Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

More On Frank White's Firing: Frank White Speaks Out, Dayton Moore's Role, Etc

The latest in grown men behaving badly:

This story broke Thursday night and slowly built towards an explosion Friday afternoon. Jeff Passan and Rustin Dodd let it be known that they were hearing that White was fired for being critical. Then White went on Nick Wright's radio show and it reached a new level.

  • As has been mentioned a few times in the comments, we are only hearing one side of the story here. I'm not sure the Royals have a great side of the story to offer, but in any case, right now, it's all Frank's side. For many fans, there's nothing that they can say that would placate them anyway. (Now, full disclosure, I am not in that camp. But I'm also a non-KCitian.)
  • I was going to write this morning something to the effect of "don't blame Dayton Moore." My assumption was that this was an ownership matter and couldn't quite see how the baseball side would care. That may be incorrect, however. Mellinger writes, "Royals general manager Dayton Moore is being blamed in many circles for White’s ouster from the broadcast booth, which multiple sources adamantly dispute and classify as a collaborative decision." In the same column, White isolates, "upper management" as the problem. Moreover, Mellinger spotlights the 2008 manager search, and Trey Hillman's hiring, as a key flashpoint in the Royals-White battle. Given that, I think that Moore likely is a player in this. Although maybe it is a one-sided animus. If I'm Frank and I see that Moore doesn't take me seriously as a candidate (in my mind) and brings in Trey freaking Hillman instead, I probably do get real bitter, real fast. But that still doesn't get us to Moore wanting White gone. Maybe after three years of sniping, Moore put in a call.
  • Importantly, I think the leaked explanation of White being critical or having the wrong tone on broadcasts is the team's attempt to spin this. They can't say, "we've had a toxic environment with Frank for years and everyone is just sick of it." FSKC also can't say, "you know what, Frank was pretty bad on TV fulltime." So they went with basically no explanation and then the behind the scenes thing about negativity. The problem is that Frank was rarely negative on camera, so the plausible explanation isn't really that plausible.
  • I believe that everything relevant in this matter was off camera. White may have been really negative, but it was all in the halls, media elevators, and suites of The K before and after games. What we're dealing with is a group of middle-aged men who just don't like each other. And really, that may just be the long and short of it. Here's what White said on 610, "I’m not going to miss going to the ballpark, having guys look at you with one eye. Guys who don’t wanna come up and talk to you. But then they do, they say, "hi, how you doin’ today?" And then go behind your back and talk about other stuff. I don’t like that. I don’t like people that lie."
  • Mellinger has written about the White-Royals split before and has made the point that White is probably not blameless here. Mellinger writes, "White is complicit in getting to this point. His reputation for privately badmouthing the Royals caught up to him, as well as a feeling from some that he’s a diva who longs to be treated as George Brett’s equal without the Hall of Fame status to justify it."
  • Now, the dot that isn't fully being connected here is that Ryan Lefebvre interviewed for the Twins radio job this off-season, seemingly a step down professionally. From what I've heard, he really wanted the Twins job: it wasn't just a contract ploy. Now, perhaps Ryan wanted the change for strictly personal reasons. However, given the last few days, there's no way we can't speculate about how Ryan fit into all of this. Was the environment getting so toxic that Ryan simply wanted out? Was he worried for his own job? Was he on the side of "upper management" against Frank?

On the one hand, you want to write, "how did it get this bad? How could the Royals get in this situation?" But, on the other hand, you can see how it happened. White wanted to be around and, inconveniently, he was the one guy in twenty that didn't move to Arizona/Florida/California and safely disappear. Awkward. And really, the qualifications to get baseball coaching and broadcasts jobs just aren't that high. White is simply looking at the industry he's spent his life in and wondering, "when is my turn?" The Royals -- if they never actually wanted White around in a prominent role -- did themselves no favors by having him manage AA or do part time broadcast work. They thought White would either quit or be satisfied with partial victories. But he wasn't and he called their bluff. So here we are.

I don't sentimentalize the situation here. I find it laughably immature and a poor reflection on all involved. A group of middle-aged men (I'll reference their supposed maturity again) all making good to great money and generally living amazing lives couldn't find a way to make it work. A group of guys who spend their lives in golf shirts talking to overgrown adolescents in baseball uniforms, couldn't keep it together and just let things be.

Once again, baseball does teach us quite a lot about character, leadership, and life.

Comment 274 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well said

I’m indifferent on this whole thing. It will be forgotten by spring training.

by Royal Tiger on Dec 3, 2011 1:31 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Maybe,

but it puts it in the context that MLB teams in general are never going to please guys like you. Emotionally driven fans who lack pragmatism.

by Bronzillo on Dec 5, 2011 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmmmm......well,

First – I discount the implication that the MLB teams are run pragmatically. For my evidence I offer I offer the following: Jose Guillen was paid $36million dollars over 3 years with the KC Royals; Carlos Zambrano is owed $18 million by the Cubs through 2013; the Cleveland Indians signed Juan “Gone” Gonzalez in 2005 after his injury plagued 2003 in Texas and 2004 in KC; The Neifi Perez trade.

Second – when one’s whole industry exists because of emotionally driven fans, one should probably make an effort to learn to deal with them. I would also put forth the theory that when a team has been as bad as the Royals have been for as long as the Royals have been bad, combined with the fact that they “small-market” and so already have a smaller fan-base to draw from, that they should make an extra effort to embrace their emotionally-driven fans. Because who besides crazy people and emotionally-driven fans would have stuck with this franchise through all this?

Third – the fact that there might be others in one’s peer group (in this case, other MLB teams) that are as bad as you at something is really not much of an excuse to also be bad at it yourself. I also still reject the notion that some of the “PR blunders” we’ve talking about here would be repeated by the other 29 teams, although I would believe that there are a few of them who are this stupid.

Fourth – I’m not sure what fan isn’t emotionally driven, since professional baseball serves no practical function for society other than that it is pleasing as a leisure activity.

Fifth – I’m not a guy.

by Gross(est) on Dec 5, 2011 8:23 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

So sorry ma'am

I see ya got a bee stuck in your bonnet….

I will only say this,

Teams that base their decisions around the knee-jerk reactions of fans, lose. A lot. Winning games is the only thing that makes fans happy.

I remember a certain fan base being absolutely furious when Drew Bledsoe was kicked to the curb. He had been the best QB in franchise history (sorry Steve Grogan). I don’t think too many Chowda heads give a fuck about old Drew these days……I could use a thousand examples.

…..I like the pick of your cat, lady. Looks like my old buddy Ocho who fell off my roof many years ago. What a cute lil’ pussy he was.

by Bronzillo on Dec 6, 2011 3:21 AM EST up reply actions  

-1
Teams that base their decisions around the knee-jerk reactions of fans, lose.

Who said anything about Drew Bledsoe? Teams need to manage their relationship with fans; the Royals have not done that well. To argue against that gets you a minus one.

Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Dec 6, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm totally OK with them firing White if they think that's what they need to do

But it’s weird to essentially say that a company shouldn’t take stock of public reaction when considering decisions that relate primarily to public relations.

Also, I think Gross(est)’s comments have been very measured. Also, I find them pretty convincing.

by KSinDC on Dec 6, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I do think that if he was feeling like he wasn't being paid the proper respect by the FO/Ownership

it would be hard not to become bitter about the whole thing. I’ve certainly experienced that as an employee. Where there wasn’t a reciprocated respect from the employer, it was hard to maintain a positive outlook on things, which certainly permeates your outlook on the employer when talking about them privately. I’ve never really gone into the situation with a negative outlook on the first place and have been content at my last two jobs, yet in those other jobs where a modicum of respect wasn’t present I found myself complaining when the job would come up.

Is Frank White at least a bit to blame for that? Sure. But what was the root of those problems? It could be a character flaw with Frank himself, but I’d be more inclined to believe that it was a product of a guy whose request to be in a goodwill ambassador in the community via the PR department to wait out his last few years before retirement was met with a dismissive, “No, thank you.”

