Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



Royals May Never Win Again

At 19-34 the Royals are now back where they belong; with the worst record in baseball, complete with the worst home record to boot. Thanks to their incredible string of multi-run losses (the PC term for "beatdowns") the Royals have now evened out their actual record with the pythagorean prediction, and are now projected to dangerously flirt (flirt dangerously?) with another 100-loss season.

Not surprisingly, the peasants and plebes are growing restless. And why not? Another winter and spring of getting roped back in, another summer of endless failure. Failure of the team and by implication intellectual and emotional failure for us. Honestly, its an invitation to self-hatred, as we collectively wonder, why do I waste my time with this trash and how could I be so pathetic to have ever believed in any of them? In time's like these, Royaldaddy's State of the Royals Address speaks to what so many of us surely feel.

According to BP's three daily updating projection generators, if you sim the rest of the season a million times...

-Playoff Odds Report: 65-97
-Playoff Odds, Pecota version: 61-101
- Playoff Odds Report, ELO version: 60-102

If we were of a skeptical bent, we might contend that Tuesday night's player's meeting didn't work. Although my larger question is why the offense felt somehow responsible for losing 10-2 (and the like). Ohh well, at least its something like a sign of life or discontent, whic, however ineffective, shows that at least someone still cares. Interestingly, it doesn't seem immediately clear if Buddisimo really had much to do with it.

"I was in there for a while," Bell said. "It was a hitters' meeting. I think it's important that the veterans take an active role in whatever we're doing, whether it's something inside the clubhouse, something on or off the field, they should all be a part of that and make sure things are being done the right way."

(For more on meetings, I recommend Sam Mellinger's piece in the Star.)

Bell's primary gambit was a little lineup jiggle, moving Shane Costa into the leadoff spot and shifting DeJesus to fifth. Again, who really knows what the logic behind these class of decisions are, I don't have a problem with them at the micro-level, as it seems certain enough that basically all parties involved understand its just "what you do", a gesture falling somewhere on the spectrum of superstition-shaking things up-random changes event horizon. In the long term of course, more Costa is no kind of answer (he's a career .256/.288/.372 hitter in 366 MLB PAs), but I think thats a given. Why we're finding at bats for him over about three other guys... well, thats a more in-depth answer that only members of the brain trust truly understand.

Finally, the lineup juggling helped the Royals maintain their blistering pace (yes, so fast that blisters are being formed) in terms of playing time variety.

Through 53 Games:

-44 lineups
- 50 Batting Orders

50. I love that.

Futility Update: Team Stats Since May 24th:

Royals Batters: .193/.242/.250 (1 HR, 6 2Bs, 1 3B)
Opposing Batters: .329/.395/.531 (8 HRs, 20 2Bs, 1 3B)

Well, we have a good building block with tripling ability, and we know that Dayton Moore still has a plan, so no worries.

No worries at all.

0 recs | Comment 13 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Silver lining
Last year at this time, we were 13-40 and 22.5 games back. We were 6.5 games worse than any other team in baseball.

In 2005 we were 16-37, 19 games back. We were the worst team in baseball.

We're making progress!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 30, 2007 12:24 PM EDT   0 recs

When I checked the box score I
thought I was seeing things.  Costa as leadoff... beside Buddo's imagination...what did Costa do to earn this spot?  Gator maybe leadoff...but oh ya he is still in AAA.   Nobody has figured out yet that this group of fumblebums are not making it.  So, send some people down and bring some people up....  or just kick drop some of them off the team.

If we "JUST KEEP PLAYING," like Buddo suggests we could be at 12 straight losses in no time.  Change needs to happen...meetings aren't going to work and nothing the Clown does is or has worked.

So...to echo Buddo... JUST DO IT...

by grudz69 on May 30, 2007 1:14 PM EDT   0 recs

I still would like to know
What German did to piss Buddy Bell off. Someone needs to look into this. I'll call the KCTV5 Problem Solvers.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 30, 2007 1:40 PM EDT   0 recs

.193
A whole major league lineup below the Mendoza line while making HOFers out of the opposition is epic. We are witnessing history, like the early 60's Mets and A's. Just sit back and enjoy; it can't last forever.
Being a fan is irrational, but what is the alternative?

by philofthenorth on May 30, 2007 2:12 PM EDT   0 recs

Its all about entertainment
and finding that however one can.  I do find Buddy's ineptitude entertaining.  I do find Dayton's discomfort entertaining.  

Its entertaining to see a team run in a way that you disagree with and watch them lose.

2007 Royals -- the song remains the same

by tfn on May 30, 2007 2:48 PM EDT   0 recs

Maybe Not
I moved to KC from Colorado two years ago and let me tell you, it really sucks to be watching Buddy again.  Here's my theory as to why he hasn't been fired/why they're waiting to pull the trigger:

This team is too crappy right now to attract a high profile/proven winner/even decent manager.  Girardi would be great (lots of Rockies fans talking about him as well) but why would he come to KC when there is a ton of interest from other teams?  Why would anyone who is a winner want to come here? We need to have some dramatic improvement from the organization before we can think about attracting a great manager.

So my question for everyone is if we fire Buddy, who should we hire?

by DeJesus Christ on May 30, 2007 6:50 PM EDT   0 recs

One More Thing
Oh, and I think managers are not really that important in baseball.  So even if we fire Buddy and get someone else, I don't think that will really solve many problems.

by DeJesus Christ on May 30, 2007 6:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Frank White is the hot name
among Royals fans. He's number 2 on the Royal popularity list after George, of course.

by royaldaddy on May 30, 2007 7:09 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Someone from a winning organization
Some young manager who has been instilled with the values of a winning organization. This is NOT Frank White. Frank jumps from job to job in a losing organization and has a very limited track of success as a manager. I'm thinking a good coach with a winning organization that has built with young players. Joel Skinner of the Indians, Tony DeFrancesco of the A's, Scott Ullger of the Twins, John Farrell of the Red Sox, Terry Pendleton of the Braves. Not Frank. He has been infected with the virus of losing Royals baseball.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 31, 2007 9:36 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

4 Million Dollar Man
We built Frank White, so we must take his career to its logical conclusion. He must manage the Royals.
Being a fan is irrational, but what is the alternative?

by philofthenorth on May 30, 2007 8:07 PM EDT   0 recs

If managers aren't important, why have them?
They have to fill some role for a team, and there must be some reason there are many successful ones and many unsuccessful ones beyond being blessed by a great roster.  For example, I know everybody hates LaRussa around here, but is it just luck that he managed the late 80s A's, the mid 2000's Cardinals (who, other than last year's fluke, were undeniably good), as well as winning a Division Championship with the 83 White Sox?

At some point, the manager must do something of importance, and to have the second worst one of all time at the helm cannot be a good thing.

by CentralChamps2009 on May 31, 2007 1:29 AM EDT   0 recs

Bobby Cox... was he just lucky that Atlanta
had that streak of championships.  No, the manager does matter.   Ours is sucking every bit of life out of us.

by grudz69 on May 31, 2007 12:32 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nyroyal3a_small
Royals Confidence Index - December
Fredo-corleone_pictureboxart_160w_small
Projecting the Royals' 2009 Pitching With Bill James (Seriously, It's Just a Title)
Royalsretro_small
The Best Free Agent Signings in Royals History
Small
Value Over Replacement Defender
Nyroyal3a_small
Royals 2009 Payroll (including projections)

Recent FanPosts

Small
One move that will improve the Royals
Small
Projected wins?
Clemente_small
OK SO MAYBE JACOBS AT 3B WAS A JOKE, BUT KC WINNING THE CENTRAL IS NOT
Clemente_small
KC ROYALS JUST 15 WINS AWAY! THAT'S IT
Zackgreinke2_small
Final RR top prospect list
Aquinas_small
Mental Help: More Discussion on Biancalana
Small
Depth Chart
Steve_balboni_pose_small
Royals Auditioning For Greinke

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter