Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Ironically, he doesn't draw walks because of incredible eyesight or because he's trying to take them — he gets them because he's looking for extra-base hits.

almost 2 years ago Superd_7451647_tiny Trey Hillman's Chin 27 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Now I get it

Kila would hurt the Royals chances of winning the team batting title because of his selfish walks and XBHs

We have met the enemy, and he is us.

by Royal Kingdom on Jul 21, 2010 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

exactly!

Are we the team to beat in 2010? I sure think so! Go Chiefs.

by jrcnc on Jul 21, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

FTA
Some old-school baseball types believe that a cleanup hitter’s job is to drive in runs no matter what, and that he should be prepared to expand his strike zone in RBI situations. But that’s not the approach Ka’aihue takes — and he is driving in nearly one run per game

That’s a pretty good translation.

by Trey Hillman's Chin on Jul 21, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't want to hurt our chances

 Of leading the league in batting average.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jul 21, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

In what way is that ironic?

The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986

by labbadabba on Jul 21, 2010 9:56 AM EDT reply actions  

The same way rain on a wedding day is ironic

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Jul 21, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

The preceeding sentence was

His reputation as a patient hitter — he’s well on his way to a third straight season of more than 100 walks — has long been established

He has a reputation for being patient, but ironically he doesn’t actually set out to be so, he tries to get XBH’s.

by kcbottom9th on Jul 21, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but there is nothing unexpected

about walks arising from a patient approach. Just because it is a “side-effect” doesn’t make it ironic.

by Trey Hillman's Chin on Jul 21, 2010 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

At least he didn't say

That begs the question, why does he get so many walks when he’s trying for XBHs?

by Trey Hillman's Chin on Jul 21, 2010 10:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I would cut him a little slack in the sense that the "old school" thinking would

expect that looking for XBH would lead to fewer walks, so having more walks is unexpected. I don’t agree with the usage, and he didn’t actually state the qualification I mentioned above, but it’s no “rain on your wedding day” (as d_f mentioned above, which, btw, makes that song unlistenable).

Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 21, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

That particular phrase is what makes that song unlistenable?

“Man, if she just wouldn’t have included such an inappropriate use of irony in her lyrics, then this song would have been on my all-time top 10 list!!”

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie

by Sweep_the_Leg on Jul 21, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

To me, the reason that song is unlistenable is “Alanis Morrissette is singing it.”

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on Jul 21, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I actually thought about expanding on the many unlistenable qualities of the song

when I was typing that. However, I will stand by my statement that the repeated misuse of the term “ironic”, by itself, makes the song unlistenable, regardless of by whom and how well/poorly it is sung.

Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 21, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT word usage: awful

A NY Times article I was reading had a parenthetical about the history of the word awful that I found interesting. It is used today in a derogatory sense, as in “Jason Kendall is awful at baseball right now”, but the original meaning was in a generally positive sense (sort of like the word “remarkable” now), which survives today in the word “awfully”, as in “Brayan Pena is awfully good at baseball compared to Jason Kendall”. Of course we’re all familiar with both uses, but I thought it was interesting how the word usage had changed from it’s 17th century meaning where awful = remarkable.

Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 21, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Similar To Awesome?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Jul 21, 2010 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think so

it’s odd that today’s meanings have “awesome” and “awful” as opposites.

Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 21, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, come on

One is “some” “awe” and the other is “full of aw”. What the hell is “aw” anyway, HUH?

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on Jul 22, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

This ignores his true repeatable skill of course

His BA with RISP!!!!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jul 21, 2010 10:58 AM EDT reply actions  

I think I'm missing something here...

Shouldn’t this be everybody’s approach at the plate?

You wait for a good pitch to hit, you don’t go up swinging at every strike.

by AxDxMx on Jul 21, 2010 11:19 AM EDT reply actions  

You swing at the first pitch

regardless of location.

Signed Yuniesky Betancourt

by stlJeff on Jul 21, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

honestly

that’s kinda bull anyways. it might be true, but he DOES have great eyesight. the guy spits on pitches outside the zone with two strikes that 80% of majors leagues would probably swing at.

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9

by doublestix on Jul 22, 2010 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Great, another Bobby Abreu

like that guy ever did anything. He doesn’t even have a ring!

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.

Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.

by Matt Klaassen on Jul 22, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan