Micheal Bourne- Why a 5 year contract would be horrible

SB Nation | Sign Up |

PRESENTED BY

🔗

Fanshot

Micheal Bourne- Why a 5 year contract would be horrible

posted by Cuthbert1, Jan 30, 2013

pretty interesting, I know it's a pipe dream but I would love the Royals to offer him a 3 year (or 1 year) deal. Even though I have no idea the money would look like.

More Fanshots


Dubya's Top Farm Performers (5/24/13)

Dubya on May 25, 2013 2 comments
📷
Elliot Answers my Question and Opens Up on GMDM

theroyalblues on May 24, 2013 0 comments
🔗
Duffy starts rehab assignment

sfeldkamp on May 24, 2013 3 comments

Dubya's Top Farm Performers (5/23/13)

Dubya on May 24, 2013 6 comments
🔗
Royals TV graphic gets it REALLY wrong

HarryL on May 24, 2013 7 comments

The Next LinkShots

4 months ago / 5 comments

Mayo's Top 100 Prospect List

4 months ago / 8 comments / 1 rec

Q:A: Dave Eiland | Fangraphs.com

O X

Next unread Unmark all

There are 0 Comments. Add Yours.

Show speed reading tips and settings ↓

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Show touch bar

Royals Review, a Kansas City Royals community

Fanshots

Fanshot

Micheal Bourne- Why a 5 year contract would be horrible

More Fanshots

Dubya's Top Farm Performers (5/24/13)

Elliot Answers my Question and Opens Up on GMDM

Duffy starts rehab assignment

Dubya's Top Farm Performers (5/23/13)

Royals TV graphic gets it REALLY wrong

The Next LinkShots

There are 0 Comments. Add Yours.

Comment Settings

Comments for this post are closed.

Royals Review