Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

The Brewers Did the Right Thing

Right now, the Milwaukee Brewers might look like horrible failures. Haha they just lost to the Cardinals in six games! They got blown out at home in an elimination game! This is understandable, but it is an immediate emotional response and an overreaction. They won the NL Central, won an NLDS series, and won two games in the NLCS. They were six wins from a World Series title. Their big 2011 gamble paid off. They could have gone 79-83 and gone down in flames, to be sure, but they did not. 

Last night, there was an undercurrent of discussion to the effect of: the Brewers have a horrible farm system because of the Greinke-Marcum trades and Greinke-Marcum sucked in the postseason, so LOL fail. The details of the Greinke-Marcum trades are quite fascinating, but I would like to respond, primarily to the argument centered around trading away prospects. Obviously, from the Royals perspective, there are multiple layers of relevance here. 

  • The purpose of a farm system is to help you reach the postseason and win a championship. A good farm system, in and off itself, is completely irrelevant to a Major League team. 
  • Greinke & Marcum helped the Brewers reach the postseason. While the Brewers could have conceivably made the playoffs without them (and a straight WAR subtraction suggests they would) given the fact that they would have quite likely replaced Greinke & Marcum with sub-replacement level starters, which could have had a cascade effect on the bullpen, etc. at the very least we can see that the last two weeks of the season would have played out very differently for Milwaukee.
  • Farm systems can contribute by producing players directly or by providing trade currency. Greinke & Marcum were, effectively, products of the Brewer farm system. If you must be a farm system fetishist, Greinke & Marcum can work for you just the same. They were generated by shiny prospects.

Star-divide

  • The Brewers traded in some potential future wins for present wins, which, given their situation, made perfect sense. Trying to get from 80 wins to 90 wins now is more valuable than worrying about 65 versus 75 wins in 2014. 
  • Moreover, we don't actually know if Milwaukee traded away any future wins at all. This is far from set in stone, even today. 
  • The Brewers already had a poor farm system, which was in part why they made the Marcum & Greinke trades in the first place. In trading away Lorenzo Cain, Jake Odorizzi, and Brett Lawrie they gutted what was left, but they didn't pawn off a future trip to the playoffs.
  • Look, neither trade was perfect and both Greinke and Marcum were disappointments in October. That's fair.

    I love the Greinke trade for the Brewers. They got a potential 6 or 7 WAR pitcher in bulk, for a handful of prospects and bit players. It is the kind of trade people propose on message boards and blogs all the time. The worst part of the trade was that Betancourt was included, which no one has ever really understood. Was he an NBA-style inclusion, an awful player who had to be included, or did the Brewers actually think he was positive value? The weird thing is, Yuni had some huge hits in the postseason, and the same usual awful defense. He was Yuni, but over the postseason sample, he may have been a positive. Cain and Escobar are all-defense players of unclear utility. Jeffress is a live arm and Odorizzi is a lottery ticket. The only player in the trade who has a chance of being as good as Zack Greinke is Odorizzi, and that will happen, if it happens at all, in 2014. The Royals got depth and got rid of a player who (supposedly) wanted out and was a bad clubhouse guy, and that was about it.

    The Marcum trade is more complicated. Last off-season, the Brewers acquired Shaun Marcum from Toronto in exchange for Brett Lawrie. Marcum had a bad postseason, while Lawrie had an absolutely insane month and a half to end 2011. Lawrie hit .293/.373/.580. Toronto is slated to enjoy six more seasons of Lawrie's services, and there are reasonable odds that he will be an extremely valuable player for them over that span. His 2011 performance was delivered in an extremely small sample, but with his top prospect pedigree and the low risk associated with position player prospects, something like, in terms of WAR, a 2-3-5-5-6-6 win progression seems plausible. Marcum was basically a 3 Win player in 2011, and that would be a decent expectation going forward. The odd thing is, the Brewers could have used a competent 3B in 2011, but they felt that the overall shape of their team needed to be refitted. They wanted to give up some offense for starting pitching. 

    Lastly, the Brewers got two years each of Greinke/Marcum. These were not three month rentals.

    Prospects are fun to talk about, because they always have the potential. It's fun to sit here as a Royals fan and imagine how awesome Odorizzi or whomever is going to be someday. Playing in two postseason series and cashing in on the end of the Braun-Fielder era is better. The Brewers have a poor farm system. Guess what? They have a good Major League team.

    Comment 74 comments  |  6 recs  | 

    Do you like this story?

    More from Royals Review

    Would You Hire Dayton Moore Again?

    May 2012 by Freneau - 212 comments

    Royals M.A.S.H Report

    May 2012 by Jeff Zimmerman - 16 comments

    Royal Ramblings for 4/19/12

    Apr 2012 by Jeff Zimmerman - 102 comments

    Upbeat 2012 Royal Predictions

    Mar 2012 by Jeff Zimmerman - 154 comments

    Comments

    Display:

    good points, Will

    you have a good farm system to build a good major league team, either by promotion, trades, or both. it makes no sense to have a great farm system and hoard the prospects like magic beans.

    "Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

    by buddyball on Oct 17, 2011 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

    Marcum wasn't a good deal.

    Not terrible. Not good though.

    But I’m not a Marcum fan. Stuff isn’t good enough to sustain 2010 numbers.

    by WURoyal on Oct 17, 2011 12:09 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

    The casual Brewers fans are probably sick over the Marcum deal.

    I don’t hate it either way, but having Hairsston as the 3B is a liability. It surprises me that Yuni sucks more than him actually. OUr team would probably look alot different if the Brewers did the Greinke deal first…

    I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

    by mitchfreakingmaier! on Oct 17, 2011 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

    It surprises me

    They couldn’t find anything out on the trade market better than Hairston. I get their farm system is depleted, but there had to be someone out there.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

    And it's not like the Brewers are now option-less

    They still have a great team on the books for next year, and could make a couple moves to go for it again. Based on current rosters (taking Pujols and Fielder out) I think they might be the favorites in the NL central next year.

    Option B : they could rebuild by moving some of their SPs through trades this offseason or next July.

    by Loose Seal on Oct 17, 2011 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

    Ehhh, with Wainwright back I think you have to give the nod to the Cards

    Re-signing Berkman, finding a serviceable bullpen, plus the emergence of several solid options in Jay, Freese, and Allen Craig.

    Definitely like the Cards if they re-sign Furcal (which is almost a certainty, IMO, if they lose Albert).

    by WURoyal on Oct 17, 2011 2:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

    not saying the Brewers fan base is gonna get desperate but

    there is at least one guy who suggested replacing Prince Fielder with Clint Robinson

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

    I think, as Royals fans, our view of the farm system is skewed

    We’ve suffered such bad teams for so long that Royals fans automatically assume that whoever is in the fame system is inherently better than a player at the major league level. Fans keep calling for the likes of David Lough and Clint Robinson to play when, in fact, they aren’t any improvements over what we have here. Even the Kilamonster—who the Royals misandled for sure, yes—has proven to not be at all close to the talent level that we assigned him.

    So, naturally, Royals fans look at the Brewers’ farm system and scoff. Well, the Brewers have done twice within the last decade what the Royals haven’t been able to do for the last almost 30 years. Advantage Brewers.

    by Yodazilla on Oct 17, 2011 12:25 PM EDT reply actions  

    Good points
    We’ve suffered such bad teams for so long that Royals fans automatically assume that whoever is in the fame system is inherently better than a player at the major league level

    This also goes for the Chiefs and quarterbacks/back up quarterbacks.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Fans of bad teams almost always seem to have that issue

    with their quarterbacks. The devil you don’t know is better than the devil you do know.

    I do remember seeing Rich Gannon come off the bench and totally outshine Steve Bono when I was very young, so it’s skewed for me, too.

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room!

    by KeepItCopacetic on Oct 18, 2011 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

    Gannon Looked Great

    Until he threw the horrible interception. Every time.

    I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

    by philofthenorth on Oct 18, 2011 7:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

    My response to this is here:

    Give it a look.

    I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

    2012 is the year we shine.

    by Jack Marsh on Oct 17, 2011 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

    Whoops, link didn't show up properly.

    http://www.royalsreview.com/2011/10/17/2495862/the-brewers-did-the-right-thing-why-cant-the-royals

    I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

    2012 is the year we shine.

    by Jack Marsh on Oct 17, 2011 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

    couldn't agree with this more

    two wins from the World Series seems like a pretty good outcome for the Brewers. their GM has a little bit of work to do this winter, but he showed he can be creative last winter.

    by BeauJackson on Oct 17, 2011 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

    Also, if the FA comp picks stay more or less the same,

    the Brewers will at least get a 1st round and a supplemental pick, maybe two first round picks if Marcum can sustain success.

    So the Brewers actually traded “prospect Odorizzi” for “future prospect Odorizzi”

    Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448

    by SagehenMacGyver47 on Oct 17, 2011 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

    if Marcum's price is low enough post playoffs

    then go for it..

    sure, as a 30 year old pitcher, the level of his performance will hold-even or go-down. But he’d be the best pitcher in the rotation and his price wouldn’t be any lower than it is now.

    Provided that Marcum’s arm isn’t toast or something

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

    The Royals got depth and got rid of a player who (supposedly) wanted out and was a bad clubhouse guy, and that was about it.

    There is no supposedly about it.

    by 306008 on Oct 17, 2011 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

    the main supposedly is

    the matter of how much did he want out before the Royals started shopping him. It’s a great spin to shop someone for months, then when he wants a resolution to the situation, blame him for wanting out. (Coincidentally, the two only two teams to express interest could have met in the World Series)

    It’s like blaming one side entirely for a divorce, when that’s rarely ever the case.

    I will note that there’s not exactly any reason for the Royals fans to trash talk any playoff team. Considering that there’s still a solid shot that Zack Greinke will have played more games in the playoffs than Alcides Escobar when their times in baseball end.

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

    DM told me, in the same room, that Greinke got 2 offers

    Milwaukee and Texas

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

    The problem with Zack and the clubhouse

    was his refusal to eat fried chicken, drink beer, and play video games with Gallardo and Marcum when all three were off.

    Or was the problem that they did do it?

    I can’t keep it straight.

    Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
    My Twitter feed.
    Before getting tweaked, read up on regression.

    by Matt Klaassen on Oct 17, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

    I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

    by philofthenorth on Oct 17, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

    Had Greinke had stayed in KC and pitched the way he did in 2010,

    the Royals would have gotten nothing for him. If Greinke would have accepted the Nationals trade offer, would the Royals be in a better position moving forward?

    by royal_in_cincinnati on Oct 17, 2011 1:25 PM EDT reply actions  

    Not quite right

    We’d still have the option of trading Greinke this winter, and he’d still has significant value, although not as much as last winter. We’d also have the option of trading Greinke in July. We’d also have the option of holding onto Greinke (after all, we are looking for an ace this winter), and taking draft pick compensation when he leaves – or signing him to an extension if he was amenable.

    As for the Nats deal, I believe it was Danny Espinosa (3.5 WAR this year), P Jordan Zimmerman (3.4 WAR), and P Drew Storen (0.9 WAR) with possibly OF Michael Burgess as well so yea, it was better.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Catcher Derrick Norris

    Wasn’t he rumored to be the 4th piece?

    by Dadunca on Oct 17, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

    There were lots of rumors

    I think it was Heyman who reported Espinosa, Zimmerman, Storen and a minor leaguer, and I’m assuming it wasn’t a guy as good as Norris. Maybe it was.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Would of loved that trade.

    Better than what we got from the Brewers for sure.

    by vic1124 on Oct 17, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

    actually

    Greinke may have pitched worse in 2011 than 2010

    But you know, STRIKEOUTTTTTZZZZZ… so he’s obviously more awesome than ever

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

    not saying they're bad

    but it’s essentially the entire Greinke defense for people who don’t blame everything bad to happen to Greinke on the Milwaukee defense.

    1.6 bbrefWAR over 28 starts in 2011 after 2.3 bbrefWAR in 33 starts in 2010. Or in fWAR, 5.1 in 2010 and 3.9 in 2011.

    So the Greinke that allegedly autopiloted half of 2010 was better than the Greinke on a contending team?

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

    He quit on both the Royals and the Brewers

    In fact, in every season that he didn’t win the CY award, he quit on his team. He’s a quitter. Hates baseball too. And Kansas City.

    You may know me as NYRoyal.

    by Scott McKinney on Oct 17, 2011 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

    he quit every year

    I hear he refused to pitch every 5 days after the season ended. Quitter.

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

    IIRC, Lawire is supposed to be a terrible defender too

    So he would have fit right in.

    Great points all around. I think in part it is why I don’t mind so much cashing in some of these prospects for a SP now, provided he is here for at least three more seasons. I guess we all agree on that, its just a matter of whether we should do it this winter or next.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

    I'm sure it's pretty easy, tons of team would be willing to trade a young, cheap ace

    for, say, Christian Colon, Jarrod Dyson, Chris Dwyer, and Tim Collins.

    I’d just be worried that’s too much to give up.

    Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
    My Twitter feed.
    Before getting tweaked, read up on regression.

    by Matt Klaassen on Oct 17, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Depending on who that "young, cheap ace" is, I might take that in a second.

    No one has a tremendous ceiling on that list I remember Goldstein saying scouts were saying Herrera is a “55” guy, and Dwyer is a “50” with control issues. If you can sell him as a part of a good deal—awesome. Collins, even with better control, doesn’t seem dominant. Dyson’s speed is really fun to watch, but the bat will frustrate into a 4th OF. Colon is 22 and has a sub-.700 OPS in AA.

    None of these guys are dead in the water, but they are all easy sells for me. 2 WAR players at their peak.

    by dejezeus on Oct 17, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Ummm

    He’s joking. Those four are not going to come close to getting a “young, cheap ace.” For anyone to give up an 1) ace, who is indeed 2) young and 3) cheap (if anyone would, which is unlikely to the point of non-existent) the Royals would have to give up at least one of the highest upside in-the-majors-or-close guys they have, like Hosmer or Moose, which defeats the entire purpose. To get an ace, you’ve got to 1) develop your own, 2) pay a ton of money, or 3) bundle high-end prospects in July for a guy with a year or so left on his contract and see if you can resign him. That’s it.

    What the Royals might be able to do with the above prospects is get a solid-yet-unspectacular innings-eating relatively cost-controlled third starter. Yay.

    It's all ball bearings these days!

    by CentralChamps20?? on Oct 17, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

    look

    it was impossible to get a Brett Lawrie for one of our guys. After all, he wasn’t a shortstop, centerfielder or a pitcher. Much like how all those good Beltran offers had to be turned down since they weren’t a 3rd baseman, catcher, and pitcher.

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

    I Still Don't

    Know who Mike Wood is, but his B-R comparables are outstanding.
    1.Doug Waechter (980)
    2.Gary Knotts (980)
    3.Slick Coffman (978)
    4.Doug Linton (978)
    5.Frank Gabler (978)
    6.George Grant (977)
    7.Rocky Coppinger (976)
    8.Sun-Woo Kim (976)
    9.George Murray (975)
    10.Joe Slusarski

    I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

    by philofthenorth on Oct 17, 2011 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Unfortunately

    I remember the Doug Linton Era in KC all too well.

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Waechter was a beast

    I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

    by philofthenorth on Oct 17, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

    The Brewers offseason moves we a complete and utter failure.

    Saying that the did the right thing is absolutely incorrect.

         If they had stayed pat and signed Bruce Chan and Jeff Francis, they would have been 1.7 WAR higher even if Cain did nothing for them. They now have lost Cain, Lowrie, Escobar for 15 cost controlled years, have no fiancial flexibiliy and will bleed all thier talent away due to lack of money. It was stupid when they made the deals, and its stupid now.

    Go Royals!

    by BabyBlues on Oct 17, 2011 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

    a complete and utter failure

    did the Royals go to the ALCS while the Brewers won 71 games or something?

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

    They would have won more games without Grienke and Marcum then with them and spent

    about 35 million (7 more wins) more to do it. That is an epic fail.

    Go Royals!

    by BabyBlues on Oct 17, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

    they still went to the NLCS this year and the goal of the moves was to get the playoffs in fielder's walk year

    i don’t see how making moves to build a playoff team, and reaching that goal is an epic fail. now, maybe they should’ve kept lawrie and the bag of meh they traded to the royals, and traded fielder instead. but, isn’t it nice to go for the win now when you can?

    by BeauJackson on Oct 17, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

    are there any guys out there who would have added those 7 wins?

    or 5 wins according to BBRef

    Keeping in mind that Chen/Francis is 2.6 WAR combined, with Chen giving you 2.6 of 2.6 there.

    Just because your family shops Best Choice doesn’t mean every family should shop Best Choice.

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Francis has more WAR in Fangraphs model

    What accounts for that?

    Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

    by RoyalsRetro on Oct 17, 2011 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Each win is worth 5 million, and the Brewers wasted a lot of money.

    Francis and Chen were worth 4.7 fWAR, combine that with the 1.5 WAR they lost to playing Yunie, and the over two WAR they lost to playing Mcgehee., plus whatever they would have gotten from Cain and that equals…

    FAIL

    Go Royals!

    by BabyBlues on Oct 17, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

    That's just what the numbers say.

    They show that Chen+Francis+Escobar+Lowrie were more valuable then Grienke+Marcum+Yunie+McGehee, and much cheaper as well.

    Go Royals!

    by BabyBlues on Oct 18, 2011 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

    I'm the last person to get into this fight,

    but isn’t including Lawrie in this a little premature? That’s a really small sample size and I seem to remember the Brewers record being something like 17-3 in home games where Zaq pitched. That’s strong. Also, didn’t they already have McGehee?

    I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

    by mitchfreakingmaier! on Oct 18, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Yep

    I think it is an awesome idea to construct a team lineup for 2011 by waiting for the 2011 season to be over, then adding up a bunch of random dudes WAR and proclaiming their season a failure for not getting THAT lineup. Jeff Effing Francis? A search of BCB results in zero stories on Jeff Mondaythroughfriday Francis. But I suppose you would counter that they should’ve been looking at him, since now we know the difference in WAR between 2 cherry picked groups. Re: money and Mr. Betancourt. I think we can all agree that it would be a better move to just put a briefcase with $4 million in it out at SS. Or a $45 couch.

    by John Good on Oct 19, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

    awww luck

    the concept that all pitchers should have the same results based off of a few factors… the great booster to the hopes of pitchers who aren’t very good.

    Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
    Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!

    by BHWick on Oct 17, 2011 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

    are you Kyle Davies?

    "Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

    by buddyball on Oct 17, 2011 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Brett Lawrie

    You didn’t really take a close look at his numbers did you. Yep, he got off to a very fast start but then the pitchers caught up to him and his numbers fell like a rock. So to think he’s going to put up similar type numbers(293/373/580) next season isn’t a likely scenario.

    by R_F on Oct 18, 2011 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

    Badly

    Well, he hit .171 over the last 10 games before an injury put him out for the year. I don’t exactly see that as an up swing.

    by R_F on Oct 18, 2011 6:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

    He'll Go As

    Far as duct tape and 40s will take him. Needz moar tatz.

    I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

    by philofthenorth on Oct 18, 2011 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

    VERY IMPORTANT

    Yours truly,

    Luke Hochevar, Chris Dwyer and Mike Montgomery

    by thelaundry on Oct 18, 2011 10:47 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

    10 games

    I prefer to look at 3 years worth of numbers and lots of video myself. But since, Lawrie only played in 43 games, the last 10 do tell us “something”. He got off to a hot start which is not all that unusual. Then the adjustments began and his production fell off rather dramatically. I would be more impressed if he had hit .200 the first three weeks and .400 the next three rather than the other way around. This would have shown he was the one making the positive adjustments. 43 games does not tell me much, except I like his range, arm and speed, and I think he will hit next year, just not 293/373/580. If he plays 140+ games next year I would look more for an OPS around 800 not 950+. But I was wrong once and it could happen again someday.

    by R_F on Oct 18, 2011 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recommended FanPosts

    Royalsretro_small
    Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
    Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
    Mitch On the Bench
    Royalsretro_small
    Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

    Recent FanPosts

    Dignan_small
    Friday Game 43 Open Thread
    Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
    MORE Mitch on the Bench
    Sexy-beast-original_small
    OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
    Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
    RR Poetry Contest
    Small
    Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
    Small
    Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
    Small
    Alcides Escobar's Bat
    Download_small
    Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
    Chalmers2_small
    2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

    + New FanPost All FanPosts >

    Yahoo_full_count

    Managers

    Cimg0036_small Freneau

    Editors

    Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

    Authors

    Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

    Headshot_small Old Man Duggan