The Case for Trading Billy Butler
I've wanted and not wanted to write this blog post for some time. I do think, for the reasons to be elucidated below, that the Royals should consider trading Billy Butler. However, because much of his game is tied to doubles and a decent OBP, Butler is precisely the kind of player that statheads defend against the attacks of fans who see, in Butler's case, surprisingly low home run totals and too many double plays. Like many fans, yes, I'm disappointed that Butler hasn't yet become an offensive machine along the lines of Manny Ramirez or Jim Thome. But those are high standards and despite being a precocious player, he's never reached an elite level. He's never been part of the problem either. Butler's been around for many years now and seems like a genial enough fellow. It would be cool if he could be part of the next good Royals team. I'm just no longer sure it is in the best interest of the Royals to be committed to him.
Butler's name has not surfaced in the numerous Royals trade rumors we've heard this summer. If the Royals aren't considering or even actively shopping Butler, I think they're making a mistake. So, without further preface, here is a devil's advocate case for trading Billy Butler. I have tried to think about Butler not as a fan of the Royals, but how I would see him if I was, say, a Tigers fan.
- This is as good as he's going to be: Butler posted an OPS+ of 125 in 2009, a major improvement from his previous performances. Unfortunately, he's been unable to move to the next level in the last two seasons. His power numbers have mysteriously stagnated, actually dropping slightly from his 2009 performance. Butler -- and we've been writing this for literally years now -- is still young (he'll be 26 next season) but at this point he's now accumulated 2861 Major League PAs. A power spike is really the only way he can get better. He might randomly post a high batting average at some point, but in terms of long run development, he's got to show more power, which will also lead to more walks. There's no reason to expect that that will happen. Butler has hit more ground balls than the league average since he entered the Majors, and while he's whittled around that number to 46%, even if he gets down another four or five percent (a pretty large accomplishment) he's still going to merely be average, hindering true breakout power. Any modest power improvement is also likely to coincide with a natural decline in his batting average, a huge part of his game.
- As a DH/1B Butler simply isn't that special: When you have no positional value you have to be a very good hitter to make an impact, and thus far, Butler hasn't hit at that level. Butler was worth just 1.8 fWAR last season, 6th best in the American League among DHs. (bWAR had him at 2.4) His wOBA of .351 was 27th in the AL amongst all players with 300 PAs or more. In terms of wOBA, his most comparable player in 2011 was Josh Willingham, but Willingham can at least stand out in the outfield.
- As an exclusive DH Butler is hurting the team's roster flexibility: Now that Eric Hosmer is established at 1B, the Royals have the two easiest positions on the roster to fill, 1B & DH completely locked down. Because of this, the Royals have very little room to further improve the offense, especially given that Alex Gordon, Jeff Francoeur, and Mike Moustakas are also seemingly locked into their positions. Upgrading the defense is similarly complicated. If Butler was a better hitter, an elite hitter, you could live with these complications. Is he worth the trouble as a 125 OPS guy with negative baserunning value? Butler forbids the Royals from giving Hosmer or Moose a soft landing as a sometime DH, blocks the position as a way to rest the outfielders, and prevents the Royals from finding a solution if one of the corner guys struggles defensively. Butler is a nice guy with a nickname who happens to make it very difficult to upgrade either the offense or defense of this roster.
All of this is assuming that Billy Butler is not an elite, mega-hitter, waiting to flower. It's like prospect talk: sure, there's a small chance that this player will emerge as an All-Star or even a Hall of Famer. So sure, Butler could be headed towards a massively productive peak. We're not talking about Mitch Maier or Christian Colon here. But how likely is that?
The Royals are in a tough position. As a small market team, they need some long-odds bets to payoff. Obviously, trading Butler and then watching him blow up would be devastating to the Royals. But you can't manage a team based on fear. Butler is a nice player for the Royals, but he isn't pushing them to a championship right now. If Eric Hosmer was an outfielder, this might be a different discussion, but he's not. And as such, Butler is just short of being in the way. He's not there yet, but he's closer than you think.
So we come to a rather obvious and not so bold position, but one that nevertheless no one is making: the Royals should be shopping Butler
165 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If you can get a front line starter for Butler I would make the deal
Call up C-Rob for DH or sign someone
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 18, 2011 9:22 PM EST reply actions
Then how will we trade C-Rob for Gio Gonzalez?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 18, 2011 9:46 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
@@@Grape Nehi!@@@
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 19, 2011 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
Gio Gonzalez was acquired by the Yankees!
I don’t see a trade posiblitiy being made for gio Gonzalez. He was recently signed by the Yankees from what I read last. As far as trading Billy, I’m sorry, must disagree! I don’t feel Billy had a bad season. I felt he did pretty good. He had some walk-off and also homers durng this season. Please advise if I’m wrong, I feel being a DH sometimes is a tough position to play! Not the same as playing out in the field and coming up to bat. Those that play during the whole game..their body are more warmed up and ready to keep things going at times. When you come up to bat as a DH, your actually not as warm as the other guys who are more active in the game. I could be wrong about this. BB should not be trade and I really, really hope we keep the team as is for now. I keep in thoughts, that not evey player will play good every game. There will be times, that they have good days and bad days! But this happens in all sports. I personally, like Butler as a player and he does good! However, as far as the line is concern…I much rather see Hoz batting third and Butler clean up man! So, my thoughts on BB is we keep him! No trade no deal! Keep us as we are for now! We have a good team and they will make the playsoff this new season!
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 1:05 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
My apology!
What I read was just a rumor! Went back to read the article! Thanks for the correction! I did read there was a time the Royals wanted Gio Gonzalez. What are those chances of KC acquiring Gio?
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
I thought the following!
The Royals view Billy Butler as long-term, so I don’t see….Butler on the trade market this winter. My understanding.he is potentially under team control through 2015 on an extension signed in January.
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
Do you buy your exclamation points in bulk from Costco?
Just curious. Do they also have deals on Question marks?
Ideally, a variety pack would rock. With some -hyphens, (and parenthesis), and a few of those cool accent marks that european keyboards have.
by Bronzillo on Dec 20, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Whoever is pulling this off, I commend you.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
by Warden11 on Dec 19, 2011 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
They aren't just doing a good job.
I’m totally buying it. I stink.
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
Thanks Jim.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
Would love to see an economic impact study
that measures the effect of trading Butler relative to the coinciding bankruptcies of several local Kansas City eateries.
by KyleM on Dec 18, 2011 9:40 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Broxton was signed for this reason
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 18, 2011 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
It makes sense
But as has been pointed out before, the market for a DH only player who doesn’t hit it out of the park isn’t going to be that great. Butler is worth more to us than he will fetch in a trade, most likely.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 18, 2011 9:46 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Might as well stir the pot
What, say you, might we realistically expect in a Butler trade today*? What about at the deadline?
*Please include C-Rob, Gio Gonzalez, Gavin Floyd, Brian Bannister and Charlie Weis is all proposals.
Tough to say, since there aren't any good comps
What young, cost-controlled, but not minimum money 2-3 WAR DH/1B types out there get dealt?
Only ones I can think of are:
Adam LaRoche – he was dealt after his age 26 season, a 2.5 WAR season, just before his first arbitration season. LaRoche is a bit suspect defensively and clashed a bit with his manager. He was dealt with Jamie Romak for Brent Lillibridge (then still a decent IF prospect) and closer Mike Gonzalez.
Mike Napoli – he was dealt after a 2.7 WAR season in Anaheim in one of the worst trades in recent history ,for the albatross contract of Vernon Wells. He was then dealt for middle reliever Frankie Francisco. I believe Napoli only had two years left before FA when he was dealt.
If Gaby Sanchez or Kendrys Morales gets dealt, that can help set the market. If I had to guess, I’d say Butler could net you a B prospect and maybe a C+ prospect or an interesting throw-in. I put his value at roughly the same level as Soria, but that’s just a WAG.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 18, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions
this is the way i look at it
his numbers from the DH spot seem easy to replace, but i’m not so sure they are. and what would the royals expect for him? wade davis? meh.
by BeauJackson on Dec 18, 2011 10:04 PM EST up reply actions
What about the curious case...
…of Magglio Ordonez? But he was more of a DH/RF guy, right?
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
I don't believe as ever traded
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 18, 2011 11:02 PM EST up reply actions
True, but..
…his contract value with the Tigers might tell us something about Butler’s worth on the market. …Again, with the caveat that Ordonez could play right field.
"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.
I'm struggling to see how to be honest
Maybe his contract value, but that’s not what we’re talking about.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
I'm certainly not against it if the Royals could get the right return (in terms of production, years and money)
But getting that return would be difficult. But Moore should explore it.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Dec 18, 2011 10:09 PM EST reply actions
If you’re trading Billy because a team comes up with a great package, that is one thing. If you are trading Billy because you dissatisfied with his defense and power numbers, then you are making a mistake. Billy is 25. He is not expensive. He is a team leader. He is great at what he does (DH). If you want to send a message that the Royals are competing, then trading one of its most recognizable players is the wrong thing to do.
Butler a team leader?
That’s the first I’ve read of that, not that I particularly care about who is/isn’t a team leader.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
Jeff Francouer just punched you in the nuts for this.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 9:55 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
and then as soon as you recovered and thanked him
double tap
2011 Royals Review NCAA Bracket Challenge Winner, by process of attrition
Is there another bat being blocked by Butler being locked in as DH? Being a Cleveland fan, I’d love to get Butler. Being in a realist I would be HIGHLY surprised if he’s dealt anywhere.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Dec 18, 2011 11:36 PM EST reply actions
This could be an interesting conservation once Prince Fielder signs
Tampa and Texas could have interest, Seattle and Toronto to a lesser extent. I just don’t know how likely it is that the return would be worth losing his consistent production.
How bout we just stop trading?
When do we get to a point where we say “ya know, we’ve spent 859 years developing players and then trading them….maybe we should just stick to a f*cking roster for a change”?
Butler can’t field and runs the bases like he’s never played the game of baseball before. Big f*cking deal (can I cuss on this site? I need to know. I swear a lot and am looking for a safe haven for swearers). Dude more than makes up for it and doesn’t have a big contract ($9m per year or so). Oh, and he’s 25.
Don’t trade Soria. Don’t trade Butler. This organization probably won’t win a division title in 2012, but we’re pretty darn close with what we have. The more we gut it and try to pick-up prospects, the less likely we are to ever win. Plus, I’m kinda sick of having 50% of our roster completely different than the year before. The prospects we always trade for usually end up sucking anyway. I’ll take Butler (and Soria) with not-so-high contracts, proven Major League talent, and still young ages over prospects.
It’s time to win. We’re not getting there by trading away every decent piece of the puzzle we already have.
by Kim DeJesus on Dec 18, 2011 11:48 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
If the Royals aren't going to win now...
Then why not try and build a team than can in 2013.
You can’t make trades because the previous ones didn’t work. Also its not really fair to hold GMDM responsible for the sins of his predecessor
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
by averagegatsby on Dec 19, 2011 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
Also Bravo on the handle...
And to my knowledge as long as you don’t swear at someone its fair game.
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
by averagegatsby on Dec 19, 2011 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
Cuss away my friend.
Just don’t go on acting like we’re a farm team for the Yankees.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 9:57 AM EST up reply actions
I think there's nothing wrong with swearing
but if I say I can smell your ****, I’m heading for trouble I bet.
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
I doubt Butler is traded before the 2013 deadline
And I’d like to see him get at least a season and a half to see if his power improves.
We should trade for Vance Worley.
Successful Trading Is
About getting more value than you give up. Billy is a difficult trade; AL teams will see him as a modest power DH/1B, and NL teams will see him as half of that. Until we have an equal or better replacement (and C-Rob is not an option), it is hard to justify trading him for a 2 WAR starting pitcher, and that’s what we probably could get.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 19, 2011 12:42 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I think what might make sense would be trading with a team loaded with pitching who needs a bat
Say, Butler and a B pitching prospect for a 3 WAR pitcher. The first question – is that even a fair trade? The second, is there such a thing as a team so stacked in pitching that they’ll trade a 3 WAR pitcher?
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Dec 19, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
The Thought Of
Moore having to think outside the box is terrifying.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 19, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
I agree, but then the question boils down to
what American League team is loaded with pitching and looking for a DH? Tampa Bay is pretty much the only team that comes to mind. And I don’t know how hard they are really looking for a DH. Trading something of value to get a slightly under market rate Butler just doesn’t seem like a Friedman kind of move.
by Sweep_the_Leg on Dec 20, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
What would really help is if Butler's not quite as bad a fielder as it seems
Wasn’t he making some progress before Kila/Hos relegated him to the DH role? Not a good fielder, if he could just be considered a slightly-bad fielder.
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Dec 20, 2011 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
I know this is a devil's advocate argument, but your preface indicates otherwise.
The thing is, most of the reasons you list for shopping Butler are also reasons that Butler would not be able to pull his value back in a trade. Also, you claim that 1B and DH are the easiest positions to fill. I’ll give you 1B, but I am certainly not giving you DH. There are two philosophies as far as I can tell, but I don’t think any team consciously chooses which one to go with. They could either have a regular DH who consistently produces, or just give guys a half day off by using them there. I think most teams would choose to have a regular DH if they were productive, but they don’t want to pay for it. Billy is a luxury, and not in the way that he is expendable. I would argue he has positional value because DH is a spot in the American League lineup and he is one of the best to do it. Rather than have players perform an unaccustomed-to task like DHing every once in a while, the Royals have a player who has that for his regular job.
So, sure; WAR doesn’t deem Butler valuable, but it’s more complicated than that. Which is why a power spike is NOT required for him to be valuable. What he needs to be valuable is more people on base in front of him. So move him to 5th in the lineup.
Also, why would we need to rest Hosmer and Moustakas and others? They’re young. They can play every day (almost). Ride out Butler’s prime and quit worrying about how he isn’t perfect. Someday, he will begin to decline and I suspect it will be apparent. Until then, worry about the parts of the team that require improvement.
Last, you’re right that we don’t ever really talk about Butler aside from the spike in discussion last season where we had to defend Butler to the masses. But maybe there’s a reason we don’t talk about Billy.
by hawkinscm87 on Dec 19, 2011 3:29 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
1B and DH were easy to fill in the silly ball ear
But looking around now, what would be a cheap replacement at DH/1B? Jonny Gomes? Andy LaRoche?Those aren’t great options.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
Remember when we all liked Jonny Gomes?
Most of us on this site were so pissed we grabbed Dick Ankiel over him.
at least we have Timmy Collins
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 10:00 AM EST up reply actions
I'd rather Collins than Gomes these days...
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
Examples?
I’m sure there may some good finds out there, I’m just struggling to think of any. Who is today’s Roberto Petagine? Today’s Jack Cust? I mean other than Kila.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
DH seems easy to fill, but check out this (imperfect) analysis
Yankees used mostly Posada, with an 87 OPS+
Rays: Damon, 110
Tor: Encarnacion, 110
Bos: Ortiz, 154 (@ $12.5 million)
Det: Martinez, 132
Cle: Hafner, 126
Bal: Guerrero, 101
Chi: Dunn, 56 (ha ha, stupid White Sox)
Min: Thome, 127
Tex: Young, 124
LAA: Abreu, 104
Oak: Matsui, 92
Sea: Cust, 94
Butler’s 125 OPS+ compares quite favorably; in fact, it seems like there is David Ortiz, then the next tier of good hitters, including Butler (who is the only one of that group on the right side of 30 and who has a chance of improving), and then a bunch of “meh” or worse. Compare Butler’s numbers to Edgar Martinez at similar age/playing experience, and you will like what you see.
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
A lot of those guys aren't cheap though
Guys I would consider affordable would be Damon, Encarnacion, Thome, and Cust. Of those, only Cust and Damon are available right now. So who else would be available?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
I think we are agreeing?
I don’t want any of those other guys, nor do I know who else is available. While I’d try to package Butler in a James Shields deal, I’m good to hold on to him until we have a better in-house option. I’m solidly pro-Butler.
The point I was trying to make is that while it seems easy to just pick up some guy to be your DH, the truth is that most teams use creaky, older players at the end of their contracts or pulled off the scrap heap, and that Butler’s production was as good or better than the other DHs save Ortiz. This should have been a reply to Will, not to you, probably.
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions
That was the point.
Butler is better than all but Ortiz on that list.
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
And ViMart, Hafner, and Thome.
At least according to OPS+. I would think Butler is better than Hafner and Thome in some metrics.
My sincerest apologies for grouping Butler with
ViMart, Hafner and Thome for being only within .007 OPS of that group.
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
If you factor in that he's way younger than them,
I think he is better at this point.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
well, the point is, you could put, literally, anyone there
Let’s say the Royals wanted to make an OF upgrade. Sans Butler, they could acquire a COF and DH, say, Frenchy (119 OPS+)
That May Be True
But until the Royals have more quality hitters than available positions, this isn’t a problem. Unless there is a reason to jettison Butler, why would we do it? While it is true that the roster lacks “flexibility” in the abstract, it doesn’t seem like the team is hurt by it right now.
This seems like a conspiracy theory to move Frenchy out of RF and earn more plate appearances for MITCH. Admit it.
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
MOREOVER
You can just put anyone at DH, but according to your wOBA calcs, there are only 26 batters you can put there that would perform better. And how many of those guys are available? Sure, if moving Butler allows you to grab a stud to play in RF, then go for it. Until that point, Butler is a nice part of the team.
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
You think I'm a God-damned fool???!!
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
Bulter
Billy in my opinion did well and is an awesome player! He batted 95 runs, didn’t he have about 174 hits, 44 doubles, 19HR and RBIs around 93 or 95 in about 157 or 159 games? I understand, trading is part of the business…but if they keep trading in hopes that KC Royals will improve rather then to give our guys that chance they want..in which they have high expection they can get to the playoff and even win! Once, you start making trades..there are times it back fires! It’s like starting all over again..to play as a team! We lost Cabrera..to me was a mistake and maybe many of you disagree! Yes we need pictchers…or…pitchers bieng trained in the area they not doing so well in! If KC Royals keeps trading and getting rid of the regulars…who are like family right now and they play as a team…then get ready for having a losing team rather then a winning team! I just pray..they don’t trade anymore of the regular guys and give them a chance to finish their unfinished business on the field! Once the ice is broken….then we can start picking up the pieces of all the lost games we will inquire! I know many will be opposed tio what I just said…sorry..but this is ,y opinion and feelings about this! Don’t trade Billy Butler or anymore of our regular guys…Give them the chance to win this season! Billy is an awesome player! As far as Soria…if he gets trade it will be..because Soria decided to leave….cause he has a “no-trade clause” on his contract!
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
elaine benes approves of your exclamation point usage
by BeauJackson on Dec 19, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I would venture to say that she does not however find him spongeworthy...
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Sans Butler, they could acquire a COF and DH, say, Frenchy (119 OPS+)
Yes, but that won’t be free either, unless you’re talking about freely available talent, which again I would ask – who?
Seems silly to trade Butler only to create another hole we’d have to acquire another play for UNLESS the bounty for Butler was so great that it made sense – and I rather doubt the bounty would be great.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
one option is to platoon bench players
Say you add a utility IF guy in the mold of, oh, I don’t know, Mike Aviles, who can DH against LHP and spot start in the IF, then add a LH OF bat to do the same against RHP.
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Dec 19, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions
We have no hope for this.
The prime candidate to platoon is Frenchy and they wouldn’t think of doing it.
Gomes + Kila
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 20, 2011 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
"silly ball ear"
LOL!
Is that anything like cauliflower ear?
That information is somewhat classified.
Just a couple simple points:
Much as in the Frank White case, we really have a lot of unknowns here, as always. We don’t know how much Billy has talked with the front office. He does seem to be of the other-motivating-factors type, and this could mean he has iterated his want to become a lifetime Royal. I know he has made many statements about “just shutting up and playing ball” and this could be a reason the front office wants to keep him around.
It could be simply that we have shopped him many times to many shallow offers; or it could be that we have refused to trade him before, because as recently as early on in the 2011 season he was the lone guy with solid production in the lineup.
As a fan, I am indifferent. It would be nice to see a couple of the players stick around for some time (which is why I back Pioli, because Charles/Hali/Flowers are all signed for a long time), but Billy has shown me some things I love and some things I hate. I think I am in the majority here when I say that I would much rather have Gordon or Hos long-term, but Air Billy would be nice too.
I am the one who knocks.
Best thing Billy can do for his career is lose 25 lbs and improve his hitting with RISP.
if he drove in 15 more runs a year and GIDP 15 fewer times, he would be the face of the franchise.
if you want to trade him, package him in a deal For shields from TB. they need a DH and Billy is fro Florida (i think) so its a good fit. Possible package: Butler + Mendoza +Colon for Shields + AAA utility infielder
by DickHowser4ever on Dec 19, 2011 9:40 AM EST reply actions
I thought Billy was from Idaho...
Am I way off? And there’s no way Tampa makes that deal. It would have to be Billy+ Myers and Herrera or something insane. I’d be fine with or without trading Billy. I like him fine, but with the right value I’d be fine.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
Pretty sure he is from Florida.
Lives in Idaho now, fell in love with it while playing at Idaho Falls?
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
Tampa Bay doesn't seem like a club willing to spend $8 mill on a DH
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
Shields will make > $5 million next year wont he? plus they wouldn't need to resign Johnny Damon
at ~$5 million (based on 2011 salary) to play DH. so it would really be a net salary dump for TB.
by DickHowser4ever on Dec 19, 2011 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
I think they could dump more money
Trading their pitching for a cheaper hitter.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
He is only a DH for KC.
It is likely that he would be viewed as a 1Bman in any trade. This would help his value.
He is probly below avg there, but not Mike Jacobs bad. He actually has pretty good hands.
I agree. If Billy isn't going to hit for power, then he needs to transform his body to increase his speed.
Since he can hit for average, being toned and quicker could only help his average. I don’t think he would lose much double power. That could also help him in the field.
I could be wrong
but it seemed to me that BB looked alot stronger at the end of the year. Is he working with the strength and conditioning coach? If he is making a determined effort to transform his body, then I think the Royals should wait and see what this change will produce.
2010 = The beginning of a dynasty
by ChiefWildcat on Dec 19, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
I get burned out on
the Billy bashing. He is the only consistent, proven hitter in our lineup. Like most, I agree that Hosmer is a can’t miss and Gordon looked great last year. But, who do we have that is proven? By proven, I mean has had more than one good season. Cain? Not proven. Gio/Getz? Not proven. Escobar? Not proven. Moose/Sal? Not proven. Obviously Billy is limited. He cannot run, cannot play a position, and will never hit 40 HR’s. But, at this point, I think we need to be careful with him, because he is the only player in our lineup that is a proven commodity. In Billy, we know what we have. He is consistently a productive hitter. Fans have a tendency to overvalue our players. Other teams know Billy has weaknesses as well. We are not going to get a #1 or #2 starting pitcher for him. Let’s ride Billy out and see how he does through his prime.
I think there is definitely an argument to be made that trading Billy would be a positive. He is far from an untouchable.
But I still have a problem with simply proclaiming that he can’t get any better. You seem to think that he can only improve with a “random power spike,” but I see no reason why his power can’t improve as he enters the prime hitting years. I think both his fatness and inability to improve his power are wildly overblown. I think Butler’s best years are ahead of him. No, he’ll never be a truly elite, offensive monster, but he can still improve I think.
Killing time until time kills me
I guess the question would be
“how much more likely is Butler to improve than any other random player?”
he’s young, he has a good pedigree and… he’s young
he’s also played quite a lot, has some fundamental issues with his profile (lack of speed, athleticism, groundballs) that would need to be factored in
Sure, I buy that he isn't going to improve as much as some other young players...
..but he’s also a young player who is a known quantity and pretty damn close to a sure thing, in regards to being a pretty solid player. That counts for something too. Butler’s upside might not be as high as we’d like, but his floor is a hell of a lot better than a random young prospect’s floor as well. For me, that makes me want to keep Butler. Given the potential we have in Hosmer and Moose and many others, I like the idea of holding onto the steady value as opposed to gambling on a higher-upside/higher-risk guy.
Killing time until time kills me
by EspeciallyK on Dec 19, 2011 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
i agree with this. BB probably won't improve a lot, but (imo) what he will be is consistent
he will provide a steady and productive bat to put behind Hoz or Moose (or whoever becomes the power bat) in the line up forcing opposing teams to pitch to them.
by DickHowser4ever on Dec 19, 2011 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
From my observations on BB!
For the times I saw him play defense..felt he is good..as a hitter awesome…it’s not everytime you get up to bat that you will hit everytime! That we all know…the only thing…I have observe is his running. I would like to see hi pick up more speed in running! I know he can..if he works at this. Other then that,,,he is as awesome player!
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions
this
So fantastic. +1 whomever is pulling this one.
I am the one who knocks.
by PhattStairs on Dec 20, 2011 12:57 AM EST up reply actions
McKinney has got to get to work...
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
I think if you were to trade any player, based on not being likely to improve on their 2011 numbers
it is Melky Cabrera. Mission Accomplished.
Second would be Alex Gordon. Not that it makes sense to trade him, but he’s more of a sell-high player than Butler, considering it’s unlikely he’ll repeat last year’s numbers.
While it’s true that Butler may have peaked, he’s one of the few proven commodity’s we have on this team. I don’t know that I would be willing to give up on that.
batter nine you sucky
by marbotty on Dec 19, 2011 10:48 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
He's been the most consistent hitter on the team the past 2 seasons.
But hey, if you wanna get rid of him for a top of the rotation starter, I’m all for it. However, I don’t possibly see how anybody offers anything other than a mediocre player for him. He’s more valuble to us.
I can now say this with a straight face, and it will be accurate: Tim Tebow is a better QB than Matt Cassel.
by ProbablyYoungerThanAllOfYou on Dec 19, 2011 11:25 AM EST reply actions
I would echo what a few others have said
Billy probably not going to improve much from here on- definitely defense, baserunning, contact rate, etc. will not improve. Power could, at least slightly. Honestly, I think what we’re seeing is what we’re gonna get.
He is a slow DH. Regardless of what his WAR is, he is a good hitter and worth having in the lineup every day. And it has been every day, BTW. Remarkably injury-free, and that counts for something.
IMO, he is very likely to have a BA around .300, with a good OBP, about 45 doubles and 16-22 HR. He could realistically hit anywhere from #2-6 in any order and help a team. And I could see him doing that until he is about 32 without much drop off. He is absolutely capable of going on a 2 month tear during a pennant race.
We should explore what we could get in return for every player on the roster. Anybody is gone for the right deal. But the chances of getting equal or better value in return are not, I would figure, very high.
So just write him in the lineup every day and go lead the league in runs scored. And have everybody talk about how good he would be if he hit 15 more HR/yr.
by Rufus R. Jones on Dec 19, 2011 11:27 AM EST reply actions
Keep Butler until he has a better year and then consider trading him
Echoing much of what was said above, there just is not much of a market for Butler right now because he is coming off a merely okay year, he is owed $8.5 million each of the next three years, and he does not have a defensive position. The Royals also do not have an imminent, obvious replacement (either at DH or at another position like OF where someone else would move to DH).
Maybe one way to look at this is to ask how much is Carlos Pena going to get as a free agent? I am not sure he is going get three years and $25 million. Pena is older, but he should provide about the same offensive in the near term and can play a legitimate 1B. Teams may prefer Butler, but probably not so much that they will give up a premium.
Using hitter aging charts, Butler is just entering his peak (age 26-27), so a tangible spike in power or walks is a real possibility. He also makes great contact, so a flukey BABIP-driven “breakout” season is a real possibility as well. At that point (and with another year of guaranteed money off the books), the trade market should look much better.
I think Billy could post Edgar Martinez like numbers
Mostly based on his approach of hitting line drives up the middle. Edgar never really hit his stride until his Age 32 season, and posted 42.4 WAR in the seven years between his Age 32 and Age 38 season.
Billy is only gonna be 26 next year. At that point in his career, Edgar had played in under 100 games, had under 300 PA, and 2 homeruns.
I think Billy could be something special, and I’d rather sign him to a 10 year $100MM deal than trade him for anything less that an elite prospect.
I think Edgar...
was a prime suspect for PED’s, looking at the arc of his career and production. But I DO think Butler will hit for more power at some point and may have Martinez-like numbers, anyway. I think Butler also compares well to Youklis, who didn’t really come on until 27.
If women only slept with nice guys...guys would only be nice. And they don't. And we're not.
by setupunchtag on Dec 20, 2011 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Billy is NOT a good candidate to age well
overweight, unathletic players are often done in their early 30’s. Edgar was juiced up.
I keep expecting to see some kind of deal involving the Yankees and Butler.
I just have a feeling that they would really like rid of AJ Burnett and that he’s the kind of veteran pitcher a guy like DM would covet. Factor in Eiland as the pitching coach and voila. Then I wonder, would this be bad? I mean, I know it probably would be bad (because he sucks quite often), but if they ate a bunch of $$, would it really be that bad?
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 1:09 PM EST reply actions
Boom.
When we get him and D’arnaud, it will be instant chaos. No one team has ever experienced that level of clubhouse confusion.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
the yanks dont have a spot for a full time DH....
they’re going to have to use arod and jeter there more and more as they get older…and they have montero..
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Dec 19, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
For now.
Only because we still have Soria
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
Butler Similar Through Age 24
There are a few names on this list that would give one pause trading him.
John Olerud (948)
Kent Hrbek (942)
Keith Hernandez (931)
Nick Markakis (924)
Carl Yastrzemski (919) *
Delmon Young (909)
Carlos May (904)
Don Hurst (904)
Steve Kemp (903)
Ben Grieve (900)
by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 19, 2011 2:42 PM EST reply actions
He Pitched, Too

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 19, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
I remember there being some debate
As to whether he should be a pitcher in the Majors or a 1B. A lot of anonymous scouts thought he could win 15 games in the majors.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
he's only 43, why not give him a shot?
moyer-olerud-chen, now that is some veteran craftiness.
by BeauJackson on Dec 19, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
He's right handed
There’s not such thing as a crafty right-hander.
It's all ball bearings these days!
by CentralChamps20?? on Dec 20, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Rewinding myself!
I guess he is left-handed! Then there is nothing to stop him! Because…Go For It!
It's all ball bearings these days!
by CentralChamps20?? on Dec 20, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting
A HOFer (Yaz), three HoVGers (Hernandez, Hrbek, Olerud), Nick Markakis, and four guys who absolutely fell off a cliff (Grieve, Kemp, Young, May).
Never heard of Don Hurst
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
I think the Hernandez comp
is based on defense
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 2:44 PM EST reply actions
Reply fail
Should have been to BlueEyes, above.
"Put that in your pipe and smoke it."
by Hal McRae's Telephone on Dec 19, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
If we trade Butler
My wife won’t let me watch baseball in the living room anymore.
by LaFLamme on Dec 19, 2011 2:50 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
So where is she going to go
when you watch baseball in the living room?
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
I'm confused.....why is your name Fans-of Eric Hosmer
Why not just fan? Are you multiple people? What if I’m discussing something with you and then the other person comes in…..I’ll be confused…..You dumbfounded me
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
NIce.
I was wondering the same thing-PB
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
I hope Tim Lacy knows how much I adore him
My RR fantasy basketball team name is “We Want Tim Lacy”
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
My theory:
The name is “fans” because the source would be multiple comments taken from the Royals facebook page.
Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk
I comment on Royals Facebook Page
I always put “God Damnit Getz”
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
that fucking Tiquan Underwood pissed me off yesterday...
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
He had one catch yesterday
I still think he is the worst WR ever.
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
Fans of Eric Hosmer
I started wtaching the Royals, when Hoz made the team. Have watched his game in Florida while in highschool. So i continued following the team. Now I became a loyal KC Royals fans and love the whole team. I have ask to change my username numerous of times with both Royals Review and SB…and I’m giving up! They never answer the e-mails to change my username and still waiting! So, I doubt, anyone will answer my e-mail and help me out with this matter. Best thing to do..is give up! LOL
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions
After reading that
I know understand why you made fan plural
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
LOL
Yes, I laugh out loud…find it better then to get upset for nonsence. My facebook page is Fans of KC Royals…and we are pretty big group.
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 8:22 PM EST up reply actions
It all makes sense now
You’re a Facebook Fan
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
I get it now
you are representing the Facebook page…Alright all cleared up :)
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions
The few times I actually laugh out loud over a computer
LOL doesn’t warrant it
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 7:05 PM EST up reply actions
This...
If I lol at the computer it’s more of a holy shit I’m lmmfaolamf
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
The hyphen is more intriguing
Because they aren’t fans. And they aren’t fans of. They are fans-of. And I don’t even know what that implies.
We should trade for Vance Worley.
by JKWard on Dec 19, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Fans-of
Has to be written that way…since facebook did not accept my username as “Fans of” had to add a dash.
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 8:37 PM EST up reply actions
That's odd
Maybe It’s a first name thing?
It is a long title so It makes sense
BFIB
by tiquanunderwear on Dec 19, 2011 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
Very much like "its coming"
The most disturbing handle in all of SBNation.
Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan
by Old Man Duggan on Dec 22, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
These names were already taken:
Fans_of Eric Hosmer
Fans – of Eric Hosmer
Fans . . . of Eric Hosmer
Fans~of Eric Hosmer
Not lets get back to Billy Butler
I say no trade..no deal! Sorry, just I want to keep the regulars for this season. They have a good chance for a win this coming season. By the way, we have a scrimmage game in March with the Angels….How do you all think we will do? Any perdictions?
by Fans-of Eric Hosmer on Dec 19, 2011 8:42 PM EST reply actions
They'd better have a good chance at more than one win.
That or I want my fucking money back.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 20, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
At Least We
Can’t trade him for Yu-Bet now, so there’s that.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
Billy could be elite
if they would let him put on as much weight as he wants. he’s already a fatty, so just make him squat and deadlift all offseason so that he gets HUGE and then mashes the ball forever. it won’t matter if he’s a line-drive hitter, because he’ll have 260lbs of beef behind every ball.
Tony Richardson, we hardly knew ye...
thats an interesting theory...
and seeing as how he’s probably here for 3-4 more years…why the hell not
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Dec 21, 2011 2:23 AM EST up reply actions
He should be squatting and dead lifting already
but doubt he is.
by Rufus R. Jones on Dec 21, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions




















