2012-06 Spring/Regular Season Team Pitching Breakdown

Spring Training for the Royals fans can be so confusing at times when we see pre-season greats such as Mark "Arizona Oppo Field Bomber" Teahen, Justin "I Hit It in Any Minor League Park" Huber, Ryan "Jedi Swing" Shealy, or Mike "My Swing is a Long as My White-T Goatee" Jacobs get dominated once the regular season starts. Even the team has taken 3 Cactus League Titles since 2006 with nothing to show for in the regular season.

With a couple hours on hand and a lot of yellow flavored Peeps in my stomach, I browsed the stats page to do some amateur analysis. Though the data is limited to just 7 seasons of Spring Training stats, I found something that caught my attention.

This Spring, the Royals Team ERA in Innings 1 to 6 ranked 4th (4.28) out of all 30 MLB teams. I felt that ERA would handle the different games/innings pitched by each team and limit it to only the 1-6 innings to capture the starting pitching against Major League hitters. Finding that was a surprise, but more surprising was how consistantly bad the team pitching was the years before.

Spring 2013
4th (4.28)

Spring 2012
21st (5.11)

Spring 2011
15th (4.60)

Spring 2010
30th (6.82)

Spring 2009
22nd (5.54)

Spring 2008
23rd (5.50)

Spring 2007
24th (5.74)

Spring 2006
16th (5.33)

Could this 2013 starting pitching staff be unique and translate this ERA to the regular season? In order to quantify it, I looked at teams who qualified a top 14 finish out of all 30 teams in Spring Training and Regular Season based on 1-6 Innings Team ERA ranking. A 14th or better would be the Royals best finish in the 7 years of data.

*- Indicates playoff teams

8 - Tigers*, Dodgers, Yankees*, Phillies, Giants*, Mariners, Cardinals*, Rays

8 - Braves, Angels, Dodgers, Yankees*, Phillies*, Giants, Cardinals*, Nationals

8 - Cubs, Dodgers*, Marlins, Phillies*, Padres, Giants*, Cardinals, Rays*

7 - Braves*, Cubs, Tigers, Angels*, Marlins, Cardinals, Rays

8 - Red Sox*, Cubs*, Angels, Dodgers*, Twins, Mets, Cardinals, Rays*

5 - Braves, Red Sox*, Indians, Twins, Blue Jays

10 - Reds, Tigers*, Astros, Angels, Dodgers*, Marlins, Twins*, Yankees*, Athletics*, Giants

55% of teams who ranked in the top 14 in Spring Training 1-6 Inning Team ERA has a 55% rate of finishing 14th or better in the regular season. Since 15th was the Royals best finish in this range, I made 14th the qualifier since that would be their best finish since... there's no data 1-6 Innings before 1999, so before at least 1999.

44% of teams who finished with a Spring Training and Regular Season ranking in 1-6 innings Team ERA of 14th or better made the playoffs that year.

There's factors (injuries, DH, PEDs, WBCs, STDs) that are not taking in consideration in this analysis that makes it a shaky case at best, but this is what the number say and how someone makes a case for the rankings and percentages can be positive or dismissive (depending on how much Hot Damn! you've been drinking). When the first pitch is thrown today, will all the Spring Training stats be useless? Maybe they won't or they will?


This FanPost was written by a member of the Royals Review community. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors and writers of this site.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.