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 3, 2011 1:42 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Given that this persisted across multiple FO regimes

And given that, whatever their multiple other faults, neither Moore nor Baird had reputations for mistreating people or creating hostile work environments, how much blame do you apportion to each side? Obviously, we’re lacking a ton of relevant information, but I’m surprised how many people’s snap judgment is that the Royals are primarily at fault here.

I’m very willing to believe that Dayton Moore has misjudged the ability of a MLB player he’s acquiring. I’m much more reluctant to believe that Dayton Moore is part of a whispering campaign to poison the environment for Frank White.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

What are you referring to

that occurred under Baird? Frank himself says things went sour after he interviewed for the manager’s job in 2008, after Bell left.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

So that was

20 years ago and had nothing to do with Baird.

How are the two situations comparable?

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think there's a pattern of him saying he's being mistreated by the Royals

That persists across multiple front offices. Which makes it harder for me to believe that’s what’s going on.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

But you cited

one incident 20 years ago, together with the current one. How do those 2 incidents, for a man who has been associated with the organization for more than 35 years in two separate tenures, constitute a pattern? In the absence of other such incidents, Is it not more likely that he was actually in the right both times?

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The KC Star's archives suck

So I can’t go back and find the articles, but my memory is that Frank expressed displeasure with his treatment by the Baird regime before he went to Wichita, and that he went to Wichita in order to prove them wrong and/or pay his dues so that he could get the job he wanted. Baird, during that time was much more circumspect, but it seemed clear that there was tension between him and White.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Baird

extended Muser how many times? And later decided that Buddy Bell was the right guy. So if Frank White thought Allard Baird was wrong and wasn’t happy about it, that goes for just about all of us, too.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I want to say it was around the Tony Pena/Buddy Bell hiring

That Frank White had stated publicly that he was upset that he was not interviewed for the job, and I believe if memory serves he was coaching AA at the time. I distinctly remember a lot of conversation on sports radio about it, and that there take was that “insiders” were saying that Frank White would not make a good manager, and how some took that as the Royals disrespecting him, and I’m sure Frank himself felt that way.

I imagine the switch to Moore without a shift in philosophy regarding White’s viability as a big league manager irked him. I thought he also had some greivance when he interviewed for the job before Trey Hillman’s hiring. Something along the lines of he felt he wasn’t given a legitimate shot at the job.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

It's also the case

that he had been on the coaching staff at the major league level under Muser from 1997-2001, after having held that job for the Red Sox from 1994-1996. He moved to the front office in 2002. That he would be interested in becoming a manager after having coached at the major league level for almost 8 full seasons seems like a reasonable ambition to me; shouldn’t his employer have counseled him about the right things to do to gain the appropriate qualifications to make the jump, such as to get managerial experience in the minors? How is it even possible that he’d find out the club wasn’t at all interested in him for that job by their choosing not to interview him, unless the organization really didn’t care what his ambitions were?

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasnt the move to the front office predicated by them going in a different direction at manager?

I am unclear as to the circumstances, but didn’t he move to the FO after Muser was fired and they hired Tony Pena without interviewing him for the job? Then Pena brought in his own coaching staff, which left White with the option of moving on, moving up, or moving out to a new team or to the minors?

I want to say that Frank White had specific things that he needed to do to become a viable candidate, and he did some of those things. I think one of the great unknowns is what White’s grasp of the managerial side of things really is, or was. There are only so many reasons that a guy like Frank White is kept from being a manager. Most of them have to do with the stuff that fans never get to see.

And perhaps they laid out a plan for him. Things he needed to do. And he did them. And they still refused, particularly after switching GMs. The point is I don’t know.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe he just wasn't good enough at managing

Christian Colon knows what he needs to do to become a MLB player. He’s just not able to do them.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally, that is the most viable reason for him not managing

When you realize that Clint Hurdle, Bob Brenly, and AJ Hinch were all allowed to manage.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Meanwhile, let's all wish the best of luck to

Mike Matheny and Robin Ventura, who have obviously paid their dues and are unquestionably ready for their new gigs.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Not forgetting the

years of service at the major league level that Trey Hillman brought to his legendary reign.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Which can only speak more to how the Royals viewed the "Frank White, Manager" situation

There must have been something that they felt disqualified him from being able to be a manager. Whether it be a total lack of understanding of how to manage a team or basic prejudice or the fact that they liked him more in the role he was in, I don’t know. It’s not as if they were averse to former players as managers. Pena. Bell.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Why else

would you bring in Trey Hillman, major league nobody?

And then go to Ned Yost, who after his tenure in Milwaukee was never going to get the benefit of any doubt from anyone?

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Now, how fair is that?

He managed and won in Japan with a team that was considered under-powered. In hindsight, we can obviously say he did badly for the Royals, but certainly going into 2008, that seemed like relevant experience.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Dec 4, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it's absolutely

fair, and I know its entirely unoriginal on my part.

I will never forget coming back to the States and talking to one of my best friends in the game, telling him that Hillman was smart, impressive, engaging and all those good things.

He listened. Then he said this: “Yeah. He’s never been in the big leagues.”

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

And yes

I used “its” incorrectly. Trying to be fair and balanced here.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

No you didn't.

It’s = it is

“i think it is absolutely fair.”

You used it correctly, at least in the post you’re replying to!

by Justin Bopp on Dec 5, 2011 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

It's my honesty

that forces me to to point out that “its entirely unoriginal” was a failure of correctness.

by 2X2L on Dec 5, 2011 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, that's wonderful.

After Hillman fails and is fired, Joe, who remembers being impressed with his Japan performance, quotes someone anonymously as having been a nay-sayer.

Everyone needs to have “not been in the big leagues” before they could finally “be in the big leagues.” The Royals had, at the time, just come off three years of a manager whose sole qualification was that he had “been in the big leagues” (notwithstanding the fact that he only had one winning season, and that one just barely). I think everyone was ready for a fresh face, and as fresh faces went, Hillman was as good a choice as any.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Dec 4, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't get it.

We were talking about guys with no experience managing major league ballclubs. Hillman was mentioned. You took exception to this, even though in fact he had had no major league experience in any capacity when he was hired by the Royals.

I refer to an article that discusses whether this lack of experience hampered him and concludes that it did. And you take exception to it because the guy credited with pointing out the very obvious fact that he had no major league experience is not credited by name. What does it matter who pointed it out? It was true.

So I’m not following.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

not only no managing experience in the big leagues....

no playing, no coaching….that does matter

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I never understood why it should

It doesn’t seem to make a difference in the NFL

by KSinDC on Dec 4, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

i meant playing experience

But I still don’t see why experience coaching in the big leagues matters. Is the theory that if Trey Hillman gets another job, he’s likely to do better than he did at the Royals?

by KSinDC on Dec 4, 2011 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm sure he would mostly make

new mistakes.

You can read the article cited about whether his lack of prior exposure to the major league scene had anything to do with his inability to bring his previously observed strengths to bear in that situation.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

i think it comes down to knowing how things are done at the major league level...

that major league players dont carry chairs as punishment. nobody took him seriously from day 1.

he wont get another chance so we’ll never know

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

He's Mattingly's bench coach

and with that franchise in a muddle, whether there’s new ownership in place or not next year, if they fall out of contention early and decide they need to shake things up, they may very well let Hillman run the show for a bit and then open up the job for interviews in the offseason.

Stranger things have happened.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

its possible

im not really counting an interim gig as him getting another shot unless he parlays it into the full time job

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I took exception

to the notion that not having managed a major league ballclub is necessarily a reason to not hire someone to manage a major league ballclub. With that kind of thinking, we’d currently have fourteen teams with no manager, and the dessicated corpses of John McGraw, Connie Mack and Clark Griffith would be mounted in major league dugouts.

Hillman managed in the minors. And won. He managed in Japan. And won. How much more does someone have to do to have “paid his dues” enough to get the chance in MLB?

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Dec 4, 2011 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

its wasnt the not managing or playing....

it was the not ever having been in a major league clubhouse before…

managing in japan and in the minors is far different….in japan the manager is revered and nobody questions him…having your players carry chairs might actually work there…here it just looks like little league shit

how many major league managers havent ever been coaches, players or managers in the major leagues? why is that?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Hillman's name arose

as part of a discussion about the assumption that Frank White could not have been a good manager without certain kinds of experience; in connection with that discussion I mentioned managers who were hired either with less manager experience, such as Matheny, or with less major league experience, such as Hillman, only to make the same point you made: such assumptions clearly are not universally applied. Why they were in White’s particular case is still unclear; that’s the topic at hand, not primarily whether Hillman was doomed to failure or not.

But on that secondary topic, in retrospect it’s probably reasonable to believe that in his particular case the utter lack of major league experience made the difference. Anyway I think so myself.

Even Earl Weaver spent a half-season in the big leagues as a first-base coach before becoming a manager. Maybe there’s somebody who had never set foot in a major league clubhouse in an official capacity until becoming a manager and succeeded, but I can’t think of who that may be just now. Didn’t look too hard yet though, I admit.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean

over the last half-century or so. Clearly everything has a start; don’t need to go all Clark Griffith on me.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Jack McKeon is one

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Dec 4, 2011 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

He was not a success in his gig in KC.

Overcompensating for his lack of experience, he was a wise-ass who slowed the Royals progress toward success. They were immediately better under Herzog and never reverted.

Yes, they won 88 games in his first year under him. Doesn’t mean he was the difference. He wasn’t.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Be that as it may

It means that hiring someone who’s never been in a major league dugout isn’t entirely unprecedented, even in the modern era.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Dec 4, 2011 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasn't looking for just any precedent

Was looking for someone who succeeded.

I know a bit about McKeon; as it happens, his home town of South Amboy, NJ is just across the river from where my parents worked at the time, and we subscribed to the area newspaper that portrayed him as the local boy made good. It wasn’t until much later, after reading about his feuding with Piniella and Busby and his public pronouncement that Brett didn’t have what it took to make it in the big leagues, and the of him offered in Lou Gorman’s book, that I realized that at that period of his life he was not yet ready for the job.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

make that: “the observations of him offered in Lou Gorman’s book”

Too much posting today.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't remember

if he moved to the front office before or after Muser was fired.

And I don’t know either what Baird or anyone else did or didn’t do in response to his ambitions. All we know is that Frank White’s perception is that he never got a real shot at the job he wanted and that no one ever told him to his satisfaction why.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it comes down to three possibilities

1) he is really awful at coaching/managing
2) some weird psuedo-prejudice
3) they preferred him in his role as an ambassador.

I don’t know which, if any, is the “most accurate.” It might be a combination of them. Or none of them. Maybe David Glass is a racist and doesn’t want a minority manager. I honestly don’t know.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

4) Frank White has a better reputation in the Kansas City community then anyone in the Royals’ front office.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true.

And there probably is a personality conflict, that Frank White is a well-known figure who has been apart of the organization for a very long time in a very public capacity. And if that is the reason, because Frank White is not a “Dayton Moore guy”, then Dayton Moore is way too egomaniacal.

But since it stretches all the way back to the Baird Era, there has to be more to it than that. I lean closer to either A) he just isn’t good at managing or B) they prefer him in his role as an ambassador or C) both.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Not necessarily

as his qualifications have changed since then. While he didn’t have any managerial experience when the job was open under Baird, when it was open under Moore, he did.

Whether or not that was the difference, I think it’s reasonable to assume that there was a difference between Baird’s reason not even to interview him and Moore’s reason, although an interview did occur, not to take his candidacy seriously, at least in White’s mind.

And while I can readily agree with you that the organization may prefer White to play a role in public relations instead of a role managing the club, they cut him out of that role effectively enough as well by offering him a 2/3 cut in salary. So I’m not buying your (B) at all.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

From what I've heard and read, they cut his salary because his role had changed

Since he was doing TV broadcasts, he wasn’t “fulfilling his obligations” in the PR role, and they wanted to reduce his salary from that since he wasn’t spending nearly as much time on it while he was working in the booth.

From my understanding, Frank White didn’t like that very much, and chose to completely resign instead.

And this is where things get muddied. By the time he resigned from his PR role, he had already been signed on to do the broadcast for the next year.
Some have said he wanted to get paid to do both, despite the fact that one role diminished the other. And instead of accepting reduced pay for reduced workload, he resigned from the role completely.
Others say the organization was trying to force him out.

I don’t know. I don’t think we’ll ever know the real reason. From some of the conjecture, Frank White may have been entitled enough to think he deserved two full-time paychecks for one full-time job and another that he was essentially doing only in the off-season.

But that doesn’t mean he didn’t deserve it, either. He is Frank White. And I mean that with all sincerity.

As far as his qualifications changing, he had experience by the time Muser was let go, and then the Royals hired three new managers under two different GMs before Frank seemed to give up all hope completely and settled for the PR gig.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think he should have been allowed to double-dip.

I made this point already above, but nobody deserves to get paid for a job they aren’t doing. So a rough proportion of his salary should have been accepted by him if it was possible.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

See my comments below regarding the whole PR salary/broadcast gig stuff.

Essentially, I think they just wanted to reduce his salary while he was doing the radio thing. And maybe he didn’t like that very much. Or maybe they were trying to force him out.

But again, I don’t know.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

He said on the radio yesterday

that he was unsure of where the TV job was going, and that he willing to work full time in the PR role, anticipating that he’d retire after 5 years. The Royals said no.

So he said he was in the TV job this year only because the club had no other place for him. I never heard him say that he wanted to be paid for both jobs and do just one of them. If there is information that that’s what he wanted elsewhere, I missed it.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

He was willing to work full-time in the PR role

But from my understanding he was signed on to do the radio broadcast as well.

If I may be permitted to make an inference, I think the FO wanted to reduce his PR salary while he was doing the broadcasting thing. If that kept going, okay. If not, come back and do the PR thing.

But Frank took it as a slight, or misconstrued it, or was just generally upset that they wanted to reduce his salary, regardless of the motives. But everything is either conjecture based on one side of the story or hearsay regarding what would be typical business practice in a situation like this, both of which may be completely erroneous.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

So he could have

opted out of his TV contract, whatever it was, and gone back to the PR role, if the club had been willing to let him keep that job. Nobody was really sure how much he’d be needed on TV anyway, because at the time it wasn’t clear whether Split would be back.

That sort of opting out happens all the time; I’m sure if Francona takes a job with ESPN and later gets an offer from a club, it’ll work out.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

That may have been an option

But maybe he really enjoyed doing the TV broadcasts. There are dozens of possibilities as to why he didn’t/couldn’t/wouldn’t opt out. Maybe they were going to reduce his pay even if he just went back to doing the PR thing. Who knows?

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know, for sure,

but did hear the interview with Wright. I’m just going by what he said there.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Right. And I get it. That is definitely his side of things

But there are way too many unknowns to try and get anything more than a cursory understanding of what actually happened.

I believe that Frank White believes that that is what happened. And I believe that he is not flat-out lying. Along with other reports, it is enough to know that the front office screwed up Royally.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You're of course absolutely correct in saying
there are way too many unknowns to try and get anything more than a cursory understanding of what actually happened

So I’m going to leave off pondering these issues now and watch a film with a transparent narrative that’s much easier to follow, such as Rashomon.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Or Eraserhead

Or Blue Velvet.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Twilight Samurai is one of my favorites

Wonderful story about maintaining honor, dignity, and nobility even when they are all you have left.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

It's set in 12th century Japan

and there is a samurai in it, but it’s really more about the nature of individual perspective than it is about 12th century Japan. Good film.

Rains very hard in that picture, just as it does in Seven Samurai. Maybe that’s a Kurosawa thing.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Good observation

Funnily, when Steven Spielberg met Kurosawa, first thing out of his mouth was, “You really seem to like rain.”

by Sweet Thang on Dec 4, 2011 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I know he had managed

one or more fall league clubs for the Red Sox, but had he managed a full-season club at any level before he went to Wichita in 2003?

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Managed no, I don't think so.

But he had been on major league staffs for several years, and played for two decades, which is certainly more qualification than a lot of managers that get plugged in with.

But again, I don’t know what his intrinsic knowledge of managing a club is. And I don’t remember hearing much of his time at Wichita, other than him getting non-interviewed for the Pena/Bell job and getting, from what I believe he viewed as a “lip service” token interview when Hillman was brought on.

Then they brought in Yost as an assistant to the GM or whatever and everyone knew that he was in place to take over if Hillman failed out.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Which

it was pretty clear to anyone without a stake in his success that he would.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Right. And to that end

I think more so than the TV broadcast/PR role debacle is what set everything in motion. If Splitt hadn’t fallen ill I think this whole thing would have been a lot less public, but Frank still would have been let go from his PR role due to internal friction.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

True. But you don't have to make up the "too critical" excuse

And this whole thing doesn’t get blown up like this.

You instead could have said that the Royals organization and Frank White have decided to part ways after many years of working together. Done and done. There might be a little cloying about the motive and such, but without the added absurdity of the “too critical” narrative.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

If that had happened

and White really hadn’t been party to a mutual decision, I have no doubt that pretty much the same press and radio interviews would have followed. It’s not a matter of whether he was the color guy on TV. He would have been, as you so aptly said, Frank White either way.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Just figured someone should let you guys know

this tete-a-tete is getting perilously close to classic Scott vs. [insert handle starting with the initial ‘k’ here] protracted arguments.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 3, 2011 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

It's getting perilously close

to the right-hand margin, for sure, but I don’t really feel as if I’m arguing with JK in the same way that I and other have argued with Scott in the past. That experience is….well, anyone who has ever had it will know without my saying any more.

I don’t actually feel that JK and I are arguing at all. I think we’re both just trying to make sense of White’s ouster, and we have different perspectives to offer.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

What do you mean?

The text is still like 1/10th of a column wide.

There’s still more room ;)

by sterlingice on Dec 3, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Do I need to start using blockquotes?
this tete-a-tete is getting perilously close.

This is so wrong I don’t even want to get into this with you.

starting with the initial ‘k’ here] protracted arguments

Out of context blockquotes make you look stupid.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

But much of the outcry, initially at least, particularly on here, was based upon the reasoning of the decision and less concerned with the motive. Only after White’s interview, when a semblance of context was gained, did focus shift towards motivation.

And I think that initial outcry would have been severely reduced, particularly if they had done a better job of at least making it appear amicable.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

It wouldhave been around that time

With Greinke, Gordon, and Buter right?

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

They won a division title

under White in 2006. Butler, Gordon, and Greinke were indeed all on the team.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

It was the season that Greinke stepped away from the game. Given the fact that I believe he managed Gordon in the minors, that would have been the year they won IIRC.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 3, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That's where they all "learned to fight for each other,"

which is why the team became awesome soon after this, and all those guys are life-long buddies now.

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.
Before getting tweaked, read up on regression.

by Matt Klaassen on Dec 3, 2011 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

At least Gordon and Butler are friends

From what I hear.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Gordon & Butler

Just from casual observation (batting cages, practice, locker room), Gordon & Butler are acquaintances & teammates. I wouldn’t call them close friends of each other.

by RoyalsFan on Dec 5, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

There’s no reason to bring that up unless you have some sort of hard evidence.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Reductio ad absurdum

It is the farthest thing from possible.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Soren Petro talked about this once

And his take was something to the effect that the Royals told him to work on it, and Frank would only spend 2-3 years at each job, expecting to be handed the job after that. He never seemed willing to toil away like many managers do (how long was Trey Hillman a minor league manager? Over a decade) and expected his playing career to give him a shortcut to the top.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps the pattern exists because the impetus is reality?

I surely don’t know. He was probably mistreated in some fashion before, though not to the extent that he made out. But he was definitely mistreated in this situation.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly. Per Mellinger:

White is the common denominator in a tension-filled relationship with the club that stretches back to his playing days — through different general managers, front office personnel, coaches, even ownership.

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/02/3298952/im-done-with-the-royals-frank.html#ixzz1fWFXIREF

by its coming on Dec 3, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, you used "its" properly.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 3, 2011 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Your right!

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 3, 2011 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

It's Like A

Special Purpose.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 4, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

the other common demoninator

is David Glass

2011 Royals Review NCAA Bracket Challenge Winner, by process of attrition

by sfeldkamp on Dec 4, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

david glass who gets shit for being a very hands off owner who doesnt really care and is just out to make money...

goes out of his way over the past 20 years to commit various injustices against frank white?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

"even ownership"

This goes back before Glass

by KSinDC on Dec 4, 2011 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

The 2nd to last full paragraph is interesting.

The people involved in “upper management” are tired of Frank because he sticks around wanting to contribute in some way, so they are constantly doing things trying to drive him away. It’s like a person trying to get their significant other not to like them so the other person will break up the relationship. But Frank just kept waiting around. And during that time, he spoke with a lot of people who were sympathetic to his situation, but those people went and spoke with some other people. So it got out that Frank wasn’t happy and was talking about the “upper management” badly. BUT… all he ever really wanted is to be respected and to be treated the same as every other former baseball player. The way this business is run, it doesn’t make sense. Frank seems to have been singled out. I understand if they don’t want to give him the managing job, but you bring him in to Spring Training to work with players and let him continue some instruction into the season.

What I take from this is that the Royals don’t want their former players sticking around and taking on somewhat ceremonial roles. As far as I know, every other team does it, but if you’re going to stick around with the Royals, you better be George Brett, or you better get really good at your job (Splittorff).

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

I forgot to mention that Frank is invaluable as a PR ambassador also. He’s really not just some former baseball player with nothing to offer. He’s an African-American in a city that really would benefit from the black population getting involved in baseball and the Royals (aside from wearing ugly hats), he’s an incredibly nice guy for a random person who meets him, and he has value as an instructor. But even if you take out the instructor part, he’s valuable.

Another thing that bugs me is the business with cutting his salary for his PR position when he began broadcasting games. Now… who knows what he was being paid for broadcasting or by who… but there’s a big issue here if Frank was caught in a Catch-22. If he was given the choice of (1) helping out the Royals in a time of need by stepping in to broadcast games; or (2) telling the Royals to screw off because he needed to keep his salary for his PR position, then that’s pretty unprofessional. On the other hand, Frank mentioned in the interview that the Royals didn’t like how much money he was making, which probably means Frank was happy to double-dip when he wasn’t performing fully at another position. I probably have to side with the organization on this one.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I think there's a big difference between wanting to be a PR ambassador and wanting to be the manager or TV broadcaster.

I’d analogize this to the two friends where one wants to date and the other wants to just be friends. The one who wants a relationship keeps pushing for it, the other keeps pushing back and eventually even the friendship is lost.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Until we hear the management side it's hard to deduce what the true reasons were

A lot of what we’ve been able to speculate seems plausible.

Another area that I don’t believe has been mentioned around here is money. Perhaps White wanted more, and perhaps something lucrative that didn’t match his performance. Or perhaps Ryan got a raise that made it difficult to budget for Frank, or Ryan got a raise after flirting with the Minnesota gig and Frank wanted his just deserts.

I don’t know if that’s true. Money may be the furthest area from this debacle. But it would make sense that if Frank wanted some extra spending funds, the Royals would say “screw it,” bring in a relative newcomer that still has history with the organization (Mike Sweeney?), and cut ties with Frank, saying they wanted to go in a more “positive” direction or something.

Unless you’re a broadcasting legend, it’s fairly common for someone to get the axe when the money starts to get skewed – especially before you get a chance to become too ingrained in the public’s perception, never allowed to reach legend status. Not saying Frank would be a legend, of course.

by KyleM on Dec 3, 2011 1:43 PM EST reply actions  

make for the Sahara.

The most impartial of the “just deserts.”

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Learn something new everyday

Knowledge is power.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, the English language is downright befuddling sometimes

I don’t blame immigrants for not learning it.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

And That Is

At least in part due to the language having absorbed so many

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 3, 2011 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Words and phrases from other languages and Anglicizing them.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 3, 2011 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it is all about not being manager

Simple as that. White thinks it is his due, Royals management wouldn’t even put him in as an interim.

by BlueEyes_Austin on Dec 3, 2011 1:49 PM EST reply actions  

Great piece Will

I think bullet point 4 (about the important actions taking place off camera) is especially good. It’s an important point.

I feel bad for Frank, but the mistreatment that he perceives has occurred through multiple front office regimes. I can not believe that he doesn’t have significant fault here. And if he is creating a toxic work environment, then he should be forced out, regardless of the fact that his number is retired. It’s not fair to everybody else to do otherwise.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 1:53 PM EST reply actions  

I really can't comment about this

Considering I’ve only started following the Royals recently, and wasn’t alive during the glory days, and wasn’t around for the shithole that ensued after….But I can comment that the Royals fucked up big time, I can understand that they might not want Frank back for reasons. But the reasons that they listed are bullshit, they need to realize that the Royals legends are due respect and this FO is really making me pissed

Good game homie

by tiquanunderwear on Dec 3, 2011 2:06 PM EST reply actions  

I'm in the same boat as you brother

Been back following baseball/royals since 09. Frank white is a class act in person. I know I met him twice. What happens behind closed doors is something else. But Frank is a royals great, you don’t fuck with Royals greats. We don’t have many if em’

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Dec 3, 2011 6:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Just three in my mind

George, Frank and Justin Huber.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2011 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Even as far back as say, five to seven years ago, I remember listening to sports radio and every once in awhile (whenever the Royals were in need of a new manager) hearing the rumblings of Frank White in AA wanting the job, even on the interim, and he was always turned down cap in hand or wasn’t considered at all.

The most similar case I can think of from a separate sport is in the NFL, when Mike Singletary was essentially the token black interview (since the NFL requires a minority interview) for a decade or more before getting a job with the 49ers.

I am willing to bet that the major breaking point, though, was when they brought in Ned Yost in that arbitrary official capacity where no one knew what his job was, but everyone knew it was pretty clear that he was brought in to take over when Trey Hillman failed out. The fact that Frank White had been serving in an official capacity, in an actual role, doing actual work, and to know for six months or however long it was between Yost’s hiring and Hillman’s firing that you were not going to ever be considered for the one thing that you had always wanted to do before you retired, which is coach the team, your hometown team, that you played for, that you won titles and championships for.

I imagine that was pretty demoralizing for him.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:10 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I'm sure it was demoralizing for him

I imagine his whole post-baseball career has been demoralizing.

I’m not sure that the just outcome would have been any different though. Obviously, the metrics for managing or broadcasting aren’t as clear or as public as they are with on-field performance, but lots and lots of people try to succeed in baseball and fail. The minor leagues are full of them. Failure and demoralization is the rule in baseball, not the exception.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I am of the opinion that the Royals can do better for a commentator than old Frankie Giggles

And that, based on his post-baseball resume, he was ill-equipped to serve as manager for a major league club. I’m sure he is a fine fielding instructor. He probably could have been a very good bench coach. That is about it.

And I agree that there is more under the surface than just the “Royals kick Frank White to the curb” narrative. But honestly, when someone has meant as much to your organization as Frank White has, you owe him the due courtesy of communicating to him what his role can be, like adults. And to let him down easy.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely not. Let him down easy?

No, you let him contribute because he has value to the organization.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes. He does. And yes. You do.

I meant as far as informing him that you didn’t want him to do color commentary anymore. Man up. Tell him you’re going in a different direction. Let him down easy.

Then put him back in the role he wanted to do before bailing everyone out when Splitt became ill.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh okay.

Misunderstanding. I thought you meant cut ties with him easier. I agree. They shouldn’t have told a FSKC guy to come up from St. Louis to tell Frank the news. It’s no secret that the Royals have control over the broadcast personnel. It should have been Dan Glass or Dayton Moore giving him the news, but telling him the truth. They should have told him they didn’t think he was performing well in the booth, but that they would love for him to pick up his PR role before Splitt became ill.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Although, I guess they would have been lying. We may not ever know because once Frank was told he was “too negative” he bolted (literally, he left the building).

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

even still, Jack Donovan (FSKC guy) is not the one who would say

“Oh hey Frank, we appreciate what you’ve done but we’d like to go in a different direction on the TV broadcasts but, we’d like for you to return to your previous role in the PR department.” He has no authority in the Royals FO to make that statement. He is just the messenger. And from his opening statement, it seemed like he only had one message to convey.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

The message didn’t seem to include anything more. But if it did, if they’re sending Jack Donovan as a messenger for this, then I don’t see why they couldn’t use him as a messenger to tell Frank his old job is waiting for him. Either way, it’s improper to send that guy.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Mainly because Jack Donovan isnt strictly employed by the Royals.

He is employed by Fox Sports. FSKC is the licensed media arm of the Royals, but as far as I understand it, Jack Donovan is employed by Fox Sports to work for FSKC. He isn’t a “Royals FO” member. He’s a subsidy of a subsidy.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Jack Donovan may be the only one who could tell him his contract wasn't renewed but he isn't the only person capable of talking to him.

You can have someone from Royals FO meet with him to put the public relations job out there for him “to think about” again so that he’s got that in the back of his mind, so he knows about that invitation and nokws about that possibility before he finds out he’s fired, so that when he does get the talk from FSKC he already knows that he’s got another job offer from the Royals.

You give a guy a respectable out, one that he can walk away from with his head held high. Buddy Bell got a freaking “advisor to the GM” job to cushion his firing. It seems like you see this in politics alot, where your loyal right hand has burned too many bridges, but you don’t want to make an enemy of him, so you have one of your friends offer him a job and then you encourage him to take it.

by Gross(est) on Dec 3, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Like Frank or not as a broadcaster the guy was a great defensive player and

at least one of the current players (Alex) respected his knowledge and coaching ability. For the organization not to at least ask him to help with defense, something that the organization has struggled with for sometime is a sign of their ignorance. Whether they like the man or not he was a talented player who could help them in one aspect of the game. Their paranoia needs to stop.

In the end whether GMDM is the one behind this move it comes down to it being David Glass’s fault. He owns the team and at anytime could’ve stepped up and told GMDM to play nice because the Royals need Frank White. Instead he decided to trim a little salary and push out a Royals and Kansas City legend.

Checkout Royals minor league notes at www.14for77.blogspot.com

by kcscoliny on Dec 3, 2011 2:22 PM EST reply actions  

I think his comments in the Wright interview about not being consulted on player evaluation are pretty telling

And really, if White wanted to take a larger role in player evaluation (and that’s ALL he wanted), and the DM regime didn’t think he had the chops, it’s hard to blame them for shutting him out, even if they knew it would upset him.

I don’t think that explains the situation boiling up to this, though. I find it hard to imagine that the FO’s hands were tied to the extent that they couldn’t offer him some sort of PR position that, even if it didn’t come with any real responsibility, would have kept him happy.

The narrative practically writes itself. If they didn’t want him in the broadcast booth anymore, how hard would it have been to just spin it as, “Frank really stepped up last year when Splitt died, but this offseason we’re going to find a replacement so he can get back to the sort of public ambassador role that he enjoys so much.”

The “who does this guy think he is?” comments are kind of troubling. Fits in so well with the “our way or the highway” mentality that I already envision the DM regime as having.

by ams5661 on Dec 3, 2011 3:15 PM EST reply actions  

Am I the only one who really doesn't care about this?

Frank wasn’t particularly good at his job and he was fired. I really don’t much care why. If they thought he was too negative…ok. I guess that’s not great, but every team is going to make sure anyone broadcasting their games is going to be positive. I guess the Royals didn’t handle it as well as they could, but they were firing him (or at least not renewing his contract), so he was going to be pissed regardless.

I don’t know. The Royals didn’t owe him that job. It wasn’t his right as a Royals icon. It was a job. He didn’t do it very well. Now they are trying someone else. I care about this a lot less than who gets the last spot on the bench coming out of spring training…and that isn’t very important.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 3, 2011 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

^^ this

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Dec 3, 2011 6:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think you've been keeping up on the story.

Read the 2 articles from the Kansas City Star. It’s possible you still don’t care. If that’s the case, it may be that you need to be in Kansas City in order to understand.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I get the feeling that in KC Frank White is adored much more than by the out-of-town fans.

Growing up he was my favorite player and he is still my all-time favorite Royal. That his WAR is lower than George Brett’s is irrelevant to me in terms of how important and integral he is to the story of the Kansas City Royals.

A part of me feels like in the end winning on the field is all that matters, but a much bigger part of me feels like if winning was truly all that mattered, I wouldn’t like baseball one stinking bit, and frankly, Frank White has been awesome enough as a Kansas City Royal to fulfill both of the feelings.

by Gross(est) on Dec 3, 2011 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

To concur with others,

it is the shunning of an icon who really just wanted to be a goodwill ambassador (albeit one on the payroll).

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 3, 2011 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

To answer you question, then.

Yes, I think you’re the only one who doesn’t care about this.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't care about him being forced out as announcer

I care if he’s being mistreated.

If there’s no other side of the story, I’d be upset with the Royals. He deserves better than this.

I’ll be interested to hear if there’s another side to the story.

by KSinDC on Dec 3, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I could care less about this whole ordeal

they didn’t renew the contract of a mediocre/bordering on crappy announcer, why should i care?

by BeauJackson on Dec 3, 2011 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Imagine if it were Bo Jackson

And they fired him for being “not badass enough”.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

i get that he was a Royal legend in his playing days

but the bottom line for me is that he wasn’t good in the booth. white doesn’t deserve a lifetime contract if the only thing baseball related hes good at is actually playing the game.

by BeauJackson on Dec 3, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Now imagine that your family doesn't want you anymore

Because you and your 2nd cousin don’t get along.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

i could understand that, my parents love my second cousin

he brings my parents his latest bigfoot catch every thursday. my parents can’t miss out on that deal.

by BeauJackson on Dec 3, 2011 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

But, one can extend this out to

Should anyone else care if I get kicked out of my family due to me and my 2nd cousin not getting along

by sterlingice on Dec 3, 2011 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Now imagine that you are getting fired from your job

Because you aren’t “ugly enough”

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Besides. Very little of this has to do with the broadcasting gig

There’s more to it than that.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, the boys just couldnt get along

they all need to just put on their big boy pants. i’m not exactly sad that frank won’t be in the booth anymore though. hooray immature pettiness.

by BeauJackson on Dec 3, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

not the only one.

he was an excellent fielder. he was a poor TV analyst.

I will say that it is abundantly clear to me that there was a consensus that he be let go. Does anyone really think that Dayton Moore or Glass didn’t know that this would cause a brief firestorm? Does anyone really think the heads of the organization don’t know White’s stature? They weighed all that and still decided to let him go. Also probably worth noting that the negativity that they’re referring to probably wasn’t confined to his on-air analysis, and that this provides some insight to why he’s never been given a shot to manage. Frank White aside, “not negative” is probably at or near the top of the list of attributes you’re looking for in a ML manager.

by billexgordler on Dec 3, 2011 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

good point
"not negative" is probably at or near the top of the list of attributes you’re looking for in a ML manager.

by KSinDC on Dec 4, 2011 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

True

but whether the criticism of Frank White as being “too negative” is fair is still very much an open question.

It might be more reasonable to say that if he wasn’t grumbling privately about how this franchise does things, he can’t possibly have cared very much about the Royals.

Now if he has privately believed that the folks in charge are bozos I can certainly understand why they don’t want him around — if I were in that line of work they wouldn’t want me around either. Nor most of the other folks who post regularly here.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

On a different note

I have received 2 separate comments on my Royals cap at the Philadelphia airport. Neither of them were trash talk. Improvement? I think so.

by Yodazilla on Dec 3, 2011 5:06 PM EST reply actions  

I think we should trade for Vance Worley.

I think we should trade for Vance Worley.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

And + Worley

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 3, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I never get trash talk on my Royals gear when I'm out of town.

I get sympathy along the lines of “Oh! You’re a Royals fan! That’s so cute! Good for you!”

by Gross(est) on Dec 3, 2011 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

This probably leads to some of that animosity.

Frank feels he’s been a much better ambassador and is still treated much worse.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Heh.

That was pretty funny though. Maybe because I’m not fond of Keitzman or Harry. But yeah. What an ass.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

(Holds up 3 fingers)

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 3, 2011 5:36 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The Royals

might as well just announce that they’re firing Denny Matthews this offseason too. Might as well take the hit while they already appear to be callous and petty.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

Are they still selling the naming rights?

I guess that 71 win season built up so much goodwill in the community they feel they can do all these bad pr moves.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Shank

Here’s a blurb from the Royals site:

“FOX Sports Midwest general manager Jack Donovan told me that it was a joint decision between FOX and the Kansas City Royals, and the Royals were unhappy with the job that I was doing,” Shank said. “Jack Donovan said that FOX was very happy with the job I had been doing since I’d been working for them.”

So, it was a joint decision between FOX and the Royals, but only the Royals wanted Shank out?

Link: http://kansascity.royals.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111202&content_id=26080776&vkey=news_kc&c_id=kc

by kansasjohn on Dec 3, 2011 6:19 PM EST reply actions  

It was a joint decision for the Royals to give Shankman the boot

And for FOX to keep earning sweet, sweet ad revenues.

We should trade for Vance Worley.

by JKWard on Dec 3, 2011 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of ads

I dislike the J.B. Nutter kid who hits a HR, suddenly leaves the game, runs home and is immediately served a sandwich by his mom.

by kansasjohn on Dec 3, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Apparently...

It was a joint decision, but Fox disagreed with the joint decision.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 7:39 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Is it incumbent on the Royals to give a full-time paying job for life to every member of the Royals HOF?

Is that the problem here? That the Royals aren’t giving Frank some job and it’s their responsibility to employ him for life?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 3, 2011 7:09 PM EST reply actions  

Wasn't trying to set up a straw man. Just asking a question.

I’m just trying to figure out what exactly people are upset about.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 4, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

It's obviously not

because folks think every Royals HOF member is entitled to a full-time paying job for life. So that’s the answer to your question.

Next question.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

it does seem like people think frank white should have a job for life...

which is completely ridiculous….and frank resigned from the royals gig…struggling to figure out why the royals are the clear bad guy in this

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

What specific responses here

or in any of the other related threads lead you to think so?

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

If only we could avail ourselves of a forum

where folks could post their thoughts on these issues and we could read about them.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

You haven’t seen many posts saying something like “he’s a Royals icon. He should have a job somewhere in the Royals organization”?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Dec 4, 2011 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh

role. Fingers not nimble enough to navigate the local orthography.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 9:09 PM EST up reply actions  

rec rec rec

That last paragraph nails it.

by Gross(est) on Dec 4, 2011 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I've probably gone over the line into some realm of homerism that I'd rather not have,

but it does seem to me that his request last January wasn’t that out of the question. He was, after all, already employed by the front office in that capacity, and was only doing Royals broadcasts because of Splitt’s illness.

While the term ‘icon’ has certainly been bandied about, I think it could be very reasonably argued that in the franchise’s 41-year existence it has had exactly two ‘icons.’ Those icons are a first-ballot Hall of Famer and a hometown boy who literally helped build the stadium came up through the Royals Baseball Academy and built a borderline Hall of Fame career while wearing the powder blues in the franchise’s heyday. The former has his role in the front office, likely for life. The latter could certainly be a bridge to the relatively large African-American community in the Greater KC Metro Area and for better or worse is a much loved figure in the community. Moreover, there are two players with statues at Kauffman. It seems that if you chose to essentially deify those players it may not be the best PR move to then turn around and defecate upon them.

I know advocating for what boils down to a legacy post is lame, but it does seem like this is a somewhat exceptional case.

I do think he was pretty bad in the booth, but he’d had a position in the front office that his filling in for the ailing Paul Splittorff had gotten in the way of. While his taking umbrage at the suggestion of a cut in salary because of his tied up schedule with the color gig is a bit much, it seems to me that the FO should likely have handled the ‘firing’ and offered him his prior position back. They clearly pulled the strings on canning him, but they did it in an indirect and ultimately disrespectful way.

I think I’ve primarily advocated for the employer treating the employee with respect throughout this whole thread, and this is the point I keep coming back to: show the man respect. Instead they had the FSKC guy hand him his walking papers while telling him that they thought he was too negative for them. They should at least have the respect to say that to his face as he’s been a fixture in the franchise and the community for much of the past four decades.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 5, 2011 1:49 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And just to be clear,

I don’t really give a damn on a personal level. I have no real feelings about Frank White as a person. I’ve never lived in Kansas City. I don’t ever plan to (no offense). This won’t really affect my life at all.

It’s more that I see this FO continue to make asinine PR decisions that seem to be met with resounding backlash because they cannot act like adults. This is another case of this.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 5, 2011 2:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

there are reports of frank talking shit on them behind their back

those dont have as much credibility as the reports that he was fired for being too negative on air?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 5, 2011 2:41 AM EST up reply actions  

We can assess the credibility

of reports of what he was told he was being fired for, because we know who they come from — Frank White himself. We can ask ourselves what his motivation for making those statements might be; we can ask ourselves whether it cost him anything to make them. I think that it did; he said he was upset that some folks might take away from it all the notion that he was a negative sort. If you choose to believe that he is making his story up, you must also believe he’s being phony in stating his concern. It’s way more likely, in my view, that he’s just telling it the way he sees it.

Also the producer who was also fired can either corroborate or deny the story. It doesn’t seem likely that Frank White would go public with a false report about his firing that someone else who was also a loser in the situation could immediately gainsay.

Those other reports you mention; who do they come from? How do we gauge their credibility? Not much to go on there.

So yes, there’s a difference.

by 2X2L on Dec 5, 2011 2:56 AM EST up reply actions  

That isn't the main issue here.

My issue is the lack of integrity based on White’s narrative, culminating in what appears by most accounts to be a false rationale for dismissal. Doubtless there’s more to the story than what White’s presented, but it’s not so simple as “he’s an entitled legend”.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 3, 2011 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

For people in this town

the Royals are pretty much Kauffman, Brett, White, Howser and Matthews. Others are appreciated. Those 5 are loved.

This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.

by KC_Satchmo on Dec 3, 2011 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed brother!

So why in the heck would ya do frank dirty?!

"Stay Classy Kansas City"

by Mas Cervezas on Dec 3, 2011 8:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Glory Days Were

1973 to 1993.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 4, 2011 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Time Slips Away

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Dec 5, 2011 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

When I was a little older than 9 years old

I rode my bike past that Metuchen plant. I never did tell my mom I went that far from home or on that busy road. And I won’t call her up and tell her now either, mister, because that’s just a boring story of

CHORUS

by 2X2L on Dec 5, 2011 12:26 AM EST up reply actions  

learned something

The Metuchen lyrics aren’t on the album. Looked it up and WTF, I see them. It is my least favorite Springsteen album, but I know my Springsteen. Maybe I don’t.

by kansasjohn on Dec 5, 2011 1:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Right; it's a capitalist society. If they want to, they have the right to change the

stadium name to Pumpernickel Stadium and raise ticket prices to $200. I find it highly discouraging that the team is as PR-deaf as it has appeared to be for years. As one friend of mine who is in the local press told me, the biggest takeaway is how badly the team seems to have misjudged how well it would go over. Or that they didn’t care. Because you have to think that eventually, perception does, on some level, affect the bottom line.

"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth

by KeepItCopacetic on Dec 3, 2011 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure that White was/is loved...

Not by me anyway. And those teams were part of my formative years. I loved Brett. I loved Willie Wilson. I loved Hal McRae. I even loved Daryl Motley (and not just because of ‘85). Frank White, not so much. I didn’t love Sabes, even though he was excellent. I loved Quiz. I loved Dennis Leonard for some reason.

by billexgordler on Dec 3, 2011 11:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Were Frank White hired as manager in 2008

He would have done awful, the team would have been awful, and he would have been fired, which would have led to him no longer being a beloved Royal.

This way, he gets to still be a beloved Royal, and the Royals come off looking poorly.

I’d say this was the better deal for White.

by NotAHippie on Dec 3, 2011 7:16 PM EST reply actions  

He may very well have been even worse

than Trey Hillman — we’ll never know — but do you really think two or three years of managing an awful team would really negate his standing permanently?

I don’t think so. Neither Ted Williams nor Frank Robinson had much success as managers, yet they’re still Ted Williams and Frank Robinson. Now of course their playing careers are better known than White’s, but we ‘re just talking about White’s standing among Royals fans, so I think the argument scales down well enough for the purpose.

by 2X2L on Dec 3, 2011 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, great deal for White.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure where I said 'great deal'

To be fair, I just read my post again. And it turns out, I did not say it was a great deal.

by NotAHippie on Dec 3, 2011 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I did use sarcasm font.

But to be sure, I also think it’s foolish to say “this was the better deal for white.” I don’t think he cares about winning the PR battle. I think he cares about contributing to the team he loves and securing his future when he is retired.

Of course those Royals teams would still suck if Frank was managing, but I don’t think firing him would have been a disaster. I think he would be upset about it, but would understand, then he would go to another position with the Royals (like a PR role).

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 3, 2011 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I know you used sarcasm font. But you used it indicating that you sarcastically agreeing with my statement about it being a great deal. A statement I never made.

by NotAHippie on Dec 3, 2011 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you’re the one not getting it, since your explanation of your statement doesn’t agree with the actual statement.

by NotAHippie on Dec 4, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Sometimes when we humans are being sarcastic

we take things a step further. Perhaps going so far as to go into hyperbole. Sometimes not, though. Regardless, direct quotes are not necessary to convey sarcasm. Just coding.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 5, 2011 1:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

But I’m sure he’d still like that chance.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2011 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Great write-up, Will

This is a really weird situation and I hope Frank and the Royals can make up and find some common ground to work together in the future.

by Loose Seal on Dec 3, 2011 8:41 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

Very well written

Sums up my views pretty well. Plenty o’ blame to go around by a lot of entitled people.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2011 11:34 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with Scott on this one

After reading the Mellinger article, I think the smart thing would have been to tell White that he was out as a broadcaster but in as a coach/instructor and in as a PR guy. He’s a bad broadcaster but certainly a qualified instructor; if I were a young ballplayer I would listen to what Frank White advised me to do. And he’s obviously qualified, perhaps even uniquely so, to shake hands and tell anecdotes.

Now, if White doesn’t like that, he’s free to quit. He’s not entitled to a lifetime sinecure. Nobody is. And he’s not entitled to be the manager. That’s the boss’s decision. If you don’t get the promotion you wanted, you can either stay on with the company or resign like a gentleman and find a new job.

One thing I found troubling was that White is said to have been bad-mouthing the Royals organization. I teach at a private language academy. If word got around that I was bad-mouthing the school, I’d get fired.

"All the boys think she's a guy
She's got crazy Frenchy eyes."

by Juancho on Dec 4, 2011 4:56 AM EST reply actions  

Is any basis the the "Frank is badmouthing the Royals" angle?

If true he most likely deserved to be let go, but I’d still like to hear some concrete examples of what White purportedly did wrong. Right now, the only thing I’m seeing is the vague comment in Mellinger’s piece.

by kansasjohn on Dec 4, 2011 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

What he said that I agreed with

“The Royals didn’t owe him that job. It wasn’t his right as a Royals icon. It was a job. He didn’t do it very well.”

