Should We Whine About Winning When They Don't Win the Way We Want Them To Win?
Or, to put the question a different way: should a rational Royals' fan want this particular team to win?
Consider this Baseball's equivalent of asking: if a tree falls in the forest, and there is nobody around to hear it, does it make a sound? I say yes. The tree makes noise and a win is a win, even if Kendall drives in the go-ahead run.
Being a fan of a baseball team shouldn't be that complicated. Sure, reasonable minds might differ on how to run the enterprise, how much weight to give to scouting, the value of grizzled free-agents, etc. At the end of the day, however, a philosophical commitment to a certain kind of baseball lens should not prevent enjoyment of a decent run, even when that run makes you want to rub your eyes and mouth a phrase that rhymes with "holy shit, Yuni just got a big hit."
Let's be specific: a casual reader of this website might get the impression that Pods, Kendall, and JoGi were not the wisest of additions to the Royals. Same with Gil Meh-che and a phalanx of others. True enough, but what the hell were these guys supposed to do? Turn the money down? Tell GMDM that his offer was too generous? It really is not a free agent's fault, my friends, when that free agent is offered riches out of proportion to his or her projected value.
The temptation is to personalize our collective frustration onto a Pods or a Kendall, but that misses the mark, especially when, in some of these cases at least, they are delivering exactly the goods someone with a keen and prescient eye would have expected them to deliver.
Obviously, if some fan wants to be bummed out that the Royals are winning, that is his prerogative. My guess is what such folks are truly bummed out about is a handful of decisions by Dayton Moore--and, unfortunately, that handful of decisions has now become a substitute for the actual Royals themselves. Instead of rooting for the Royals, one ends up rooting against a handful of decisions to succeed. Does this make any sense?
A handful of decisions by Dayton Moore do not the Royals make, and an undue focus on falling trees can make you miss the forest. Or something like that.
Let's end with a thought experiment: assume the Royals can win the division with this team, but would then get swept by whoever they first meet in the playoffs. Would we allow ourselves to enjoy this once-in-a-quarter-century-achievement, or would we gripe about the fact that it wasn't done the way would have preferred?
136 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In all seriousness, a GM's process really is what is important
A bad process can occasionally get some short-term anomalous positive results (see the 2003 Royals). But that success just leads to additional bad moves and a longer term for the GM before he’s finally fired. But a bad process in the long-term will lead to lots of failure. That’s what we’ve seen from Dayton Moore. If the Royals have a 2003-like season this year, that will probably be the worst possible result. It will reinforce to Moore that he’s doing things the right way. It will convince Glass (even more than he’s already convinced) that Moore is the right guy to be the Royals GM and it will lengthen Moore’s tenure with the Royals.
The immoderate moderator
I agree with everything you said there
But I hate Dayton has much as anyone and even I have to concede that he’s done a good job restocking the minors. We have one of the best farm systems around right now. Sure it’s possible that none of these highly touted prospects will pan out, and most of them probably won’t, but it’s a good bet that at least a few of them will make a real impact at the major league level. I would love to find out that all of these bad acquisitions the past few seasons have just been misguided attempts at stopgaps until the real talent gets here—the homegrown guys we drafted.
Though it is definitely a big part of a GM’s job to make smart decisions on veteran players, too… Maybe DM would be better suited to be a scouting director?
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 8, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I give Moore full credit for rebuilding the minors
So far, it looks like he’s done well. Unfortunately, I don’t think that is enough. He’s got to be able to figure out who gets to the the majors when, who to keep and who to trade, and how to fill out a team around these guys. Dayton Moore just doesn’t have it in him.
But I think you are right with your last statement. Like Allard Baird, Dayton Moore is a good front office piece if he’s not overexposed. As a GM, both are incompetent. But in the right role in a front office, they are both assets.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Problem is
I don’t know if the scouting director is in charge simply of scouting international and amateur players, or if he also evaluates players currently in the majors. If that were the case, he’d still be overexposed it seems. I guess he should just be a draft specialist.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 9, 2010 5:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Bingo.
Look, I always always always want the Royals to win, and I don’t care what sort of ridiculous process they’re following in order to do so. If this team stumbles its way to 83 wins, well, it’s a winning season and I’m perfectly happy with that.
The problem is exactly as you say. If we, as fans, have faith that the front office knows that this mythical winning season is totally unsustainable going forward… if they know that they did this with smoke, mirrors, baling wire, and unicorn farts… then it’s not a problem. It’s just that I’m not sure Moore really believes this (even though he has made comments of late which indicate he might really understand it).
I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.
my basic attitude towards all of this, with regards to being a fan and rooting
we’re dealing with sports here, which exists solely for our enjoyment. there’s no right or wrong way to be a fan. not only that, but this is a professional baseball team, so there’s not even the fake “they’re just kids/I’ll always be loyal to my school” thing you see in college sports. I dont have a problem with the fans who are different from me, but I’m also going to root however I feel.
by Freneau on Jul 8, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
I feel close to exactly the same
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 8, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
for a basic attitude, that's pretty darn all encompassing and great
Given enough velocity even a pig will fly
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jul 8, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I would be thrilled if the Royals
even went .500 with this team. A Royals win brightens up my day a little. But the playoffs ain’t gonna happen.
Winning with lousy players = Lucky streak. Unfortunately, lucky streaks end, leaving us with nothing but old headlines on discarded fishwrap tumbling in the breeze down the abandoned streets of Quindaro.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
Oooh, I like it
Finding poetry in a blog comment is like finding a rose growing out of the sidewalk.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 8, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
poetry AND a metaphor
that’s a two-fer.
"Shot by my own men."
I Think That's
A simile. Ross Perot loved them both, and occasionally mixed them to create a simiphor.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 8, 2010 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I would definitely take .500
I am being cautiously optimistic mostly because I’m afraid that this will lead to burying more talent in the minors. I think they have an outside shot at .500 this year, but I just worry it will affect the future. That said, I do root for wins each game and for players to do well, but there are some players I just want nothing to do with.
"You'll never make it to the bigs with fungus on your shower shoes."
by MinnesotaRoyal on Jul 8, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Totally Agree
Would love to see the Royals get to .500 with this group. Just means if we can replace some of our bad players with better ones in the next few years, who knows how far we can go.
Is Quindaro Really
Abandoned? It was like a second downtown when I was a kid. My mother used to make me watch parades there. My church was a block off Quindaro at 17th and Yecker.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 8, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Far from abandoned
I subbed there when I was starting out. They’ve made a lot of improvements. The idea that Quindaro is abandoned, unsafe or “scary” is either ignorant or racist.
OK, I'll change it to "Raytown"
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
I didn't really take your post to mean the specific area was abandoned.
But rather just a street or block. I have to advocate for my hometown, you know? Aren’t you also from KCK?
I'm really from Suburbia, USA
We moved around a lot when I was a kid until we washed up in Leawood in the late seventies and my dad got downsized from General Electric. Then he took a job with a local company and we stayed. My dad’s folks are all from Lamar County, Texas; my mom’s folks are from Ellis County, Kansas, and far West Texas.
Both sides of my family have Confederate soldiers. I’m thinking about infiltrating the Sons of Confederate Veterans and finding out whether they’re just good ole boys or the reincarnation of the Klan.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
I Was "Walking"
Down Quindaro on Google Maps a few minutes ago. The place looks a lot different now, and there are a lot of vacant lots, but nothing like, say, East St. Louis or Detroit.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 8, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions
It's far from perfect, but compared to 15 years ago?
It’s in MUCH better shape.
I'm Seeing The
Same trend in Anchorage. What passed for the “bad” parts of town have been cleaned up tremendously in the last 20 years. I don’t go there often, so the changes really stand out to me.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 8, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I drove through there recently
And it’s far from being the part of KCK in the worst shape.
She thinks she missed the train to Mars; she's out back counting stars.
by KeepItCopacetic on Jul 8, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, for me my enjoyment of Royals games is 3 pronged:
1. I enjoy every Royals win, whichever players contribute.
2. I enjoy it more when it happens in a well played game against a team with whom we are well matched (and especially if some of my favorite players contributed).
3. I enjoy it most when it moves us up the standings and makes us relevant in our division race.
But even though I have fun with any one victory, I have been with this team and heard about how “now we’ve turned the corner” to get too excited about any one win or even one month’s worth of wins, at least in the 3rd category of my enjoyment. 2003 and Lima-Time were fun, but I would like the chance to test out your thought experiment for real, and I don’t think there is anything wrong with asking “is this sustainable” when we win to try to project if it is or not.
To use a goofy analogy: I’m a pretty picky eater, and I’m also the youngest so my opinion didn’t matter much, so I just got used to having what everyone was having and picking it through it for what I wanted, leaving most of the food on my plate. But now that I’m an adult, I find eating is actually fun when I order the pizza I want and can eat it all, or cook my own dinner full of only ingredients I’ll actually enjoy.
For most of the past 25 years, I’ve enjoyed Royals baseball by picking through and finding small victories wherever I can – DDJ is not only cute, but a legitimate major league player! OR Isn’t that sweet that after playing in the minors for 10+ years Aaron Guiel makes it to the majors – good for him OR we won 64 games this year, which means we didn’t lose 100! OR we didn’t really come in last in the division (again) because we tied for 4th place with Cleveland!.
I am really looking forward to the day when I can enjoy my Royals fandom on all 3 of my levels, and analyzing the current state of the Royals and hearing other’s analysis of the farm system is part of preparing me for that.
I will never give up the part of my fandom
Where I enjoy the fact that DJ is cute.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
On a 25 man roster, there is always SOMEONE who looks really good in the uniform.
That fact has gotten me through many seasons.
Some people just love a man in uniform...
"Shot by my own men."
I looked pretty good in my Taco Bell uniform
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
Isn't it just a black polo shirt?
Did you actually get hit on while wearing it or was it more a looking-at-yourself-in-the-mirror kind of goodness?
It was an "I'm in charge here at this register,
and I have power over you" kind of goodness. Intimidating, yet vulnerable.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
mine was a dark purple
I’ve only been hit on like once or twice in my life, so it was definitely just “I liked it” kinda thing
I worked at TBell after my MA and before I started my PhD, so when I wore it at Iowa, I think people generally thought it was typical hipster posing. I just thought it was a decent polo shirt. There was a Taco Bell logo on the sleeve, but it was pretty small.
Taco Bells in Iowa
There aren’t enough of them, no?
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Jul 8, 2010 8:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
What employee discount?
We ate whatever we wanted to. I never went beyond two seven-layer burritos, hold the sour cream, with green sauce and extra tomatoes.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
officially or unofficially?
I never made anything for myslef, though frequently at the end of shifts my manager would ask me if i wanted anything
Unofficially, I suppose
The assistant manager didn’t care as long as the work got done. The franchise won’t go broke because the 19-year-old at the register had a couple of green beans and a Pepsi.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
I want winning in a long-term, sustainable manner
I don’t want a fluke 2003 season. I want long-term success. It doesn’t even have to be MY way necessarily. He can show utter disdain for statistics all day if he wants so long as he builds a team that is successful for many seasons.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jul 8, 2010 2:47 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
That mirrors my thoughts
It’s not about a winning season, it’s about a winning franchise. If lousy roster construction gets the Royals to a winning season but stunts the progress toward a winning franchise, then I will “whine” (as Stonewall says). If the FO can create a winning franchise despite the (apparently) lousy roster construction, however, then I’m all for it.
Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 8, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
let's be honest: whining is too strong a word, but
it just happens to start with a W
"Shot by my own men."
So does Willie, though.
She thinks she missed the train to Mars; she's out back counting stars.
by KeepItCopacetic on Jul 8, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
And Wilson
Given enough velocity even a pig will fly
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jul 8, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with your sentiment
but isn’t the day of building a winning “franchise” in the smal market over? I mean any team can build a winner, but with the cost of talent, most has to be homegrown. To constantly compete, you trade away your prospects for vets to stay in the race and your draft position changes. You can’t as easily reload or retain your budding stars.
I’d settle for a playoff season every now and then and accept mediocrity the rest of the time. I remember saying I’d didn’t care if we ever won again as long as won the ’85 series.
guess i’ve got my wish so far
"People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby
by MidTNRoyalsFan on Jul 8, 2010 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions
+ 1000
I love the results-oriented nature of your comment.
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
That sounds like a Trey Hillman catchphrase
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jul 8, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
But Hillman was...
…always about the process, yes?
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
maybe that should be the new back-handed compliment
“That’s such a great viewpoint, I’m sure Trey Hillman would agree”
“He’s such a good player, Trey Hillman would like him”
Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 8, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
rec'd and i second the idea
"People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby
by MidTNRoyalsFan on Jul 8, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
My Royal fan philosophy is best summed up by the post a few weeks/months ago
Basically about how to be a rational/informed Royals fan, and just taking every win as it is. A win like the last two gives me so much joy, and being unemployed, that really does help me keep my spirits up. Long term, I really do think the team is in the right direction, especially after hearing Dayton Moore expound more on what the “process” exactly is. I’m not so cynical as many on here to believe that deviations like signing veterans to 2-3 win contracts undo everything.
I figure, if I want to watch a dominant sports team, I have KU basketball (which I love). If I want to watch a team slowly build, I have both KC sports teams.
She thinks she missed the train to Mars; she's out back counting stars.
My fandom
I root for the Royals to win every night and for Pods, Kendall and Yuni to suck ass at the same time. This rarely happens but that is what I root for.
I like this post
I understand the point about rooting anyway you feel, and if fans want to root against players such as kendall, bloomquist, betancourt, pods, guillen, and meche, go right ahead. But I wish fans on here would voice their distaste more towards the guy who signed them (moore) than the players themselves. For example, bloomquist. He’s hated because he’s been played more than he should have and he’s thought of as a “gritty ballplayer.” he has no control over how he’s perceived by moore and yost and the traditionalists who love him. Direct your hatred towards the guys who prop him up, not towards him.
There's a big difference between saying the player sucks
and saying the person sucks. Luis Mendoza is not a bad person. Bloomy and Pods and Meche seem like perfectly normal human beings. Yuni might be a bit weird after growing up in Communist Cuba, so you can’t blame him for that. If Kendall really does get all drugged up on booze and speed and abuses his wife, then he’s a dick and we can all take pleasure in hating him. Farnsy seems to be rather violent and dangerous, and I would stay away from him for fear of getting taekwondoed. And Guillén is, as we know, GCAA.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
don't worry about being taekwondoed...
being Krav Maga’d would be a different story altogether, however.
"Shot by my own men."
I once again feel the need to express
Just how much I love the phrase GCAA.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 8, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
In Communist Cuba
Yuni hits ball!
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
by Juancho on Jul 8, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Generally Considered An Asshole
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
I'm pretty sure that around the league that Farnsworth is GCAA.
Having said that, if he ever works on his jiu-jit-siu he’ll be a badass in the cage.
Ned likes Kendall in the 2-hole!
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Jul 8, 2010 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Around the league
The most notorious GCAA players are probably A.J. Pierzynski, Milton Bradley, and Elijah Dukes, right?
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
Also Stonewall, to address your question at the top
I don’t think there is any such thing as a RATIONAL Royals fan.
by Gross(est) on Jul 8, 2010 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Awesome!
Given enough velocity even a pig will fly
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jul 8, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Rec'd
Quote of the week
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jul 8, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Rob Neyer is a beliver in Edgar
Which poses a quandary for the subset of of Royals fan who intensely dislike him because he dares to be critical.
http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/4254/royals-winning-with-new-manager
Wow, that pretty much exactly sums up my thoughts on the situation
Though I think it’s a little sunnier than I would have written it—I would definitely attribute more of the success under Yost to luck than Neyer did. But I do still think Yost is a better manager, even if only incrementally. And I definitely like him better in his dealings with the media.
My question is, who dislikes Neyer? He’s the only guy at ESPN willing to talk about the Royals, and he does so in a rational, well-researched way.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 8, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Yost the great talent evaluator
Who bats Pods and Kendall 1-2, plays Kendall everyday and twice on sundays, and plays Yuni everyday.
Massive improvement over Hillman
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I like this line:
“And Yost, naturally enough, does love Bloomquist. I just don’t get the impression that he fetishizes Bloomquist the way Hillman did. "
I don’t think Yost fetishizes a lot of things the way Hillman did. He kinda gave me the creeps.
...
what do you mean, nothing he ever did gave me the creeps

Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 8, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, Yost is indeed...
…a massive improvement over Hillman. I mean, we all knew the Royals were no better than a .500 team at the start of the season, but none of us really expected another 100-loss season—-which is where they were headed with Hillman. So at least Yost deserves credit for making do with what’s there—-for meeting minimal expectations. – TL
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
That assumes that the W/L numbers of Hillman and Yost are due to Hillman and Yost
I think that kind of analysis is a mistake.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, lots of things are in there
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
A winning record potpourri!
It’s a nice break from the losing record potpourri we usually get. I mean, it’s still a losing record on the season, but if I put up my thumb and block it out, it’s like it’s not even there!
I wish Yost was a significant factor in the team's better record after Hillman was fired
Unfortunately, there’s no reason to believe that he is.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh I'm not saying it's significant - just that it's a factor.
Probably the biggest factor would be (IMO) the personnel shakedown in the bullpen where we got rid of some of the deadwood and Tejeda returned to good Tejeda. Some of it is just luck – even the worst team wins a third of their games, so maybe this has just been our two week stretch. But with no evidence to back me up, I’d guess that having a manager who seems to be competent, average, nondescript MLB manager has a positive affect on player performance over a manager who gives off creeper vibes and micromanages. And perhaps the difference in delegating more to his managers to oversee their areas of expertise instead of micromanaging and changing the pitcher’s between game routines has helped a couple players put it together at the right time. I don’t know. But I like speculating about it.
The ridiculous amount of variables that affect a baseball game’s outcome are part of what makes it fun for me. That and the uniforms.
I also would have to think that a big portion of it is due to Yost simply based on the attitude changes.
Other than Guillen, they do seem to be a “team”.
Ned likes Kendall in the 2-hole!
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Jul 8, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions
just because you can't explain
doesn’t mean he shouldn’t get credit. Betemit and Chen are two players who have become basically awesome under Yost. Chen was in the bullpen sucking under Hillman and Betemit was in Omaha
by GobbleforCyoung on Jul 8, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I still think
we may be selling short Yost’s in-game tactical management as a “significant” factor. He’s not obsessed with giving away outs, and that’s a fundamental, measurable difference.
I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.
I wonder
How much less sac bunting, hit-and-running and other small ball Yost has done as compared to Hillman.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know
I can’t seem to find numbers anywhere, but my perception from watching games is that it happens significantly less often now than it did under Trey-san. The only “stupid fundamental” thing that doesn’t seem to have precipitously declined is baserunning errors.
I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.
Trey also seemed to take it to a whole new level this year.
1st inning bunts and then continuing to do it all game.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk
I know DDJ bunted with two on under Yost at least once
and then there’s the “Kendall hitting #2 every night” thing, which is about as stupid a thing as one can do
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 8, 2010 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey, I'm not the president of the guy's fan club
He’s pretty much Generic Baseball Manager #457, interchangeable with almost anybody else in MLB. But even that is better than Trey. And of course it annoys the hell out of me that he continues to overuse the same crappy players, but I don’t know who we could find that would have the balls to go against the conventional wisdom that Kendall is a scrappy ironman with good bat control and Podsednik should lead off because he can steal bases. I bet most managers would make the same mistake given the same players.
The Yuni thing is unexplainable though. I don’t know why any manager would want to play him, unless they have selective amnesia and only remember his WEB GEMS and forget about his three inch range, regular botching of routine plays, and awful plate discipline.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 9, 2010 5:23 AM EDT up reply actions
I think they get drunk on Yuni's spin move.
Ned likes Kendall in the 2-hole!
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Jul 10, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
He's been irrationally grumpy about them
For quite awhile.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jul 8, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed, hence...
…my comment immediately below.
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
It's actually kind of...
…nice to see Neyer be upbeat about KC for the first time in about 15 years. Really nice, actually.
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
Moore's fate lies on how good Moustakas, Hosmer, Lamb, Montgomery, etc perform a couple of years
Not on how the team does this year. Even if they collaspe Moore just got a 4 year extension for basically being the worst GM in baseball. Almost all of his FA moves have sucked. Every single one. I would say Tejeda and Callaspo are the only decent ones, but they’ve had their ups and downs too. Farny is ok.
But as a fan how can you root against the team ever? Its like the saying my country right or wrong. My team right or wrong. Its like hoping your country loses a battle in war because you think it will rally the troops for victory later. Whatever
by GobbleforCyoung on Jul 8, 2010 3:06 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
well, there is the little matter of baseball
not being life and death, etc. But I get your point.
"Shot by my own men."
Yeah, there's a big difference between sacrificing a battalion and sacrifice bunting
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
Tell that to Ray Chapman.
She thinks she missed the train to Mars; she's out back counting stars.
by KeepItCopacetic on Jul 8, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Amazing that only one guy has been killed
in Major League history, what with all those spitballs flying around and the sheer number of pitches thrown and line drives and Mickey Cochranes and Herb Scores and Tony Conigliaros out there.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator
But as a fan how can you root against the team ever?
Because sometimes losses for the team in the short-term are better for the team in the long-term.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm very conflicted
I know this Major League roster is poorly conceived (Guillen, Kendall, YuBet, Pods, Willie and Ankiel specifically), and I want GMDM to recognize that and LEARN. For that reason I struggle with short term success.
At the same time, I’ve been deprived of any kind of hope as a Royals fan for so long, that a winning streak like we are currently on genuinely makes me happy. I love seeing guys like Betemit be the hero. I love that there are teams looking up at us in the standings.
Thus my conflict. I am of two minds.
I once had hope...now I have Moore.
Yeah I agree with you
And I kind of look at it like this:
Moore is either going to see it or he’s not. If this winning right now and playing .500 ball the rest of the way makes him think that all his moves have been great then he and the Royals organization is screwed no matter what.
So basically, I hope we do keep playing well, I hope we do make a run at….3rd place and if Dayton Moore thinks that is because he signed some of these scrubs then it really won’t matter because he just doesn’t get it.
by I need more Esteban on Jul 8, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
This post I think goes to the crux of a problem I think baseball is having right now.
Active baseball is fun. Guys bunting to get on base is exciting. Stolen bases are exciting. Hit and runs are exciting. A 3 run inning built on 5 hits, a player going from first to third, and then being brought home on a sac fly or even a suicide squeeze is fun dramatic baseball.
However, statistical analysis has shown us that you win more games when you don’t do any of those things (I’m talking generally). Better baseball is played when you work the count, draw walks, and play for the 3 run homer. There is nothing more exciting in baseball than a home run. However, much of the rest of the game becomes long and boring. Players try to passively force errors out of a pitcher by working the count in order to get a walk instead of actively trying to beat a pitcher by putting a pitch into play.
I think we all understand that the latter is the winning recipe of baseball and winning is fun. That doesn’t answer the question of whether this is the more enjoyable brand of baseball to watch. I think that is one of the reason why I like watching the Rays play. They do everything well. Yes, they draw walks but they also steal bases. Yes, they hit home runs but they are athletic enough to stretch some singles into doubles. It’s also why Ichiro is so fun. He slaps the face of Sabermetrics by refusing to walk and getting bunt singles and infield hits (all of which are enjoyable to watch).
This current Royals team doesn’t really play high quality old school baseball and thus aren’t really a good example. They are bad defensively, below-average basestealer’s, and despite what anyone says, that very good “handling the bat”. That goodness for that last part, because last night if Callaspo had laid down his bunt we wouldn’t have gotten the 3-run home run!
***Edit***
. . . they aren’t very good “handling the bat”.
I can give you that.
Adding on to what you just said, there are few things worse than watching a hit and run in which the hit doesn’t occur and the runner if out to dry.
Or The Batter
Has to swing at a horrible pitch he would have taken and fouls it off.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 8, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course
Of course we should want to win, for a couple of very good reasons.
1) Not being a laughingstock will enable us to have a much better chance at getting the key free agent or two we’ll need in a couple of years;
2) There’s no reason to believe that Moore will favor vets over HIS kids (as opposed to Allard’s kids). Success now isn’t going to screw Hosmer or Lamb.
There was a quote from a “Royals official” back around the GM switch that I’ve always assumed was straight from DMs mouth. It was along the lines of: “Yes, we’re bringing in scrubs. They’re at least professional ball players unlike the guys who were here when we came in.” I really think the Pods and Kendalls of the world are on the team for one reason—to have us not be a laughingstock and hold the fort down until the kids arrive.
I really think the Pods and Kendalls of the world are on the team for one reason—to have us not be a laughingstock and hold the fort down until the kids arrive.
the royals have been doing this for a decade
different vets, same story, year after year
baird did it, moore did it, etc
our attitude is always getting better and better
except Moore has a plan to get the team out
which might actually work. If/When it doesn’t, then we’re back to your same story, of course.
(And a large part of the reason it might work is that the league is forcing Glass to spend more on the roster, but that is lucky for Moore and a topic for another day.)
Would you like to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, or my blog...well you can't.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 8, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm confused
how is having Pods and Kendall playing every. single. day. preventing the Royals from being a laughingstock?
That’s like saying LeBron is having the Big Show tonight because he doesn’t want to attract undue attention to his annoucement.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 8, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Every team with have at least 10 free agents, probably 15 on it
Which players will Dayton fill these spots with?
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jul 8, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Cheering against the Royals to support long range success
Sounds like baseball has been upped in importance to the level of national security.
Place witty signature here.
I will rail against the players
that need to get railed upon. But as soon as the game starts they are all my Royals and I will cheer for them when they do well and throw shoes at my tv (computer now…) when they suck.
Pretty simple really.
The Kansas City Royals; Successfully failing since 1986
i think there is an argument to be made
that supports success, regardless. this is based on the simple premise that more wins increases fan support, which in theory will directly increase revenue, which increases the amount of money we have to retain players or, on occasion, add players.
i understand the concern that moore might feel validated when and if this team succeeds, but i think two important considerations need mention:
1) as mentioned above, we almost had to sign some sort of free agents in order to avoid what baltimore is doing. maybe not to be competitive, but at least to avoid humiliation. this is a direct result of a relatively depleted farm system at the upper levels – players are getting there now, but realistically one or two years ago there wasn’t much at all at AA or AAA. at all. and, please, seriously be realistic about kila and gordon. (i’m not asserting that they are good or bad, but those two examples are not enough to refute the suggestion)
2) how are we winning? last night, for example, was a great win supported by our younger players. we can’t assume that moore will feel validated with an average season and thus feel the need to continuing to sign major league filler – seeing wins which derive of good play by maier, bert and butler may actually have the opposite effect – the “hey, these guys are creating wins, not the filler, so lets stop with the filler”.
we can’t be too presumptive. or predictable, for that matter.
by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on Jul 8, 2010 4:59 PM EDT reply actions
As a side note
Baltimore signed plenty of free agents this off season. Indeed, Guys like Garrett Atkins are very much in the Rick Ankiel mode. And those guys (along with the horrible play of some of their “can’t miss prospects,” sound familiar?) are very much the reason for the sort of humiliation they are experiencing so far this season.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 8, 2010 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions
you're absolutely right
re atkins and milwood, however, they didn’t do much beyond that, and those were ill advised. they made it a point to rely on guys who weren’t quite ready – especially early in the season.
by Professor Stephanie Willbanks on Jul 8, 2010 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Mike Gonzalez
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs and Beyond the Box Score.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 8, 2010 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the title question of the original post would be more interesting if this team had a winning record
As it is, they just have a stretch of games where they are a couple games over .500. But the team is still on pace to win about 74 games. So the current question should be, “Should We Whine About The Losing?” Because the Royals are likely to have yet another losing season.
The immoderate moderator
Because I recognized that "whining about winning" is occuring in yet another losing Royals season?
I really don’t think I’m turning into Neyer. I just recognize when the Royals are a bad team and when the Royals have a bad GM. These are awful realities which hurt my soul. And I don’t jump to unrealistic extremes like predicting the Royals will never again win a World Series…ever (a Rob Neyer classic).
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 8, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
perhaps "whining about a win streak" captures it better
but I don’t read any of the comments posted herein as assuming I meant they would even be so bold as to have a winning record.
And, the alliteration wouldn’t be as tight.
And, that is the reason for the “thought experiment” at the end of the post.
"Shot by my own men."
by StonewallPDS on Jul 9, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
We are definitely better than 2008
I don’t get the comparison That year we had Brett Tomko and John Bale. Ross Gload playing first every day. We had TPJ. Butler and Dejesus were much worse. We didn’t have Chen or Betemit!!
They only difference is Meche
betemits 50 odd PAs and Chen havent made that huge of a difference
and really, the team isnt all that better
we;re, seriously, like 1 or 2 wins better than we’ve been every year through 85 games. seriously, check the numbers
I was told there would be no numbers.
Signed,
-A guy Trey Hillman would buy a newsletter about baseball from.
:)
Given enough velocity even a pig will fly
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jul 8, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
The record isnt' better
but the talent is. How can you say its not? And its a big contrast between Yost and Hillman as far as winning.
Supposedly two of our better starting pitchers are still injured. This team has a chance don’t be so critical
by GobbleforCyoung on Jul 8, 2010 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree with this
Numbers aside, the team doesn’t look as fragile as it did just about every day under Hillman. Maybe the fact that the change can’t be precisely measured and laid out in a chart is exactly what bothers some people. To me, the change is one of psychology and character. They seem collectively like a surly, unpredictable teenager who finally started to come out of that ugly period. And you can’t blame them for the vileness of those awkward years. Their upbringing was just terrible.
Place witty signature here.
My feelings on the issue would be mixed, real mixed
I would be happy the team played well, even overachieved, but at the same time leary that there’s a shoe going to drop somwhere. The shoe could be extension of the stop-gap players we can’t stand, or a horrific slide back into putridity that we’ve gotten used to seeing. Either way, I find myself looking for the bad to happen, hoping like hell that it doesn’ t happen.
I don’t actually care who helps the team win on any given game. It is, after all, a team game, not an individual sport. That being said, I almost want the suck-krew, (Kendall, Pods, Guillen, Ankiel, Yuni, and to a lesser degree Willie B) to have carreer years, overachieve and do better than anyone expects them to. Why? Perhaps it will make another team or teams view them as valuable and trade for them to get them off our team. Trade the lot of em for a bag of rubber nipples for all I care. But if they’re here, maybe I can hope they have real good seasons for us. I actually find myself wanting Ankiel to reinjure himself, (not that I want to see anyone hurt, I don’t) I just don’t want him to come out of the minors, at all, ever, for as long as he’s a Royal.
One thing I do see positively on this team over other versions in the past, is the fire, the drive to win, the belief the team can win. For whatever reasons, the team is drinking the Yost-aid and it seems to be working. You can see this team doesn’t give in late in games like past versions did, or even the same team led by Hillman. I see that as refreshing, and makes me root for the Royals a lot more than I used to.
Sorry for lengthy comment, I don’t post often
Superstitious? I'm not superstitious
*spins Frank White bobblehead conterclockwise three times
I don't want to see Ankiel hurt, either
I wouldn’t wish a broken leg or torn Achilles on anyone except Diego Maradona. But a strained oblique and a little lower back pain would do just fine. Won’t do any serious damage to him, but will keep him off the field where he belongs.
"The bowler's Holding, the batsman's Willey" - Unfortunate cricket commentator

by 
















