Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Royals Catchers 2009 v 2010

Just to further depress all of us that Kendall's getting everyday action and that we somehow chose the worst of 3 options this offseason (assuming there were only 3 options...) in giving Kendall the starting C job over Olivo and Buck, here's the 2009 and 2010 (projected) stats for our catchers. I'd say if anything, these are optimistic for 2010 because of the obvious wear on Kendall as he makes a run at the major league record for games caught.

Star-divide

 

The stats:

 

Offensively:


R   H   2B   3B   HR   RBI   SB   CS   BB   SO   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  
2009     72    162    32        8     31     99      6     3    30     167 0.270 0.310 0.504 0.814
2010 Projected
    47    141    24      -        -       49    15     9    49        54 0.265 0.331 0.311 0.642

  (25)    (21)    (8)     (8)   (31)   (50)      9     6    19   (113) -0.005 0.021 -0.193 -0.172

 

 

Defensively:

 


PB WP SB CS CS%
2009 14 89 114 39 25%
2010 Projected
5 45 118 46 28%

 

 

So basically, we are MUCH worse off at the plate as we all probably knew, but we also probably overstated our disdain for the Buck/Olivo combination last season. Of all problems we had, getting a .270/.310/.504 out of the catching position wasn't exactly something that needed fixing. Of course, the other side of it is the MLB-leading 89 wild pitches thrown last season. This season's 33 are a little below the league average. I have no way to know how many of those are Olivo's, but from watching most of the games last year, I'd say a ton of them. There's no question we chose the worst of possible worlds with Kendall, but the atrocity that is his bat, especially in comparison to last year's production, is so egregiously one-sided, that no defensive contribution could really be relevant.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'll never figure out why John Buck was so hated.

I really disliked Olivo’s defense and Buck’s rag arm (Kendall’s arm has looked worse at times this year), but other than that, they were both at the upper end of the middle range for catcher offense. Yeah, the OBP was terrible, but the SLG more than made up for it.

by AxDxMx on Aug 2, 2010 7:39 PM EDT reply actions  

It really saddens me

I recognized Buck’s deficiencies, but I couldn’t seem to get anyone on board with my “Buck teleports behind the plate” meme. Seriously, it seemed like you had to TRY to throw the ball away from Buck to get it past him, although he did have the occasional hiccup (all catchers do).

But Bucky really is fantastic at blocking balls in the dirt, even when they’re wild right or left too. Absolutely fantastic.

And now he’s hitting even better than last year (when he was above average). Breaks my heart.

I am now channeling Will McDonald's optimism.

by jonfmorse on Aug 2, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dunno how true this is or not

but I imagine Buck’s status as part of the Beltran trade probably didn’t help him. Just a hunch, even though I’ve generally been a fan of his ever since he arrived in KC. Part of the reason I liked Buck more than Olivo was in part because I thought Buck’s noodle arm was more tolerable than Olivo’s awful defense.

As for Olivo, keep in mind that he has been playing half his games at Coors Field, and it definitely shows in his splits—at home, he’s hitting .389/.413/.678, and on the road, he’s hitting .202/.296/.336 (albeit in a slightly smaller sample size). Olivo’s road OPS is actually worse than Kendall’s season OPS.

Don’t take that previous paragraph as any kind of endorsement of Kendall—in fact, Kendall’s road OPS this year is a TPJ-esque .594. All I’m trying to say is that it is totally understandable to miss Olivo and Buck in light of the totally worthwhile display of veteranny grit we get this year, I think the far bigger mistake was in letting Buck go rather than Olivo.

by DarthYoshi on Aug 2, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I missed Kendall in the AS game too.. Buck was waaaay better that anyone gave him credit for.

Your killin me smalls....

by royalblue69 on Aug 2, 2010 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Any way to get a comparison

based on WAR?

-You play to win the game - Herm Edwards

by truebluetradition on Aug 2, 2010 9:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Olivo, Buck, and Pena

combined for 2.0 WAR in 2009. Through 105 games, Kendall (1.2) and Pena (-0.2) have combined for 1.0 WAR (thus far) in 2010.

"Never get less than 12 hours sleep. Never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as as city. And never go near a lady who's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick with that, and everything else is cream cheese." -Coach Bobby Finstock

by Sweep_the_Leg on Aug 2, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan