Umpire Hunter Wendelstedt: Helping Moscoso With The No-No
Yesterday, with the Royals struggling to get a hit against Moscoso, home plate umpire Hunter Wendelstedt, who from now on will be known as HW, called a strike against Mitch Maier that was a ways out of the strike zone. Here is a screen shot of the final pitch location:
Additionally, video of the pitch can be seen here (1:30 mark in the video):
The pitch is outside. No doubt about it. To beat a dead horse, here the plot of called balls and strikes for the game (catcher's/umpire's perspective). I bet you can't pick out Maier's called 3rd strike (strikes are red, called balls are green):
He obviously called some pitches closer to the plate balls for both teams. He did only have one pitch that was completely out of his normal strike zone, but it was an important one. Further more, HW loves to call pitches strikes on the outer half of the plate when a left handed hitter is up. Here is a general map of his LHH strike zone:
The strike zone is from the catcher/umpire's perspective. The square is the rule book strike zone and the circle is added for visual reference. The scale is the percent that the umpire call a ball a strike in that part of the strike zone. If the umpire is being compared to the league average or another umpire, the values are the difference in percentage points. The zone is adjusted according to the player's height.
As it can be seen, he does call quite a few pitches on the outside part of the plate. Here is how he compares to other umpires:
The umpire is being compared to the league average, so the values are the difference in percentage points.
Compared to other umpires, the difference can also be seen.
Pitch FX placed the pitched at -1.6 in the horizontal and 3.0 vertical directions. This pitch is in the 0% called strike zone.
I know the images do round down to the closest numbers, so I looked a little further to see if he had called any strikes that far outside before. Since 2008, he actually did call 3 pitches this far outside. They were at the horizontal values of -1.61, -1.68 and -1.68. Two of the instances didn't have a major impact (one in the 1st inning that ended up in walk and the other AB ended up with a HBP), but the 3rd is a little interesting. The Cubs were throwing a shutout going into the 9th inning and the pitch ended up being the 3rd strike on Felipe Lopez for the first out. HW may have a thing for helping dominating pitching performances out.
It was a bad call and HW should be tarred and feathered because of it. On the other hand, he loves to call pitches strikes on the outer half of the plate when a lefty is up. Moscoso took advantage of the expanded zone and got a lucky, but incorrect call.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
clear anti-Royals bias by all of baseball
they will be sorry when we don't invite them to the parade
"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell
by buddyball on Sep 8, 2011 11:53 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I think that the best argument for automated umpires
is consistency. At the very least, for balls and strikes. For what it’s worth, I do think that Pitch FX would help out pitcher more then hitters. It seems like a lot of balls that just paint the outside corner are often called balls. That could just be my bad eyes though.
I actually think it is one area that a team can gain an advantage of the system.
A team should have a great understanding of each umpire and their tendencies. This is one area the Royals, with their limited budget, should be exploiting to the max. The problem is that they are not. It seems every week or so the Royals don’t have a clue of some unique zone and just get frustrated by it.
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Sep 8, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Should there be unique zones though?
I mean there is a rule book strikezone for a reason. Why is it okay for these umpires to be able to adjust their zone to what suits them? I guess it’s like in football, when is holding, HOLDING? I think football has done a good job of keeping it in check though. Where baseball has not. Time for Pitch F/x to take over.
by royal_in_cincinnati on Sep 8, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think there SHOULD be
but as long as there is, then the Royals should be taking advantage of the disparities in different umpires’ zones. And I agree with Jeff that it sure doesn’t seem they are using his heat maps (or any other method) to capitalize on them.
by Sweep_the_Leg on Sep 8, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
This would be an interesting topic to ask about
the next time the Royals do one of those “Blog Your Way to the K” events. Perhaps, whoever asks the question could be prepared with the heat maps for that night’s HP umpire.
Tension is the enemy. - Charlie Lau
by aHorseWithNoName on Sep 8, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
one would think that this could be something that even a scout sitting on his butt
behind home plate could note, if they don’t want to use those new fangled computers.
"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell
Oh wow
you used a computer, here’s a cookie.
Royal love from the Rockies.
Maybe they can learn to hit the balls in the zone?
Learning differential umpire zones sounds like hard calculus.
Nick Swisher is handsome.
Is it possible to bat differently with an umpires tendencies in mind?
We’re talking about serious muscle memory battling against tendencies discussed during the day’s BP. While the idea of adjusting to different umps sounds good, I’m skeptical that batters could actually do it.
Pitchers on the other hand…
Royal love from the Rockies.
That's a good question
This is probably one that you’d have to ask a major leaguer if they could make that adjustment.
On the other hand, it really only makes a huge difference when the batter has 2 strikes on him. It wouldn’t make any sense to adjust a swing prior to that point in the count. For example, with Wendelstedt calling the game, it’d be helpful for a left-handed hitter to know that he needs to protect an extra 2+ inches outside or expect to be rung up.
Tension is the enemy. - Charlie Lau
by aHorseWithNoName on Sep 8, 2011 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree, but the question is
How well can a hitter identify the pitches that are headed for the extra 2 inches of strike zone? That seems like a pretty small thing to be able to successfully adjust to.
I kind of wonder if, assuming the hitter is accounting for the strike zone with 2 strikes, they would be just as likely to swing at an even further out of the zone pitch as successfully identify and swing at a pitch in the outer strike zone.
I guess it depends on the hitter, but the best hitters probably deal with this automatically and the others just may not be able to discern well enough to successfully account for the different strike zone.
When In Doubt
Swing.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Sep 9, 2011 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I was under the impression the league was using Pitch F/x to review umpires zones. If you watch a game closely, you will see several instances where the Royals pitchers get no love on pitches over the black. And where Royals hitters zones are larger than the plate. Normally the outside pitch is what screws the Royals.
The umpires have been entirely too inconsistent as a whole. But I think the Royals are getting the worst of it.
by royal_in_cincinnati on Sep 8, 2011 12:51 PM EDT reply actions
I can think of at least one game
where Soria got a very generous strike zone that helped him get out of an ugly 9th inning.
Worst season ever, ump-wise
I know there’s no way to back that up, but it feels that way to me. I’m ready for the Quantum Pitch Locators.
In un-related news,
Bud Selig has invited Jeff Zimmerman to a re -educational program entitled "How to be a baseball fan
Bud Selig doing "anything" to me gives me the Heebie-jeebies
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Sep 8, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
"come over here young man and let me tell you about baseball"
old time baseball, Eddie Shore Honus Wagner baseball
"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell
in relation to league
Is there a way to rate strike zone consistency by team for the entire league and rate the teams? I am curious how the size of the zone shrinks and grows for teams based on whether they are a winning team or not. I am willing to gamble that the Royals have a larger strike zone than a team like Boston or the Yankee’s.
ran an article on it recently
http://www.baseballheatmaps.com/2011/08/royals-and-yankees-strike-zone-comparison/
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Sep 8, 2011 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Is that just for 0-0 counts?
I would much rather like to see it for 1-2, 2-2, and 3-2 counts.
Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so.-Bertrand Russell
by Dr. van Strijcker on Sep 8, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Just 0-0
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Sep 8, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






















