Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks 90, Raptors 87: "Shump and Lin wouldn't let us lose."

The Greatest 100 Royals of All-Time - #100 Jay Bell

Royals Review and Royals Retro are joining forces to bring you the Greatest 100 Royals of All-Time.

We've ranked the Top 100 Royals according to Win Shares, with some minor modifications.

We'll start the series with #100 - Jay Bell.

Jay Bell's career with the Royals lasted exactly one season, but that season was so great, he warrants a place on the 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time. If you're wondering how many Win Shares it took to make this list, Jay Bell compiled 21 Win Shares in his one season in Kansas City. His stint in Kansas City was so brief, I couldn't even find a picture of him in a Royals uniform. Even without photographic evidence, I'm still pretty sure Jay Bell played for the Royals.

Bell was acquired in six player trade along with 1B Jeff King in a Pirates salary dump for a trio of minor league Jeffs - Granger, Wallace, and Martin - as well as Joe Randa. The trade was controversial because everyone in baseball regarded it as highway robbery. Cleveland General Manager John Hart claimed he had made a much better offer for Bell, but Pirates GM Cam Bonifay would not accept it. "It was unbelievable.... We can't seem to do business with those folks," said Hart. It turned out that Cam Bonifay wasn't being obstinate, he was just a moron.

Randa was a serviceable player for one year in Pittsburgh and of course went on to a successful career upon rejoining the Royals, but the rest never did anything. Bell had an outstanding season for the Royals, one of the best of his career up to that point, and King had two solid seasons with the Royals before deciding that playing with the Royals was more agonizing than not playing at all.

The Royals were coming off a last place season, but they had won 75 games, just 13 games back of the Wild Card. They picked up Chili Davis for a broke down Mark Gubicza, and dealt Michael Tucker for Jermaine Dye. For one off-season, Herk Robinson actually seemed like a competent general manager. Unfortunately, the team way underperformed in comparison to their Pythagorean W-L, and won just 67 games.

Bell's career was an interesting evolution. By the time he was a regular in Pittsburgh, he was with his third organization, having already been involved in trades for Bert Blyleven and Felix Fermin. When he was in Pittsburgh playing for the perennially contending Pirates, he was an amazing bunter, laying down 69 sacrifice hits over the 1990-1991 seasons. He wasn't known as much of a home run hitter, although his double totals were decent for a shortstop.

When he arrived in Kansas City for his contract year, he had his first twenty home run season , drove in 92 runs and slugged .462 at age 31. It was easily the best season ever by a Royals shortstop. In fact, his 1997 season was one of just three seasons by a Royals shortstop to post an OPS+ over 100. The others were UL Washington in 1982 and Kurt Stillwell in 1988.

This landed him a five year $34 million deal with Arizona. He went nuts in 1999 and slugged 38 home runs, but couldn't match that number in the next three seasons combined. Jay did get to score the game winning run in Game 7 of the 2001 World Series. He retired in 2003 after hitting .181 in 72 games with the Mets. He was the bench coach for the Diamondbacks last season, but retired to spend more time with his family.

Jay wore glasses and seemed to live up to his librarian looks. There are a quite a few spectacle wearing players I can recall from the 1980s - Tom Henke, Kent Tekulve, Pat Sheridan, heck even Reggie Jackson wore glasses. Who wears glasses today?

Here's Royals Review with Five Fun Facts About Jay Bell:

Five Fun Facts About Jay Bell

  1. Bell only spent one season with the Royals, coming to Kansas City on December 13, 1996 in a trade that sent Jeff Granger, Joe Randa, Jeff Wallace and Jeff Martin to Pittsburgh. The Royals got Bell and Jeff King. Its hard to say who "won" that trade: the Pirates got younger, but not better with all those young Royal prospect-types, while King and Bell produced mixed results that ultimately did nothing for the Royals either. King managed to hit 28 homers in his first season with the Royals (2nd on the team to Chili Davis) a number only rarely bested in Royals history. Still, King was out of baseball within three years... There's something chilling about thinking about an old trade like this; it disrupted the lives of a few familes, was probably vaguely interesting at the time and greeted as a sign of future progress, only nothing really became of it and it was utterly forgettable.
  2. However, in that one season in KC, Bell hit .291/.368/.461 with 21 HRs, 28 doubles and 3 triples. Thats nice production for a guy who played in 149 games as a short stop. It also represented a nice bounceback season for Bell, who had struggled in both '96 and '95 and was merely average in '94.
  3. In 1999 Jay Bell hit 38 homers for the D'Backs. His previous career-high was the aforementioned 21 with the '97 Royals.
  4. In 30 postseason games with the Pirates ('90, '91, '92), D'Backs ('99, '01) Bell hit .262/.328/.402 with 3 HRs. In the 1991 Pirates-Braves series (not the Sid Bream/Fransisco Cabrera one) Bell had a truly bizarre postseason: he struck out 10 times, walked none, but managed to get 10 singles and 2 doubles out of the series. So, he went 12 for 29 and 10 of the 17 outs he made were at the plate. Against the Braves in 1992, he struck out only 3 times, but also managed only 5 hits and 3 walks. In the epic game 7 of that series Bell had a double, a walk, and a run-scored. Of course, the Braves scored 3 runs in the 9th to beat the Pirates, who haven't made the playoffs since. Or had a winning season.
  5. Bell had a strange, but somewhat typical career, increasing his walks and power with age. After a boring three-season stint with the Indians, Bell was a key asset to the late 80s/early 90s Pirates team, often hitting 3rd in a lineup that also featured Barry Bonds, Bobbby Bonilla and Andy Van Slyke. His late in life renaissance with the D'Backs was ohh so D'Backian, but somehow always left me feeling strange, since most of those old Pirates were non-factors in the game by the late-90s. Well, Bonds excepted, of course.
Ugh. Those weren't so much "facts" as "assorted thoughts". Still, Bell's 1997 with the Royals helped the Boone and Muser led boys to a 67-94 record, which at the time was the worst Royals season in 27 years... Sadly, that mark of horribleness would be topped multiple times.

Comment 16 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hmmmm......
100 "greatest" Royals -
what will be on the bottom of that barrel that you will be scraping?  will Tuffy Rhodes make it?  this might have been even more entertaining if you had started with #1 and worked downward.  We could have contests guessing which is the next worst player.

by buddyball on Jun 11, 2007 10:15 PM EDT reply actions  

OK, about this list
I find the idea of ranking the 100 "best" Roysals to be more and more fascinating.  Will it include pitchers as well?  These kinds of lists are always interesting because you are guaranteed a quick, heart felt response from the fans ("What do you mean Mark Teahen is better than Danny Tartabull?!?!?!?), no matter how objective you try to be.  Can you be more specific on how you modified your rating system, or is that a bloggers secret?  No biggie, just curious to see how it all plays out.  I can't help but wonder who #2 will be.  A starting pitcher (Sabes?), a reliever (Quiz), a position player (B-error-a?).  I'm anxious to read on.  Will this be released throughout the rest of the season?  Neat idea.

by buddyball on Jun 11, 2007 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Answers
It will include pitchers. I basically just went by Win Shares (Bill James formula for evaluating all players). The system of course is not perfect. It will also skew towards players who were simply on the roster for many years, but maybe weren't all that great. For example, Brent Mayne was nowhere near the player Jim Sundberg was, but he ranks a lot higher because he played way more games in Kansas City than Sunny did.

So the system is not perfect, but no list is. This is really just a chance to walk down memory lane, create a little discussion, and think back to better times in Royals history.

I also guarantee Angel Berroa is not #2 all-time. I would shoot myself if he was.

I'll try to do this every Monday if possible.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 12, 2007 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

list
I love lists like this.  Keep em comming Retro.  Once a week will take you 2 years to get through a top 100!

by David Howards Legacy on Jun 12, 2007 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bell recently has been a coach with
the Diamondbacks until this season. He was a ray of hope for the Royals, then he was gone. We hardly even knew ya, Jay. One last thing about Bell. 20-something homers a year to 38? You thinking what I'm thinking? Not to tarnish his reputation, but I'm just saying.

by royaldaddy on Jun 11, 2007 11:16 PM EDT reply actions  

its pretty wild that...
one season gets you into the top 100, although, the more i think about it, maybe not...

bell's KC career is odd

by Freneau on Jun 12, 2007 12:43 AM EDT reply actions  

those late 90s teams
would kick our asses now, which is really sad
What hath Bell wrought?

by FireBell on Jun 12, 2007 12:46 AM EDT reply actions  

i wonder how many baseball fans today
ever think of Jay Bell... can't be too many

by Freneau on Jun 12, 2007 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

well, he was a Buddy kind of player
veteran presence, character guy

I also wondered about that late career power surge...

by buddyball on Jun 12, 2007 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Family Ties
http://www.baseballhistorian.com/html/american_heroes.cfm?page=62
"Although, he's now best remembered as baseball's first of three generations to play in the major league's (father of Buddy Bell and grandfather of Jay Bell), Gus Bell was one of the baseball's most feared hitters and as an outfielder ranked high defensively all throughout the 1950s - and was admirably well-liked and is still fondly remembered as one of baseball's "good guys"." Manager@baseballhistorian.com
Being a fan is irrational, but what is the alternative?

by philofthenorth on Jun 12, 2007 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

So.....
is Jay Bell a nephew of Buddy, maybe? I don't get that comment. I didn't think they were related.

by royaldaddy on Jun 13, 2007 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Internet Misinfo
That post was a result of a quick Google search. The author must have comfused Jay with David. Here's another Jay Bell:
http://www.lgbtran.org/Profile.aspx?ID=175
Being a fan is irrational, but what is the alternative?

by philofthenorth on Jun 13, 2007 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan