clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Royals-Giants Sanchez-Cabrera Trade Link Roundup & Analysis

New, comments

 

It appears the overall consensus is that this was a good trade for the Royals. Joe Sheehan, in his newsletter, made the point that in the last two years, Melky Cabrera has been traded for a solid #2 starter (Javy Vasquez) then outright released and now traded for a possible back of the rotation guy (with huge upside according to many) like Sanchez. His point was even within the game, there's still an incredible over-reaction to last year's data. Sheehan isn't a huge Moore guy, but implicit in that analysis is that Moore's two Melky-related moves were good deals.

As far as I can tell, I'm just about the most negative evaluator of this trade out there, which is fine and maybe predictable. I don't hate the trade, I just don't love it. The structure of the trade is solid: moving roster excess in the OF to address a need in the rotation. However, I have big doubts about Sanchez being much more than back of the rotation filler in the AL, and given that he's a FA after 2012, there's no long-term gain. At the point at which Melky was traded in November, you have to wonder if this is the best the Royals could do. As I said on the day of the trade, I think I'd rather have had the trade be for two Verdugo-esque players than Verdugo+Sanchez.

  • Royals Acquire Sanchez, Verdugo from Giants for Cabrera - Beyond the Box Score
  • Jonathan Sanchez: An American Horror Story? - Roto Hardball
  • Melky Cabrera Trade Inaugurates Lorenzo Cain Era in Center-Field - Royals Review
  • Well Played, Dayton…Well Played | Pine Tar Press
  • Royally Speaking: The Sanchez/Cabrera Trade And How It Affects 2012
  • Tangled Up In (Royal) Blue: Stick With Me Baby, Stick With Me Anyhow
  • Melk-Man Finds His Expiration Date In KC - Royals Authority