Remember when we had to pretend that Nate Adcock was a great find who was helping the Royals?
|2011 - Nathan Adcock||1-1||17||2||0||0||0||0||42.0||50||28||25||5||19||26||5.36||1.64|
I don't mean to be too negative here. He was a Rule 5 (in the post-good-players-being-in-the-Rule-5-era) guy who is pitching in a lost season. Nevertheless, his value is eating innings twice a week in a mop-up situation. He's not good.