit in 2009, so this appears to be a new thing. If Montgomery suddenly lost velocity and had some problems with his command for a month, would he then suddenly be crap? Does one month of worse stuff and control mean that the pitcher is done? That the velocity loss and control problems are permanent? If so, how do we know this? Please share your inside information with me.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

One thing to also remember

is the forearm injury Rosa had at the end of 08. I don’t think that’s been brought up yet, and he really did take a long time to recover.

As many HAVE mentioned, Rosa doesn’t pitch on back-to-back days. That takes away a lot of value. There’s not much reason to believe he’s fully healthy, or will be fully healthy in a way that would actually be helpful. One thing a righty reliever should be able to do in the Majors is pitch whenever he’s needed, even if it’s on back-to-back days. Rosa can’t do that. Let’s keep that in mind when trying to figure out how helpful he’d be.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

is the forearm injury Rosa had at the end of 08. I don’t think that’s been brought up yet, and he really did take a long time to recover.

Ok, that’s valid. But he did get his velocity back in 2009 according to Pitch f/x.

As many HAVE mentioned, Rosa doesn’t pitch on back-to-back days. That takes away a lot of value

But is this a permanent thing? It certainly decreased is value in April. But is he never going to pitch back-to-back again? My point is we don’t know, but it seems like a lot of people in this thread are assuming so, based on….I don’t know what.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it might be permanent.

In all of last season, he only pitched back-to-back twice. This is incredible for a right-handed reliever, isn’t it? Shouldn’t we be able to call on a guy like that a couple nights in a row more than two times in an entire season?

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Going back even further

He averaged fewer than 5 appearances per month in 08, even before the forearm injury.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

...and zero of those were back-to-back days

So this is not a new thing, and I doubt it’s going away.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whoops my bad

I forgot he was still a starter then

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Was that because he couldn’t possibly do it or because they were being careful with him given his injury history? I don’t know. I’m just saying that it seems like we’re making a lot of assumptions on little knowledge.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great argument!

I noticed you didn’t even address my take on this, but since you haven’t used the words “12 innings” in any subsequent response I’ll assume you accepted the validity of my comment.

Yeah, you’re familiar with his scouting reports, and his velocity… are you familiar with the overall impression of how he’s throwing (in-game or otherwise) has been this season, including ST?

I can’t stress this enough: it’s far easier to tell when a pitcher’s ready for the casien mills without even seeing them perform in game than a hitter or a fielder. If the guy can’t even hit 94 on the gun outside of in-game action, then what makes YOU think that the velocity loss is TEMPORARY?

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I noticed you didn’t even address my take on this, but since you haven’t used the words "12 innings" in any subsequent response I’ll assume you accepted the validity of my comment.

Think again. I wasn’t saying that anything he does in those 12 innings might just be random. If his velocity is down in those 12 innings it is a concern. But my point is that all we know is that his velocity has been down in April 2010. One month. Was it more than that? I don’t know. Is this a short-term thing or a long-term thing. We don’t know. But I see a lot of assuming here that because of what we saw in April, we know that he’s all of the sudden a much worse pitcher now and forever. That doesn’t make sense.

And yes, of course velocity loss can be temporary. And, for the record, we don’t know how much velocity has been down. So far the only report of it that I’ve read has been doublestix saying he saw Rosa hit 90 on the Omaha radar gun. We really don’t know what his average FB velocity has been. Is he down 1 mph? 2? More than that? We don’t know. But do you think velocity loss in one month is alway permanent? YOu don’t really think that…right?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's what I think.

I think that there are two reasons why one might assume a velocity loss is only temporary:

1) Injury (which, if true, would be his second in 18 months, earning him the label of “injury-prone” and immediately devaluing him as a prospect).

2) Player slacking off on physical training (which, if true, speaks to the player’s commitment to improvement).

Outside of those two situations, I think it’s more likely to be permanent than temporary, since the only real reason left is a decline in skill.

Make of that what you will.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what I can tell,

number 2 is not the case.

So there’s that.

WTF, self?

by minda33 on May 2, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

lets play a game

here is the game: pretend we are general managers, and we are preparing for a draft.

we have two choices, our varsity team has no chance of contending this year, but we do have a solid core group of prospects who we think will come up in 2-3 years.

one is a middle reliever who is close to the majors, but has a declining skill set which does little to distinguish him from other middle relievers whom we know are readily available. mid 90s fastball, an ok slider, less than ideal control and the oft cited inability to pitch more than three innings per week.

the other, of course, is a A+ 20 year old at a premium position (a position in which, as an organization, we have no depth). his stats up to date have been less than stellar, but not bad. the stats that we are more concerned with aren’t available to us, but on the surface the stats we do have aren’t the best. every one who watches him all agree – he has great tools, and lots of upside.

who do we pick?

not to give away my answer or anything, but i am absolutely positive that if we traded away, say, bianchi (injuries and higher ranking not withstanding) for the equivalent of carlos rosa, the same detractors now would be even louder.

fortunately for them, they would, in that situation, at least have a point while maintaining some semblance of credibility.

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Can I ask a few clarifying questions?

In this hypothetical, is the pitcher only going to be able to pitch 3 innings per week for the rest of his career? And where did we get this information from?

Also, what kind of stats are we talking about when we say “less than stellar but not bad.” From a genuine prospect, are hitting stats like these in the low minors “not bad”?

2007 Rk – .250/.274/.283
2008 Rk – .258/.323/.385
2009 A – .262/.308/.339
2010 A – .241/.307/.329

Are those stats really not bad? Low BA. Low OBP. Low SLG. They kind of look horrendous.

And everyone who watches Navarro agrees about how wonderful he is? How do you know this? No scouts dislike him or think his potential is limited? A good write-up in BA doesn’t mean that scouts are unanimous in their love for this perennial #10-15 prospect in a team’s system.

not to give away my answer or anything, but i am absolutely positive that if we traded away, say, bianchi (injuries and higher ranking not withstanding) for the equivalent of carlos rosa, the same detractors now would be even louder.

So Bianchi is a good comp for Navarro despite the fact that Bianchi has actually done something in the minors? Does actual performance on the field mean anything to you?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're also making the assumption he's just a "middle reliever"

Until last year, Rosa was a starter, and a damn good one at that. I won’t go into why the Royals brass decided to move him to relief, but that’s been their modus operandi for good pitchers for years. They did it with Rosa, they did it with Soria, hell, they even did it to Zack Greinke.

They also did it with JP Howell. And Howell’s been a stellar relief pitcher over the last few years. Oddly enough, they traded Howell away for exactly the type of player you seem to be suggesting the Royals acquire more of.

Not surprisingly, the player the Royals picked up is now out of the organization. And as a result of depleting our available bullpen arms, the Royals have blown over $8 million in acquiring arms for the pen when there was already a decent replacement on hand.

So, yes, you can gamble on a SS suddenly acquiring the ability to hit homeruns and draw walks, and sacrifice your bullpen (or potential rotation spot, as the case may be.)

Or you can go for the nearly sure-thing, hold on to the reliever in the pen and spend your surplus cash on a proven SS. Hey, and if all we want a Rey Ordonez clone, I’m sure we could re-sign TPJ for league minimum.

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on May 3, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don't know man

we’re just playing the game. this is all the information we have. closed universe hypothetical, limited to the information we know is available to us. on this board, i guess. we’ll limit available information to this board. do with it what you will.

by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on May 2, 2010 1:07 PM EDT reply actions  

The problem is that I don’t think your hypothetical matches up with the players in this trade.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

To steal a line straight out of the 90's

Take a fucking chill pill everybody!!!!!

It’s not even worth it. It’s not the first “questionable” move DM has made and I can guarantee you it won’t be the last. I understand wanting to vent your frustrations but it’s getting a little overboard here don’t you think. This FO is starting to turn our friendly little site into a flaming/bashing board and it’s disgusting. Maybe there are more 15 year olds here than I thought.

by JSouth on May 2, 2010 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Fair enough, but...

There is much more vitriol in game threads. And the Royals major league games this season are actually less important than “process” moves like this one in which Moore disposes of a player who could be a part of the Royals contending future. Things have gotten so bad that when Moore either improves or makes worse the Royals minor league system, that is more important than whether the Royals have taken a step backwards or fowards in their quest for 70 wins this season.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on May 2, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Throwing to first

with Guillen on is a sign of weakness.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Wrong thread.

Oops!

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on May 2, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really don't understand the mass angst following this move...

Small market teams HAVE to make this types of moves. It’s essential to our survival. Shipping off a AAA reliever has injury and velocity loss concerns for a high ceiling, toolsy 20-year old shortstop is really not a bad move. Could Rosa have made an impact in the bullpen? Perhaps. But there’s no reason to think that he would be anything more than a journeyman bullpen pitcher. Ship the guy off before he completely loses all of his value, and take a chance on younger prospect. I’ve got no problem with it.

But the overwhelming, and at times irrational, pessimism has become a bit difficult to bear lately. Yeah, I get DM has made some shitty moves, but this is certainly not one of them.

by adschofield on May 2, 2010 10:19 PM EDT reply actions  

high-ceiling?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.

by Warden11 on May 3, 2010 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

if it makes you feel better, i was rather optimistic

about Rosa’s ability to pitch well

batter nine you sucky

by marbotty on May 3, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

"high ceiling" in this case

is TPJ 2007

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on May 3, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan