Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Players out of options for 2012

Luke Hochevar, Luis Mendoza, Jose Mijares, Sean O’Sullivan, Felipe Paulino, Brayan Pena, Mitch Maier

Thanks to MLBTR

3 months ago Dayton_tiny Jeff Zimmerman 142 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I may be out of options pretty soon too

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 21, 2012 1:17 PM EST reply actions  

I've Cleared Waivers

Dozens of times.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Feb 21, 2012 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I Have Plenty

Of options, just no good ones.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2012 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I've been DFA'd to Cardinal Country.

Wish I could just retire. No way I’d give the money back though.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 23, 2012 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Mendoza and SOS are in that “battle” but Duffy isn’t?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

How many times have the Royals kept a starter in the minors to begin the season to game his service time clock?

Hochevar. Any others? And they called him up when they did last year and kept him in the majors for the remainder of the year, just to keep him in the minors again to start the next season before calling him up again? Doesn’t that seem kind of ridiculous?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

The team already has Duffy for six more years

The Royals would have to keep him in the minors for most of the year to get another year (and then you are just switching out the timing of the six years, not gaining anything).

Cot’s has Duffy at 134 days of service time from last year, so to take him out of potential Super 2 territory (remember the cutoff is lowered under the new CBA), they would have to leave him in the minors for something like a month.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, the only thing that sounds halfway reasonable would be keeping him in the minors to avoid Super 2. But I really don’t think the Royals have been focusing on that much. I think they are in “promote when ready, as long as there is an opportunity for regular playing time” mode. Service time be damned (except for maybe making sure they get more than 6 seasons of team control).

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

if the Royals did not care about Super 2 status with Duffy last year

I am not sure the Royals would care this year based on his major league performance last year, or at least as a sole consideration.

I have not looked at the early schedule, but I could see them making him the 5th starter and keeping him in the minors until the 5th starter is actually needed, which would free up a roster spot in the interim, help limit his innings, and potentially reduce Super 2 probability.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

there you go

If the rest of April has some off days, I guess they could keep SOS just to make that start and maybe one more before DFAing him.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Banny.

Davies too, I think. I was just kidding, though. Use your powers on someone else.

by Dadunca on Feb 21, 2012 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you really think they were trying to game Davies service time clock?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps. It’s at least possible. But Davies, no.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

SOS isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Mendoza might make it. Paulino is in because of that. Pena, Mitch, Mijeras, LUKE are in.

by 306008 on Feb 21, 2012 1:55 PM EST reply actions  

I beg to differ.
SOS isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

That is exactly what SOS is.

by kcemigre on Feb 21, 2012 9:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

That's what I was saying.

It’s not a bad thing he’s out of options.

by 306008 on Feb 22, 2012 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah..

…I forgot the sarc font.

by kcemigre on Feb 22, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

If Mendoza is in the big leagues on May 23,

I will purchase and wear his jersey to whichever game he pitches in Yankees stadium.

by Loose Seal on Feb 21, 2012 2:24 PM EST reply actions  

Mendoza is on this team for sure

he either makes it as a starter or long relief, but no way he gets cut. (unless he really really stinks up Arizona)

talk to me, Johnny...

by johnny4 on Feb 21, 2012 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

they do dumb stuff....

but its almost entirely based on being nearly blind to anything besides tools…mendoza has no tools/stuff…kyle davies, he is not.

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 21, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

No idea where someone could get this idea

Certainly that kind of stupid mistake by the Royals FO is possible, but I wouldn’t say it is likely, much less certain.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 7:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Tend to agree

I bet he makes it as a long reliever, and they try to pass him through waivers in mid-April.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Dayton specifically mentioned that they didn't want another Humber situation

And IIRC he was talking about Mendoza. I wouldn’t equate the two, but he did. If he really meant it, I have no idea.

by thelaundry on Feb 22, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

The Star (I think Dutton) had a point on Paulino that I hadn't considered

If Paulino doesn’t win a rotation spot, he’ll definitely wind up in the MLB pen. It seems pretty unlikely that he won’t win a rotation spot, but they can’t put him in the minors and they won’t put him on waivers. So he’s either in the rotation and pushing some combination of Duffy, Monty, Mendoza, etc to the minors, or he’s in the bullpen and he’s pushing some combination of Wood, Herrera, Crow, Collins etc to the minors.

Adjust your roster scenario expectations accordingly.

by kcdc1 on Feb 21, 2012 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills every time I hear talk coming from the organization about Paulino having to battle for a spot in this disaster of a rotation.

Disasters are made, not born. It is the competence of this front office which has led to the quality of the Royals rotation. They may not be done making bad decisions.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes and no

He’s probably the best starter, but he doesn’t have much of a track record. If he really sucked in ST, it wouldn’t be totally unreasonable to put him in the pen until he shows signs of life.

That said, I think there’s about a 95% chance he’ll make the rotation, and that’s as it should be.

by kcdc1 on Feb 21, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

FWIW

Paulino is generating “buzz” in camp for his side sessions, per Joel Goldberg.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 21, 2012 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Dutton said something

about him looking really good in his bullpen sessions too.

Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so.-Bertrand Russell

by Dr. van Strijcker on Feb 21, 2012 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

This kind of thing is another reason I find it odd that Paulino is getting the "on the bubble treatment" from the Royals

They love tools and stuff. And that’s his strong suit. He’s the kind of guy who looks really impressive in workouts and side sessions.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know this, but I am willing to bet that

he is in the best shape of his life™

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 21, 2012 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to believe that Felipe may have some attitude/motivational issues

which may have helped speed his DFA from Colorado last year. What’s most disconcerting about all of this, though, is that apparently Francoeur has not been able to work his clubhouse magic on Felipe by getting him to understand how to properly approach the game and, well, life. So he resorted to asking Dayton to spread these kind of quotes through the media in an effort to motive Felipe. This begs the question: Has Frenchy lost his leadership edge?

by Sweep_the_Leg on Feb 21, 2012 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

"motivATe Felipe"

This is how upsetting Francoeur’s struggles with leading and clubhouse chemistrying Felipe are…I’m making typos that are completely out of character for me.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Feb 21, 2012 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Frenchy was busy this offseason.

Hunting the mighty bigfoot with Jonathan Broxton

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 21, 2012 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought Jonathan Broxton was bigfoot

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 22, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

FWIW,

There’s a lot of talk about Paulino looking really impressive in bullpen workouts. I guess they weren’t watching him pitch last year.

by hawkinscm87 on Feb 22, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Guys that might be worth looking at

That might not make their roster:

LHP Sean West, FLA
LHP Ross Detwiler, WAS
OF Nolan Reimold, BAL
RHP Michael Bowden, BOS
RHP Collin Balester, DET
C AJ Ellis, LAD
LHP Mike Zagurski, ARI

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 21, 2012 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

Callaspo, I think.

Leading Rany to write an article about how the Royals would NEVER be so stupid as to trade Callaspo for essentially nothing. Then, boom. SOS.

by Dadunca on Feb 21, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Take that back

Will Smith is like the Royals 10th best prospect according to royalsprospectsaretehawesome.com

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 4:40 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I still think Nolan Reimold could do something.

Not that there’s room on the roster (barring injury), but still.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Feb 21, 2012 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I might dump Mitch for him

Although I know Reimold’s defense is pretty suspect. But isn’t that a big part of what Dyson is for?

by Sweep_the_Leg on Feb 21, 2012 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah...and we should so we can keep dyson

but they’ll likely go with the extra man in the pen…which really, isnt the worst idea in the world

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 21, 2012 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know that the extra man in the pen is that necessary.

So many of the relievers have options, and they are so fungible for the Royals at this point, that a smaller pen with a slightly more frequent call to Omaha should be the course of action. Of course, that’s not how the Royals will look at things, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Feb 21, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

the 10-day rule makes it difficult to manage

There is a rule that a player has to stay in the minors for 10 days before being recalled (except in case of replacing someone who goes on the DL). It is not impossible to juggle players back and forth on the Omaha shuttle — and the best scenario probably involves a team like the Royals with multiple basically interchangeable relievers taking up the last spots in the pen — but it would create headaches for Jin Wong or whoever is in charge of keeping track of that stuff.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Is how Omaha feels about anything relevant. That team exists to serve the Royals.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 8:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

uhh....you dont care if your employer constantly treats you like shit?

doesnt give you the necessary tools to do your job well?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 21, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Minor league teams know the deal. They exist to support the major league team. That is their primary purpose. Everything else is a distant second. Doing their job well is developing players for the major league team.

But I’m not saying Omaha would be happy about it. I’m saying their happiness is entirely irrelevant.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 7:09 AM EST up reply actions  

You don't have always send them to Omaha you know.

You could send one to NW Arkansas and so forth.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Feb 22, 2012 8:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn't say entirely irrelevant

There is an incentive for MLB teams to placate minor league affiliates a bit. The Royals have a vested interest in promoting their brand in Omaha. If the Stormchasers feel they’re getting dicked around and decide to affiliate themselves with the Rangers, that hurts the Royals a bit, and the Royals are stuck with some far-flung affiliate in Edmonton.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

But doesn’t every MLB team promote and demote players as they wish? Isn’t that precisely what every minor league affiliate expects? Do you think ANY minor league team thinks “why do they keep taking our best players?” or “why don’t they make certain I have a full bullpen of rested players?”

More to the point of your comment, do you think any minor league team is thinking that if they change affiliation to another MLB team, they will be treated less like a taxi squad for the major league team? Minor league teams know what they are and what they’re for. They haven’t been meaningfully independent enterprises for several decades.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

when have teams constantly shuttled tired relievers down to AAA

with the intention of having them not pitch in AAA? how does that effect how the AAA team deals with the other players on their team? Is monty staying in the game longer than necessary? are legitimate prospects being overused?

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 22, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Teams shuttle pitchers back and forth as needed. Sometimes that can happen frequently. And as far as how that might affect the usage of other players, the MLB team controls the minor league managers. They aren’t going to let him overuse Monty or any other prospect. There’s always filler that can eat innings.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

These minor league teams do get disrupted a little bit,

but they actually look at it as an opportunity to sell out the ballpark. I remember Springfield people going nuts when Josh Kinney made some rehab appearances. It was standing room only when Carpenter made a start. They love when guys from the big league squad get sent down for any reason other than sucking.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 22, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I think an 8-man bullpen is silly at best. They really dont need that many relievers. They might only need one in a rare isolated case or two. I would much rather have a 4-man bench including maier and dyson.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 7:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Out of options does not necessarily mean the player is gone

If the player is out of options and cut from the 25 man roster, the team will designate him for assignment (outright release is very rare). If he is not traded and clear waivers, the team can keep him and outright him to the minors without his consent if (1) he has less than 5 years (I think) service time and (2) has not been outrighted to the minors previously.

None of the players have five years of service time, but Mendoza and Pena have previously been DFA’d, cleared waivers, and assigned to the minors, so they would have the option of refusing the minor league assignment and becoming free agents.

The rest would remain with the Royals if they cleared waivers. In reality, though, Hochevar and Paulino are virtually guaranteed spots on the 25 man roster, Mijares (LOOGY) would likely be claimed, and Maier (perfectly adequate 4th OF) might get claimed, leaving O’Sullivan as the one likely guy who would clear waivers.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

If SOS is out of options, then I would think he would get a very long look for the 13th pitcher if we end up keeping that many. Basically have him come in and be the long reliever if one of our pitchers gets hammered (which probably will happen more than we all would like).

by craig102m on Feb 21, 2012 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

The Royals have already given O'Sullivan a pretty long look and know what they have

SOS is pretty much the epitome of a replacement level starter. Unless he suddenly added 5 MPH to his fastball, everyone knows how his skill set plays in the majors.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

He should volunteer for TJS and go on the 60-day DL for the year.

It can’t hurt. More importantly, he can’t help much as-is.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Feb 21, 2012 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

You realize his role would be as a long reliever/mop up guy. His job would be to keep us from having to use our whole bullpen in games we are not in. If we are in the game he wont come in. Guys like Wood and Herrera are not long relievers. I also dont think there is a point in wasting service time on a high level pitcher that wont be used in any meaningful situations. We used Adcock in a similar role last year and would much rather have SOS up than one of our players with potential.
Also by doing this one of three things will happen…
1. He sucks and we send him through waivers.
2. He is adequate and we use him for mop up duty.
3. He is better than expected and produces some value for us or in a trade…
it probably will be option 1 or 2, but you never know.

by craig102m on Feb 21, 2012 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

True, but Teaford has options and more value. He is a lefty so why not send him to AAA and have him there incase there is an injury?

by craig102m on Feb 21, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

b/c he's already like 28...no need for him to waste anymore time/innings in AAA....

long relief in kc is more useful to the organization that pitching in AAA

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 21, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

There are better options for long relievers

Wood is a former starter who is not terrible against lefties and capable of throwing more than one inning at a time. Adcock, Mazzaro, and Teaford all project as better pitchers than O’Sullivan. The team should use any of them before SOS.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Golden Corral?

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 22, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Denny's

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 22, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

KFC FTW! Doubledown!

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2012 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know if Mijares would be claimed because he is not making the minimum.

I think he is a near lock for the bullpen as the LOOGY though.

Pena will make the team because he is a switch hitter and Pina has options.

Hochever is a lock.

Paulino should be a lock for the rotation.

Mitch should be released, but he will make the team so that he can write letters to home.

Mendoza will make the team as the 5th starter or the long reliever, which will either put Teaford or Duffy in AAA.

Sean will be put through waivers I think, although If Mendoza makes the team as the 5th starter, he could push Teaford to AAA and be the long reliever.

Locks for the pen
Soria
Broxton
Holland

Advantage to making the team in the pen
Jose Mijares (LOOGY job should be his)
Tim Collins (has to beat Verdugo)
Teaford (has to beat either Mendoza or SOS for long reliever)
Crow (unless he is starting in AAA)

If there are seven relievers and Crow is in AAA or eight relievers and Crow is in the pen, one of Wood or Coleman should make the team.
(They could both make the team if there is eight relievers and Crow is in AAA, or could both not make the team if Crow is in the pen and there are seven relievers)

Other Royals on the 40 man who may or may not make the team
If there are seven relievers, Getz or Dyson may make th team.
Duffy has to beat out Crow, Mendoza, Teaford, Mazzaro, and SOS (I think he is the sixth starter and would need an injury to make the team)

Long shots
Kelvim Herrera (good but looks blocked)
Jeremy Jeffress (raw and the Royals have lots of relievers)
Clint Robinson (hey the Royals could figure out they need a lefty pinch hitter)
Derrick Robinson (why is he still on the 40 man?)
David Lough (would have to pass Mitch)
Ryan Verdugo (would have to pass Timmy)
Noel Arguelles (near zero chance)
Nathan Adcock (near zero chance)
Vin Mazzaro (near zero chance)

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Feb 21, 2012 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I would bet heavily against Mendoza making the 25-man roster. There are more talented SP options and no room in a stacked bullpen.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 21, 2012 7:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think he is at least 40-60 to make the team.

Better odds then Duffy faces in making the team, as he just has to beat out two of Duffy, SOS, and Teaford, and to make the roster. Also remember that an injury to one of 7 players, (maybe a 20% chance?), would up his chances to a near lock to be on the roster as well.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Feb 22, 2012 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

My guess at Moore's view of the Royals SP depth chart

1. Hochevar
2. Chen
3. Sanchez
4. Duffy
5. Paulino
6. Montgomery
7. O’Sullivan
8. Mazzaro
9. Mendoza
10. Teaford
11. Adcock

And there’s a possibility that a good showing from Crow in spring training could put him in the top 6 of that list, but I find it unlikely. Long story short, I think it would take injuries or very poor ST performances from at least 4 of the top 8 SP’s.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 7:16 AM EST up reply actions  

And you think the Royals are desperate to keep Mendoza and SOS? Also, do you think someone is likely to claim them if waived? I think Moore wants to win games, and I think he’s going to choose better pitchers over worse pitchers (who are marginal major leaguers at best) that are out of options.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Moore, like most GM, seems unwilling to let "talent" exposed to other clubs

I can see SOS getting sent down, but I think they will give Mendoza a loooong look.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Why has he never received a long look before?

I really have no idea where the idea came from that Dayton Moore really likes Luis Mendoza. I mean, maybe he does, but where do people get this opinion from? Has he been saying things about Mendoza that are beyond the standard, generally positive comments he makes about all miscellaneous players in the organization? He may well have said things that I’ve missed. He certainly doesn’t fit the toolsy profile that Moore tends to prefer. I see no reason to believe that Moore values Mendoza much, and especially no reason to believe that he’d demote a better player so that we don’t lose this particular talent.

That being said, with Moore, any mistake is possible. I just don’t think it is likely.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Because he had a really good ERA at AAA last year

That’s why.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

So you’re suggesting that Dayton Moore is going to make a personnel decision based primarily on stats?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, Anthony Lerew had a full season as a starter for Omaha in 2010 with a 2.25 ERA. Why didn’t he get a long look, or even make the 25-man roster in 2011?

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Am I insane?

Why do I remember Anthony Larew being in KC for a long time in 2010? I think I remember them being all in love with him, starting him with a small sample size of success, then him imploding his way back to Omaha. Am I way off?

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 22, 2012 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Lerew had 26 innings in KC in 2010.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Who knows

It just seems like in all the talk about the Royals, media people seem to indicate Mendoza is getting a serious look. There is no reason for the media to fabricate this – typically, they would not even know who Mendoza is, or would only remember him as the guy who shit the bed in the big leagues. But there is smoke, I suspect there is fire. Mendoza will be either one of the very last cuts, or will make the team IMO, and I’m pretty confident he’s on the team. Not that I advocate such tomfoolery.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I've been on the road a lot lately...

…and therefore out-of-the-loop when it comes to KC media. But I recall Dayton saying things about Mendoza toward the end of last season that really had me worried.

by kcemigre on Feb 22, 2012 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

My bad.

For whatever reason, I remember thinking it was much more at some point. Maybe I just liked his sideburns.

I'm waiting for my wave of talent to arrive.

by mitchfreakingmaier! on Feb 23, 2012 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Moore hated his burns

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Feb 22, 2012 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Mijares is making only a little above the minimum and less than $1 million

A team who is suddenly in need of a LOOGY is not going to balk at paying him a few hundred thousand more.

by Gopherballs on Feb 21, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? I think Coleman is a mortal lock to make the team, with Teaford extremely unlikely to make the team. You appear to assume that a pitcher with a lot of recent SP experience has to be the long reliever. That certainly isn’t necessary. Wood and Holland both spent a good deal of time in long relief last year. I think Wood can and should handle that role ably. I would think the bullpen would look something like this:

Soria
Broxton
Holland
Coleman
Mijares
Wood
Collins

I think Herrera and Jeffress have a shot. I think guys like SOS, Mazzaro, Teaford, Mendoza and Adcock are merely SP/LR depth who should be in the minors unless circumstances necessitate their promotion.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 7:24 AM EST up reply actions  

It is not always quality, the Royals like balance in the pen, and Teaford happens to be a lefty.

What should happen and what the Royals will do are usually two different things. There may only be five slots for righties, and Crow, Holland, Broxton and Soria take up 4. That does not leave a lot of space.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Feb 22, 2012 8:08 AM EST up reply actions  

First, I screwed up in leaving Crow off the above list. I think he’ll be in the major league bullpen. And I think it is very likely that there will be a 7-man bullpen. So who is the odd man out? Probably Collins or Wood.

I think the Royals will probably have two lefties in the pen, if possible. I think Mijares is a lock unless something goes really wrong in ST. Collins would be the second choice for lefty reliever. I think Teaford is a distant third, and he has options remaining so they can safely stash him in the minors. I think there’s next to no chance they go with three lefties in the pen.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Haven't heard much about Crow and the starting rotation over the last month or so.

That’s one of the few things going on in the spring that I’m very interested in seeing.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Feb 22, 2012 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

moore just talked about it on fescoe's show....

kinda tap danced around ‘will crow be in the mlb bullpen or in aaa starting if he doesnt make the rotation?’….moore said something along the lines of ‘it is absolutely possible that crow starts in omaha’….personally, i think its likely, given that we have bullpen options who are likely to be about as good as crow such as herrerra

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Feb 22, 2012 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Likely that he'll be in Omaha trying to make it as a starter?

I have a hard time seeing that as a likely outcome. After the last season, I just think he’ll be in Kansas City either in the pen or in the starting rotation early. Hopefully I’m wrong here though.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Feb 22, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, in Omaha as a starter

Moore seems to recognize that they need to take a shot at developing any possible starting pitching prospect. It also allows them to game his service time.

Sporadically musing on the Royals at both Royals Review and Royalscentricity, pop culture at Inconsiderate Prick, SVU at Munch My Benson and on Twitter at Old Man Duggan

by Old Man Duggan on Feb 22, 2012 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm all for it.

Too bad he wasn’t doing that last season already but too late to worry about it now.

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.
Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Feb 23, 2012 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Moore seems to recognize that they need to take a shot at developing any possible starting pitching prospect.

Really? Do you think that putting Crow in the KC bullpen last year was about developing him as a starter? I wouldn’t say that he was or is committed at all to developing Crow as a starter. I don’t think he’s completely against it, but neither his actions nor his words show much enthusiasm for the concept of Crow as a starter.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 23, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think that bullpen is very good and deep

I like Herrera a lot, and I think Collins could bounce back to being at least decent. And I think there’s good depth, especially from some prospects coming up.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 22, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Bob Dutton said Coleman is a virtual lock

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

which is better?

mortal lock or virtual lock?

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 22, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I asked George Brett

He said the only lock he cares about is Loch Lloyd.

by thelaundry on Feb 22, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Or Virtual Mortality?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2012 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a decent possibility

Especially if Blake Wood doesn’t make the cut in the bullpen.

You may know me as NYRoyal.

by Scott McKinney on Feb 23, 2012 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

That means "able to execute", right?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

good at scrabble?

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 22, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Sadly, It Has

Nothing to do with excrement.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2012 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench

Recent FanPosts

Web_gem_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan