Batting second, Alcides Escobar

This was probably in the first inning. - Brad White

The Royals reverse course and put their out machine shortstop back at the second position in the batting order.

Black holes. Vacuums. Individual vortex of suck. They are all over this Royals lineup.

Earlier this month, Frank Ned Yost supposedly took the advice of his statisticians and built a lineup a sabermatrician could love. It looked something like this:


It just made so much sense. Take your best hitters and stack them at the top of the order. Because this is the Royals and the Royals offense, there isn't much to choose from, so you're best hitters are really just your top four. It's a flaw of Dayton Moore and his roster construction that he's built a team that is devoid of a true number two, a couple potential number threes (key on potential) and absent a real power threat, lacking a cleanup hitter. So for the personnel assembled, the above lineup was one that seemed to work. This new sabermetric inspired lineup - first seen June 5 - averaged 4.2 runs per game. It's a tick better than their 3.9 runs per game they've averaged for the whole season.

It was fun while it lasted.

On Tuesday, Yost juggled his lineup again. Most notable was the reinsertion of Alcides Escobar in the number two spot. Yes, Escobar and his .277 on base percentage is now in a position to increase his plate appearances. Because if you can give more at bats to one of your offensive vacuums, you have to do it, right?

And of course that new lineup has to come into play immediately, as Escobar was up with the bases loaded and two outs in the ninth with a chance to tie or win the game. He swung at the first pitch and flied out.


I understand Eric Hosmer has retooled his swing and approach at the plate and is finally flashing the power potential we thought had dried up forever. The Royals opened the season hoping he could be their third place hitter and really want to drop him in that role. Now he's on the upward plane, Yost couldn't wait to move him back to third. That leaves a void at second in the lineup.

It's a void that will be filled by Escobar. Irony.

According to Bob Dutton, Escobar is back in the second position because that's where the Royals think he "fits best."


Let's play "spot the outlier" and take a quick look at Escobar's career stats.

2008 21 MIL 9 4 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 .500 .500 .500 1.000 167
2009 22 MIL 38 134 125 20 38 3 1 1 11 4 18 .304 .333 .368 .701 87
2010 23 MIL 145 552 506 57 119 14 10 4 41 36 70 .235 .288 .326 .614 66
2011 24 KCR 158 598 548 69 139 21 8 4 46 25 73 .254 .290 .343 .633 74
2012 25 KCR 155 648 605 68 177 30 7 5 52 27 100 .293 .331 .390 .721 98
2013 26 KCR 72 305 288 28 72 12 2 3 22 10 32 .250 .277 .337 .613 68
6 Yrs 577 2241 2076 244 547 80 28 17 172 102 294 .263 .303 .354 .656 79
162 Game Avg. 162 629 583 69 154 22 8 5 48 29 83 .263 .303 .354 .656 79
Provided by View Original Table
Generated 6/25/2013.

Obviously, we discard 2008 and 2009. That leaves us with three full seasons and part of a fourth. In those three-plus seasons, he's topped .300 in on base percentage once. It's not represented above, but he's topped .290 in wOBA once. (I bet you can guess which season.) And he's compiled better than a 75 OPS+, you guessed it, once. We look a little deeper and we see that his 2012 season was fueled by a .344 BABIP. Again, the only time in his career he's topped the .290 BABIP mark.

I'm not really going out on a limb when I declare Escobar's 2012 season an outlier. It was the best offensive season of his career where he reached heights that will be difficult for him to find again, given his profile as a hitter. The Royals, however, ignore the stats that indicate he struggles with major league pitching. While Escobar has accumulated over 2,200 plate appearances, the only ones that count are the nearly 650 he had in 2012. Because that was the only season where he was offensively average. Just another clue this regime doesn't - and won't - get it.

The Royals think Escobar is qualified to hit second. That's where he fits best.

It's a cruel game the Royals play with us, isn't it? After months of frustration, it appears the light goes on and the Royals make a move that clearly makes their offense better. (OK, maybe not clearly, but it was a better lineup with Escobar buried at the bottom.) And once the team shows a glimmer of offensive light, they switch back to the old, broken way. How very Royals.

There are a lot of bad - or wrong - choices for who should hit second in the Royals lineup. There are just too many black holes. Too many automatic outs. Escobar is probably the worst of the choices. His true spot should be at the bottom of the order. If you like the idea of a "second" leadoff man, maybe that should be Escobar. Really, the fewer times he puts the lumber in his hands, the better this team will be offensively speaking.

Sadly, Yost just can't help himself.

I'm not sure who the best choice is for the Royals at second in the lineup. Maybe it's Jarrod Dyson. Maybe it's David Lough or Lorenzo Cain. Maybe it's still Hosmer. Who knows? As I said before, there are a bunch of options, all of them underwhelming.

One thing I do know: Escobar is a bad choice to hit second.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.

Join Royals Review

You must be a member of Royals Review to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Royals Review. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.