I Am Musket Soak, the Story of the Moustakas Slump
Mike Moustakas has 2 hits in his last 51 PA. Which is good for a total of 2 for 49.
Mike Moustakas has 0 hits in his last 22 at-bats (he did have a HBP).
Mike Moustakas had 0 hits in 21 at-bats from July 3rd to July 10th.
Mike Moustakas hasn't hit the ball out of the infield in his last 10 PA.
Mike Moustakas hasn't drawn a walk since July 1st (remember when we were surprised about his plate discipline and acted like it was better than Eric Hosmer's?).
In other words, Mike Moustakas is hitting horribly. In the eyes of some, obviously he has to be rushed back to Omaha to ever become good again. Because someone who doesn't hit for that long will be scarred for life. Shaking. Traumatized.
Well now, let's take a look at the at-bats over this string to gain some deeper insight about Mike Moustakas.
In 55 PA from July 3rd to July 20th, Moustakas has 5 hits, 3 of them coming in the first 4 PA. He has seen 198 pitches (103 fastballs) in those 55 PA, an average of 3.6 per PA. 17 of the PA have ended on the 1st or 2nd pitch. He has seen 60 balls, swung/looked at 46 strikes, hit 39 foul balls (29 on fastballs), and put 47 balls into play.
The outcome of the 55 PA: 5 hits, 7 strikeouts, 1 HBP, 1 Sac Fly, 18 groundouts, 13 flyouts, 9 popouts, and 1 lineout.
Out of the 9 popouts, 6 of them came on the 1st or 2nd pitch. 5 of the popouts came on fastballs.
37 of the PA have been v. RHP. 18 v. LHP. Moustakas has 1 hit v. LHP over this time.
In fact, the first deep question involves Moustakas and LHP. Does it do Mike Moustakas any good to be benched v. LHP at this moment? Over the period of the last 17 days, Mike Moustakas was benched twice instead of facing Brian Duensing and Charlie Furbush. He did get to face Mark Buerhle twice, John Danks and Francisco Liriano. Does the break from playing make his hitting in future games better or worse? Shouldn't Mike Moustakas get as many at-bats v. LHP as he possibly can so that we can get the best idea possible of his abilities v. LHP? In the minor leagues, the split between his hitting v. lefties and righties was mainly a split of his abilities to hit for power, not a split in his ability to get on base.
There's an argument for both sides, but if you're gonna tout development. If you're gonna argue for batting Escobar late in games when he was slumping "because we need him to hit in those spots".. why is Mike Moustakas development as a hitter less valuable than Alcides Escobar's? Moustakas should be getting every start possible v. LHP with Betemit gone. If he doesn't, you'll hear about it.
If you go back to Mike Moustakas' splits in the minor leagues, you find a split of 36% groundballs, 36% flyballs in Springdale last year. But you find a split of 29% groundballs/39% flyballs, 11.5% popups in Omaha. Moustakas topped 10% in popups in Wilmington (11.8%) and Burlington (12.8%) as well. Currently Moustakas has 46% flyballs/37% groundballs/27% popups.
The calling card of a struggling Moustakas appears to involve popups.
When it comes to the first pitch over the 55 PA sample, Moustakas took the first pitch 38 times and swung 17 times. When it took, the pitch was a ball 25 times and a strike 13 times. When he swung, he missed 5 times, fouled the ball off 5 times, 3 groundouts, 3 popouts, and a single.
In fact, when you go back to the strikes thrown against Moustakas, 31 were called strikes and 15 were swinging. So when Moustakas swings the bat, he missed 15 times, fouled the ball off 39 times, put the ball into play 47 times.
The second deep question is about self-confidence. The people who mention the self-confidence card seem to tilt towards people who think body-language is easy o interpret through a TV and meaningful. Is Mike Moustakas' inability to get a ball out of the infield for days at a time a self-confidence issue and not a swing issue? If someone is having confidence issues, wouldn't they be swinging at bad pitches, laying off hittable pitches in the strikezone at the wrong times? Wouldn't the self-confidence issues show up outside of hitting?
Perhaps part of the problem is that Moustakas cares too much. Listens to too much advice. Tries to change too much, and makes things worse. I'm no expert in the quality of the Texas League or the PCL, but i'm gonna guess Mike Moustakas did not hit for power in those leagues with the swing we've seen lately. Just a suspicion.
And when it comes down to what he's not hitting hard, what makes you think a stint in AAA would lead to him seeing enough quality pitches to get into enough of a groove that he could hit in the majors upon recall? Maybe the problem is that he's facing quality major league pitching, and that problem isn't going to be solved in Omaha. It's only going to be solved by facing quality major league pitching in the major leagues.
But but.. he'll be changed foreverrr if we don't let him go to Omaha to get his confidence back. No he won't. If he's not good enough to come back from a 2 for 49 string and start hitting sometime in his career, he's not good enough anyways. The reality that this team has not contended in 8 years. Has not had a good run in it in 15+ years. Has not had a youth movement carried out in 35 years. Distorts people's points of view about how to handle young players. They're not wearing diapers. They're not cutting themselves in the locker room out of sorrow. They're paid to do this and they feel failure, but when they succeed, they get over the failures. Mike Moustakas isn't going to mope over his 2 for 49 in three years. And the fact that this team hasn't had a good run thanks to young players since the 1970s leads to fans having an impatience with young players and a belief that they're better off in Omaha than facing major league pitching on a major league team that is not in contention.
But Mike Moustakas should play almost every day v. righties and lefties (yes, even against Charlie Furbush). And when it comes to his swing, he should go back to what got him to the dance and stop screwing around with the advice he gets from teammates and hitting coaches. It's better to at least try what you are comfortable with than to fail using someone else's hitting system.
Just let him play the game. If he's meant to be good, he'll hit. If he's not meant to be good, then so be it. Demoting him now or reducing his playing time won't change a thing.
Review the slump chart yourselves.
| Gm | Date | PA | Pitcher | Pitches | Result | |||||||
| 19 | 07/03/11 | 74 | Hammel (RH) | FB94KS | FB93F | FB94B | FB94IP | LO1 | ||||
| 07/03/11 | 75 | Hammel (RH) | CB76B | CB76KL | FB92KS | CB80B | CB76IP | 2B9 | ||||
| 07/03/11 | 76 | Belisle (RH) | SL90B | SL90KL | SL87B | FB91F | FB92B | FB92F | FB91F | SL90IP | 2B9 | |
| 07/03/11 | 77 | Belisle (RH) | SL92KL | FB92IP | 1B1 | |||||||
| 07/03/11 | 78 | Mortensen (RH) | FB88B | FB87IP | PO6 | |||||||
| 07/03/11 | 79 | Mortensen (RH) | FB88B | CH81IP | GO3 | |||||||
| 20 | 07/04/11 | 80 | Buehrle (LH) | FB86KS | FB86B | CU83KL | FB86F | FB84B | FB83KL | K | ||
| 07/04/11 | 81 | Buehrle (LH) | FB86IP | PO6 | ||||||||
| 07/04/11 | 82 | Buehrle (LH) | CU83B | CB83B | FB84KL | FB87B | FB84IP | PO3 | ||||
| 07/04/11 | 83 | Santos (RH) | FB96F | FB96B | CH88KL | SL84KL | K | |||||
| 21 | 07/05/11 | 84 | Peavy (RH) | FB92KL | FB91KL | FB92IP | SF8 | |||||
| 07/05/11 | 85 | Peavy (RH) | CU86B | CH83F | PO85 | CU85KL | CB79B | CH84F | FB92IP | FO7 | ||
| 07/05/11 | 86 | Peavy (RH) | CU87KL | FB91F | CB80KS | K | ||||||
| 07/05/11 | 87 | Bruney (RH) | CH87B | FB96KL | FB96IP | FO7 | ||||||
| 22 | 07/06/11 | 88 | Jackson (RH) | SL83KL | FB97B | SL86IP | FO9 | |||||
| 07/06/11 | 89 | Jackson (RH) | FB96KL | PO86 | CH86B | FB94F | FB96IP | GO46 | ||||
| 07/06/11 | 90 | Jackson (RH) | FB98F | FB95F | FB96F | FB98F | SL90KS | K | ||||
| 07/06/11 | 91 | Santiago (RH) | FB95B | FB94KL | FB95B | FB93F | CH77B | FB95IP | FO7 | |||
| 23 | 07/07/11 | 92 | Scherzer (RH) | FB94B | FB94B | FB95B | FB94KL | FB94IP | FO6 | |||
| 07/07/11 | 93 | Scherzer (RH) | CH82B | CH83IP | GO43 | |||||||
| 07/07/11 | 94 | Coke (LH) | CB84KL | CB82IP | FO8 | |||||||
| 07/07/11 | 95 | Valverde (RH) | SP85B | FB95B | FB94F | FB95F | FB96F | SP88IP | FO7 | |||
| 24 | 07/08/11 | 96 | Porcello (RH) | FB92IP | GO6 | |||||||
| 07/08/11 | 97 | Porcello (RH) | FB92B | CH84KS | FB92F | FB92F | FB92IP | FO5 | ||||
| 07/08/11 | 98 | Purcey (LH) | FB93KL | SL82IP | PO2 | |||||||
| 07/08/11 | 99 | Coke (LH) | CH85B | CH85KS | CB82KS | CH84KS | K | |||||
| 25 | 07/10/11 | 100 | Verlander (RH) | FB95IP | 1B9 | |||||||
| 07/10/11 | 101 | Verlander (RH) | CH85KS | CB79B | CH86IP | GO31 | ||||||
| 07/10/11 | 102 | Verlander (RH) | CH85B | FB94B | CH85IP | FO9 | ||||||
| 07/10/11 | 103 | Valverde (RH) | FB95B | FB92IP | GO63 | |||||||
| 26 | 07/14/11 | 104 | Liriano (LH) | FB90IP | GO3 | |||||||
| 07/14/11 | 105 | Liriano (LH) | FB93B | SL86KS | SL88F | FB94IP | 2B7 | |||||
| 07/14/11 | 106 | Liriano (LH) | FB92KS | FB92F | SL86KS | K | ||||||
| 07/14/11 | 107 | Mijares (LH) | SL78KL | SL79B | SL79IP | PO3 | ||||||
| 27 | 07/15/11 | 108 | Blackburn (RH) | CB78KL | FB91B | CB79IP | GO31 | |||||
| 07/15/11 | 109 | Blackburn (RH) | FB88F | FB89F | FB88IP | GIDP463 | ||||||
| 07/15/11 | 110 | Blackburn (RH) | CU87IP | GO43 | ||||||||
| 07/15/11 | 111 | Capps (RH) | FB92IP | PO6 | ||||||||
| 28 | 07/16/11 | 112 | Pavano (RH) | CH80KL | CH82F | SP80B | FB89F | CH79IP | FO8 | |||
| 07/16/11 | 113 | Pavano (RH) | FB89IP | PO6 | ||||||||
| 07/16/11 | 114 | Pavano (RH) | SP80KL | SI89B | FB89B | FB90F | SP85F | FB89IP | FO8 | |||
| 07/16/11 | 115 | Nathan (RH) | CB81B | CB81B | SL88KL | FB93IP | FO9 | |||||
| 29 | 07/18/11 | 116 | Buehrle (LH) | FB87KL | FB87F | FB84HBP | HBP | |||||
| 07/18/11 | 117 | Buehrle (LH) | CU83B | FB83B | FB88B | FB87KL | CU82IP | GO43 | ||||
| 07/18/11 | 118 | Buehrle (LH) | FB86F | CB71B | CU81KL | CB72B | CH77F | CH79F | CH78F | FB87IP | FO7 | |
| 07/18/11 | 119 | Santos (RH) | FB96B | FB96KL | FB97F | SL87B | SL87KS | K | ||||
| 30 | 07/19/11 | 120 | Peavy (RH) | CB78B | CB77KS | CB79KS | CB78IP | GO13 | ||||
| 07/19/11 | 121 | Peavy (RH) | CU86B | CB77KL | CH84B | CB76B | SL84IP | GO43 | ||||
| 07/19/11 | 122 | Peavy (RH) | FB90B | SL85IP | FC | |||||||
| 07/19/11 | 123 | Bruney (RH) | FB96B | CH88F | CH88F | SL87B | FB97IP | GO63 | ||||
| 31 | 07/20/11 | 124 | Danks (LH) | FB91KL | CU88IP | PO6 | ||||||
| 07/20/11 | 125 | Danks (LH) | CU87KS | CB78KL | FB93B | CU87IP | GO43 | |||||
| 07/20/11 | 126 | Danks (LH) | FB91F | FB92IP | GO63 | |||||||
| 07/20/11 | 127 | Sale (LH) | SL82B | FB97F | FB97IP | GO31 | ||||||
| 07/20/11 | 128 | Sale (LH) | FB98KL | FB98B | FB98KS | FB98F | SL85IP | PO4 |
25 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Like te article homie
But he won’t go to AAA.
The only way he goes there is
A. The front office wants to play aviles at 3B to raise his trade value.
OR
B. The front office loses confidence in him and he becomes a “organizational player”
IMHO
"Stay Classy Kansas City"
by Mas Cervezas on Jul 21, 2011 1:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I see the point of letting him hit vs both RHP and LHP,
though I can also see the counter point of letting him focus on RHP, at least for now. Once he’s righted the ship, then by all means get him as much exposure to pitchers as you can.
I don’t really have a strong feeling one way or the other, though.
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Jul 21, 2011 2:14 PM EDT reply actions
Have we reached the point
or when does he, when it mirrors the travesty of letting Mazzarro take 100 earned runs in an inning and a half?
I didn't mention that
Gordon hit 169/289/250 in his first 160 PA in 2007
Then he hit 283/348/455 in his next 161 PA.
and without that start, he hit 273/323/464
If he doesn’t get a hit in his next 32 AB and goes into the 160 PA mark at 149/200/189.. then it’s Mazzaro territory
but the only way for him to get hits and get out of the slump is to play every day and get back to playing the game the way he’s most comfortable playing it.
Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bhindepmo
Chairman, The Melky Cabrera Seasoning Sauce. It's great on your outfield!
I'd like to see Aviles get a weekly start at 3rd
The jump from AAA to the majors is proverbially the hardest, and Moose does look over-matched right now and can’t square anything up right now. Hos had similar problems for a while, where every ball that he hit in play was weak, and the only balls he hit hard would end up fifty feet foul.
A little rest is not going to hurt Moose and it might give him a chance to observe some things that he’s not seeing right now.
Comparison to other demotees:
Kila: .195/.295./.317/.612 (96 PA)
Aviles: .213/.257/.391/.647 (184 PA)
Moose: .190/.252/.241/.493 (128 PA) (+ vs. lefties .061/.088/.091/.179)
Neither Of Them
Were ever as highly regarded as Mous or Gordon. Aviles, however, had proven he could hit MLB pitching. He was just a victim of Yost and Moore’s misplaced love of Getz.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 21, 2011 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions
or a victim of his own terrible defense and baserunning...
and of his awful at bats…which may very well have been corrected in omaha
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 21, 2011 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
He Was A
Good baserunner until this season, and his defense was actually good at SS. First Yu-Bet and now Herc have kept him playing out of position for 3 years.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 21, 2011 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions
but he wasnt this year...
and it wasnt due to a lack of skills or deteriorating athleticism…getting picked off is just stupidity or lack of focus…something that a trip to shitty ass omaha might fix…and his swing and approach was juat atrocious…even worse than it has been in the past
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 21, 2011 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Everybody Has Been
Running bases poorly this season. Remember, we’re trying to get 10 steals for
Butler; that's a noble goal
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Jul 21, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Haven't been watching Royals games, so I haven't really seen Moose throughout this slump, but I'm not surprised.
He has a grooved swing which basically means that his swing is only suited for a specific type of pitch in this case a fastball on the inner half (he hooks the ball).
You pitch him away or give him a good off-speed pitch and he can’t do anything with it.
Learned this from mah boi Steve Carter at Project Prospect.
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
so....
can he change? can he improve? can he learn? or is he doomed to be this way forever?
Right now, pitchers in the NL are outhitting Moose. EVERYONE is outhitting Moose. Freddie Freeman is outhitting Moose. Daniel Hudson is outhitting Moose.
I say let him play…his defense has been very good. If he wants to make a career of this baseball thing, then he needs to learn how to hit off speed pitching and outside pitching.
Yeah, he can definitely improve.
It may take some time, though, as he has probably been swinging this way for a while (muscle memory).
I still see a lot of thump from the man. He can keep his swing and destroy fastballs on the inner half, but he will remain vulnerable to heaters outside and off-speed stuff.
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Jul 25, 2011 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm sick of all the negativity on this blog!
Making watching baseball as fun as doing your taxes.
My Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 21, 2011 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
"what makes you think a stint in AAA would lead to him seeing enough quality pitches to get into enough of a groove that he could hit in the majors upon recall?"
In Omaha, he’d have Major League caliber hitters hitting behind him in the lineup. Something he doesn’t have in Kansas City.
Not saying we snould send him back to AAA. I just think it’s fun to point out that Clint Robinson provides more lineup protection than Getz, Escobat, TREANOR! et al. And yet Robinson will likely never sniff the Kaufman Sheboygan.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
that is close to what I thought earlier today . . .
. . . at least in terms of protection. I’m not sure about C-Rob being MLB ready (not saying he isn’t, I just don’t know).
robinson will likely never sniff any major league food....
now, some japanese sushi….
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 21, 2011 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't see why people think C-Rob won't get a shot somewhere
I don’t think he’ll be a worldbeater or anything, but it’s not out of the question to me that he ends up getting claimed in Rule 5 or off of waivers and putting together a decent career as a bench bat and spot starter for somebody. Sure he’s slow and has an iron glove, but I can’t think of too terribly many fast, slick fielding first basemen anyway.
by Soria's Unibrow on Jul 22, 2011 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions
speaking of which.
This is his fifth season. Is it just as simple as having him on the 40 man in order to protect him? I can’t imagine any of a dozen teams NOT taking him in the Rule 5 after this year.
Nick Swisher is handsome.

by 




















