Haren signs for 1 year, $10 Million.

Royals Fans ask: Where the "F" were you Dayton?

There are generally three camps when it comes to the Jason Vargas signing:

  1. Those who are basically just happy the Royals are spending money
  2. Those that think it was a shrewd, below market move in per year value
  3. Those that don't hate the move in a vacuum, but think it was a dumb allocation of limited resources
Count me in the latter group. When it's David Glass' money, it's usually good that the Royals are spending money, but when it's also David Glass' budget, you also know that you have a certain percentage of payroll to reach a value total, and once that percentage is maxed out, that's the end of it. I don't think there are too many fans that outright hate the move regardless of the circumstances.
But the appropriation of resources is alarming for many fans. And I think for many, trumping any other concerns about payroll creativity is the idea that Moore is still essentially evaluating pitchers on their ERA. Dayton hopes on tools and high-powered fastballs with a boyish fascination. But he does so only because he ultimately believes those things will lead to the ERA's he covets; and he's not wrong to covet a low ERA. That is what the sport is about, after all.
What Moore is wrong about is the way in which pitchers accumulate their low ERA's. Despite his preference for "toolsy" fielders who have, by god, somehow formed one of the best defenses in baseball, he seems oblivious to the fact that they also have a direct and positive effect on his pitching staff: He knows a good defense is good to have, but he doesn't seem to realize that a god chunk of a pitcher's ERA can be largely dependant upon it. And perhaps I'm selling him short here; perhaps he does actually realize this. But he certainly doesn't seem to understand the significance of peripherals. He certainly doesn't understand that oftentimes, a pitcher's past peripherals are a better indicator of his future ERAs than his past ERAs themselves.
And this is what is so maddening about the Dan Haren contract. Perhaps he wouldn't have signed with the Royals for $10 million (with an option for the next year). Perhaps it would take a bit more. But it combines two huge elements of disconnect that many an educated Royals fan bang their heads over: it's hugely uncreative in structure, and wildly uninformed in todays evaluation mores (no pun intended). It's like Dayton is GMing baseball 15 years ago.

This FanPost was written by a member of the Royals Review community. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors and writers of this site.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.