Remembering the First Royal All-Star: Ellie Rodriguez
The first player to represent the Kansas City Royals was Ellie Rodriguez, a backup catcher for the American League in 1969.
On the day the 1969 All-Star game was played, Rodriguez was a .261/.342/.344 hitter. Um, ok. Are we missing something? Well, he was a catcher and it was the late 1960s... and... yea, that was still a bad line. Rodriguez was in his second season in the Majors and his first season as a Royal. He also ended up randomly making the All-Star team in 1972 as a Brewer. Well, then. (His stats are after the jump.)
| Year | Age | Tm | PA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 18 | OAK-min | 223 | .332 | .332 | .484 | .816 | |
| 1965 | 19 | NYY-min | 342 | .272 | .272 | .354 | .626 | |
| 1966 | 20 | NYY-min | 372 | .233 | .309 | .304 | .614 | |
| 1967 | 21 | NYY-min | 343 | .246 | .322 | .282 | .604 | |
| 1968 | 22 | NYY-min | 151 | .291 | .396 | .370 | .766 | |
| 1968 | 22 | NYY | 27 | .208 | .296 | .208 | .505 | 58 |
| 1969 | 23 | KCR | 308 | .236 | .333 | .296 | .629 | 78 |
| 1970 | 24 | KCR | 267 | .225 | .312 | .290 | .602 | 68 |
| 1971 | 25 | MIL | 380 | .210 | .311 | .257 | .568 | 64 |
| 1972 | 26 | MIL | 422 | .285 | .382 | .352 | .734 | 123 |
| 1973 | 27 | MIL | 350 | .269 | .376 | .303 | .680 | 97 |
| 1974 | 28 | CAL | 485 | .253 | .373 | .357 | .730 | 117 |
| 1975 | 29 | CAL | 293 | .235 | .380 | .301 | .681 | 102 |
| 1976 | 30 | LAD | 90 | .212 | .400 | .212 | .612 | 80 |
| 1977 | 31 | PIT-min | 163 | .224 | .356 | .313 | .669 | |
| 9 Seasons | 2622 | .245 | .356 | .308 | .664 | 94 | ||
| 162 Game Avg. | 548 | .245 | .356 | .308 | .664 | 94 | ||
| MIL (3 yrs) | 1152 | .255 | .357 | .306 | .663 | 95 | ||
| KCR (2 yrs) | 575 | .231 | .323 | .293 | .617 | 73 | ||
| CAL (2 yrs) | 778 | .246 | .376 | .337 | .712 | 112 | ||
| LAD (1 yr) | 90 | .212 | .400 | .212 | .612 | 80 | ||
| NYY (1 yr) | 27 | .208 | .296 | .208 | .505 | 58 | ||
| AL (8 yrs) | 2532 | .246 | .354 | .311 | .665 | 94 | ||
| NL (1 yr) | 90 | .212 | .400 | .212 | .612 | 80 | ||
The 1969 Royals were a run of the mill bad team. They didn't lose 100 games, but when you look at their roster, you don't see many strong performances. I suppose taking a random catcher -- in what looks like a weak era for American League catchers -- makes as much sense as anything else. Mike Fiore was probably the team's best hitter, but he was hardly an All-Star caliber first baseman.
But back to Ellie Rodriguez. He didn't play in the game and ended up hitting poorly in the second half, dragging down his season line to an even more meager .236/.333/.296.
Now, Rodriguez was Puerto Rican, and I'm not sure real baseball men have ever considered many Puerto Ricans real leaders like Jeff Francoeur or Jason Kendall. Whispers surrounded Pudge Rodriguez for the first decade of his career: he was selfish, he couldn't call a good game, etc. Maybe that wasn't the case, I really don't know. Maybe he had a great defensive reputation. Maybe the AL just wanted a third catcher to have around.
Anyway, he was our first All-Star.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah!
why isn’t a monument dedicated outside Kauffman to our FIRST All-Star? I expect an Emanuel Leutze painting in the works, if only Leutze was still alive.
Mike Fiore was the best hitter?
um….Lou PInella ring a bell?
The only measure of true success in the NFL is the Vince Lombardi trophy. Anything less is a rationalization.
which of course explains how Pinella got to be rookie of the year
sorry, I don’t care what the stats say. Having watched the deal go down, Pinella was a better hitter
The only measure of true success in the NFL is the Vince Lombardi trophy. Anything less is a rationalization.
OBP SLG OPS OPS+ BB SO
420 .428 .848 138 84 63
325 .416 .741 107 33 56
so, who ya like? Player 1 or Player 2? Player 1 took FAR more walks and
had a highter SLG and OPS … yanno, that Player 1 musta been pretty good,
maybe he should win ROY, huh?
wait … sorry, that goes to Player 2 … Player 1 is Fiore, Player 2 is Piniella
I was there, too … wonder what might have been if Fiore, not Piniella, had
been the Opening Day hero
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
significantly? no ... not by any means
Fiore was significantly better as a hitter
in some categories Fiore had the edge … Piniella had a higher average and far more RBIs … SO about the same, Fiore took more BB … Sweet Lou had a tendency to swing more than Fiore
Winner: 2009 Nostradamus of Arrowhead Pride Award
"I shall conquer untruth by truth" - Mahatma Gandhi
"It's always easier to sell 'em some shit than it is to give 'em the truth" - Shel Silverstein, The Perfect High
hi, Mo! 5 minutes!!!
Piniella was hitting .300 at the AS break, so he would have been pretty justifiable
But its hard to break in as an outfielder. Here are the AS outfielders that year and their first half stats:
Starters – Reggie Jackson OAK, Frank Howard WAS, Frank Robinson BAL
Reserves
Roy White NYY .313/.433/.471 4 HR 46 BI
Paul Blair BAL .312/.358/.533 19 HR 52 BI, Gold Glove defense
Reggie Smith BSN .339/.395/.485 9 HR 45 BI
Carlos May CHW .279/.377/.505 18 HR 57 BI – only CHW rep
Mike Hegan SEP .293/.426/.463 7 HR 30 BI – only SEP rep
Lou Piniella KCR .305/.339/.434 10 HR 52 BI
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com





















