How bad was that pitching staff?
Hope I don't step on RRs toes, as I know he is preparing a season ending post in which we can (hopefully) put this sad year in some kind of perspective.
I was looking at Baseball Prospcetus' VORP for Pitchers, and it got me wondering. I sorted the category by team, and looked at KC.
Did you know we used 31 pitchers on the year, and nearly half (15) of them posted a negative VORP?!? That's ridiculous! VORP is supposed to represent "replacement level" talent; i.e., pitchers that are readily available in the minors and in theory would produce a zero VORP rating if just given the chance.
I then totalled VORP for all of our pitchers, and it came up to:
-7.5
That's right - our pitching staff, as a whole, was BELOW REPLACEMENT LEVEL!
Honestly, the good people at BP must be having second thoughts about their methodology! This simply should not be possible!
Of course, if you stick with pitchers who are clearly inadequate, and you stick with them too long, I suppose this result is less amazing.
Let's take a look at some of the larger offenders:
Joe Mays -16.9 in only 23.7 IP
Hernandez -13.2 in 109.7 IP
Wood -7.7 in 64.7 IP
Sisco -7.6 in 58.3 IP
Stemle -6.1 in 6 IP
Duckworth -5.2 in 45.7 IP
Dohmann -4.9 in 23.7 IP
Affeldt -3.7 in 70 IP
Mays didn't work out at all; however, at least they dumped him after a relatively low number of innings. Wood and Sisco could both probably benefit from more minor league seasoning. Stemle got hurt, so can't criticize the organization too much on that one. Affeldt was traded for a positive position player; however, Dohmann was acquired in said trade and did not merit the number of innings given to him, IMHO. Ditto for Duckworth - should have been released, hopefully will be by Nov 20th deadline for setting the 40 man roster. That leaves the most egregious error on the list - Fat Elvys. Absolutely cannot see a justification for giving over a 100 innings to a guy performing that poorly. Yes, you could argue they were desperately trying to showcase him for trading, but realistically, how bad would your team have to be before you would attempt to acquire him? And even if you did, why in the world would you risk trading even a Grade B prospect for him?
I want to be fair to Dayton here. Rather than an indictment of Moore, what this probably indicates more than anything else is just exactly how much our minor league system was left to rot under the Glass "leadership". Seriously, it appears our pitching was so thin in the minors that we couldn't even come up with replacement level bodies to replace the failures on the major league staff.
Keep in mind, replacement level means minor leaguers that nobody really covets all that much, NOT the good prospects whom you presumably would not want to use in this manner anyway.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
The staff was horrible
Here are the final numbers for the R's
Todd Wellemeyer 8
Adam Bernero 5
Joel Peralta 4
Elmer Dessens 2
Mike MacDougal 2
Joe Nelson 2
Zack Greinke 0
Leo Nunez 0
Steve Andrade -2
Ryan Braun -2
Jorge De La Rosa -2
Jimmy Gobble -2
Luke Hudson -2
Bobby Keppel -2
Denny Bautista -3
Jose Diaz -4
Seth Etherton -4
Kyle Snyder -4
Chris Booker -5
Ambiorix Burgos -5
Brandon Duckworth -6
Scott Elarton -6
Odalis Perez -6
Mike Wood -6
Steve Stemle -7
Jeremy Affeldt -8
Scott Dohmann -8
Joe Mays -14
Andrew Sisco -14
Mark Redman -15
Runelvys Hernandez -19
Team total was -123. At least the Orioles were dead last with -129.
by Berroa is the devil on Oct 2, 2006 2:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
VORP showed the same thing -
Bernero a close second, and he appeared in like 3 or 4 games total, I think.
Very sad, indeed.
by loyal2s dad on Oct 2, 2006 4:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i'm kinda surprised
Gobble was a negative? ehh... must have been his starts.
ya berenero thanks to his randon good start being positive
by LeoBloom on Oct 2, 2006 6:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by loyal2s dad on 














