Royals May Never Win Again
At 19-34 the Royals are now back where they belong; with the worst record in baseball, complete with the worst home record to boot. Thanks to their incredible string of multi-run losses (the PC term for "beatdowns") the Royals have now evened out their actual record with the pythagorean prediction, and are now projected to dangerously flirt (flirt dangerously?) with another 100-loss season.
Not surprisingly, the peasants and plebes are growing restless. And why not? Another winter and spring of getting roped back in, another summer of endless failure. Failure of the team and by implication intellectual and emotional failure for us. Honestly, its an invitation to self-hatred, as we collectively wonder, why do I waste my time with this trash and how could I be so pathetic to have ever believed in any of them? In time's like these, Royaldaddy's State of the Royals Address speaks to what so many of us surely feel.
According to BP's three daily updating projection generators, if you sim the rest of the season a million times...
-Playoff Odds Report: 65-97
-Playoff Odds, Pecota version: 61-101
- Playoff Odds Report, ELO version: 60-102
If we were of a skeptical bent, we might contend that Tuesday night's player's meeting didn't work. Although my larger question is why the offense felt somehow responsible for losing 10-2 (and the like). Ohh well, at least its something like a sign of life or discontent, whic, however ineffective, shows that at least someone still cares. Interestingly, it doesn't seem immediately clear if Buddisimo really had much to do with it.
(For more on meetings, I recommend Sam Mellinger's piece in the Star.)
Bell's primary gambit was a little lineup jiggle, moving Shane Costa into the leadoff spot and shifting DeJesus to fifth. Again, who really knows what the logic behind these class of decisions are, I don't have a problem with them at the micro-level, as it seems certain enough that basically all parties involved understand its just "what you do", a gesture falling somewhere on the spectrum of superstition-shaking things up-random changes event horizon. In the long term of course, more Costa is no kind of answer (he's a career .256/.288/.372 hitter in 366 MLB PAs), but I think thats a given. Why we're finding at bats for him over about three other guys... well, thats a more in-depth answer that only members of the brain trust truly understand.
Finally, the lineup juggling helped the Royals maintain their blistering pace (yes, so fast that blisters are being formed) in terms of playing time variety.
Through 53 Games:
-44 lineups
- 50 Batting Orders
50. I love that.
Futility Update: Team Stats Since May 24th:
Royals Batters: .193/.242/.250 (1 HR, 6 2Bs, 1 3B)
Opposing Batters: .329/.395/.531 (8 HRs, 20 2Bs, 1 3B)
Well, we have a good building block with tripling ability, and we know that Dayton Moore still has a plan, so no worries.
No worries at all.
0 recs |
13
comments
Comments
Silver lining
In 2005 we were 16-37, 19 games back. We were the worst team in baseball.
We're making progress!
by RoyalsRetro on May 30, 2007 12:24 PM EDT 0 recs
in three more years, we'll be at .500
by royalsreview on
May 30, 2007 12:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
When I checked the box score I
If we "JUST KEEP PLAYING," like Buddo suggests we could be at 12 straight losses in no time. Change needs to happen...meetings aren't going to work and nothing the Clown does is or has worked.
So...to echo Buddo... JUST DO IT...
by grudz69 on May 30, 2007 1:14 PM EDT 0 recs
I still would like to know
by RoyalsRetro on May 30, 2007 1:40 PM EDT 0 recs
.193
by philofthenorth on May 30, 2007 2:12 PM EDT 0 recs
Its all about entertainment
Its entertaining to see a team run in a way that you disagree with and watch them lose.
by tfn on May 30, 2007 2:48 PM EDT 0 recs
Maybe Not
This team is too crappy right now to attract a high profile/proven winner/even decent manager. Girardi would be great (lots of Rockies fans talking about him as well) but why would he come to KC when there is a ton of interest from other teams? Why would anyone who is a winner want to come here? We need to have some dramatic improvement from the organization before we can think about attracting a great manager.
So my question for everyone is if we fire Buddy, who should we hire?
by DeJesus Christ on May 30, 2007 6:50 PM EDT 0 recs
One More Thing
by DeJesus Christ on
May 30, 2007 6:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Frank White is the hot name
by royaldaddy on
May 30, 2007 7:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Someone from a winning organization
by RoyalsRetro on
May 31, 2007 9:36 AM EDT
up
0 recs
4 Million Dollar Man
by philofthenorth on May 30, 2007 8:07 PM EDT 0 recs
If managers aren't important, why have them?
At some point, the manager must do something of importance, and to have the second worst one of all time at the helm cannot be a good thing.
by CentralChamps2009 on May 31, 2007 1:29 AM EDT 0 recs
Bobby Cox... was he just lucky that Atlanta
by grudz69 on May 31, 2007 12:32 PM EDT 0 recs








