Royals Lose 3-9, Tigers Get to Hochevar In 1st Inning; Why Does Hoch Struggle With Men On Base?

DETROIT, MI - MAY 01: Luke Hochevar #44 of the Kansas CIty Royals reacts after giving up three runs in the first inning during the game against the Detroit Tigers at Comerica Park on May 1, 2012 in Detroit, Michigan. (Photo by Leon Halip/Getty Images)

The Royals were in the game in the top of the first innings when the score was still 0-0. Then the the bottom of the 1st happened. 6 Hits and 2 errors later, the Royals were down 5-0. Even though the Royals were able to score single runs in the 5th, 6th and 8th innings, the game was basically over. This game is similar to many games in the past, especially when Hochevar pitchers, where one big inning has led to the loss.

Hochevar's results are horrible once runners are on base. Usually he runs into problems in the 5th or 6th inning, but tonight it started when the first batter got a hit. With no runners on base, Hochevar allows a triple slash line of 0.247/0.307/.409. Once someone gets on base, the numbers jump to 0.302/0.371/0.474. This type of difference causes his (Earned) Runs Allowed to be higher than is ERA predictors. Here are his ERA and ERA predictors from 2008 to 2012:

ERA: 5.34
FIP: 4.33
xFIP: 4.24
tERA: 4.54
SIERA: 4.33

Luke's ERA exceeds his predictors by almost 1 run in each case.

The problem is not just limited to Luke. Of the top 10 pitchers whose ERA has exceeded their FIPS from 2008 to 2012, 5 are/were Royals:

Nate Robertson 6.08 4.86 1.22 4.81 4.96 4.82
Charlie Morton 5.01 4.35 0.66 4.31 4.84 4.43
Francisco Liriano 4.77 3.94 0.83 3.97 4.00 3.99
Ricky Nolasco 4.37 3.62 0.75 3.48 4.06 3.53
Manny Parra 5.17 4.42 0.75 4.02 4.67 4.16
Felipe Paulino 5.18 4.04 1.13 4.00 4.14 3.92
Luke Hochevar 5.34 4.33 1.01 4.24 4.54 4.33
Brian Bannister 5.58 4.85 0.73 4.60 5.17 4.69
Jeff Francis 4.93 4.28 0.64 4.24 4.87 4.41
Kyle Davies 5.20 4.61 0.59 4.79 4.78 4.81

Besides just individual players, (ERA-FIP) can be examined at the team level. Over the same time frame, the Royals led the league with a value of 0.36. The 4th ranked team, the Pirates, have a value (0.17) that is half of the Royals value.

Looking at the team list, there seems to some pattern to the top and bottom teams. The Rays, who recently are a great defensive team, have the lowest ERA (3.98) compared to the their FIP (4.19). The better the defensive team, the better the difference between the values. Here is a plot of the team's total UZR and (ERA-FIP) from 2008 to current.


There is definitely some correlation in the data. The Royals UZR of -88 should be closer to an (ERA-FIP) value of 0.10, not 0.36. A crap-tastic defense can some what be blamed for the difference, but it is not the only reason.

So why can Royals pitchers not know how to throw out of the stretch with runners on base? Are they scared? Are they thinking too much? Are they thinking not enough? Does their philosophy change? Are the pitchers making the changes by themselves?

Is a certain type of pitcher? Why are the Royals the only team that seems to target these players? Why do other teams know better not to go after them?

Is it coming from the management? Is it the team's fault for not teaching the players to pitch with men on base? Is there anything they can do?

I really don't know.

The team is not just being unlucky with runners on base. There are too many coincidences for too many years for it to be dismissed at luck. The problem is fairly complex and so may be the solution. Until the Royals been to get to the bottom of why their pitches can't pitch with runners on base, they are going to continue to see their starters struggling with long innings with many base runners and many runs scored. At least they let the cat out of the bag early tonight by allowing the big inning early.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.