"All the boys think she's a guy
She's got crazy Frenchy eyes."

by Juancho on Dec 4, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know why people are singling out Dayton Moore

this has Dean Taylor’s fingerprints all over it!

Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.
Before getting tweaked, read up on regression.

by Matt Klaassen on Dec 4, 2011 9:45 AM EST reply actions  

no....

although in franks whiny interview on 610 he did say he may ask to have his number removed from the OF wall…how old is this guy

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I didn't follow that from Frank because it paints him in a pretty poor light.

He needed some PR advice on that comment.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 4, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

he didnt come off well in the entire interview...

he’d have been better off keeping quiet and letting guys like passan do his fighting for him…he’s not an eloquent speaker…which is why we’re here in the first place

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

R.I.P. Frank White

Being born in 1970, I do remember the only glory days of the Royals. Everyone of my friends wanted to be George Brett, and I idolized the man. I enjoyed reading all about George, the excitement of Willie Wilson hitting one in the right field corner and wondering whether it would be a triple or in inside the park home run, the aggressive hitting and baserunning of Hal McRae, and the utter coolness of Amos Otis. However, when I went to my first live game in 1979, Frank White was the one that most impressed my young mind with a leaping catch of a line drive and a great backhanded stop up the middle.

I became more of a Frank White fan. As I couldn’t hit worth a lick, quite like a young Frank White, I concentrated on defense. My most memorable moment was making an over the shoulder catch in short right friend in machine pitch and making an unassisted triple play by touching second base and tagging the runner already rounded second base from first base. My thoughts running off the field was this is how White would do it.

While George won the batting titles and the accolades, White was the glue that held the team together. He was the Kansas City native who came through the Kansas City Baseball Academy, along with his double play partner U.L. Washington. Most people thought he would never hit, but he found some power later in his career and batted clean up for the 1985 World Champs.

Do I think that Frank White should have been the manager? No, as I am starting to buy into the sabermetric viewpoint of baseball, and some of the things that Frank said seems to be a little too “old school.” Do I think that Frank was a particularly good color analyst? No, but he was growing on me, and I especially liked his technical breakdown of middle infield defense. Do I think that Frank had the “right” to be on the TV broadcase? No, but the Royals totally screwed up by making some excuse that Frank is too critical, and not keeping Frank in the organization under some dual PR/infield instructor position.

The history and image of any sports franchise is important of the fan. With Frank no longer with the organization, the only tie with the Royals glory years is now George Brett. As much as I would like to play 18 holes of golf with George and have a few beers with him, George is not someone who can present the proper PR image to the fans or really puts in the effort to be fan friendly.

While this is much less of the magnitude that happened when Jerry Jones bought the Cowboys and unceremoniously fired Tom Landry, it brings in me that kind of reaction when a childhood hero is no longer with the organization. If the Royals can become winners like the 1990s Cowboys, then this episode may become forgotten. However, as of today with this incident and the fact that the Royals have cancelled Fan Fest, I am not sure that the Royals have a good handle on positive PR, and an organization that cannot handle something simple like PR is probably deficient in other areas that would affect putting a winning product on the field.

by ks.cowboy on Dec 4, 2011 12:53 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

can you link me where the royals have said it was due to frank being too critical?

we’re getting this from frank who allegedly got it from the FSKC guy who allegedly got it from the royals…until the royals come out and say differently, im assuming he was fired b/c he was an awful broadcaster

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

What made him awful?

I don’t think he was great, but he didn’t seem appreciably worse than any one else I hear around MLB.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Dec 4, 2011 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Have you never watched another team's broadcast?

That’s what they’re all like. Holy shit, the Cleveland guys don’t even bother to learn the names of the opposing players.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 5, 2011 1:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know that 'many' are better.

It’s rare that I see one that doesn’t make me ill.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Dec 5, 2011 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was a bad PR move, but...

for the most part, I’m indifferent.

I can remember a few times when he had been a little judgmental about the team, but he had right to be judgmental because we have sucked for 20+ years.

On particular incident is way back during the trade deadline, when we were talking about how the Royals weren’t going to trade many players at the deadline. I remember Frank saying something like ’Well, I think it would be a good idea for the Royals to trade French…". And then he just stopped. I pictured some Royals FO guy standing back in the broadcast booth giving Frank the evil eye. (I think we were playing the Red Sox at Fenway back during the deadline when this happened).

However, I am pretty much indifferent. I don’t think Frank was that good of a broadcaster, but the very least they could do was make him a coach or FO guy at some level. But I think that’s about it.

We still have the ability to win games next season, and that’s all I really care about.

I'm a 14 year old freshman in high school with a love for all things Royals and Packers.

2012 is the year we shine.

by Jack Marsh on Dec 4, 2011 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

If they wanted to keep him in the FO job

do you think there was a better way than offering him a 2/3 salary cut?

I know there was a conflict between the FO job and the TV job a year ago; if they had wanted him in one or the other, they could easily have worked it out with him. Given what they did, my conclusion is the same as his: they wanted him in neither.

So now they don’t get the benefit of his involvement in anything. Are you arguing that the Royals are better off as a result?

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

the TV broadcast has a chance to be better...depending on who they hire....

so thats a big bonus for the fans….i dont think having a guy like frank white in the front office does a whole lot for the organization…i dont think its a good thing for the organization to pay guys like frank white big sums of money for not doing anything.

should they have continue to pay him when he wasnt doing the things that he was contracted for? would your boss do that?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Where do you get the impression

that White wasn’t doing anything? His job was PR, and before he was put into the TV gig (on an emergency basis) I think there is every indication that he was working at it.

Are PR functions not important to professional sports franchises? If they are, should they not be filled by well-known figures with roots in the communities in which they operate?

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

he was doing 1/3 of the appearances that he was contracted for...

no matter the reason, them asking him to take a commensurate pay cut was entirely fair. if he wanted to work for the royals full time, he couldve said no to the broadcasting gig and kept his PR job. instead, he threw a temper tantrum and quit the royals job

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Right, he was not able to fulfill his duties

while he was pressed into service on the TV side. My understanding is that he recognized that this was a problem and was indeed willing to go back to the PR role full time last year at the salary he was previously making in that role, up until his retirement. The club said no to that.

You and others have said that instead of that he proposed that he draw both salaries while 1) not fulfilling the original terms of his PR job and 2) staying with the TV gig. What makes you think that those were the terms he insisted on? Because that’s not what I took away from what he said to Wright.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

ive seen nothing that leads me to believe

he tried to turn down the tv gig for the full time pr job

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Dec 4, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

And until you see that

you’re going to assume that he was being unreasonable. How about this then:

I said, "look, I really think my job is community relations and public relations. I have no clue where this TV thing is going to go. I have no clue how many games I’m going to get." Because Paul was still in the picture. And, I said "all I want you guys to do for me is let me stay, in my role, at my salary in public relations for the next 5 years, and I’ll retire, and everything will be great. That’s what I want to do here."

I think at that point the Royals had the option of saying, “Let’s settle the question of where the TV thing is going. How about you work full time in the PR role and do no TV games?” No?

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

He could certainly have quit the TV job without such an agreement in place

but all he was offered at that point was a PR job at 1/3 his previous salary. So that’s not really good negotiating.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Clearly

the club didn’t offer him the option of keeping the role he had previously been hired to fulfill and wanted to retain. This is on them, not on Frank.

by 2X2L on Dec 4, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think he resigned because they were putting him in a tough situation.

They needed him to do broadcasts because they were in a pinch, but they didn’t want to pay him for his PR role. That’s fine. But from his perspective, he is stepping in to do something for the Royals, which is rather significant considering he wasn’t very comfortable as a broadcaster early on, and they’re wanting him to give up a good chunk of his paycheck. He was still doing PR stuff for them, just less, but only because they needed him to do broadcasts. I think the Royals should have treated him better this time, because in their time of need, he stepped up.

by hawkinscm87 on Dec 4, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan