OT: Pele's wrong. He ain't the greatest no more.
This ESPN interview with Pele shows what's wrong when a former player gets an "I´m still the greatest" attitude.
Basically, he says that Leo Messi is not as good as he was.
I beg to differ. Pele racked up his fame in the three World Cups he won, with the greatest supporting cast ever seen until then. He never had any success in the European pro leagues; I'm not sure he ever tried.
The game has changed a great deal, especially after the Bosman decision. Now players are judged by their professional club's success, and no club has had more than Barcelona in the last three years.
Messi shines on Barcelona because he has Xavi, Iniesta, Fàbregas, Pedro, Piqué, and company passing him the ball; this is why Pele shone with Brazil.
Right now I'm gonna say that Messi is clearly better than Maradona, especially when you consider career value (Messi doesn't get hurt or snort coke off hookers' nipples.)
Pele has a point when it comes to his own career value; Messi is still very young and needs to put in a few more good years, which he is capable of doing. Messi's 213 goals for Barcelona were mostly scored against top-level talent. A lot of Pele's over 1000 career goals were scored against the local equivalent of minor league teams.
If Messi scores 300 with Barcelona, and especially if he should somehow make 400, he's definitely the greatest ever.
Messi has not yet done well with Argentina, but that's hardly his fault, since the Argentine national team is not nearly as good as FC Barcelona and does not feed him as many tasty goals.
I think this is a case of an old guy not willing to accept that his sport's changed and he couldn't compete today; remember Joe DiMaggio demanding to be introduced as "the world's greatest living baseball player" while Ted Williams, Willie Mays, Stan Musial, and Hank Aaron were all alive.
4 months ago
Juancho
54 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Based on the videos, I don’t think Pele was greater than Maradona, and surely wouldn’t even be in the top 10 of the current world players. But I gotta disagree a bit on one point:
Messi’s 213 goals for Barcelona were mostly scored against top-level talent. A lot of Pele’s over 1000 career goals were scored against the local equivalent of minor league teams.
Given the spending disparity between Barcelona and the rest of Spanish teams (excluding Real Madrid), I don’t think the majority of teams in Spain are top-level talent.
by Loose Seal on Jan 20, 2012 4:11 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
There are plenty of lower spending EPL teams, which by most consideration is the toughest club league in the world, and they are still competitive.
European club talent isn’t based on salary like in baseball. Otherwise clubs like Liverpool and Man City would be winning cups year in and out.
I’d say the La Liga is probably the second best league in the world and dominating it, like Messi is, isn’t like killing it in the AAA. The EPL is the AL East and LL is probably the NL Central with Brewers/Cards/Reds being Barca/Real/Madrid.
Messi the best now, and the best ever hands down.
by KCTiger on Jan 20, 2012 4:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'm talking about distribution of talent within La Liga
While La Liga is probably 2nd best to EPL, La Liga is incredibly top heavy in talent. I think that the bottom 10 teams in La Liga are collectively worse than the bottom 10 teams from England, Germany and Italy.
To go with your MLB analogy, the EPL is like baseball – some big teams, some medium teams and some small teams. La Liga would be like baseball if you kept the Yankees (Real Madrid) and the Red Sox (Barca), got rid of almost all the mid-size market teams, but kept the small spending teams… and maybe added a couple AAA teams… i mean, what the fuck was Tenerife doing playing in La Liga in 2009.
Im hardly a soccer expert, and the bulk of my soccer viewing has been in the last world cup
and the last European Championship. But by the eyeball test, Messi is by far the best player I’ve seen, and it doesn’t sound like there is really any dispute to that. So the only way I can make sense of how good he is, is to compare how much better he is to everyone else compared to someone else. The only person I can say dominated his sport like Messi is Barry Sanders, I don’t think I will ever see another athlete make fools out of his competition like Barry did.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
Messi is really incredible
I can’t compare since I didn’t see Maradona or Pele in their primes, but Messi is really a treat to watch.
BUT I THOUGHT DAVID BECKHAM WAS THE BEST EVR!
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jan 21, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
I heard a podcast between somebody and somebody else
But what i got from it was that Beckham made the people around him better, something about how he had incredible vision and could put the ball in the best spot for someone else to score.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
by averagegatsby on Jan 21, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
Landon Donovan says they both suck.
by hunter s. royal on Jan 20, 2012 6:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Seems unfair to Pele
He didn’t go to Europe while the club hierarchy was still evolving, we’re going to use that against him?
Pele had a great cast around him, so does Messi. Let’s see what Messi does the rest of his career.
Also, I don’t think we can just throw out his performance for Argentina. If Messi was from somewhere like Slovenia or Honduras, it would be ok to write off international success. But, come on, the guy is from Argentina and hasn’t seen success with his country, that is a mark against him.
There are plenty of all time greats who have had very little club success
Look at Rooney in England. Guy has to be one of the top players in the world, and eventually maybe the best Englishman ever, and he has had zero success on his national team.
National teams are so grab bag. Ask guys like Zlatan Ibrahimovic or Ronaldo. Not their fault their teams suck but they play on good club teams.
by KCTiger on Jan 20, 2012 11:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Ask Ronaldo?
Went to WC Finals in 98, tournament MVP when Brazil won the WC in 2002. When Messi puts Argentina on his back and leads them to at least the finals, I might change my tune. Didn’t one of the all time greats from Argentina do that before? As of right now, he appears poised to be the best of his generation, but that is all.
The game is called differently now too, which is advantageous to a player of Messi’s stature. If you go back and watch some of the 50-70s WC’s, the game was much more violent than it is today. Messi might’ve been eaten alive in that environment. It is really hard to compare players from different generations, thus best ever is hard to gauge. I’m inclined to say that Messi is not the best ever though, at least for me.
by BeauJackson on Jan 21, 2012 12:23 AM EST up reply actions
Speaking of Christiano Ronaldo not Ronaldo of Brazil
by KCTiger on Jan 21, 2012 12:35 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
People have been disappointed that Ronaldo hasn't taken Portugal anywhere in tournaments
Figo got them to the semi finals of the WC.
by BeauJackson on Jan 21, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
Rooney is far from best Englishman ever.
He’s good, but come on man. So many better players to choose from. And why are strikers the only ones who get this type of hype?
I might take Xavi over Messi
Messi is great and Xavi might not fill up a stat sheet like him, but he’s been the point man for the best club and country for like 6 years now. Sure Spain and Barca have tons of talent, but Xavi’s the one who pulls all the strings.
A 60 year old Pele could probably put up double digit goals with the way Barca passes the ball into the net.
Some sportswriter tried to make the argument that Xavi > Messi because Xavi is good in less noticeable ways. I’m sorry, if you’re claiming to be the BEST IN THE WORLD, you have to be the best in a very noticeable way.
We need April to get here worse than I thought
by Rufus R. Jones on Jan 20, 2012 10:32 PM EST via mobile reply actions 3 recs
Are y'all talking baseball?
Senator, we have another old saying,"Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." Fletcher
Question about soccer.
I’m a Sporting KC fan and I kind of follow European soccer. My question is: why do Americans who like soccer seem to always randomly pick a European (usually English) team to root for? Any by randomly, I mean whoever won the EPL the year before they choose their favorite team. It’s ridiculous. Go on people’s SBN profile. A lot of people have a EPL blog they follow. For NO REASON! In my personal life as well, people do this. I see people walking around with Manchester United jerseys on. I go to a Sporting KC game and see people wearing Manchester United jerseys. A couple years ago when Man U came to KC, the stands were half Wizards fans, half Man U fans. What gives, people? I know Will has a favorite EPL team, but at least it’s completely random. I mean, nobody’s rooting for Norwich City. They’re terrible. But you live in the DC area, right Will? DC United? Ever heard?
Do you have a favorite Hi-A minor league baseball team?
Or do you focus on a big league club?
by BeauJackson on Jan 21, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
I'm a legit Barça fan since I live in Barcelona
and it makes sense to root for the team of the city where you live. No bandwagoning. I stuck with them while they were having their bad years (early 2000s). What’s turned me off most about them is the sponsorship from the Qatar Foundation.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
I chose Arsenal
because I liked soccer, wanted a team that wasn’t one of my friends’ favorites (Newcastle or ManU), and had actually been to London and seen their stadium.
I don't really have an EPL team
I suppose I sort of root for Arsenal because my friend Murph is an Arsenal supporter, and it makes him happy when they win.
My ancestry is English (Chappell, Hovis, Whitney), Scottish (Colley), Irish (Shannon), Cherokee (Shoemake), Prussian (Walz), and Austrian (Aust). In parentheses are my great-grandparents’ surnames. Pretty much standard mongrel American. I don’t really have an old country because our folks have been over so long, so I didn’t grow up as a fan of any foreign club.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Im a huge Dempsey fan so I try to follow Fullham a little
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
by averagegatsby on Jan 21, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Newcastle
a buddy of mine decided that he should be a Newcastle fan because he liked the beer.
Insert your own jokes about Americans and soccer.
I like Fulham
Because I like American Clint Dempsey.
I don’t think its much different than people from non-MLB cities choosing MLB teams, sorta at random.
If you like Man U though, you are like a Yankees fan from Nebraska. Boo.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jan 21, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
I'm also more of an MLS fan than an EPL fan
I get your point about supporting local teams.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jan 21, 2012 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
I'm a Jay Demerit fan
JAY JAY JAY FROM THE U.S.A.!
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Fulham also employed Brian McBride for a while
…they tend to do okay with what few talented strikers we produce.
Dempsey scored the first hat trick for an American player
in the English Premier League.
I kind of have a soft spot for Newcastle because there’s this rude English comic I like called Viz whose authors are from Newcastle, and make gleeful fun of their hometown, apparently full of drunks and thugs.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
FWIW
I list Bayern Munich as my favorite European side because I visited Munich in 2004, the year Germany hosted the European Championships, and just fell head over heels for European soccer there. I had been raised on MLS, and, well, there isn’t much of a contest.
Same reason I follow MLB
Going to the local AAA game is okay, but I’d much rather watch the top.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
This seems as good a place to ask it...
And when it gets closer I’ll post a fanshot.
but I have a spreadsheet from the last European championship with a tiered scoring system for the purposes of gambling on the tournament. Im not sure if we want to do this for fun, or if we want to try and set up some sort of pay league through paypal or something. I really have no idea how we could do this, but if this is something people want to do there are people smarter than me who can help make this happen… Of course I would have to do some translating since its all in German (thankfully math is an international language. I’ll have to email my buddy for a refresher on it.
The real beauty of the spreadsheet is that I could just email it to everyone ones they bought in and they can follow along on their own.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
I dunno
Not into gambling for money, myself. I really don’t know much more than the Spanish league, and a few top teams from other countries. I would just bet Barça to win out, anyway. I mean, like, who’s better?
About a year and a half ago they had a porra at the local bar on the Barça-Madrid game. You have to call the final score and, in case of more than one winner, you have to call the minute the last goal is scored. Barcelona beat Madrid 3-1 and I had minute 76, or something like that, and I took the 90-euro pot, which I then proceeded to waste on wine, women, and song.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Well... Barca won't be in it... But Spain will.
And I came in second to last place with a bunch of Germans so that was a moral victory for me.
You also get to pick the scores after each round so you could go with the hot foot. And if there was only like a $5-$10 buy in its not like it would be too much for anyone to handle.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
by averagegatsby on Jan 21, 2012 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
Whaddaya mean?
Barça is the favorite in the Champions League, is in the race in the Spanish League, and is still in competition in the Spanish Cup. I wouldn’t bet against them in any of the three,
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Because the European Championship is a competition between countries.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
by averagegatsby on Jan 21, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, OK, the Eurocup
That will be fun.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Maybe a bit off topic here..
..but does the greatest soccer player have to be a big-time goal scorer? Given the nature of the game, isn’t is possible that the actual greatest player ever might be a defender who was just unbelievably awesome? Yet since that would be so hard to measure….people seem to just assume that all the best players are just those that score the most. Just because goals are easiest to track doesn’t mean those that score them are the best.
I’d argue the same in football. Just because the QB or RB racks up the prettiest stats doesn’t mean they are actually the best players. It’s entirely possible that the best actual player in football is an offensive lineman who is just super-dominant.
Killing time until time kills me
Anthony Munoz is pretty much regarded as the greatest O Lineman of all time
I don’t really remember his play, but its not like he doesn’t get his fair share of acclaim.
Since 2005: Royals win% = .4100, Chiefs win% = .4095
Mitt Romney is a serial killer.
by averagegatsby on Jan 22, 2012 12:51 AM EST up reply actions
attacking midfielders don't get the glory sometimes, but they are pretty important
Maradona, Socrates, Zico, Platini, Zizinho, Gullit, Zidane, Charlton, Rivelino, etc. A guy who went by Socrates might have to top any list.
by BeauJackson on Jan 22, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
I think any list of greatest soccer players has to include a few defenders
Franz Beckenbauer and Paolo Maldini revolutionized the attacking capacities of defenders, and more pure defending type backs like Franco Baresi and Lothar Matthaus would make a lot of top 20 or 25 lists, too, I have to think.
Maradona snorted coke off more than just hooker titties.
And I’d still rather that than kicking for Barca.
Take that.
Nick Swisher and Johnny Giavatella deserve treats in the Kaufmann parking lot.
Huh? Maradona did play for Barça
for about a season and a half. He didn’t do much but start a fight that’s still all over YouTube with the title “Maradona Kicks like a Pussy.”
If Leo Messi can stay healthy four more years, and win a World Cup and a few more club titles, there’ll be no dispute on who the greatest is.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
















