Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

#Royals/#BlueJays deep into talks for Soria. Royals love D'Arnaud.

He's a Top 50 MiLB prospect. And a Catcher.

@Pio DiPortes

Guys done good on Twitter breaking things in the last few weeks

5 months ago Bsnublcd_tiny 306008 51 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This was like 4 hours ago.

I can’t believe no one put it up here. From Sickels.

1) Travis D’Arnaud, C, Grade B+: Borderline A-: He would be an A- or maybe even an A if he was more effective at throwing out runners and struck out less often, but he can really hit and is still a superior prospect even with those weaknesses.

by 306008 on Dec 18, 2011 11:31 PM EST reply actions  

My view

If this is an option, do it. D’Arnaud will hit. If he improves defensively then he will possibly take the job from Salvador. If Sal never hits, then this is our next starting catcher. Either way, to have both up in the bigs at some point next year would be sweet. If we get TdA we let him mature in Omaha and give Sal the chance to show he can hit.

I would assume we get an arm that’s really far away also if we did this deal. But who knows.

by 306008 on Dec 18, 2011 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The question is

Can he play other positions?
If Sal hits remotely well, then it would probably be better to keep him back there for his defense.
In which case the question is what other positions can D’Arnaud play? Is he a cOF guy? Can he play second? Or is he a C/1B/DH type?
If we moved Myers to the OF because of what we think about Perez, why go out and acquire another C? Why not Marisnick or one of the Blue Jays supposedly very good pitching prospects?

"We don’t have guys with a long history of being effective in the seventh and eighth innings."
~Trey Hillman, master of understatements.

by RoyalPug on Dec 19, 2011 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Myers wasn't moved because of Sal

he was moved because his bat advanced beyond his catching

2011 Royals Review NCAA Bracket Challenge Winner, by process of attrition

by sfeldkamp on Dec 19, 2011 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

if Moore got D'Arnaud

i might break the internets in half

by BeauJackson on Dec 18, 2011 11:37 PM EST reply actions  

I'd like it

Soria’s contract isn’t a huge steal anymore, and his performance last year casts some doubt on his future. Seems like a good value trade.

by kcdc1 on Dec 18, 2011 11:42 PM EST reply actions  

Meaning: It's a good time to...

…buy low on Soria.

"Sir,--It has been wittily remarked that there are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third and most aggravated is statistics." *The National Observer* (June 13, 1891): p. 93-94.

by timlacy on Dec 19, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

This would be a very good deal

Blue Jays seem to be in “were gonna be good and we need a closer to put us over the top” stage…….I would take this in a heartbeat.

BFIB

by tiquanunderwear on Dec 18, 2011 11:48 PM EST reply actions  

I would take it if it were D'Arnaud or maybe someone like Drabek or Henderson Alvarez.

I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

2012 is the year we shine.

by Jack Marsh on Dec 19, 2011 12:04 AM EST reply actions  

Travis D'Arnaud =

Radar Diva Nuts
Radar Avid Nuts
Data Darn Virus
A David Arts Urn
A Avid Ran Turds

… and much more.

by KyleM on Dec 19, 2011 12:05 AM EST reply actions  

Amen.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 19, 2011 8:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Radar Diva Nuts is pretty good.

I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

2012 is the year we shine.

by Jack Marsh on Dec 19, 2011 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Dayton Moore is a compulsive liar.

I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

2012 is the year we shine.

by Jack Marsh on Dec 19, 2011 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I get to some degree you got to get the best of whatever you can get...

But I would think Catcher is the position of least need…. Because even if Perez sucks at the plate, it sounds like GMDM will have him back there purely for his defense.

I’ve got to admit I find it to be a little bit of a head scratcher.

Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095

by averagegatsby on Dec 19, 2011 12:34 AM EST reply actions  

Even if Perez sticks, we still need another catcher.

I love the idea of an offensive catcher. I believe that defensive catchers are overvalued generally, because most “defensive” catchers are merely average defenders and some, perhaps many “offensive” catchers are average defenders as well. Anyway, I think you take this trade. If Perez hits and D’Arnaud hits, then you’ve got 2 great options. And let’s not forget that people get injured and people fail.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 19, 2011 3:36 AM EST up reply actions  

This would be a great move

A catcher who can hit is a great asset. I dont believe he’ll steal the job from Perez, but it gives you a bench bat/DH option if he’s the backup. Good for the post-Billy Royals.

Or flip him as the centerpiece of a deal. But I believe the Royals will need to maintain a high percentage of players who will be making the minimum or in the first 1/2 years of arbitration. This guy would be a great candidate for a Mike Napoli type of role. Wonder if he can play OF?

by WURoyal on Dec 19, 2011 1:10 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Or 1B.

A Carlos Santana-type flexibility.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 19, 2011 3:38 AM EST up reply actions  

1B should be well occupied here

C-ROB!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmm...

Would be a great return, but it doesn’t address the massive hole in our rotation..

by Loose Seal on Dec 19, 2011 1:37 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Soria isn't bringing Ricky Romero or Brandon Morrow.

So uh… since you aren’t going to address the massive hole either way, why not get the best talent you can. Sort of like the draft. Drafting based on need is the best way to lose out on the best talent. So yeah.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 19, 2011 3:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Dayton should try to package Soria to get a quality SP

Package deals are always more difficult to negotiate, but there’s plenty of time, we have plenty of trade chips, and there is some demand for Soria. If we miss out on D’Arnuad because the Blue Jays sign someone else and we have to have Soria pitch for us again next year for a reasonable salary, it doesn’t really hurt the team.

If Soria was blocking someone, then I’d be more eager to jump on the first good offer (like the Melky trade). But Soria and Butler are our two biggest trade chips left [assuming that 1) we are trying to lock up Gordon, 2) the good young guys are untouchable], and we need SPs, so I think we need to see if a Soria package can get us what we need. Otherwise, I don’t see how we’re going to get it.

by Loose Seal on Dec 19, 2011 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

We have to improve the rotation

But each individual deal has to be done to maximize value. Given the market for relievers if we could do this deal I’d be satisfied. It cuts salary. Addresses an area where we lack organizational depth. And d’Anraud is a great prospect. If Sal’s bat doesn’t play all that well, Sal can backup

by WURoyal on Dec 19, 2011 1:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Best player available

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe at the catcher position

You need to look at needs at some point…if we traded Soria for a major league ready 1B/DH or an outfielder, that wouldn’t do us much good.

by Loose Seal on Dec 19, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Haven't we been bashing DM for years based on only trading for needs?

It greatly limits any potential trade partners. Like the draft, I think you should always draft the best player/talent available.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Dec 19, 2011 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

And before Dayton as well

Look at the Damon, Dye and Beltran trades.

by thelaundry on Dec 19, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Of all teams, why are the Blue Jays looking for a closer? Seems random.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 19, 2011 2:13 AM EST reply actions  

One could do worse.

A team consistently finishing in the fourth of its division and not yet primed to break out shouldn’t be throwing money at closers.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 19, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

They just got Sergio Santos

I agree, it does seem odd.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 19, 2011 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't buy it

Doesn’t seem like an AA kind of move to trade a top positional prospect for a reliever. That said, I would love it if it happened. The Jays prefer Holland and I would not hesitate to offer Holland for D’Arnaud. D’Arnaud was voted the #15 overall prospect in baseball over at Minor League Ball (higher than any of the guys in the Latos trade) and there is always demand for catching.

by nwroyal on Dec 19, 2011 10:38 AM EST reply actions  

Trading Soria for a catcher???

But Salvador Perez is a lock to be a good MLB catcher!!!

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 19, 2011 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

This must be the anniversary of the Montero rumor

I doubt it’s true, makes sense for the Jays to try to drive up the price for Boston who was rumored to be interested last week

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Dec 19, 2011 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Key questions about D'Arnaud

Is he a “quality receiver”? Can he calm down pitchers well? Does he have the character and spirit of a field general?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 19, 2011 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

Just because the Royals "love D'Arnaud" doesn't mean the Jays are considering trading him

But if Dayton is able to get a top 50 prospect for Soria, I would have been impressed a year ago, and would be even more impressed now. From AA, no less.

by thelaundry on Dec 19, 2011 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan