Early Morning Royals Links: Heat On Hillman, Duffy Update, Etc.
- Rany on the Royals: Hillman's Last Stand.
- Royals manager Trey Hillman quits in middle of eighth inning…Lightsaber Metrics
- Update on Danny Duffy " Royals Prospects
- Minor League Profile: Brendan Lafferty " Royals Prospects
- The contradictions of José Guillen - KansasCity.com
- KoK Prospect #6: Tim Melville | Kings of Kauffman | A Kansas City Royals Blog
- The Pipeline: Royals on the Farm 5/9
Baseball:
- The Worst Players in Baseball, 05/07 Edition - Beyond the Box Score
- The 2010 White Sox Are Just About Out Of Contention - SB Nation
- White Sox Can't Get Out of Own Way. Guillen, Team Face Tough Decisions - South Side Sox
- Atlanta Braves Minor League Recap 5/9 - Talking Chop
- Fun with Shutdowns and Meltdowns | FanGraphs Baseball
Grab Bag:
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I saw this sentence in a recent Dutton article
"Trey Hillman is a man," McBroom said, "who if you were a father, you’d want your son to be."
That is a terrible sentence, and I’m not even talking about the content.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
Sweepy got an interview?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on May 10, 2010 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Pomona
mazo, i answered your question in the other thread, but it was days after the comments stopped.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on May 10, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
What year?
I graduated from Pomona in 2006.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
2001, just missed you
but you might have met my brother, Nick Funke, who was PO ’08
by SagehenMacGyver47 on May 10, 2010 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah, yes, he sounds familiar but I'm terrible with names
I’m most likely the only person with the name “Mage” to have gone to Pomona.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
Zweig and Strauss
were a strongly unlikely pair of collaborators from the get-go. And yet it might have worked out well were it not for the political circumstance in Germany at the time.
R. Strauss managed to baffle a lot of people at the time as to where his sympathies actually were as the Nazis came to power. He had already ridden out the Great War and borne a certain level of temporary ostracizing from western Europe (and particularly the US) over that, and he probably (I’d guess) expected the second war to be of similarly temporary impact. Whether he was simply blind to just how egregiously horrific the Nazis were already showing themselves to be, or trying to hold on to his prestige regardless, I can’t say. Zweig (for obvious reasons) found that unbearable, whatever the motivation.
The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them. -- Albert Einstein
by The Ol' Perfesser on May 10, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
didn't he (Richard)
flee Germany for the US shortly before the war?
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
There's a strange monolith on Mars?
I’d bet dollars to donuts it’s just naturally occurring, like some of the cool geologic formations we have Earthside. But if it’s not one of those, we should probably leave it alone. I don’t want to turn into a giant baby floating in space.
by Soria's Unibrow on May 10, 2010 12:41 PM EDT reply actions
That is one jacked up moon
One end looks like it was blown up by an asteroid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEUjQCCcCeA&feature=related
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on May 10, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
The Phobos Mystery Object looks like it's a flaw in the probe's camera
The two most likely explanations are that it was just an “artifact” of the picture, which is backed up by the fact that it goes all the way to the bottom of the frame, or it could be a moonlet that shares an orbit with Phobos that looks elongated due to the trailing effect caused by a long exposure in the shot.
by Soria's Unibrow on May 10, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Rany, as always, minces little and mashes much:
Since the Royals’ magical, mystical 18-11 start last season, they have now played 164 games – a full season plus two more games. They’re 58-106 in that span. That’s astonishing. In 2005, the year before Moore was hired, the Royals reached the absolute nadir of their existence by going 56-106. Five years later, despite… a payroll more than 50% higher, despite millions being invested in the farm system, the Royals are exactly as bad now as they were then.
That’s…oh my god.
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
I read this too
couldn’t decide if I wanted to cry, get really pissed, or get drunk and get really pissed and cry. It’s unbelievable to me how someone can do so little – with so much more than the previous guy – who was at one time considered the best man for any job. And after the mountain of evidence we have against his suckitude, DM still wants to spout his greatness and how we need to “trust” and how “he’s going to get it fixed.”
I can understand we need to be patient, fine, but four years is plenty of time to establish at least a .500 team or close to it. There’s nothing with this team that could make anyone think that’s within reach for at least another two years.
Don't worry
82 wins in 2012 is a definite possibilty. All that needs to happen is that Zack stays around and and healthy, Hochevar “figures it out,” Gordon transitions to the OF well, Moustakas and Hosmer work out and are ready to contribute, Monty and Crow are ready, and maybe Melville.
That’s pretty likely, right?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on May 10, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions























