Alex Gordon's Unprecedented 2011 Breakout Season
Going into the 2011 season, not a lot was expect from Alex Gordon. Some crazy fans even suggested that the best course of action may be trading him to another team. We all know what happened. Alex Gordon put up one of the greatest seasons statistically ever as a Royal. The breakout was nearly unprecedented.
To find out how often players have this level of breakout, I wanted to collect players who were similar in age and production. To get the numbers, I used historic Marcel projections. While Marcels may not be the most robust projection system, they are available to back to 1901. Marcels only looks at offensive numbers, so no defensive numbers were involved. I selected players which were similar to Alex in Age, OPS and Reliability (how much of Alex's stats are regressed to league average - basically how may PAs of data are used for the projection). Here are Alex's 2008, 2009, 2010 stats and his projection for 2011:
| Year | Age | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| 2008 | 24 | 571 | 0.260 | 0.351 | 0.432 | 0.783 |
| 2009 | 25 | 189 | 0.232 | 0.324 | 0.378 | 0.703 |
| 2010 | 26 | 281 | 0.215 | 0.315 | 0.355 | 0.671 |
| 2011 Projection | 359 | 0.243 | 0.331 | 0.396 | 0.727 |
While he had a decent 2008, his last two seasons, which are weighted more, were not as good.
Then I found all players since 1980 who had the same projected OPS (+/- 0.010), Age (+/- 1 year) and reliability (+/- 0.05). 140 players made the list. Alex had the forth highest OPS. He had the highest OPS for those players with over 600 ABs. Here is a list of the top 12 players with over 400 ABs:
| First Name | Last Name | Age | Year | AB | OPS |
| Mo | Vaughn | 26 | 1993 | 539 | 0.915 |
| Alex | Gordon | 27 | 2011 | 611 | 0.879 |
| Mark | Ellis | 28 | 2005 | 434 | 0.861 |
| Joe | Carter | 26 | 1986 | 663 | 0.849 |
| Michael | Barrett | 28 | 2004 | 456 | 0.826 |
| Mike | Cameron | 26 | 1999 | 542 | 0.825 |
| Randy | Winn | 28 | 2002 | 607 | 0.821 |
| Chris | Sabo | 28 | 1990 | 567 | 0.820 |
| Luis | Gonzalez | 26 | 1993 | 540 | 0.818 |
| Terry | Kennedy | 26 | 1982 | 562 | 0.814 |
| Von | Hayes | 26 | 1984 | 561 | 0.806 |
| Bo | Jackson | 27 | 1989 | 515 | 0.805 |
The list is full of some decent players, but not many Hall of Famers or near Hall of Famers. Now here is a look at how the players performed in the season after the breakout season.
| First Name | Last Name | Year | OPS | AB | OPS | Difference |
| Alex | Gordon | 2011 | 0.879 | 2012 | ? | ? |
| Mark | Ellis | 2005 | 0.861 | 2006 | 0.704 | -0.157 |
| Von | Hayes | 1984 | 0.806 | 1985 | 0.731 | -0.075 |
| Joe | Carter | 1986 | 0.849 | 1987 | 0.784 | -0.065 |
| Randy | Winn | 2002 | 0.821 | 2003 | 0.771 | -0.050 |
| Terry | Kennedy | 1982 | 0.814 | 1983 | 0.776 | -0.038 |
| Luis | Gonzalez | 1993 | 0.818 | 1994 | 0.782 | -0.036 |
| Mike | Cameron | 1999 | 0.825 | 2000 | 0.803 | -0.022 |
| Michael | Barrett | 2004 | 0.826 | 2005 | 0.824 | -0.002 |
| Chris | Sabo | 1990 | 0.820 | 1991 | 0.859 | 0.040 |
| Bo | Jackson | 1989 | 0.805 | 1990 | 0.866 | 0.061 |
| Mo | Vaughn | 1993 | 0.915 | 1994 | 0.984 | 0.069 |
| AVG= | -0.025 |
8 of the 11 players saw their production decrease with the average decrease being a 0.025. The historic drop is not that bad. I expected some level of regression in 2012 after Alex posted a 0.358 BABIP last season, but it may be horrible.
Alex Gordon had an unprecedented breakout season in 2011. While people should expect some level of regression in 2012, historically the drop in production has been limited.
24 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cool study - I was expecting a lot of regression from Gordon in 2012
But now I only expect a little. And it’s looks like Alex has about a 1 in 3 chance to be as good or even better than he was in 2011
If he can improve his K%
he has a chance to improve on last year.
2010 = The beginning of a dynasty
If Yost Has
The sense to make Gordon, Butler and Hosmer the first three batters pitchers have to face, Gordon would see better pitches.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 21, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
That Leaves Frogger
As the likely cleanup hitter, followed by Mous and Cain. Not Ideal, but probably OK. Then Perez, Escobar and Giavotella.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 21, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
At this point, the rest probably doesn't matter all that much
but I really want to see Gordon, Butler, and Hosmer get the most PAs this season (more or less in that order). I’m assuming of course that Gia can’t OBP even like .340 at the major league level.
Frenchy at the 4 spot sounds ugly but he’s only there if they really need to R/L through the lineup.
Nick Swisher is hands^h^h^h^h^h delicious.
Who Else Is
There that even remotely makes sense? Mous?
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 24, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions
Gordon's BABIP Was
.358, still probably unsustainable, but not as bad as .382. That was his wOBA. I still believe 2012 will be closer to 2011 than 2008, especially the HR’s. I think he has a 30+ HR season or two in him.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 21, 2012 10:50 AM EST reply actions
Thanks for catching the BABIP error.
Doubting Thomas, the patron saint of sabermetrics
by Jeff Zimmerman on Feb 21, 2012 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Wow, Von Hayes
I hadn’t thought of him in years. He had a decent, late peak and then fell off the earth in his early 30’s.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 21, 2012 11:04 AM EST reply actions
I will rec any post that references Chris Sabo.
Great stuff, Jeff. Thanks for taking me back to high school.
I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.
by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 21, 2012 11:10 AM EST reply actions
So is it fair to say that
Sometimes a breakout season is really a breakout season? Pretty interesting that some of those players got even better. Don’t think Alex’s BABIP stays, but I think he could improve some of his other numbers (BB, HR, RBIzzzz)
I'd say this is a possibility.
Obviously, 3 of 11 improving, 7 of 10 declining, and 1 basically staying the same does not bode particularly well for Gordon’s odds. Then again, 2 improvers were Vaughn and Jackson, particularly high ceiling guys. As a 2nd overall pick, Gordon is also a high ceiling guy.
The numbers don’t make these same comps, but I think some interesting ones are guys like Kirk Gibson and Phil Nevin. The easiest comp isn’t OPS, it is games played. All 3 were 1st round picks (1, 2, and 12, respectively), all dealt with injury issues, and around age 27, things clicked and they hit the holy smoke out of the ball.
These things are in Gordon’s favor. I certainly expect batting average to decrease next season, but a large fall-off seems unlikely.
Good study idea
I’d also be interested in finding the study population by limiting the pool based on projection stability and then further limiting by % over-performance. So instead of limiting the pool to players near Gordon’s projected OPS, you’d limit the pool to players that outperformed their projected OPS by a certain percentage.
The projection stability is set by the reliability value I am setting
I am not sure of % over performance for the whole group is ideal. I am thinking of putting out he player’s percentile to go with a chart like this:

Doubting Thomas, the patron saint of sabermetrics
by Jeff Zimmerman on Feb 21, 2012 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, by projection stability, I mean reliability (basically # of PA’s).
The change I’d make would be to look at a group that is characterized by its % of over-performance relative to its projection rather than looking at a range of projected OPS. Gordon’s 2011 was unique because he outperformed his projection by so much—not because his projected OPS was between .717 and .737.
You’d eventually be looking at the same thing—you’d just be looking at a larger group of players.
I never gave up on Gordon and don't think 2011 was a fluke
I actually think he will only get better. If his OPS in 2012 is under .890, I will be surprised. He hits the ball hard – even grounders. I think he will always strikeout a lot, but he more than makes up for it. When he puts the ball in play, he consistently makes solid contact. Sure, he has the occasional dud grounder to second base, but who doesn’t?
What’s really amazing about his high BABIP last year is it SHOULD have been higher. I remember the first couple of months where it seemed like every game he would crush one only to have it run down in on a sick play by the defender in the gap, or he would hit a lazer right at outfielder. He seemed very unlucky early in the year. I think things kinda evened themselves out for him as the season went on, which is why we saw the batting average rise in the final month or so.
Gordon is a very good athlete and a smart hitter that makes solid contact. There will be no dropoff, I don’t care what his statistical projections are.
"Poker, poker, it's all skill. Start with the worst hand and go uphill" - Mike Matusow
I think we can safely pencil Alex in for 4 WAR
at least.
"That fucking fucker of a general swears too fucking much." --Unnamed soldier about Gen. George Patton, 1943
Gordon's 2012
700 plate appearances
.289/.370/.480
42 doubles, 3 triples, 23 homers
99 runs, 82 RBI
15 steals, 7 caught
Yeah, but did any of those guys already know beforehand that they were gonna dominate?
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
by mazoboom on Feb 21, 2012 10:31 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Pffffffft.....Please.......
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2012 12:29 AM EST up reply actions

by 



















