MLB's Bud Selig to Implement One-Inning Playoffs for 2012
NEW YORK - Citing his strong respect for the history of the game, MLB Commissioner Bud Selig announced today a bold new playoff plan for the 2012 post-season. The playoffs will begin with a series of one-inning matchups destined to produce the most exciting October in memory.
"Fans have told us for years that baseball's regular season is too meaningful. Now, we're ready to act," Selig said. "Other than preventing Mark Cuban from owning a team, clearly this is the number one priority of the fans, and I respect that."
In the bold plan that many of baseball's inner circle, including Joe Torre and George Will are calling "visionary" ten teams from each league will make the playoffs. The top two teams, based on record (or maybe they have to be division winners, it isn't clear) will receive a bye. The remaining eight teams will play of series of one-inning matchups, to be held annually at Miller Park in Milwaukee.
These one inning matchups will be played, bracket-style, one after the other, on the same day until a single team emerges victorious. Then, a day later, that team will play a full, one-game, playoff against the second seed in the league.The winner of that one-game playoff will then play the team with the best record in the league in a seven game series.
Selig explained his new plan under a banner that read MLB Madness and pictured a holographic image of Jackie Robinson, Tony La Russa, Babe Ruth, Ken Burns, and Spiderman negotiating a labyrinth.
"We saw this fall that the current system is miserably broken," Selig said. "We looked at what we had, including unbalanced schedules, uneven divisions, leagues of different sizes, etc. And sought more ways to make the entire process arbitrary. Our daily, 162-game season is unique in sports, so we had to look at ways to tear it down."
Under 2012's rules, the current AL playoffs would feature the following: a double-bye for the Yankees and a first round bye for the Rangers. Detroit (3) and Oakland (10) would open the one-inning madness, followed by matchups featuring TB (4) and Chicago (9), Bos (5) and Cle (8) and a thrilling 6-7 matchup between the Angels and Blue Jays.
Royal manager Ned Yost believes the move will be good for small market teams, "I like our chances in convoluted, confusing, and complicated setup as good as anyone's. Can you imagine Tim Collins in this situation? Lights out!"
"Can you imagine that final race between the Royals and the A's for the 10th spot?" asked Yost. "Insanity!"
"Everyone loves the NCAA Tournament for the fun of filling out a bracket. Now, with one-inning games we can appeal to those who want shorter games, facilitate gambling pools more easily, and insert more randomness into our playoffs," Selig argued.
"Everyone wins."
43 comments
|
11 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So every playoff game is 100% clutch situations
I love it. Now we’ll finally know which teams really are the best.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2011 12:28 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
According to Ryan
we’d dominate with Jesus Hosmer being the greatest clutch hitter eva!
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Sep 30, 2011 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
It will give a whole new meaning
to fWAR and bWAR.
2010 = The beginning of a dynasty
If true, why does Selig look so grumpy?
"Shot by my own men."
Screw the one-inning playoff
let’s just make the playoffs a Home Run Derby! Dingers! Everyone loves dingers!
Because Chicks dig the long ball...
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Sep 30, 2011 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I think there really should be a play-in game
Fans will get to vote for the remaining non-playoff teams. The winner of the Pepsi MLB Play-in Fan Vote gets to send 1 batter to play the number 10 teams best pitcher. If he hits a home run that players team usurps the number 10 position.
by TheHouseFrankBuiltLiterally on Sep 30, 2011 12:55 PM EDT reply actions
Or instead of a number 10 team...
There should be an “All-Star” team of players cobbled together from the non-playoff teams to take on the other teams.
by TheHouseFrankBuiltLiterally on Sep 30, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
That actually sounds like fun
It would be a horrible bastardization of the game, but it really would be a lot of fun.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2011 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Seconded!
What I’ve discovered from listening to sports radio is that fans like to infer all kinds of things based on the outcome of games. The less often something happens on the field, the wilder the explanations can plausibly become, because we have fewer chances to disprove it.
Football is perhaps the greatest example of this. People love to go on and on about QUARTERBACKS. The only thing close in baseball is ACES. You’ve gotta have a GOOD ACE and does he have what it takes to be an ACE no he’s just a NUMBER TWO but he could become an ACE this postseason.
I have to imagine these same people would embrace ACES if baseball were played once a week and you always used the same pitcher to start. The ACE would be like QUARTERBACK with all kinds of GRIT and HEART and TOUGHNESS.
I guess closers
are somewhat similar. Which maybe explains why people fixate on that.
Just have Josh Hamilton hit for all twenty seven outs, and other players run in place for him. Seriously, if MLB wants to be more like football, there are all kinds of things we can do to appeal to the REAL SPORTS FAN who doesn’t like BORING BASEBALL.
WHO HAS THE BEST QUARTERBACK
is he a TOP FIVE QUARTERBACK in this LEAGUE no he’s TOP TEN though
At least it’s better than college football where over half the games (in a 16 game season, thereabouts) are truly meaningless. So you spend all this time talking about EIGHT GAMES. EIGHT GAMES.
RE: Will’s post — Maybe instead of playing one inning, teams should just get ONE PITCH. WHO HAS THE BEST FASTBALL? U ONLY GET ONE PITCH WHO U GONNA TAKE.
Kinda like the wars of olden times...
One army takes their best soldier and pits him against the opposing army’s best soldier… Save thousands of lives… Winner take all.
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2006: Royals win% = .420, Chiefs win% = .354
by averagegatsby on Oct 1, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
But it couldn't be during the day.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room!
by KeepItCopacetic on Sep 30, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
The debate/build up would be more fun than the game itself, by far.
The NBA All Star game, built on star power, often sees plenty of debate over who the last one or two selections will be. Ultimately, these players might play ten minutes in a game that nobody ultimately ends up remembering, and that isn’t really all that entertaining in the first place. None of this negates the fun of arguing over whether LaMarcus Aldridge or Kevin Love is a better power forward.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room!
by KeepItCopacetic on Sep 30, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This really is the only logical solution
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2006: Royals win% = .420, Chiefs win% = .354
How about a one AB playoff
featuring the hitter on team A with the lowest batting average VS the pitcher from team B with the highest ERA
HS Freshman sports enthusiast
Love everything Jaguars and Royals
I wear number 13 in both Football and Baseball
by tiquanunderwear on Sep 30, 2011 1:47 PM EDT reply actions
This idea would never work.
Baseball is too slow. And even a one inning playoff is still too slow. Unless…
Each team bats that single inning starting with bases loaded, 2 outs, and a full count.
Then we’re getting somewhere.
One pitch death match
Has to be a lefty pitcher under 5"11 against a hitter with 5 or fewer homers….
HS Freshman sports enthusiast
Love everything Jaguars and Royals
I wear number 13 in both Football and Baseball
by tiquanunderwear on Sep 30, 2011 2:16 PM EDT reply actions
Would never work...
the conflict of interest between Getz and Collins is too great.
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2006: Royals win% = .420, Chiefs win% = .354
by averagegatsby on Sep 30, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
a fuckin holographic image
of spiderman negotiating a labyrinth lmao your retarded
by Kansas City Keith on Sep 30, 2011 2:26 PM EDT reply actions
Im sure he won't ever get it either
Your 2010 Royals Review Fantasy Football Keeper League Champion
Since 2006: Royals win% = .420, Chiefs win% = .354
by averagegatsby on Sep 30, 2011 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Fake Peter Gammons on twitter wednesday night had me rolling.
"My heart truly does ache. Haven’t felt this bad since seeing the Dudley gets molested episode of Different Strokes. This is Peter Gammons."
by Jonnyt5050 on Sep 30, 2011 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
this is the stupidist thing I ever heard
the best team doesn’t get a chance to win. If you have good hitters 1-4 and crap 5-9 you could win by scoring in the 1st.
so does your closer pitchthe 1 inning
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
If you’re not willing to think outside the box, then you’re never going to improve baseball. And baseball definitely needs to be fixed. Thank god Bud Selig is on the job.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Bud is headlining next year's TED Conference, isn't he?
by Sweep_the_Leg on Sep 30, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
And Peter Lewis is in the process of writing the Moneyball sequel about him
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
This is exactly the kind of thing MLB needs to be doing
kids don’t sit thru 9 inning games….look at the rise of video games, where you can play a whole season in one night. Even the morph from MySpace to Facebook to Twitter is indicative of short = better. Bud is a genius. I wish he was still selling cars, because I bet he’d have really cool cars too.
by Nighthawk at the Diner on Sep 30, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
and there needs to be a way to incorporate viewer / phone in voting
by Nighthawk at the Diner on Sep 30, 2011 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Viewers could call in
and vote on the next pitch that the pitcher would throw, for a mere 99 cent charge. Even better, they could auction off the right to decide what to throw for every pitch. “And this next pitch by Chen will be a curve, sponsored by Dave’s Car Wash and Bail Bonds. Oops, it winds up in the fountains. Don’t patronize Dave’s, he makes stupid pitch calls.”
"All the boys think she's a guy
She's got crazy Frenchy eyes."
Our one man pitching staff of Tim Collins
affords us alot of roster construction creativity
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Sep 30, 2011 5:14 PM EDT reply actions



















