Baseball is a proud man's game, respect the game, respect the umpires, respect the opponent.
Disrespect is not tolerated - a single act of disrespect (like spiking the baseball) can get you tossed from the game, a batter taking one for the team or igniting a bench-clearing brawl.
An act of disrespect that is often overlooked is the intentional walk - the IW. In a tight situation, a manager employs strategy to intentionally walk a strong hitter in order to face a weak hitter - D-I-S-R-E-S-P-E-C-T.
You don't want to be that guy - getting to the on-deck circle looking up to see the other manager putting up four fingers. Does the IW strategy work? Or does the challenge to a player's manhood results in payback with the bat?
The tables below detail the IW by looking at how the next batter (that guy) did in three parts: games using DH, games not using DH/non-pitcher and games not using DH/pitcher.
Several interesting notes:
Data: Years 2000-2011 (12 years, roughly 29,160 games)
|
Inning |
PA |
AB |
H |
Avg |
K% |
All |
5700 |
5132 |
1276 |
.249 |
19.6 |
|
1 |
140 |
126 |
28 |
.222 |
19.0 |
|
2 |
92 |
83 |
23 |
.277 |
9.6 |
|
3 |
339 |
305 |
79 |
.259 |
15.4 |
|
4 |
270 |
245 |
63 |
.257 |
15.1 |
|
5 |
584 |
534 |
140 |
.262 |
16.7 |
|
6 |
717 |
648 |
169 |
.261 |
19.9 |
|
7 |
1010 |
913 |
212 |
.232 |
23.0 |
|
8 |
1111 |
1012 |
254 |
.251 |
19.4 |
|
9 |
1437 |
1266 |
308 |
.243 |
21.2 |
|
Inning |
PA |
AB |
H |
Avg |
K% |
All |
9006 |
8141 |
1948 |
.239 |
22.2 |
|
1 |
377 |
343 |
97 |
.283 |
19.8 |
|
2 |
437 |
402 |
80 |
.199 |
29.1 |
|
3 |
664 |
609 |
132 |
.217 |
20.7 |
|
4 |
736 |
699 |
143 |
.205 |
24.2 |
|
5 |
988 |
907 |
204 |
.225 |
19.3 |
|
6 |
1154 |
1050 |
282 |
.269 |
21.0 |
|
7 |
1326 |
1180 |
285 |
.242 |
22.4 |
|
8 |
1431 |
1296 |
313 |
.242 |
22.9 |
|
9 |
1893 |
1655 |
412 |
.249 |
22.5 |
|
Inning |
PA |
AB |
H |
Avg |
K% |
All |
921 |
892 |
91 |
.102 |
40.6 |
|
1 |
35 |
33 |
4 |
.121 |
42.4 |
|
2 |
226 |
220 |
20 |
.091 |
45.0 |
|
3 |
83 |
77 |
10 |
.130 |
37.7 |
|
4 |
237 |
233 |
22 |
.094 |
39.9 |
|
5 |
123 |
121 |
17 |
.140 |
41.3 |
|
6 |
111 |
108 |
12 |
.111 |
35.2 |
|
7 |
43 |
41 |
4 |
.098 |
24.4 |
|
8 |
21 |
19 |
1 |
.053 |
52.6 |
|
9 |
42 |
40 |
1 |
.025 |
47.5 |
Conclusion: For pitchers due up next, it appears to be an excellent strategy, with a .102 batting average and 40% strikeout rate.
When it comes to non-pitchers, the data suggests that it works slightly better in National League games, but in a case-by-case basis, a .239/.249 batting average with a 20% strikeout rate would be tempting for a manager to use this strategy.
While overall averages are interesting, let's look at how well the co-hosts of MLB Network's Intentional Talk program did in their careers, Kevin Millar and Chris Rose.
Challenge to Kevin Millar's Manhood
|
|
PA |
AB |
H |
Avg |
K% |
|
After IW |
57 |
46 |
14 |
.304 |
23.9 |
|
Career |
5382 |
4688 |
1284 |
.274 |
17.9% |
Details of Millar's plate appearances:
Challenge to Chris Rose's Manhood
DNP
Conclusion: Clearly 1-5 ‘rose' to the occasion. The one home run came on June 8th, 2003, hitting fifth, following Manny Ramirez in the third inning off of Milwaukee's Glendon Rusch.
This FanPost was written by a member of the Royals Review community. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors and writers of this site.
There are 3 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.