Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Would You Want Joe Mauer?

Let's imagine that North and South Dakota unite, secede from the United States, then successfully invade Minnesota. They form the nation of Dakotasota. As part of the chaos that ensues, Major League Baseball folds the Twins. The current roster is subject, with current contracts transferable and valid, to a kind of draft, and the Royals get the first pick.

Should they take Joe Mauer? Would you take Joe Mauer?

In eight seasons, Mauer has hit .323/.403/.471 and is generally regarded as a good defensive catcher. In 2008-09, he was Hall of Fame good, though his production has tailed off in the last two seasons. In 2010-11 he hit .313/.387/.432 in 219 games. At his peak, he might be a 7-9 win player, and even in his injury-marred and sometimes frustrating 2010-11 campaigns, he's been valuable.

The issue is Mauer's contract and to a lesser extent his injury history, performance and status as a catcher. When Mauer was signed to a longterm contract in Minnesota, the news was heralded with puppy dogs and cookies enthusiasm and joy, as he stayed with his hometown team. It was, as they say, supposedly good for baseball that the Twins locked him up. I was skeptical that the contract was a good move for the Twins, and even half-predicted he would be resented by casual fans by the end of the deal. From now until 2018, Mauer will be paid $23 million annually. He'll be 29 next season, and has already started 740 games at catcher. Players like Mauer present a paradoxical situation: he gives you extreme value as a catcher, but those innings are toxic long-term.

The Royals believe they will be ready to contend soon, and Mauer would certainly help the team on the field. Could they afford him along with keeping Eric Hosmer and others around? What about 2016-2018? Will $23 million not be so much by then? Questions abound.

So, would you take Mauer if you could have him?

Poll
Would you want Joe Mauer on the Royals?
Yes
248 votes
No
408 votes

656 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 90 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

23 Million is way too much for a low payrolls team to invest in any one player

Especially one who has serious injury questions. Even if you were to try to put him at first or RF permenantly, I fear the damage may be done, so to speak.

by WURoyal on Oct 26, 2011 1:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

So will Dakotasota citizens be subject to the regular MLB draft?

Or will Dayton need to go in an set up an academy for his international signings?

by Sweep_the_Leg on Oct 26, 2011 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

how does Canada work?

I see it following that path.

Kinda depends on how the Franken-Bachman government sorts everything out.

by Freneau on Oct 26, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Dakotasota would be an awesome country...

Population of 6.7 million, great scenery, decent economic base, fairly weird political mix

by Freneau on Oct 26, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus they'd probably be an immediate nuclear power

what with all the ICBM’s that are still in silos up there.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Oct 26, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

As someone who was born and raised, and currently lives in South Dakota

I can tell you that we South Dakotans believe North Dakota is a worthless wasteland, and would never team up with them for much of anything, and we would never allow the crazy Minnesota politians to be in change of us.

talk to me, Johnny...

by johnny4 on Oct 26, 2011 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wasn't Dakota territory unified and only split up for statehood

I remember reading that the party that dominated Dakota territory also controlled the Congress at the time and brought the territory in as two separate states in order to double the number of Senators they’d get at the time.

by KSinDC on Oct 26, 2011 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

...

“The two population centers in the territory were in the northeast and southeast corners of the territory, several hundred miles away from each other. On a national level, there was pressure from the Republican Party to admit two states to add to their political power in the Senate. A century later, with the populations of the two states at low levels, there were discussions of reuniting them as “Dakota”, but this has never been seriously considered."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dakota_Territory

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Oct 26, 2011 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

the real division between the Dakotas is East/West

but Western Dakota would basically be Rapid City and not much else, so…

by Freneau on Oct 26, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Home of the Thrillers!

Rapid City and the awesomeness of the Black Hills would be enough to move West Dakota into the Top 25 of States.

by Gopherballs on Oct 26, 2011 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Western South Dakota (what we call West River)

is all Cowboys and Indians. Literally. West River is almost exclusively Indian reservations or ranch land (real cowboy stuff). West Dakota would be a very beautiful place to visit, with a very small population. The Black Hills is a fantstic place to vacation if you get the chance.

talk to me, Johnny...

by johnny4 on Oct 27, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt the western half of the Dakotas

has 100,000 people. That area is seriously unpopulated, like neighboring zones of Montana, Wyoming, and Nebraska.

It’s Taco John’s territory, though.

"All the boys think she's a guy
She's got crazy Frenchy eyes."

by Juancho on Oct 27, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

If for nothing else I have to nominate it for awesomeness

due to the Taco Johns factor.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Oct 28, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

There was an article a few weeks ago

About how North Dakota is technically not a state because the never ratified something properly.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 27, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Franken-Bachmann govt

is an interesting paradox.

Obviously, you are not a golfer.

by Kyled85 on Oct 26, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

No

We have the Savior

Best Farm System EVER.....

by tiquanunderwear on Oct 26, 2011 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Mauer would go undrafted due to the contract

as would Morneau and probably Blackburn too. Assuming MLB players only under team control for 2012, the draft would go something like:

1. Span
2. Baker
3. Liriano
4. Duensing
5. Pavano
6. Valencia
7. Slowey
8. Perkins
9. Casilla
10. Revere
11. Mijares
12. Swarzak
13. pass
14. Slama
15. pass
16. pass
17. pass
18. Nishioka
19. pass
20. pass
21. Hughes
22.-30. pass

by Gopherballs on Oct 26, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't believe how overwhelming the "No" votes are

If someone like that is available and interested, it’s crazy pass up the opportunity. The Royals have not been able to get their hands on proven good players. The either end up gambling on potential (Meche, Melky) or overpay for people no one else wanted (JoGui, Farnsworthless).

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 26, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

cool

let's do it!

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Oct 26, 2011 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

From what I understand, the Royals made an offer in that ballpark (adjusted for the general across-the-board rise in salaries) to Torii Hunter but he turned them down for the Angels.

Anyway, the $23M wouldn’t be an offer, in which the Royals would need to compete with other teams. In the hypothetical proposed, the $23M is already the contract amount, and locked in for a good number of years (during which free agent prices will no doubt continue to rise). It may be expensive, but it’s an opportunity unlike any other.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 26, 2011 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the 2008 offseason, it was the equivalent

Who had a bigger contract than that, other than A-Rod? Also, I thought I had heard that the Torii offer was as much as $18M per season, but my recollection could be wrong.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 26, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

5/75 was reported....

and the salaries havent really risen by all that much…i think that was the same offseason that CC got 161 million, Tex got 180 million, burnett got 82 million….i might be off by a year though.

while salaries may have gone up, we could get better than the equivalent of Torrii Hunter for $23 million a year…every single year. if we offered the remaining mauer contract to every FA this offseason, the only guys that MIGHT turn it down would be pujols and fielder. crawford wouldve taken it last offseason. reyes would take it this offseason, etc

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Oct 26, 2011 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Torii signed in the offseason between 2007 and 2008

CC, Burnett and Tex all signed the following offseason, 2008-2009.

In any case, OF COURSE any free agent (with the possible exception of Pujols and Fielder) would love to take the Mauer contract. That doesn’t mean that teams wouldn’t love to have a guy like Mauer under that contract as well.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 26, 2011 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

how many teams do you think would like to have mauer under contract?

i dont believe that even the yanks would take that contract off of minny’s hands. Boston wouldnt. Who actually would claim him if the twins placed him on irrevocable waivers? I cant think of a single team. San Fran maybe?

we’re gonna owe the guy like 160 million through his age 37 season with health issues when he’s a marginal upgrade on the DH we already have. the prospects that billy would return? probably not nearly what you’d think. Half of the league is out. Half of the rest of the teams dont really want a full time DH. We’d have to be getting fucking mike trout AND bryce harper back for butler to make trading for mauers contract a win for this organization

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Oct 26, 2011 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

San Francisco?

doubtful.

Nick Swisher is handsome. Johnny Giavatella close second.

by ChrisCEIT on Oct 27, 2011 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

No way they punt on Buster Posey at this point. I couldn’t see Mauer in the NL at all.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Oct 28, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

arod's probably available for real...

and we wouldnt have to compete to get him either

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Oct 26, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, they declined the option on Joe Nathan

SHOULD THE ROYALS SIGN JOE NATHAN?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2011 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't trust people with first names for last names.

Except Gordon, because nobody names their kid Gordon anymore. Probably Beckham’s fault.

by NobodyFsWDeJesus on Oct 26, 2011 6:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Are you kidding?!?

This is our chance to get Dusty Hughes back!

by BrRoyal on Oct 26, 2011 2:00 PM EDT reply actions  

unless he becomes a 6-8 win player again, that contract would kill the royals

can oregon secede next and occupy washington, thus having us have to choose between hernandez, ackley and pineda?

by BeauJackson on Oct 26, 2011 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

YES

Now THERE’S a revolution that I could get behind. Plus, it would simultaneously end the seemingly endless Battle for Grass Creek! That would be a true masterstroke.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Oct 26, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted yes

It’s not rational, but I still have a lot of Mauer love floating through my system from all of Posnanski’s writing on him.

It’s also not rational for the Cardinals to resign Pujols to a ridiculous contract, but I hope they do so.

Obviously, you are not a golfer.

by Kyled85 on Oct 26, 2011 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Why would you take on $161 million in payroll obligations over the next 7 seasons

for a guy who you would immediately put at DH, thereby forcing you to trade a younger, cheaper, and (lately, at least) better option? Most of Mauer’s monster value from his 2006-2010 seasons (the seasons responsible for his average WAR that you cite) came directly from the fact that he played catcher. The positional adjustment from catcher to DH is huge. He’d have to suddenly become healthy and reliable (a huge gamble given the past couple seasons), and then maintain his 2010 numbers just to surpass (barely) Billy’s value. And Mauer would be locked into the position which is by far the easiest and cheapest to fill (outside of middle relievers, at least).

This also doesn’t take into account the impact of Mauer’s contract on the Royals’ payroll. If they’re going to extend ANY of their current crop of prospects, plus Gordon, etc., then MLB payroll would effectively be absolutely maxed out until 2018. Would you really want to completely restrict the team’s ability to sign ANY impact free agents for the next seven years?

Just to give you an idea, Ortiz led all DH’s this season with 4.2 fWAR (over 146 games). His offensive numbers were .309/.398/.554. You’d essentially have to bet that Mauer would maintain that kind of offensive production for his contract to be worth it. And you’d have to determine that that kind of production, even if he provided it, would be worth the massive restriction it would put on the Royals’ payroll. That’s a really tough gamble to justify.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Oct 26, 2011 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The WAR positional adjustment from catcher to DH is 30 f***ing runs (or 3 wins)

Mauer the 6 WAR catcher becomes Mauer the 3 WAR DH, worth about ~$15 million per year.

Why in the world would you commit to spending $23 million annually for the next 7 years for a 3 WAR DH with bilateral leg weakness?

by Gopherballs on Oct 26, 2011 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bilateral leg weakness is not a disease, it's an illness

Mainly caused by an infection or a virus. Once you get rid of the cause (which he has), the strength returns and you get back to the normal trappings of being a catcher.

For a guy that averaged .334/.416/.491 from 2006 to 2010, yeah, I’d pay $23m a year for that. Not to mention moving him off of catcher increases his games played from 140 to 159, which is a decent factor, because although you take into account positional adjustments for WAR you don’t take into account the added production from playing more games, getting more at bats, and presumably being generally healthier from not taking the punishment a catcher does all season.

And yeah, the positional adjustment is 30 runs, but can be somewhat negated based on an increase in playing time:

By going from 140 to 160 games, you get back ~2.5 runs in replacement value.
From 2008 to 2010, he scored 108.4 batting runs (36.13/season) in just 421 games (140.33/season). Averaged out over 160 games, you push it up to 41.29 batting runs per season. Similar increases apply for baserunning runs; it comes out to about a 1-run increase. 2.5+5.16+1=8.66 runs (if you desired, you could nullify the -1.0 runs he was averaging as a fielder as well, pushing it to 9.66 runs).

Doing the math, he is closer to a 4 WAR DH than a 3 WAR, and being worth closer to $20m a year than the $15m you suggest, and this doesn’t adjust for inflation over the next several years that the contract would run.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Oct 26, 2011 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The hypothetical extra 15 games a year are dwarfed by the 30 run positional adjustment

Mauer’s last “healthy” year was 327/402/469, 373 wOBA, 25.3 BRAA in 584 PA (137 games). If Mauer can post a 375 wOBA over 625 PA/150 games, he comes out around +30 Batting Runs Above Average.

30 BRAA + 20 Replacement -17.5 Positional (DH) = 32.5 Runs Above Replacement or 3.25 WAR

3.25 WAR is worth about $16.25 million.

Of course, Mauer would decline over the course of the next 7 years. It would take 1980s Mexican-style hyperinflation for Mauer the DH to ever come close to breaking even on the remaining portion of his contract.

The “bilateral leg weakness” was shorthand for the myriad of physical problems he has suffered in his career. In addition to missing time in 2011 for neck problems, "general soreness," and the aforementioned leg problems, Mauer has had two surgeries on his left knee, a stress reaction in his left leg, and back and shoulder issues. Even if he stops playing catcher, guys miss more time as they age, and with Mauer, much of the damage may have already been done.

by Gopherballs on Oct 26, 2011 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the problem with that.

You are vastly underestimating the positional adjustments between C(which has the highest) and DH, which has the lowest.

The positional adjustment for a catcher is about +10 runs over a season. The adjustment for a DH is -15.
Moving Mauer from catcher to DH instantly drops his value by about 50%.

Take as an excellent example 2010 Mauer and 2010 Butler:
Mauer: .373WOBA, 134 WRC+ 5.6 fWAR
Butler: .372WOBA 132 WRC+ 2.9 fWAR

And that’s an average, injury free year for Mauer offensively.

As a hitter Mauer isn’t a lot better than Butler, he just happens to play catcher which gives him a lot of his value. If you strip him of that (which you’ll have to) then he becomes a very, VERY expensive DH. In fact, as a DH, playing at his average career numbers Mauer would be costing the team about $8 million more than he’s worth. And thats in his peak years. Mauer’s going to be 29, with a lot of innings caught. Even if he’s moved off catcher now, there will likely be long term injury concerns. I don’t normally like the .5 WAR regression for aging, but here it’s probably not too far off.

Let me highlight what that means: Its likely that by 2018, Mauer will be being paid $23 million in order to post below replacement numbers.

Let me double highlight this: In 2009 Jose Guillen got paid $12 million to put up -1.9 WAR for a net value of -$22 million. In 2018, Joe Mauer’s net value will likely be ~ -$29 million

The Mauer contract is a perfect example of why giving catchers large long term deals is very risky. While their performance offensively might not drastically change, even the best hitting catchers are rarely better than above average compared to the rest of the league, and most are a DH or 1B at best after they stop being able to catch, absolutely destroying their value.

"We don’t have guys with a long history of being effective in the seventh and eighth innings."
~Trey Hillman, master of understatements.

by RoyalPug on Oct 26, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doing a straight positional adjustment, yes, he drops by about 2.5-3 WAR

But it’s not that simple. There are numerous factors to take into account, such as an increase in the number of games played and an improvement in overall health of the player.

And yeah, Mauer was worth roughly what Butler was worth based on positional adjustment in 2010, but he did that in 21 fewer games, or roughly 80 fewer plate appearances.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Oct 26, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that might be

But Butler is strangely consistent in his playing time for a DH.
Many DH’s play in fewer games and get fewer at bats than Butler does.
For example in 2010 Mauer’s 584 PA would have put him 5th among 10 qualified DH’s, smack dab in the middle.
And in 2011 He would have been in a tie for 8th most out of 11, but the player with the 5th most had only 20 more PA’s.

Point here being that generally speaking DH’s don’t necessarily get more at bats than Mauer was already getting. And lets not forget the twins are terrible offensively further limiting his at bats.

Further point being that even with an extra 80-90 AB’s Joe would be adding about .5 WAR to his total. Taking an average season for him now being about 5.5 WAR, changing the positional adjustments to make that 3 WAR and adding extra at bats(which is of course assuming he doesn’t miss any significant time to further injury) brings us to 3.5 WAR. approximately worth $17 million.

And it bears further repeating, Mauer put up 5.5 WAR in his prime, his age 27 season, the year players historically perform their best. But he’s now two years past that and will be well on the downslope of his career by the time his contract is done. Even if he hits incredibly well, say at his slightly flukish 2009 levels he is still just breaking even on his contract as a DH. And here’s the thing, small market teams like the Royals and the Twins cannot afford to pay market value, especially not on large contracts(since the availability of money keeps top contracts from actually being equivalent to WAR, essentially no one would ever actually pay market value for an 8 win player or even really a 6 win one).

So if a player’s best case scenario is to break even on a contract that would eat up 1/3 of the payroll for the team, and the worst case is cost the team nearly $10million than he has no business even being considered for the Royals.

"We don’t have guys with a long history of being effective in the seventh and eighth innings."
~Trey Hillman, master of understatements.

by RoyalPug on Oct 26, 2011 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

80-90 more AB's averaged at his '08-'10 level of production

Actually gets him closer to 1 WAR than .5.

Secondly, if you factor that adding Mauer includes a trade of Butler, you are only assuming an additional $14.5m of direct payroll plus whatever you bring in return for Butler.

Adjusting for arbitration and inflation, raises, and salary coming off the books, subtracting Butler’s contract and adding in Mauer’s, the Royals’ payroll sits at about $67m going into the 2013 season. Add an additional $10-$13m for free agents and you are sitting at $80m, a payroll that the Royals can easily maintain, regardless of what they say about the “economics” of baseball. They chucked out $74m in 2010 and $70m in 2009 and still managed to turn a very nice profit. And although Mauer’s salary would account for more than a quarter of that total, in no way does Mauer’s contract push them into an unrealistic stratosphere of salary expenditure over the next five or six years.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Oct 26, 2011 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Once the first wave comes up for renewals, however

You would have to look at restructuring or making a trade.

When Hosmer, Moustakas, Duffy, Montgomery, Crow, Holland, Coleman, Cain, Giavotella and the likes come up for extensions, you would need to make some payroll decisions at that point, right around the 2017 season or the off-season following.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Oct 26, 2011 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

First off his '08-'10 level of production

is unrealistically inflated by a ridiculous ’09. Mauer will never hit that well again. and if we go off his career average, which incidentally is also the exact same as his performance in both ’08 and ’10, than its closer to .5.

Plus if we trade Butler then we are assuming only $14.5m in payroll, but only getting about 1-1.5 more WAR, well below the market rate. Plus there are fringe benefits to Butler over Mauer, namely in a shorter contract. If Cuthbert is ready in 3 years, then the Royals may simply release Butler at the end of his contract and move Moose to DH. This is of course theoretical, but its something to remember.

Plus while the Royals can sustain a payroll of $80, as you point out that would give them about $13m in wiggle room. Room for guys who would already be in arbitration like Gordon, Hochevar and Escobar.
Plus the only reason to aquire Mauer at that expense would be if you thought that having him would put us over the top and into contention/playoffs. Do you honestly think that this team, plus Mauer instead of Perez would make the playoffs? Or could that money be better spent elsewhere?

"We don’t have guys with a long history of being effective in the seventh and eighth innings."
~Trey Hillman, master of understatements.

by RoyalPug on Oct 26, 2011 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you could guarantee me that he would be a C that whole time (and not fall off the face of the earth production-wise)

Sure, sign me up!

But I think most of us think he has 3 years, at most, left at C. Never mind how fragile he is.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/average-is-as-average-does/
323/.403/.471 is an a nice line. A .880 OPS at C is amazing. An .880 in RF or LF is .052 and .035 above average, which is nice, but not earth shattering. And I think a guy who played the first part of his career at C probably gives back a few runs in the field. An .880 at 1B… is actually below average by .002. Paying $23M per year for below average ballplayers is how to cripple a small market team in one pen stroke.

But, hey, if he can convert to 2B like Biggio, I’d also go for it! Considering that has been successful a grand total of once in the history of baseball, I’m going to be skeptical.

by sterlingice on Oct 26, 2011 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Would be interesting to try.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 27, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

he's way too tall

for 2B.

Obviously, you are not a golfer.

by Kyled85 on Oct 27, 2011 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

No Mauer

This isn’t Roto—there’s no need to have a stud at a “scarce position.”

by BlueEyes_Austin on Oct 26, 2011 7:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I would guess the point is

You can win with Yorvit Torrealba as your catcher if you have studs at the premium positions.

Sure helps to have a Buster Posey though.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 27, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I think that the position scarcity notion in roto gets subconciously translated into a similar need in real baseball.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Oct 27, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mauer

Is not 15 million better than Billy Butler and I think Butler is going to improve(power). While Mauer on the other hand is unlikely to be the same player he was. That money could be more wisely spent elsewhere.

by R_F on Oct 26, 2011 10:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Too many arguements in this thread are based...

on the assumption that you would be getting the old Joe Mauer. What I see is a guy that slugged .368 in 333 PA with 3 homeruns. This is the second year in a row his power has been in free fall. That contract is the albatross that will handcuff Minn for many years and be one of the key reasons KC will be able to compete in this division. Minn will not be a serious contender until that contract is resolved.

by dooblay on Oct 27, 2011 12:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Wasn't the outside chance that his injury problems were a part of a larger problem?

I couldn’t trust a man, whose condition sounded degenerative, but perhaps I’m over reacting to what seemed like an obvious solution that no one wanted to hear. I think his injury problems continue and make any money spent on him risky. Also, he doesn’t have the best power numbers to move away from C, so his value is tied to him being a catcher and I doubt he has too many/any years behind the plate.

"If I stop drinking all at once, I'm afraid the cumulative hangover will kill me."
Twitter stole my soul.

by Joseph Landis on Oct 27, 2011 4:33 AM EDT reply actions  

This sounds ridiculous in hindsight

But really when describing his condition, it sounded awful and non-baseball related which was far worse long-term.

"If I stop drinking all at once, I'm afraid the cumulative hangover will kill me."
Twitter stole my soul.

by Joseph Landis on Oct 27, 2011 4:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

He gets paid too much and he's too fragile

As a DH I’d rather have Billy. As a catcher, he’s not going to last another two seasons before he completely falls apart. I’d rather spend the cash on two starting pitchers.

With the Mauer and Morneau contracts hanging around their necks, we don’t need to expect much competition from Minnesota over the next few years. Chicago and Detroit are also aging; Chicago needs a rebuild and some of their players might be available. Cleveland is the second-youngest team in the AL; the Röyals are the youngest.

"All the boys think she's a guy
She's got crazy Frenchy eyes."

by Juancho on Oct 27, 2011 6:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Joe "Hometown Discount" Mauer!

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.
Before getting tweaked, read up on regression.

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 27, 2011 8:46 AM EDT reply actions  

had they signed him to the 10 year deal or whatever before his huge season...

how much do you think they couldve gotten him for? 60% of what they did?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Oct 27, 2011 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gordon Or Mauer?

What a difference a year makes.
projectprospect.com/article/2010/05/04/revisiting-the-2005-draft-part-i

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 27, 2011 11:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Under the scenario Will gave

for this Royals team, Liriano and Span were easily the first to pop in my mind that I’d want to take over Mauer (I was glad to see essentially agreed with Gopherballs’s more informed opinion). 1B, DH and even C are not needs for this team. Pitching is the primary need. If I went with a position player, Span would be a massive upgrade over even the reborn Melky or Cain.

It's all ball bearings these days!

by CentralChamps20?? on Oct 27, 2011 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow

We get our pick of any Minnesota Twin and the best we can come up with is Denard Span!? Sounds to me like the Tinkies Organayezation is Royally fucked

by YouDon'tPhaseMeGobble on Oct 27, 2011 11:13 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Yeah.

The more I look at this Twins team, the more I see that they’re crippled by Mauer and Morneau. they are not a good team anymore with the roster that they fielded at any point this season. This makes the 4 game sweep we suffered to them at home earlier in the year my low point of the season for our club.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Oct 28, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan